油气地质

耿湾— 史家湾地区长6 段微量元素地球化学特征及古盐度分析

  • 张立秋
展开
  • 中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院
韩永林, 1964 年生, 男, 高级工程师, 多年从事沉积及石油地质研究工作。地址: ( 710021) 陕西省西安市未央区长庆兴隆园小区长庆油田勘探开发研究院。电话: ( 029) 86594836。E- mail: hyl_cq@petrochina.com.cn

网络出版日期: 2007-12-15

Paleosalinity analysis and trace element geochemistry of Chang 6 member in Gengwan-Shijiawan area, Ordos Basin

  • ZHANG Liqiu
Expand
  • Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Xi’an 710021, China

Online published: 2007-12-15

摘要

应用B、Sr、Rb、K+Na 质量分数和Sr/Ba、Rb/K 比值等微量元素地球化学方法, 结合粘土矿物X 衍射分析结果, 对鄂尔多斯盆地耿湾—史家湾地区长6 段古盐度进行综合研究, 认为长6 期湖水介质古盐度为0.014‰~6.47‰, 平均值为2.56‰, 属于淡水—微咸水环境, 局部为半咸水环境, 且自长63 时期至长61 时期湖盆水体是逐渐变咸的。湖水介质古盐度研究有2 个重要的意义: ①在长6 古盐度定量计算基础上, 编制了古盐度等值线图, 从中划分出淡水、微咸水和半咸水3 个古盐度平面分区, 确定0.5‰等值线是淡水河流与微咸水湖盆分界的古湖岸线位置; ②鄂尔多斯盆地长6 期微咸化的湖水介质和封闭还原的深水环境既有利于优质烃源岩的发育, 又能促使砂体早期环边绿泥石胶结形成抗压实- 压溶组构, 有利于原生粒间孔的保存而对储层发育非常有利。长6 段古盐度研究为岩性地层油藏有利区带预测提供了重要依据。

本文引用格式

张立秋 . 耿湾— 史家湾地区长6 段微量元素地球化学特征及古盐度分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007 , 19(4) : 20 -26 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.04.004

Abstract

The trace element geochemistry methods such as B, Sr, Rb and K+Na mass fraction, Sr/ Ba ratio, Rb/K ratio combining with clay mineral X -ray diffraction analysis are applied to analyze the paleosalinity of Chang 6 in Gengwan-Shijiawan area. The result shows that in the period of Chang 6 stage, it is fresh -mildly brackish environment, partly brackish environment with the paleosalinity from 0.014‰ to 6.47‰ , average of 2.56‰, and the water is saltier gradually from the period of Chang 63 to Chang 61. The paleosalinity isolines are mapped after recovering the paleosalinity quantitatively, in which three paleosalinity zones are divided, including fresh water zone, mildly brackish water zone and brackish water zone. And 0.5‰ isoline is determined to be the position of lake shoreline which is the boundary of fresh water river and mildly brackish lake. The mildly brackish water and close environment are favorable for the development of the high quality source rocks, and could promote the forming of the early chlorite rim cementation to retard the compaction and dissolution which is helpful for preserving primary intergranular pores. So it provides important evidence for the favorable target prediction of lithostratigraphic reservoirs.

参考文献

[ 1] 游海涛, 程日辉, 刘昌岭.古盐度复原法综述[ J] .世界地质,2002, 21( 2) :111- 117.
[ 2] 王敏芳, 焦养泉, 王正海, 等.沉积环境中古盐度的恢复———以吐哈盆地西南缘水西沟群泥岩为例[J] .新疆石油地质, 2005, 26(6) :719- 722.
[ 3] 卫平生.论坳陷盆地“坡折带”及“湖岸线”对岩性地层油气藏的控制作用———以松辽盆地南部西部斜坡为例[D] .北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2005.
[ 4] 纪友亮, 冯建辉, 王声朗, 等.东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组沙三段沉积期湖岸线的变化及岩相古地理特征[J].古地理学报, 2005, 7(2):145- 156.
[ 5] 牟泽辉, 朱宏权, 张克银, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界成油体系[M] .北京: 石油工业出版社, 2001.
[ 6] 李进龙, 陈东敬.古盐度定量研究方法综述[ J] .油气地质与采收率, 2003, 10( 5) :1- 3.
[ 7] 郑荣才, 柳梅青.鄂尔多斯盆地长6 油层组古盐度研究[ J] .石油与天然气地质, 1999, 20( 1) :20- 25.
[ 8] 周仰康, 何锦文, 王子玉.硼作为古盐度指标的应用[C] //何镜宇等编.沉积学和有机地球化学学术会议论文选集.北京:科学出版社, 1984: 55- 57.
[ 9] Adams T D, Haynes J R, Walker C T. Boron in Holocene illites of the dovey estuary wales and its relationship to paleosalinity in cyclothems[ J] . Sedimentology, 1965, 4:189- 195.
[ 10] Couch E L. Calculation of paleosalinities from boron and clay mineral data[ J] . AAPGBull, 1971, 55( 10) :1829- 1837.
[ 11] Walker C T, Price N B. Departure curves for computing paleosalinity fromboron in illites and shales[ J] . AAPGBull, 1963, 47( 5) :833- 841.
[ 12] 王益友, 郭文莹, 张国栋.几种地化标志在金湖凹陷阜宁群沉积环境中的应用[ J] .同济大学学报( 海洋地质版) , 1979, 7( 2) : 51- 60.
[ 13] 卢进才, 李玉宏, 魏仙样, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[ J] .吉林大学学报( 地球科学版) , 2006, 36( 6) :928- 932.
[ 14] 吉利明, 王少飞, 徐金鲤.陇东地区延长组疑源类组合特征及其古环境意义[ J] . 地球科学———中国地质大学学报, 2006, 31( 6) :798- 806.
[ 15] 黄思静,谢连文,张萌, 等. 中国三叠系陆相砂岩中自生绿泥石的形成机制及其与储层孔隙保存的关系[ J] .成都理工大学学报( 自然科学版) , 2004,31( 3) :273- 281.
[ 16] 郑荣才, 耿威, 周刚,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6 砂岩成岩作用与成岩相研究[ J] .岩性油气藏, 2007, 19( 2) : 1- 8.
文章导航

/