Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 18-25.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.05.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas

Zhou Wen 1，2， Xu Hao 1，2， Yu Qian 3， Xie Runcheng 1，2， Deng Kun 1，2   

  1. （1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation， Chengdu University of Technology， Chengdu 610059， China；2. College of Energy Resources， Chengdu University of Technology， Chengdu 610059， China；3. Chengdu Center of Geological Survey， China Geological Survey， Chengdu 610081， China）
  • Online:2016-09-29 Published:2016-09-29

PDF (PC)

760

Abstract:

Wufeng?Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation are explored and developed for shale gas simultaneously in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas. Great successes have been achieved at Wufeng?Longmaxi Formation, but it is unsatisfactory in Qiongzhusi Formation. Based on the data of outcrop, production and former findings, the geologic features of marine shale were summarized in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas, and the gas?bearing  property differences and their genesis between Wufeng?Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation were analyzed. It is considered that the marine shale experienced the most significant characteristic of high thermal maturity and strong reformation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas, which differs greatly with marine shale in North America. The statistical data from a large number of production wells indicates that the shale gas output in Wufeng?Longmaxi Formation is better than that in Qiongzhusi Formation obviously. The shale in Qiongzhusi Formation is characterized by lower pressure coefficient, poorly developed organic pores and widely distributed asphalt at adjacent reservoir, which indicates that the unconformity surface at Tongwan stage destructed the shale gas?bearing property in Qiongzhusi Formation. It is considered that the hydrocarbon expelled along the Sinian top Tongwan unconformity surface since hydrocarbon generation and the residual shale gas is poor in Qiongzhusi Formation.

Key words: shale gas, shale lithofacies, Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, eastern Sichuan Basin

［1］聂海宽，包书景，高波，等.四川盆地及其周缘下古生界页岩气保存条件研究［J］.地学前缘，2012，19（3）：280-294.

Nie Haikuan，Bao Shujing，Gao Bo，et al. A study of shale gas preser?vation conditions for the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin and its periphery［J］. Earth Science Frontiers，2012，19（3）：280-294.

［2］郭彤楼.中国式页岩气关键地质问题与成藏富集主控因素［J］.石油勘探与开发，2016，43（3）：317-326.

Guo Tonglou. Key geological issues and main controls on accumula?tion andenrichment of Chineseshale gas［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2016，43（3）：317-326.

［3］邹才能，董大忠，王玉满，等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景（一）［J］.石油勘探与开发，2015，42（6）：689-701.

Zou Caineng，Dong Dazhong，Wang Yuman，et al. Shale gas in China：characteristics，challenges and prospects （Ⅰ）［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2015，42（6）：689-701.

［4］郭彤楼，刘若冰.复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示——以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例［J］.天然气地球科学，2013，24（4）：643-651.

Guo Tonglou，Liu Ruobing. Implications from marine shale gas ex?ploration breakthrough in complicated structural area at high ther?mal stage：takingLongmaxi Formation in well JY1as an example［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience，2013，24（4）：643-651.

  ［5］邹才能，董大忠，王玉满，等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景（二）［J］.石油勘探与开发，2016，43（2）：166-178.

Zou Caineng，Dong Dazhong，Wang Yuman，et al. Shale gas in China：characteristics，challenges and prospects （Ⅱ）［J］. Petroleum Explo?ration and Development，2016，43（2）：166-178.

  ［6］Bowker K A. Barnett shale gas production，Fort Worth Basin：issues and discussion［J］. AAPG Bulletin，2007，91（4）：523-533.

  ［7］余川，聂海宽，曾春林，等.四川盆地东部下古生界页岩储集空间特征及其对含气性的影响［J］.地质学报，2014，88（7）：1311-1320.

Yu Chuan，Nie Haikuan，Zeng Chunlin，et al. Shale reservoir space characteristics and the effect on gas content in lower Paleozoic Erathem of the eastern Sichuan Basin［J］. Acta Geologica Sinica，2014，88（7）：1311-1320.

  ［8］余川，程礼军，曾春林，等.渝东北地区下古生界页岩含气性主控因素分析［J］.断块油气田，2014，21（3）：296-300.

Yu Chuan，Cheng Lijun，Zeng Chunlin，et al. Main controlling factor analysis on gas?bearing property of Lower Paleozoic shale in nor?theastern Chongqing Region［J］. Fault?Block Oil & Gas Field，2014， 21（3）：296-300.

  ［9］谢舟，卢双舫，于玲，等.泥质气源岩层内天然气扩散损失量评价——以黔南坳陷黄页1井九门冲组页岩为例［J］.矿物学报， 2014，34（1）：137-143.

Xie Zhou，Lu Shuangfang，Yu Ling，et al. Assessment of natural gas loss from mudstone gas source rocks—An Example from Jiumen?chong Formation of Huangye 1 well，Lower Cambrian，Southern Guizhou Sag［J］. Acta Mineralogical Sinica，2014，34（1）：137-143.

［10］郭少斌，黄磊.页岩气储层含气性影响因素及储层评价——以上扬子古生界页岩气储层为例［J］.石油实验地质，2013，35（6）：601-606.

Guo Shaobin，Huang Lei. Gas?bearing influential factors and eva?luation of shale gas reservoir：a case study of Paleozoic shale gas reservoir in Upper Yangtze region［J］. Experimental Petroleum Geo?logy，2013，35（6）：601-606.

［11］周文，王浩，谢润成，等.中上扬子地区下古生界海相页岩气储层特征及勘探潜力［J］.成都理工大学学报（自然科学版），2013， 40（5）：569-576.

Zhou Wen，Wang Hao，Xie Runcheng，et al. Characteristics and exploration potential of Lower Paleozoic marine shale gasreservoir in middle?upper Yangtze area，China［J］. Journal of Chengdu Uni?versity of Technology（Science & Technology Edition），2013，40（5）：569-576.

［12］刘树根，邓宾，钟勇，等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界页岩气深埋藏-强改造独特地质作用［J］.地学前缘，2016，23（1）：11-28.

Liu Shugen，Deng Bin，Zhong Yong，et al. Unique geological fea?tures of burial and superimpositionof the Lower Paleozoic shale gas across the Sichuan Basin andits periphery［J］. Earth Science Frontiers，2016，23（1）：11-28.

［13］张小龙，张同伟，李艳芳，等.页岩气勘探和开发进展综述［J］.岩性油气藏，2013，25（2）：116-122.

Zhang Xiaolong，Zhang Tongwei，Li Yanfang，et al. Research ad?vance in exploration and development of shale gas［J］. Lithologic Reservoirs，2013，25（2）：116-122.

［14］武赛军，魏国齐，杨威，等.四川盆地桐湾运动及其油气地质意义［J］.天然气地球科学，2016，27（1）：60-70.

Wu Saijun，Wei Guoqi，Yang Wei，et al. Tongwan Movement and its geologic significances in Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Geoscience，2016，27（1）：60-70.

［15］刘树根，孙玮，罗志立，等.兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探［J］.成都理工大学学报（自然科学版），2013，40（5）：511-520.

Liu Shugen，Sun Wei，Luo Zhili，et al. Xingkaitaphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian Strata in Si?chuan Basin，China［J］. Journal of Chengdu University of Techno?logy（Science & Technology Edition），2013，40（5）：511-520.

［16］汪泽成，姜华，王铜山，等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义［J］.石油勘探与开发，2014，41（3）：305-312.

Wang Zecheng，Jiang Hua，Wang Tongshan，et al. Paleo?geomor?phology formed during Tongwantectonization in Sichuan Basinand its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation［J］. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2014，41（3）：305-312.

［17］Cao Qian，Zhou Wen，Deng Hucheng，et al. Classification and con?trolling factors of organic pores in continental shale gas reservoirs based on laboratory experimental results［J］. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering，2015，27：1381-1388.

［18］马勇，钟宁宁，程礼军，等.渝东南两套富有机质页岩的孔隙结构特征——来自FIB-SEM的新启示［J］.石油实验地质，2015， 37（1）：109-116.

Ma Yong，Zhong Ningning，Cheng Lijun，et al. Pore structure of two organic?rich shales in southeastern Chongqing area：insight from Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscope （FIB-SEM）［J］.Experimental Petroleum Geology，2015，37（1）：109-116.

［19］黄文明，徐邱康，刘树根，等.中国海相层系油气成藏过程与储层沥青耦合关系：以四川盆地为例［J］.地质科技情报，2015， 34（6）：159-168.

Huang Wenming，Xu Qiukang，Liu Shugen，et al. Coupling relation?ship between oil & gas accumulation process and reservoir bitumen of marine system：taking Sichuan Basin as an Example［J］. Geolo?gical Science and Technology Information，2015，34（6）：159-168.

［20］刘树根，秦川，孙玮，等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组油气四中心耦合成藏过程［J］.岩石学报，2012，28（3）：879-888.

Liu Shugen，Qin Chuan，Sun Wei，et al. The coupling formationprocess offour centers of hydrocarbon in SinianDengying Forma?tion of Sichuan Basin［J］. ActaPetrologica Sinica，2012，28（3）：879-888.

［21］赵建成，刘树根，孙伟，等.龙门山与四川盆地结合部的油气保存条件分析［J］.岩性油气藏，2011，23（1）：79-85.

Zhao Jiancheng，Liu Shugen，Sun Wei，et al. Analysis on petroleum preservation condition in the coupling area between Longmen Moun?tain and Sichuan Basin［J］. Lithologic Reservoirs，2011，23（1）：79-85.
[1] YAN Jianping, LAI Siyu, GUO Wei, SHI Xuewen, LIAO Maojie, TANG Hongming, HU Qinhong, HUANG Yi. Research progress on casing deformation types and influencing factors in geological engineering of shale gas wells [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[2] YANG Xuefeng, ZHAO Shengxian, LIU Yong, LIU Shaojun, XIA Ziqiang, XU Fei, FAN Cunhui, LI Yutong. Main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Ningxi area，Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[3] QIU Yuchao, LI Yading, WEN Long, LUO Bing, YAO Jun, XU Qiang, WEN Huaguo, TAN Xiucheng. Structural characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation model of Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[4] BAO Hanyong, ZHAO Shuai, ZHANG Li, LIU Haotian. Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area，eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[5] SHEN Youyi, WANG Kaifeng, TANG Shuheng, ZHANG Songhang, XI Zhaodong, YANG Xiaodong. Geological modeling and“sweet spot”prediction of Permian coal measures shale reservoirs in Yushe-Wuxiang block，Qinshui Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[6] WANG Tongchuan, CHEN Haoru, WEN Longbin, QIAN Yugui, LI Yuzhuo, WEN Huaguo. Identification and reservoir significance of Carboniferous karst paleogeomorphology in Wubaiti area，eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 109-121.
[7] ZOU Liansong, XUWenli, LIANG Xiwen, LIU Haotian, ZHOU Kun, HOU Fei, ZHOU Lin, WEN Huaguo. Sedimentary characteristics and sources of shale of Dongyuemiao member of Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 122-135.
[8] DUAN Yifei, ZHAO Weiwei, YANG Tianxiang, LI Fukang, LI Hui, WANG Jianan, LIU Yuchen. Source-reservoir characteristics and accumulation rules of shale gas of Permian Shanxi Formation in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[9] CHENG Jing, YAN Jianping, SONG Dongjiang, LIAO Maojie, GUO Wei, DING Minghai, LUO Guangdong, LIU Yanmei. Low resistivity response characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Changning area，southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[10] JI Yubing, GUO Bingru, MEI Jue, YIN Zhijun, ZOU Chen. Fracture modeling of shale reservoirs of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Luobu syncline in Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area， southern margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[11] BAO Hanyong, LIU Haotian, CHEN Miankun, SHENG Xiancai, QIN Jun, CHEN Jie, CHEN Fanzhuo. Accumulation conditions of natural gas of Cambrian Xixiangchi Group in high-steep structural zones，eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 43-51.
[12] BO Shangshang, TIAN Jixian, LI Yaoliang, WANG Yetong, WANG Hao, SUN Guoqiang. Provenance analysis of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 99-112.
[13] BAO Hanyong, LIU Chao, GAN Yuqing, XUE Meng, LIU Shiqiang, ZENG Lianbo, MA Shijie, LUO Liang. Paleotectonic stress field and fracture characteristics of shales of Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Fuling area，Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[14] YANG Bowei, SHI Wanzhong, ZHANG Xiaoming, XU Xiaofeng, LIU Yuzuo, BAI Luheng, YANG Yang, CHEN Xianglin. Pore structure characteristics and gas-bearing properties of shale gas reservoirs of Lower Carboniferous Dawuba Formation in southern Guizhou [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[15] WEI Quanchao, LI Xiaojia, LI Feng, HAO Jingyu, DENG Shuanglin, WU Juan, DENG Bin, WANG Daojun. Development characteristics and significance of fracture veins of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Wangcang area at Micang Mountain front， Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 62-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DUAN Tianxiang,LIU Xiaomei,ZHANG Yajun,XIAO Shuqin. Discussion on geologic modeling with Petrel[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] ZHANG Liqiu. Optimization of upward strata combination of second class oil layer in eastern south Ⅱ area of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] ZHANG Di，HOU Zhongjian，WANG Yahui，WANG Ying，WANG Chunlian. Sedimentary characteristics of lacustrine carbonate rocks of the first member of Shahejie Formation in Banqiao-Beidagang area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] FAN Huaicai， LI Xiaoping， DOU Tiancai， WU Xinyuan. Study on stress sensitivity effect on flow dynamic features of gas wells[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] TIAN Shufang，ZHANG Hongwen. Application of life cycle theory to predict increasing trend of proved oil reserves in Liaohe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] YANG Kai，GUO Xiao. Numerical simulation study of three-dimensional two-phase black oil model in fractured low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] ZHAI Zhongxi， QINWeijun， GUO Jinrui. Quantitative relations between oil-gas filling degree and channel seepage flow capacity of the reservoir：Example of Shuanghe Oilfield in Biyang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] QI Minghui，LU Zhengyuan，YUAN Shuai，LI Xinhua. The analysis on the sources of water body and characteristic of water breakthough at Block 12 in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] LI Xiangbo,CHEN Qi,lin,LIU Huaqing,WAN Yanrong,MU Jingkui,LIAO Jianbo,WEI Lihua. Three types of sediment gravity flows and their petroliferous features of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] LIU Yun，LU Yuan，YI Xiangyi， ZHANG Junliang， ZHANG Jinliang，WANG Zhenxi. Gas hydrate forecasting model and its influencing factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .
TRENDMD:

Copyright © 2018 Lithologic Reservoirs

Support by Beijing Magtech support@magtech.com.cn