油气地质

鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区超低渗透储层评价

  • 张云杰 ,
  • 吴云利
展开
  • 1.西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室/地质学系; 2.山东正元地理信息工程有限责任公司
李南星,1984 年生,男,西北大学在读硕士研究生,主要从事油气储层地质及开发地质研究工作。地址:(710069)陕西省西安 市太白北路229 号31 信箱。E-mail:nan-xing@163.com

网络出版日期: 2011-04-20

基金资助

中国石化华北石油局科研项目(编号:G1303-08-kk-0024)“镇泾区块长81储层与四性关系研究”部分成果

Super-low permeability reservoir evaluation in Zhenjing area, Ordos Basin

  • ZHANG Yunjie ,
  • WU Yunli
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics/Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China; 2. Shandong Zhengyuan Geographic Information Engineering Co. Ltd., Jinan 250101, China

Online published: 2011-04-20

摘要

针对鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区勘探开发前景,为寻找有利储层,利用砂岩薄片、铸体薄片、扫描电镜和恒速压汞等技术对取心井资料进行分析。结果表明,该储层岩性主要为长石岩屑砂岩和岩屑长石砂岩,成分和结构成熟度偏低;储集空间以粒间孔和溶蚀孔为主;储集性能差到中等,原始产能低,非均质性强。结合生产动态,选用喉道半径、可动流体百分数、启动压力梯度和有效孔隙度等低渗透储层评价参数,将长81储层划分为3 类:Ⅰ类为较好储层;Ⅱ类为中等储层;Ⅲ类为较差储层。研究区主要发育Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类储层,有少量的Ⅰ类储层,分类结果符合该地区实际。

本文引用格式

张云杰 , 吴云利 . 鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区超低渗透储层评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011 , 23(2) : 41 -45 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2011.02.008

Abstract

In order to open up a vast range of prospects for oil and gas exploration and development in Zhenjing area, southern Ordos Basin, series of research methods such as rock thin sections, cast sections, scanning electron microscope and mercury penetration of constant speed are used to analyze core hole data for surveying fair reservoirs. The result shows that feldspar lithic sandstone and lithic feldspar sandstone are the main reservoir lithologies, with low compositional maturity and low textural maturity, the main reservoir spaces are intergranular pores and dissolved pores, and the reservoir is characterized by poor-middle property, poor original productivity and strong heterogeneity. Combined with production performance, the evaluation parameters for lowpermeability reservoir such as throat radius, percentage of mobile fluid, start-up pressure gradient and active porosity are selected to evaluate Chang 81 reservoir. According to the result, Chang 81 reservoir can be divided into three types. The typeⅠis better reservoir, type Ⅱ is medium reservoir, and type Ⅲ is poor reservoir. The typeⅡand type Ⅲ are the main reservoir in the study area, while typeⅠis seldom.

参考文献

[1] 卢德根,刘林玉,刘秀婵,等.鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾区块长81亚段成岩相研究[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):82-86.
[2] 张哨楠,胡江奈,沙文武,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区延长组的沉积特征[J].矿物岩石,2000,20(4):25-30.
[3] 陈小梅.鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区延长组长6、长8 油层组储层特征研究[J].石油地质与工程,2007,21(6):29-32.
[4] 李红,柳益群,刘林玉.鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田延长组长81低
渗透储层成岩作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(2):209-217.
[5] 金龙,丁晓琪.鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾油田长8 段沉积相研究[J].新疆地质,2009,27(2):160-163.
[6] 曲春霞,杨秋莲,刘登辉,等.长庆油田延长组特低渗透储层物性影响因素分析[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(2):43-47.
[7] 朱玉双,吴长辉,王小军,等.鄂尔多斯盆地杏北区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2010,40(3):497-502.
[8] 王道富.鄂尔多斯盆地特低渗透油田开发[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007.
[9] 李道品.低渗透砂岩油田开发[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997:51-60.
[10] 黄延章.低渗透油层渗流机理[J].北京:石油工业出版社,1998:80-85.
[11] 杨正明,张英芝,郝明强,等.低渗透油田储层综合评价方法[J].石油学报,2006,27(2):64-67.
[12] 郭长敏,施振生.歧口凹陷沙一段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):34-39.
[13] 杨希濮,孙卫,高辉,等.三塘湖油田牛圈湖区块低渗透储层评价[J].断块油气田,2009,16(2):5-8.
[14] 贺伦斌.浅论低渗透储层评价方法及适用性[J].科学之友,2010,12(4):25-26.
[15] 杨秋莲,李爱琴,孙燕妮,等.超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(4):51-56.
[16] 邸世祥,祝总祺.碎屑岩储层的孔隙结构及其成因与油气运移的控制作用[M].西安:西北大学出版社,1991.
[17] 王允诚.油气储层评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[18] 赵靖舟,吴少波,武富礼.论低渗透储层的分类与评价标准———以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(3):28-31.
文章导航

/