Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2013, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 66-70.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2013.03.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on resource potential of shale oil in A-29 Block, North America

ZHU Yanhe1, HU Qianze2, CHEN Guihua1, CHEN Xiaozhi1   

  1. 1. CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100027, China; 2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development,PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839009, China
  • Online:2013-06-01 Published:2013-06-01

Abstract:

Shale oil play is continuous petroleum accumulations just like shale gas, both of them are unconventional resources. The A-29 block locates in north of favorable prospecting area of Tuscaloosa Marine ShaleTMS, which is one of the best shale oil potential areas in North America.
Because of being lack of geologic awareness, the resources potential is not clear, the next step of exploration is hard to deepen. Now, knowing the resources potential and selecting favorable area are very important for next exploration and development. Analyses of lithologic association of TMS formation indicate that upper layer and lower layer are tight rock, and middle rock is shale oil reservoir. OOIP is calculated by volumetric method and the range is from 0.30×10
8 m3 to 2.56×108 m3,and resources abundance is from 7.36×104 m3/km2 to 63.22× 104 m3/km2. Based on research of some key geologic parameters which are depth, thickness, TOC, Ro and brittleness, the results show that A-29 block is a good shale oil exploration area, TMS formation is so hard for hydraulic fracturing, and the shale oil favorable area is in southeast of block. But the exploration risk is in existence, the lower layer of TMS is tight sand and tight limestone which contains free water. Once the process of fracture stimulation is not proper and length of fracture is not controlled, the breakthrough will happen. So, high risk of completion should be noticed.

Key words: extra-low permeability reservoir, diagenetic processes, diagenetic reservoir facies classification, log response, GY Oilfield

[1] 段金宝,黄仁春,程胜辉,等.川东北元坝地区长兴期—飞仙关期碳酸盐岩台地沉积体系及演化[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2008,35(6):663-669.
[2] 周刚,郑荣才,罗韧,等.环开江—梁平海槽长兴组生物礁类型及储层特征[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(1):81-87.
[3] 文华国,郑荣才,党录瑞,等.四川盆地东部五百梯地区长兴组礁、滩相储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2010,22(2):24-29.
[4] 范小军.川东北元坝地区长兴组与飞仙关组天然气成藏差异性成因[J].天然气工业,2012,32(6):15-20.
[5] 马永生.四川盆地普光超大型气田的形成机制[J].石油学报,2007,28(2):9-14.
[6] 朱扬明,李颖,郝芳,等.四川盆地东北部海、陆相储层沥青组成特征及来源[J].岩石学报,2012,28(3):870-878.
[7] 郭彤楼.元坝深层礁滩气田基本特征与成藏主控因素[J].天然气工业,2011,31(10):12-16.
[8] 朱扬明,顾圣啸,李颖,等.四川盆地龙潭组高热演化烃源岩有机质生源及沉积环境探讨[J].地球化学,2012,41(1):35-40.
[9] 张元春,邹华耀,李平平,等.川东北元坝地区长兴组流体包裹体特征及油气充注史[J].新疆石油地质,2010,31(3):250-251.
[10] 杜春国,郝芳,邹华耀,等.川东北地区普光气田油气运聚和调整、改造机理与过程[J].中国科学(D 辑:地球科学),2009,39(12):1721-1731.
[11] 杜春国,郝芳,邹华耀,等.热化学硫酸盐还原作用对碳酸盐岩气藏的化学改造———以川东北地区长兴组—飞仙关组气藏为例[J].地质学报,2007,81(1):120-126.
[1] LI Miao,PU Chunsheng,JING Cheng,YANG Hongbin,HE Yufei. Diagenetic reservoir facies classification and log response features in GY Oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3): 48-52.
[2] LIU Diren, XIA Pei, WANG enchun, YAN Linhui, ZHAO Jianwu. Characteristics of dual laterolog response of carbonate fracture reservoirs in horizontal well [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(3): 1-4.
[3] QU Yansheng, ZHONG Ningning, LIU Yan, LI Yuanyuan, PENG Bo. Using logging methods to calculate organic matter abundance of source rocks and its influencing factors [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(2): 80-84.
[4] LEI Tao, ZHOU Wen, YANG Yi, DENG Hucheng, ZHANG Guanghui, ZHAO Ankun. Logging evaluation method for marine source rocks in middle Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(4): 89-94.
[5] LIU Jingdong,SUN Bo,TIAN Chao,YUAN Guowei,YU Jingfeng. “Inverse ΔlogR” method and its application to evaluation of organic matter abundance of source rocks [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(4): 85-88.
[6] ZHAO Jun, HAI Chuan, ZHANG Chengsen. Application of log data in reef flat reservoir description in Tazhong No.1 slope break [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 86-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DUAN Tianxiang,LIU Xiaomei,ZHANG Yajun,XIAO Shuqin. Discussion on geologic modeling with Petrel[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] ZHANG Liqiu. Optimization of upward strata combination of second class oil layer in eastern south Ⅱ area of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] ZHANG Di,HOU Zhongjian,WANG Yahui,WANG Ying,WANG Chunlian. Sedimentary characteristics of lacustrine carbonate rocks of the first member of Shahejie Formation in Banqiao-Beidagang area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] FAN Huaicai, LI Xiaoping, DOU Tiancai, WU Xinyuan. Study on stress sensitivity effect on flow dynamic features of gas wells[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] TIAN Shufang,ZHANG Hongwen. Application of life cycle theory to predict increasing trend of proved oil reserves in Liaohe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] YANG Kai,GUO Xiao. Numerical simulation study of three-dimensional two-phase black oil model in fractured low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] ZHAI Zhongxi, QINWeijun, GUO Jinrui. Quantitative relations between oil-gas filling degree and channel seepage flow capacity of the reservoir:Example of Shuanghe Oilfield in Biyang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] QI Minghui,LU Zhengyuan,YUAN Shuai,LI Xinhua. The analysis on the sources of water body and characteristic of water breakthough at Block 12 in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] LI Xiangbo,CHEN Qi,lin,LIU Huaqing,WAN Yanrong,MU Jingkui,LIAO Jianbo,WEI Lihua. Three types of sediment gravity flows and their petroliferous features of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] LIU Yun,LU Yuan,YI Xiangyi, ZHANG Junliang, ZHANG Jinliang,WANG Zhenxi. Gas hydrate forecasting model and its influencing factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .
TRENDMD: