Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 101-105.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.04.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Adaptability of polymer to reservoir pore structure in Pubei Oilfield

Zhang Jihong,Guo Xin   

  1. (Key Laboratory of Enhance Oil and Gas Recovery of Education Ministry,Northeast Petroleum University,Daqing 163318,Heilongjiang,China)
  • Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-20

Abstract:

In order to seek a polymer solution flooding method suitable for oil recovery in Pubei Oilfield of Songliao Basin, a mercury injection experiment with cores from A1 well field in Pubei Oilfield was carried out. Pubei Oilfield belongs to typical low permeability reservoir. By measuring the hydrodynamic diameter of common polyacrylamide polymer and salt?resistant polymer, this paper investigated the adaptability of two kinds of polymers to the reservoir pore strucutre under different preparation conditions from the microscopic aspect, and compared the displacement efficiency by cylindrical cores. The experiment result shows that the oil recovery enhanced by 700 mg/L of salt-resistant polymer is 3.22% higher than that by 1 200 mg/L of common polymer. It is proved that salt?resistant polymer is more suitable for the flooding in Pubei Oilfield.

Key words: shale gas-bearing property, unconformable surface, hydrocarbon expulsion, organic pores, Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Qiongzhushi Formation, Sichuan Basin and surrounfing area

 [1]张继风.水驱油田开发效果评价方法综述及发展趋势[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):118-122.

Zhang Jifeng. Evaluation methods of development effect for water drive oilfield and development trend[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(3):118-122.

[2]李阳.陆相高含水油藏提高水驱采收率实践[J].石油学报,2009, 30(3):396-399.

Li Yang. Study on enhancing oil recovery of continental reservoir by water drive technology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(3):396-399.

[3] 徐豪飞,马宏伟,尹相荣,等.新疆油田超低渗透油藏注水开发储层损害研究[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):100-106.

Xu Haofei,Ma Hongwei,Yin Xiangrong,et al. Study on formation damage with water flooding for ultra?low permeability reservoir in Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(2):100-106.

[4] 蔡玥,熊琦,李勇,等.低渗透砂岩储层孔隙结构对储层质量的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长 8 油层组为例[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(5):69-74.

Cai Yue,Xiong Qi,Li Yong,et al. Influence of pore structure on reservoir quality of low permeability sandstone reservoir:A case study from Chang 8 oil reservoir set in Jiyuan area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(5):69-74.

  [5]宋力.葡北油田水下分流河道砂体储层构型研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2010(15):110-112.

Song Li. Study on reservoir configuration of underwater distributary channel sand body in Pubei oilfied[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2010(15):110-112.

  [6] 张昌民.储层研究中的层次分析法[J].石油与天然气地质,1992, 13(3):344-350.

Zhang Changmin. Hierarchy analysis in reservoir researches[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,1992,13(3):344-350.

  [7] 王友启,周梅,聂俊.提高采收率技术的应用状况及发展趋势[J].断块油气田,2010,17(5):628-631.

Wang Youqi,Zhou Mei,Nie Jun. Application status and development trend of EOR technology[J]. Fault?Block Oil & Gas Field,2010, 17(5):628-631.

  [8] 朱志良,熊迪,岳渊洲,等.克拉玛依油田一东区克拉玛依组沉积相与剩余油分布关系研究[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(3):112-118.

Zhu Zhiliang,Xiong Di,Yue Yuanzhou,et al. Relationship between sedimentary facies and remaining oil distribution of Karamay Formation in eastern block 1 of Karamay Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(3):112-118.

  [9] 韩培慧,苏伟明,林海川,等.聚驱后不同化学驱提高采收率对比评价[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,26(5):44-48.

Han Peihui,Su Weiming,Lin Haichuan,et al. Evaluation and compa? rison of different EOR techniques after polymer flooding[J]. Journal Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2011,26(5):44-48.

[10] 计秉玉.对大庆油田进一步开展三次采油技术研究工作的几点意见[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2003,22(6):60-62.

Ji Bingyu. Suggestions on further study on EOR in Daqing oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing 2003,22(6):60-62.

[11] 谢坤,李强,苑盛旺,等.疏水缔合聚合物与渤海储层非均质性适应性研究[J].油田化学,2015,32(1):102-107.

Xie Kun,Li Qiang,Yuan Shengwang,et al. Adaptation between the hydrophobic associate polymer and Bohai Reservoir Heterogeneity [J]. Oilfield Chemistry,2015,32(1):102-107.

[12] 郝乐伟,王琪,唐俊.储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(5):123-128.

Hao Leiwei,Wang Qi,Tang Jun. Research progress of reservoir microscopic pore structure[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(5):123-128.

[13] 李彦举.基于恒速压汞的孔隙结构特征研究[D].北京:中国地 质大学(北京),2014.

Li Yanju. Study on pore structure characteristics based on constantrate mercury injection[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2014.
[1] BAO Hanyong, LIU Chao, GAN Yuqing, XUE Meng, LIU Shiqiang, ZENG Lianbo, MA Shijie, LUO Liang. Paleotectonic stress field and fracture characteristics of shales of Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Fuling area,Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[2] YAN Jianping, LUO Jingchao, SHI Xuewen, ZHONG Guanghai, ZHENG Majia, HUANG Yi, TANG Hongming, HU Qinhong. Fracture development models and significance of Ordovician WufengSilurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[3] ZHANG Menglin, LI Guoqin, HE Jia, HENG De. Main controlling factors of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale gas enrichment in Tiangongtang structure, southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[4] YANG Zhanwei, JIANG Zhenxue, LIANG Zhikai, WU Wei, WANG Junxia, GONG Houjian, LI Weibang, SU Zhanfei, HAO Mianzhu. Evaluation of shale TOC content based on two machine learning methods: A case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1): 130-138.
[5] LI Xiaojia, DENG Bin, LIU Shugen, WU Juan, ZHOU Zheng, JIAO Kun. Multi-stage fluid activity characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Ningxi area, southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6): 135-144.
[6] ZHANG Bing, TAN G Shuheng, XI Zhaodong, LIN Donglin, YE Yapei. Biostratigraphic characteristics and exploration significance of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in northwestern Hunan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5): 11-21.
[7] LI Zhiyuan, YANG Renchao, ZHANG Ji, WANG Yi, YANG Tebo, DONG Liang. Quantitative evaluation of natural gas diffusion loss rate: A case study of Su-X block in Sulige gas field [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[8] YANG Yang, SHI Wanzhong, ZHANG Xiaoming, WANG Ren, XU Xiaofeng, LIU Yuzuo, BAI Luheng, CAO Shenting, FENG Qian. Identification method of shale lithofacies by logging curves: a case study from Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area,SW China [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 135-146.
[9] WANG Pengfei, JIANG Zhenxue, YANG Caihong, JIN Can, LYU Peng, WANG Haihua. Organic pore development characteristics of Longmaxi and Niutitang shales in the periphery of Chongqing [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3): 27-36.
[10] ZHENG Shanshan, LIU Luofu, WANG Yang, LUO Zehua, WANG Ximeng, SHENG Yue, XU Tong, WANG Bohan. Characteristics of microscopic pore structures and main controlling factors of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shale in southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3): 55-65.
[11] HE Guisong, HE Xipeng, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, WAN Jingya, HUANG Xiaozhen. Analysis of accumulation conditions of three sets of marine shale gas in southern China [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1): 57-68.
[12] Xie Yunxin, Zhou Wen, Guo Min,Chen Yicai, Qiumei Zhou. Typical cases analysis of effective source rocks existence in ancient carbonate rock of the middle basins of China [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(6): 16-22.
[13] Zhu Yiqing, Wang Xingzhi, Feng Mingyou, Li Ke. Lithofacies classification and its relationship with reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5): 59-66.
[14] Zhou Wen, Xu Hao, Yu Qian, Xie Runcheng, Deng Kun. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5): 18-25.
[15] WANG Peng, L IU Guangdi, CAO Zhe, SU Hui, CHANG Junhe. Identification of effective source rocks of Lower Cretaceous and its controlling on hydrocarbon accumulation in Chagan Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(2): 18-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] LI Zaiguang,LI Lin. Automatic mapping based on well data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] CHENG Yuhong,GUO Yanru,ZHENG Ximing,FANG Naizhen,MA Yuhu. The interpretation method and application effect determined by multiple seismic and logging factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] LIU Juntian,JIN Zhenjia,LI Zaiguang,TAN Xinping,GUO Lin,WANG Bo,LIU Yuxiang. Controlling factors for lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs and petroleum prospecting target in Xiaocaohu area , Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] SHANG Changliang, FU Shouxian. Application of 3D seismic survey in loess tableland[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] WANG Changyong, ZHENG Rongcai, WANG Jianguo, CAO Shaofang, Xiao Mingguo. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of Badaowan Formation of Lower Jurassic in northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] WANG Ke1 LIU Xianyang, ZHAO Weiwei, SONG Jianghai, SHI Zhenfeng, XIANG Hui. Char acter istics and geological significance of seismites of Paleogene in Yangxin Subsag of J iyang Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] SUN Hongbin, ZHANG Fenglian. Structural-sedimentary evolution char acter istics of Paleogene in Liaohe Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] LI Chuanliang. Can uplift r esult in abnormal high pr essur e in formation?[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] WEI Qinlian,ZHENG Rongcai,XIAO Ling,MA Guofu,DOU Shijie,TIAN Baozhong. Study on horizontal heterogeneity in Serie Inferiere of Triassic in 438b block , Algeria[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .
TRENDMD: