Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2014, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 96-101.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2014.02.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of seismic multi-attribute fusion technique to the reservoir prediction in Beier Depression

WU Haibo, WANG Jiang, LI Junhui   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd.,Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Online:2014-04-06 Published:2014-04-06

Abstract:

Seismic attribute analysis is an efficient method for reservoir prediction. However, using only one attribute to predict reservoir leads to multiple-understanding, especially for the fault-depressed basin which has the characteristics of multi-provenances, fast variation of sedimentary facies, multi-period volcanic movements and complicated lithologies. All of these factors result in poor prediction accuracy. Therefore, this paper proposed a seismic multi-attribute fusion technique based on different sedimentary characteristics and separated regions for reservoir prediction. Firstly, according to the sedimentary characteristics, different regions were divided with seismic waveform classification technique. Then, the relation statistics between seismic multi-attribute and reservoir information were carried out and the linear fitting was completed for the further step. At last, the separated fitting results were integrated into the final prediction results for the whole area. For the reservoir prediction of Nantun Formation in Beier Depression, Hailaer Basin, stepwise linear regression was put into use on the basis of sand data from 164 wells and the selected 8 seismic attributes. Its correlation coefficient is only 0.42. With the seismic multi-attribute fusion technique based on sedimentary characteristics and selected regions, the whole area fitting was carried out. Its correlation coefficient reaches 0.89 and the reservoir prediction result fits well with the reservoir development and the sedimentary rules in drilled wells, which indicates that the method can improve the accuracy of reservoir prediction.

Key words: horizontal well, production rate equation, formation damage, formation improvement, skin factor, skin effect

[1] 张德林.地震资料油气显示研究原理与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000:5-25.
[2] 陈遵德.储层地震属性优化方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998:8-22.
[3] 倪逸.储层油气预测中地震属性优选问题探讨[J].石油地球物理勘探,1999,34(6):614-626.
[4] 宁维琪,韩宏伟.地震属性与储层参数联合优化新算法[J].石油物探,2004,43(2):118-122.
[5] 孙万军.多种地震属性参数在储层横向预测中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(5):586-588.
[6] 季敏,王尚旭,陈双全.地震属性优选在油田开发中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(2):183-187.
[7] 陈学海,卢双舫,薛海涛,等.地震属性技术在北乌斯丘尔特盆地侏罗系泥岩预测中的应用[J].中国石油勘探,2011,16(2):67-71.
[8] 李敬生.贝尔凹陷优质烃源岩的发现及其地质意义[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(3):326-332.
[9] 陈均亮,吴河勇,朱德丰,等.海拉尔盆地构造演化及油气勘探前景[J].地质科学,2007,42(1):147-159.
[10] 吴河勇,李子顺,冯子辉,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷构造特征与油气成藏过程分析[J].石油学报,2006,27(增刊1):1-6.
[11] 刘文岭,牛彦良,李刚,等.多信息储层预测地震属性提取与有效性分析方法[J].石油物探,2002,41(1):100-106.
[12] 陈方鸿,王树平,李志政.三维可视化地震相分析在沉积相研究中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):73-75.
[13] 李军辉,卢双舫,蒙启安,等.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷南屯组典型砂体的特征分析[J].地质学报,2010,84(10):1495-1501.
[1] YAN Jianping, LAI Siyu, GUO Wei, SHI Xuewen, LIAO Maojie, TANG Hongming, HU Qinhong, HUANG Yi. Research progress on casing deformation types and influencing factors in geological engineering of shale gas wells [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[2] ZHOU Hao, LIANG Lixia. Calculation method of investigation radius of horizontal wells [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 157-168.
[3] YANG Zhaochen, LU Yingbo, YANG Guo, HUANG Chun, YI Dalin, JIA Song, WU Yongbin, WANG Guiqing. Pre-CO2 energy storage fracturing technology in horizontal wells for medium-deep heavy oil [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 178-184.
[4] CAI Hui, QU Dan, CHEN Minfeng. Reserve producing law of combined well pattern and technology strategy of horizontal well infilling: A case study from HD oilfield in Bohai Sea [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4): 147-155.
[5] ZHU Suyang, LI Dongmei, LI Chuanliang, LI Huihui, LIU Xiongzhi. Re-discussion on principle of constant porosity during primary deformation of rock [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 180-188.
[6] ZHANG Yunlai, CHEN Jianbo, ZHOU Haiyan, ZHANG Jilei, ZHANG Wei. Quantitative characterization of sweep coefficient of water drive in horizontal well for offshore bottom water reservoir [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6): 146-153.
[7] JIANG Ruizhong, ZHANG Chunguang, GAO Yihua, GENG Yanhong, YU Hui, LI Haoyuan. Fractal nonlinear seepage model of horizontal wells in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6): 118-126.
[8] AN Jie, TANG Meirong, CAO Zongxiong, WANG Wenxiong, CHEN Wenbin, WU Shunlin. Transformation of development model of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability and low-pressure reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5): 134-140.
[9] XU Youjie, LIU Qiguo, WANG Rui, LIU Yicheng. Pressure transient of fractured horizontal well with complex fracture distribution in composite reservoir [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5): 161-168.
[10] WANG Bei, LIU Xiangjun, SIMA Liqiang, XU Wei, LI Qian, LIANG Han. Multi-scale discrete fracture modeling technology for carbonate reservoir of Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi area and its application [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2): 124-133.
[11] HUANG Quanhua, LIN Xingyu, TONG Kai, LU Yun, FU Yunhui. Prediction of water breakthrough time for horizontal well in non-Darcy flow edge water gas reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1): 147-152.
[12] LI Chuanliang, ZHU Suyang, CHAI Gaijian, DONG Fengling. Comparison of productivity of vertical wells with horizontal wells [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(N): 12-16.
[13] LI Jiqing, LIU Yuewu, HUANG Can, GAO Dapeng. Multi-stage fracturing horizontal well interference test model and its application [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6): 138-144.
[14] WANG Xinjie. Calculation method for productivity of fractured horizontal well in tight gas reservoir [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5): 161-168.
[15] ZHANG Yunlai, LIAO Xinwu, HU Yong, LI Tingli, SU Jinchang. Development models for offshore heavy oil field in high water cut stage [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4): 120-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] HUANG Sijing,HUANG Peipei,WANG Qingdong,LIU Haonian,WU Meng,ZOU Mingliang. The significance of cementation in porosity preservation in deep-buried sandstones[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] LIU Zhen,CHEN Yanpeng,ZHAO Yang,HAO Qi,XU Xiaoming,CHANG Mai. Distribution and controlling factors of hydrocarbon reservoirs in continental fault basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] DING Chao,GUO Lan,YAN Jifu. Forming conditions of Chang 6 reservoir in Anding area of Zichang Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] LI Yanshan,ZHANG Zhansong,ZHANG Chaomo,CHEN Peng. Application of mercury injection data to Chang 6 reservoir classification in Changqing area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] LUO Peng,LI Guorong,SHI Zejin,ZHOU Dazhi,TANG Hongwei,ZHANG Deming. Analysis of sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary facies of M aokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] ZUO Guoping, TU Xiaolong, XIA Jiufeng. Study on volcanic reservoir types in Subei exploration area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] WANG Feiyu. Method to improve producing degree of thermal recovery horizontal wells and its application[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] YUAN Yunfeng,CAI Ye,FAN Zuochun,JIANG Yiyang,QIN Qirong, JIANG Qingping. Fracture characteristics of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in Hongche fault belt of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] YUAN Jianying, FU Suotang, CAO Zhenglin, YAN Cunfeng,ZHANG Shuichang, MA Dade. Multi-source hydrocarbon generation and accumulation of plateau multiple petroleum system in Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] GENG Yanfei, ZHANG Chunsheng, HAN Xiaofeng, YANG Dachao. Study on formation mechanism of low resistivity gas bearing reservoir in Anyue-Hechuan area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(3): 70 -74 .
TRENDMD: