油气田开发

塔河油田 1 区三叠系储层流动单元研究

  • 蔡玥 ,
  • 熊琦 ,
  • 李勇 ,
  • 丁迎超 ,
  • 许文杰
展开
  • 1.中国石油大学(华东) 地球科学与技术学院,山东 青岛 266580;2.中国石油新疆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院,新疆 克拉玛依 834000
王珂(1987-),男,中国石油大学(华东)在读博士研究生,研究方向为油藏描述及构造地质。 地址:(266580)山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路 66 号中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院。 E-mail:wangkerrr@126.com

网络出版日期: 2014-06-06

基金资助

国家重大科技专项“精细油藏描述技术及剩余油赋存方式研究”(编号:2011ZX05011-001)及“大型油气田及煤层气开发”(编号: 2011ZX05042-001)联合资助

Research on reservoir flow units of Triassic in block-1, Tahe Oilfield

  • CAI Yue ,
  • XIONG Qi ,
  • LI Yong ,
  • DING Yingchao ,
  • XU Wenjie
Expand
  • 1. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong ,China; 2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China

Online published: 2014-06-06

摘要

流动单元研究是深化和发展油藏表征的关键,对揭示剩余油分布规律等具有重要的理论意义和实用价值。 在建立河流相及三角洲相流动单元类型划分标准以及判别式的基础上,对塔河油田 1 区三叠系油藏的储层流动单元进行了划分,研究了流动单元的空间分布特征,并分析了流动单元与储层构型及剩余油的关系。 结果表明,塔河油田 1 区三叠系储层流动单元可划分为 E(极好)、G(好)、M(中等)和 P(较差) 4 种类型,其中 E 型和 G 型流动单元分布面积较大,M 型和 P 型流动单元分布面积较小,同时流动单元的层间差异和井间差异明显。 E 型流动单元与横向砂坝分布范围一致,G 型流动单元与河道沉积及纵向砂坝分布相对应,表明储层构型与流动单元之间具有良好的对应关系。 E 型和 G 型流动单元剩余油较富集,是剩余油挖潜的主要方向,M 型流动单元是剩余油挖潜的次要方向,P 型流动单元剩余油地质储量有限,挖潜潜力较小。

本文引用格式

蔡玥 , 熊琦 , 李勇 , 丁迎超 , 许文杰 . 塔河油田 1 区三叠系储层流动单元研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014 , 26(3) : 119 -124 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2014.03.020

Abstract

The research of flow units is the key of deepening and developing reservoir characterization, and it has important theoretical intention and practical value on revealing distribution of remaining oil. Based on establishing classification standard and discriminant of flow units in fluvial and delta facies, this paper classified the reservoir flow units of Triassic in block-1 of Tahe Oilfield, and analyzed the spatial distribution of flow units and its relationship with reservoir architectural structure and remaining oil. The result shows that flow units of the study area can be classified into E(excellent), G (good), M(medium) and P(poor) types, while E and G types have the most extensive distribution, and M and P types have smaller distribution area. Meanwhile, the interlayer and interwell flow units have distinct discrepancy. The E type flow unit has consistent distribution with lateral sandbar, and G type flow unit is corresponding to channel deposit and lengthwise sandbar that are sand reservoir bodies with high porosity and permeability, which means that reservoir architecture has favorable correspondence with flow units. E and G types of flow units are the main digging orientation of remaining oil, while M type is the secondary digging orientation. P type of flow unit has limited geological reserves of remaining oil, therefore has less digging potential.

参考文献

[1] 刘海磊,戴俊生,尹鹤,等.塔河油田1 区三叠系隔夹层研究[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(5):121-126.
[2] Hearn C L,Ebanks W J,Tye R S,et al. Geological factors influencing reservoir performance of the Hartzog Draw field,Wyoming[J]. JPT,1984,36(9):1335-1344.
[3] 窦之林.储层流动单元研究[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2000:1-3.
[4] Ebanks W J. Flow-unit concept—Integrated approach to reservoir description for engineering projects [J]. AAPG Bulletin,1987,71(5):551-552.
[5] Rodriguez A,Maraven S A. Facies modeling and the flow unit concept as a sedimentological tool in reservoir description[R]. SPE 18154,1988:465-472.
[6] Amaefule J O,Altunbay M,Tiab D,et al. Enhanced reservoir description:Using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals wells[R]. SPE 26436,1993:205-220.
[7] 裘怿楠,薛叔浩.油气储层评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:244-247.
[8] 焦养泉,李思田,李祯,等.曲流河与湖泊三角洲沉积体系及典型骨架砂体内部构成分析[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1995:1-2.
[9] 穆龙新,黄石岩,贾爱林.油藏描述新技术[C]∥中国石油天然气总公司石油勘探开发科学研究院.中国石油天然气总公司油气田开发工作会议文集.北京:石油工业出版社,1996:1-10.
[10] 吴胜和.储层表征与建模[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2010:228-229.
文章导航

/