Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2012, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 53-60.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2012.02.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Response relation between volcanic lithofacies and seismic facies and its application: A case study from Haerjiawu Formation in Malang Sag, Santanghu Basin

SI Xueqiang1, CHEN Wei1, YANG Zhili1, WANG Xin1, SANG Tingyi2, WEN Chuanjiang3   

  1. 1. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou 310023, China; 2. Exploration Company, PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839009, China; 3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839009, China
  • Online:2012-04-20 Published:2012-04-20

Abstract:

In order to study the distribution characteristics and define the exploration direction of volcanic reservoirs of Haerjiawu Formation in Malang Sag of Santanghu Basin, it is necessary to establish the response relation between volcanic lithofacies and seismic facies, and carry out the identification and prediction of volcanic rocks. The cores and casting thin sections were used to define the lithologies and lithofacies characteristics of volcanic rocks. Combined detailed logging-seismic calibration and seismic response characteristics, this paper summarized the response relation between volcanic lithofacies and seismic facies, and then predicted the volcanic reservoirs. The study result shows that overflow facies and volcanic sedimentary facies are the main lithofacies of Haerjiawu Formation, and the seismic reflection characteristics mainly are weak swing and blank lenticular pattern, middle-weak swing and weakly continuous moundy pattern, middle-strong swing and moderate continuous lamellar phase. According to the prediction, it is considered that the volcanic rocks of Haerjiawu Formation has the characteristics of central type eruption, there are mostly layered volcanos or konides, and subaerial eruption and subaquatic eruption both can be found in the sag. The distributed area ofmandelstone in mid-range crater is favorable for oil-gas exploration.

Key words: sandstone oilfield, high water cut, waterflood behavior, enhanced oil recovery

[1] 耳闯,王英民,刘超,等.火山岩相类型、特征和岩相-地震相响应关系[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(4):1-6.
[2] 宋吉杰.松辽盆地北部兴城地区火山岩地震预测[J].石油地球物理,2007,42(3):315-317.
[3] 张明学,吴杰,胡玉双.松辽盆地丰乐地区营城组火山岩储层预测[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(6):2145-2150.
[4] 邹才能,赵文智,贾承造,等.中国沉积盆地火山岩油气藏形成与分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(3):257-270.
[5] 刘俊田,朱有信,李在光,等.三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩油藏特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(3):23-28.
[6] 刘俊田,刘媛萍,郭沫贞,等.三塘湖盆地牛东地区石炭系火山岩相储层特征及其形成机理[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(2):64-69.
[7] 赵澄林,孟卫工,金春爽,等.辽河盆地火山岩与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999:45-64.
[8] 王璞珺,元林,刘万洙,等.松辽盆地火山岩相类型、特征和储层意义[J].吉林大学学报,2003,33(4):449-457.
[9] 李全胜.三塘湖盆地牛东地区火山岩油气藏识别技术研究[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(2):87-90.
[10] 邵正奎,孟宪禄,王洪艳,等.松辽盆地火山岩地震反射特征及其分布规律[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(1):33-37.
[11] 刘为付,孙立新,刘双龙.松辽盆地莺山断陷火山岩地震反射特征及分布规律[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(9):256-259.
[12] 崔泽宏,汤良杰.塔河地区火山岩地震相及勘探潜力[J].新疆石油地质,2010,31(3):252-254.
[13] 周路,靳利超,雷德文,等.北三台凸起石炭系火山岩地震响应及分布规律[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,30(6):5-10.
[14] 张立伟,师永民,李江海.徐家围子断陷营一段火山岩旋回测井响应特征[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2009,45(3):481-486.
[1] SU Hao, GUO Yandong, CAO Liying, YU Chen, CUI Shuyue, LU Ting, ZHANG Yun, LI Junchao. Natural depletion characteristics and pressure maintenance strategies of faultcontrolled fracture-cavity condensate gas reservoirs in Shunbei Oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 178-188.
[2] BAI Jiajia, SI Shuanghu, TAO Lei, WANG Guoqing, WANG Longlong, SHI Wenyang, ZHANG Na, ZHU Qingjie. Mechanism of DES+CTAB composite oil displacement agent system to improve oil recovery of low-permeability tight sandstone reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 169-177.
[3] ZHANG Yunlai, CHEN Jianbo, ZHOU Haiyan, ZHANG Jilei, ZHANG Wei. Quantitative characterization of sweep coefficient of water drive in horizontal well for offshore bottom water reservoir [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6): 146-153.
[4] HUANG Guangqing. Influence of ion composition and salinity on recovery of water flooding with low salinity [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5): 129-133.
[5] HAN Peihui, YAN Kun, CAO Ruibo, GAO Shuling, TONG Hui. Oil displacement methods for enhanced oil recovery after polymer flooding [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2): 143-150.
[6] LAI Shumin. Technology policy limitation of subdivision water injection in ultra-high water cut stage: a case from Shengli uncompartmentalized reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5): 124-130.
[7] ZHANG Yunlai, LIAO Xinwu, HU Yong, LI Tingli, SU Jinchang. Development models for offshore heavy oil field in high water cut stage [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4): 120-126.
[8] WANG Xiaotong, XIANG Longbin, ZHANG Yixin. Microorganism preparation and application evaluation on microbial enhanced high-pour point oil recovery in Liaohe Oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5): 162-168.
[9] LIU Chen, WANG Kai, WANG Yefei, ZHOU Wensheng. Polymer/surfactant binary flooding in A oilfield with high temperature and high salinity [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3): 152-158.
[10] Li Haitao,Li Ying,Li Yahui,Wang Ke. Low salinity waterflooding to enhance oil recovery of carbonate reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2): 119-126.
[11] Li Jun,Zhang Junhua,Tan Mingyou,Cui Shiling,Qu Zhipeng,Yu Jingqiang. Research status of CO 2 flooding and its seismic  monitoring  technologies [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(1): 128-134.
[12] TANG Mingguang, LIU Qinghua, ZHANG Guicai, CHEN Lifeng. Study on enhancing heavy oil recovery mechanism of antiscaling alkali [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3): 125-130.
[13] YE Anping, GUO Ping, WANG Shaoping, CHENG Zhongzhao, JIAN Rui. Determination of minimum miscibility pressure for CO2 flooding by using PR equation of state [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(6): 125-128.
[14] WANG Qiuyu. Technical progress for improving waterflood recovery efficiency of foreign high water cut sandstone oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(3): 123-128.
[15] RAO Liangyu, WU Xianghong, LI Xianbing, LI Xiangling. Development effect evaluation and strategy of horizontal wells in multilayer edge water reservoir in Sudan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(5): 106-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] LI Zaiguang,LI Lin. Automatic mapping based on well data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] CHENG Yuhong,GUO Yanru,ZHENG Ximing,FANG Naizhen,MA Yuhu. The interpretation method and application effect determined by multiple seismic and logging factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] LIU Juntian,JIN Zhenjia,LI Zaiguang,TAN Xinping,GUO Lin,WANG Bo,LIU Yuxiang. Controlling factors for lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs and petroleum prospecting target in Xiaocaohu area , Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] SHANG Changliang, FU Shouxian. Application of 3D seismic survey in loess tableland[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] WANG Changyong, ZHENG Rongcai, WANG Jianguo, CAO Shaofang, Xiao Mingguo. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of Badaowan Formation of Lower Jurassic in northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] WANG Ke1 LIU Xianyang, ZHAO Weiwei, SONG Jianghai, SHI Zhenfeng, XIANG Hui. Char acter istics and geological significance of seismites of Paleogene in Yangxin Subsag of J iyang Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] SUN Hongbin, ZHANG Fenglian. Structural-sedimentary evolution char acter istics of Paleogene in Liaohe Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] LI Chuanliang. Can uplift r esult in abnormal high pr essur e in formation?[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] WEI Qinlian,ZHENG Rongcai,XIAO Ling,MA Guofu,DOU Shijie,TIAN Baozhong. Study on horizontal heterogeneity in Serie Inferiere of Triassic in 438b block , Algeria[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .
TRENDMD: