阿姆河右岸萨曼杰佩气田中生界复合岩性气藏地质特征及勘探开发潜力

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20260503

Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 23-39.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260503

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles Next Articles

Geological characteristics and exploration & development potential of Mesozoic composite lithologic gas reservoirs in Samandepe Gas Field, right bank of Amu Darya

LENG Youheng¹(), YANG Yadong²(), WANG Qiang², LI Yunzhu², WEI Zhanjun¹, HUANG Feng², XUE Taofeng², LIU Yang³

¹ Amu Darya Natural Gas Company， CNPC International (Turkmenistan)， Beijing 100101, China
² Research Institute of Geology Exploration and Development, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Chengdu 610051, China
³ Faculty of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Received:2026-01-20 Revised:2026-03-26 Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-04
Contact: YANG Yadong E-mail:lengyouheng@cnpcag.com;yangyd_jx@cnpc.com.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

To extend the production life of Samandepe Gas Field, it is necessary to explore potential strata. Based on the Navigation Pyramid seismic processing technology, differences of hydrocarbon accumulation pathways, enrichment patterns, and development characteristics among three gas-bearing series, such as the shallow Aptian tight sandstone, the middle Callovian-Oxfordian carbonate rock, and the deep Middle-Lower Jurassic tight sandstone were systematically analyzed. A well-seismic joint quantitative evaluation method was adopted to carry out potential assessment and differentiated potential-tapping strategy studies for multi-layer gas reservoirs. The results show that: （1） Three gas-bearing series in Samandepe Gas Field exhibit differentiated accumulation models and enrichment patterns. Shallow series, controlled by both structure and lithology, are far-source secondary accumulation with localized weak enrichment. Middle series are lower-generation and upper-storage integral gas reservoirs, where the remaining gas is shielded by facies changes and interlayers, characterized by edge enrichment and scattered distribution in the main body. Deep series are self-generation and self-storage tight sandstone gas reservoirs with large-scale contiguous gas-bearing properties, and “sweet spots” are jointly controlled by high-quality sand bodies and fractures. （2） The differentiated potential-tapping scheme for the abovementioned three series in the study area is as follows: Precisely tapping of remaining gas in middle series (predicted remaining geological reserves of 256.27×10⁸ m³) as core task; rapid production build-up by adding perforations in shallow series (predicted geological reserves of 56.90×10⁸ m³) as near-term production replacement; and geology-engineering integrated evaluation for vertical well exploration in deep series (predicted geological reserves of 2 126.00×10⁸ m³) as the backup plan. It is estimated that a new deliverability of 27.49×10⁴ m³/d can be established, with a cumulative incremental gas production of 64.13×10⁸ m³.

Key words: tight sandstone gas reservoir, carbonate gas reservoir, structure-lithology, potential prediction, geology-engineering integration, multi-layer gas reservoir, Callovian-Oxfordian, Middle-Lower Jurassic, right bank of Amu Darya

CLC Number:

TE122

LENG Youheng, YANG Yadong, WANG Qiang, LI Yunzhu, WEI Zhanjun, HUANG Feng, XUE Taofeng, LIU Yang. Geological characteristics and exploration & development potential of Mesozoic composite lithologic gas reservoirs in Samandepe Gas Field, right bank of Amu Darya[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(5): 23-39.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 1

Fig. 8

Table 2

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Table 3

Fig. 12

Table 4

Table 5

References 33

[1]	NIE Minglong, ZHAO Wei, HE Dengfa, et al. Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the large Samandepe Gas Field in the Chardzhou step-fault zone,Amu Darya Basin,northeastern Turkmenistan:A response to the tectonic evolution of the northern margin of the Tethys[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 145:105874.
[2]	费怀义, 徐刚, 王强, 等. 阿姆河右岸区块气藏特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(5):13-17.
	FEI Huaiyi, XU Gang, WANG Qiang, et al. Characteristics of gas reservoirs in the Amu Darya Right Bank Block,Turkmenistan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(5):13-17.
[3]	董霞, 郑荣才, 吴蕾, 等. 土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2):54-61.
	DONG Xia, ZHENG Rongcai, WU Lei, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of carbonate reservoirs in Samandepe Gas Field,Turkmenistan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(2):54-61.
[4]	张培军, 程绪彬, 刘荣和, 等. 土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田气井异常积液与对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(4):62-67.
	ZHANG Peijun, CHENG Xubin, LIU Ronghe, et al. Abnormal liquid loading in gas-producing wells of the Samandepe Gasfield in Turkmenistan and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(4):62-67.
[5]	聂明龙, 童晓光, 刘群明, 等. 土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸地区盐下碳酸盐岩气藏类型及油气富集因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(1):70-75.
	NIE Minglong, TONG Xiaoguang, LIU Qunming, et al. Types of pre-salt carbonate gas reservoirs and hydrocarbon enrichment factors of Amu Darya right bank area in Turkmenistan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(1):70-75.
[6]	王红军, 张良杰, 陈怀龙, 等. 阿姆河右岸盐下侏罗系大中型气田地质特征与分布规律[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(4):52-64.
	WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, CHEN Huailong, et al. Geological characteristics and distribution law of pre-salt Jurassic large and medium gas fields in the right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(4):52-64.
[7]	左应祥, 冉丰华, 王明泉, 等. 萨曼杰佩气田集输系统安全控制与应急管理浅析[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2013, 42(3):316-319.
	ZUO Yingxiang, RAN Fenghua, WANG Mingquan, et al. Safety control and emergency management analysis of gathering and transportation system in Salman Jiepei gas field[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2013, 42(3):316-319.
[8]	CHAI Hui, OUYANG Cheng, JIANG Linwei, et al. Pressurized production optimization and engineering practice of Samandepe Gas Field[R]. Wuhan: Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference, 2023.
[9]	刘荣和, 高仪君, 冷有恒, 等. 阿姆河右岸气田复杂出水模式精细识别和长效治理对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(6):63-68.
	LIU Ronghe, GAO Yijun, LENG Youheng, et al. Fine identification and long-term countermeasures of complex water production patterns in the gasfields,the right bank of the Amu Darya[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(6):63-68.
[10]	陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):71-80.
	CHEN Jing, CHEN Jun, LI Hui, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Permian-Triassic superimposed reservoirs in central Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):71-80.
[11]	窦立荣, 魏小东, 王景春, 等. 乍得Bongor盆地花岗质基岩潜山储层特征[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8):897-904.
	DOU Lirong, WEI Xiaodong, WANG Jingchun, et al. Characte-ristics of granitic basement rock buried-hill reservoir in Bongor Basin,Chad[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(8):897-904.
[12]	张满郎, 孔凡志, 谷江锐, 等. 九龙山气田珍珠冲组砂砾岩储层评价及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):1-13.
	ZHANG Manlang, KONG Fanzhi, GU Jiangrui, et al. Assessment of glutenite reservoirs and optimization of prospects of Zhenzhuchong Formation in Jiulongshan gas field,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):1-13.
[13]	张新顺, 王红军, 马锋, 等. 北美白垩系烃源岩发育特征与油气分布关系[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(1):119-127.
	ZHANG Xinshun, WANG Hongjun, MA Feng, et al. Relationship between the development characteristics of Cretaceous source rocks and the hydrocarbon distribution,North America[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(1):119-127.
[14]	陈昭国. 川西拗陷与北美致密砂岩气藏类比分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(1):71-76.
	CHEN Zhaoguo. Analogy analysis of west Sichuan Depression and northern America sandstone gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2012, 34(1):71-76.
[15]	王旭, 李祖友, 邓文龙, 等. 川西坳陷中江含气构造沙溪庙组气藏JS₂¹气层开发潜力分析及对策[J]. 中外能源, 2013, 18(3):46-52.
	WANG Xu, LI Zuyou, DENG Wenlong, et al. Exploitation potential analysis and countermeasures on Shaximiao JS₂¹ gas re-servoir in Zhongjiang gas bearing structure of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2013, 18(3):46-52.
[16]	王小娟, 陈双玲, 谢继容, 等. 川西南地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1):78-87.
	WANG Xiaojuan, CHEN Shuangling, XIE Jirong, et al. Accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1):78-87.
[17]	冀光, 贾爱林, 孟德伟, 等. 大型致密砂岩气田有效开发与提高采收率技术对策:以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3):602-612.
	JI Guang, JIA Ailin, MENG Dewei, et al. Technical strategies for effective development and gas recovery enhancement of a large tight gas field: A case study of Sulige gas field,Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3):602-612.
[18]	李宪文, 肖元相, 陈宝春, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏多层分压开采面临的难题及对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(8):66-73.
	LI Xianwen, XIAO Yuanxiang, CHEN Baochun, et al. Separate layer fracturing and multi-layer production of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin:Problems and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(8):66-73.
[19]	张志伟, 何永垚, 王春生, 等. 中亚地区阿姆河盆地查尔朱、布哈拉阶地构造特征及演化[J]. 海相油气地质, 2010, 15(4):48-56.
	ZHANG Zhiwei, HE Yongyao, WANG Chunsheng, et al. Structural characteristics and evolution of Chardzhou and Bukhara terraces in Amu-Darya Basin,Middle Asia[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2010, 15(4):48-56.
[20]	罗海. 阿姆河右岸A区碳酸盐岩储层特征研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
	LUO Hai. Study on characteristics of carbonate reservoirs in area A on the right bank of the Amu Darya River[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2018.
[21]	陈海西. 土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸萨曼杰佩气田构造对储层的控制作用[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2022.
	CHEN Haixi. Structural control of gas reservoir in Samanjepe gas field,right bank of Amu Darya River,Turkmenistan[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2022.
[22]	马文辛, 欧阳诚, 廖波勇, 等. 阿姆河盆地东部牛津阶微生物灰岩储层特征及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5):59-69.
	MA Wenxin, OUYANG Cheng, LIAO Boyong, et al. Characte-ristics and genesis of Oxfordian microbial limestone reservoirs in eastern Amu Darya Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5):59-69.
[23]	王强, 程绪彬, 费怀义, 等. 阿姆河右岸A区气藏成藏过程分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2012, 35(2):1-4.
	WANG Qiang, CHENG Xubin, FEI Huaiyi, et al. Reservoir-forming process of A block in the right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2012, 35(2):1-4.
[24]	张培军, 谢明贤, 罗敏, 等. 巨厚膏盐岩形变机制解析及其对油气成藏的影响:以阿姆河右岸东部阿盖雷地区侏罗系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6):36-44.
	ZHANG Peijun, XIE Mingxian, LUO Min, et al. Analysis of deformation mechanism of ultra thick gypsum salt rock and its significance for oil and gas reservoir formation: A case study of the Jurassic gypsum salt layers in the Agayry region,eastern right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6):36-44.
[25]	姚建廷, 周栋, 刘荣和, 等. 阿姆河右岸中-下侏罗统烃源岩地球化学特征及其沉积环境研究[J]. 地质科学, 2024, 59(2):352-364.
	YAO Jianting, ZHOU Dong, LIU Ronghe, et al. Geochemical characteristics and sedimentary environment of the Middle and Lower Jurassic source rocks in the right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2024, 59(2):352-364.
[26]	白振华, 张良杰, 王红军, 等. 阿姆河右岸区块侏罗系盐下碳酸盐岩油气动态成藏过程研究[J]. 海相油气地质, 2022, 27(4):429-439.
	BAI Zhenhua, ZHANG Liangjie, WANG Hongjun, et al. Analysis of dynamic hydrocarbon accumulating process of Jurassic pre-salt carbonate reservoirs in the right bank block of Amu Darya River[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2022, 27(4):429-439.
[27]	方杰, 徐树宝, 吴蕾, 等. 阿姆河右岸地区侏罗系海相烃源岩生烃潜力[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014, 19(1):8-18.
	FANG Jie, XU Shubao, WU Lei, et al. Hydrocarbon generation potential of Jurassic source rocks in right bank of Amu Darya[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014, 19(1):8-18.
[28]	刘石磊, 郑荣才, 颜文全, 等. 阿姆河盆地阿盖雷地区牛津阶碳酸盐岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(1):57-63.
	LIU Shilei, ZHENG Rongcai, YAN Wenquan, et al. Characte-ristics of Oxfordian carbonate reservoir in Agayry area,Amu Darya Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(1):57-63.
[29]	张兵, 郑荣才, 刘合年, 等. 土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田卡洛夫阶—牛津阶碳酸盐岩储层特征[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(1):117-126.
	ZHANG Bing, ZHENG Rongcai, LIU Henian, et al. Characte-ristics of carbonate reservoir in Callovian-Oxfordian of Samandepe Gasfield,Turkmenistan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2010, 84(1):117-126.
[30]	张天择, 王红军, 张良杰, 等. 射线域弹性阻抗反演在阿姆河右岸碳酸盐岩气藏储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6):56-65.
	ZHANG Tianze, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, et al. Application of ray-path elastic impedance inversion in carbonate gas reservoir prediction of the right bank of Amu Darya River[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6):56-65.
[31]	熊钰, 牛全锋, 孙泽威, 等. 采气速度对不同储集空间类型碳酸盐岩气藏水侵动态的影响:以四川盆地震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2025, 46(2):654-669.
	XIONG Yu, NIU Quanfeng, SUN Zewei, et al. Impact of gas production rate on water invasion dynamics in carbonate gas reservoirs with varying storage spaces on: A case study of the Sinian Dengying Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2025, 46(2):654-669.
[32]	熊钰, 刘斯琪, 余翔, 等. 四川盆地自流井区块自2井缝洞系统结构与水侵途径和模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7):925-936.
	XIONG Yu, LIU Siqi, YU Xiang, et al. Research on the fractured-vuggy system structure and pathways and patterns of water intrusion from Well Z2[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(7):925-936.
[33]	张婷, 王强, 刘斌. 阿姆河右岸中下侏罗统沉积相及平面展布[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(6):27-38.
	ZHANG Ting, WANG Qiang, LIU Bin. Sedimentary facies and its lateral distribution of the Middle-Lower Jurassic in Amu Darya right bank area[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(6):27-38.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

TRENDMD:

砂体编号	延伸方向	长度/km	宽度/km	有效储层厚度/m	已钻井数/口
1号砂体	北东东	5.0	1.0~2.4	3.0~14.0	0
2号砂体	北东东	6.1	1.3~2.6	5.0~16.0	6
3号砂体	北东	5.3	0.7~2.0	5.0~15.0	2
4+5号砂体	北东	5.4	1.5~2.4	5.0~15.0	9
6 + 7 + 8号砂体	北东	5.4	1.8	6.0~16.0	8
9号砂体	北东	5.1	0.7~2.6	5.0~15.0	4
10号砂体	北东	2.7	0.9~3.0	4.0~14.0	4
11号砂体（小砂体集合）	北东	2.1	2.5	4.0~12.0	2

序号	层位	井数/ 口	孔隙度/%		渗透率/mD
序号	层位	井数/ 口	取值范围	均值	取值范围	均值
1	XVac	71	5.00~12.83	7.57	0.153~13.716	2.021
2	XVp	72	5.00~15.39	10.07	0.285~40.449	5.664
3	XVm	62	5.00~20.02	10.99	0.314~148.195	14.177

评价维度	评价指标	阿普特阶气藏	卡洛夫—牛津阶气藏	中下侏罗统气藏
埋藏深度	埋深/m	1 270~1 500	2 000~2 900	2 483~3 240
储量规模	储量/10⁸ m³	56.90	256.27（剩余）	2 126.00
储层条件	孔隙度/%	6.0~10.3	8.0~14.0	5.5~10.0
	渗透率/mD	6.0~17.9	0.5~10.0	0.2~0.5
	有效储层厚度/m	3.0~16.2	15.0~85.0	8.5~45.0
挖潜措施	储层改造需求	小型压裂	边部井需酸化	需体积压裂
	措施井数	老井补孔9口	复产井3口、补孔5口	—
	补充井数/口	5	5	8
经济效益	单井钻井成本/万元	800~1 200	1 500~2 000	2 500~3 000
	预测单井日产/10⁴ m³	35.50~44.02	12.18~26.95	5.14~7.52
	开发优先级	潜力挖潜	接替优先	勘探评价

准则层	权重	指标层	权重
储量风险	0.40	井控程度	0.50
		储量规模	0.30
		储量品质	0.20
产能风险	0.35	储层物性	0.40
		裂缝发育	0.25
		改造效果	0.35
压力风险	0.25	水体能量	0.50
压力风险	0.25	压力	0.50

Geological characteristics and exploration & development potential of Mesozoic composite lithologic gas reservoirs in Samandepe Gas Field, right bank of Amu Darya

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 33

Related Articles 12

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

层系	井控程度	储量规模	储量品质	储层物性	裂缝发育	改造效果	水体能量	压力	综合风险值	风险等级
浅层阿普特阶	60	70	65	70	80	60	20	30	56.9	中风险
中层卡洛夫— 牛津阶主体区	20	30	25	25	40	30	50	60	32.4	低风险
中层卡洛夫— 牛津阶边部	75	40	50	60	70	50	30	30	52.5	中风险
深层中下侏罗统	85	20	60	75	60	80	70	70	65.3	高风险

[1]	ZHANG Tianze, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, ZHANG Wenqi, XIE Mingxian, LEI Ming, GUO Qiang, ZHANG Xuerui. Application of ray-path elastic impedance inversion in carbonate gas reservoir prediction of the right bank of Amu Darya River [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 56-65.
[2]	HE Wenyuan, CHEN Keyang. Prediction method for lithologic reservoirs in Doshan slope zone of South Turgai Basin，Kazakhstan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[3]	TANG Yuzhe, CHAI Hui, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, CHEN Pengyu, ZHANG Wenqi, JIANG Lingzhi, PAN Xingming. Characteristics and new prediction methods of Jurassic subsalt carbonate reservoirs in the eastern right bank of Amu Darya,Central Asia [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 147-158.
[4]	LIU Na, ZHOU Zhaohua, REN Dazhong, NAN Junxiang, LIU Dengke, DU Kun. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone gas reservoir: a case study of the eighth member of Xiashihezi Formation and the first member of Shanxi Formation in western Sulige Gas Field [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6): 14-25.
[5]	REN Dazhong, ZHOU Zhaohua, LIANG Ruixiang, ZHOU Ran, LIU Na, NAN Junxiang. Characteristics of clay minerals and its impacts on reservoir quality of tight sandstone gas reservoir: a case from Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4): 42-53.
[6]	YANG Tebo, WANG Jiping, WANG Yi, FU Bin, XUE Wen, HAO Qian. Reservoir modeling of tight sandstone gas reservoir based on geological knowledge database:a case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4): 138-145.
[7]	Wang Hao， Fei Huaiyi， Chen Xubin， Li Hongxi. Ramp facies limestone reservoir characteristics and controlling factorof Callovian-Oxflordian in Bieshikent Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(6): 23-29.
[8]	Yuan Lin,Wang Chaoming,Li Xiaoping,Hu Xinjia,Zeng Li. Deduction and application of productivity formula for horizontal well with producing water in tightsandstone gas reservoir [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3): 121-126.
[9]	WANG Qiang，FEI Huaiyi，LIU Henian，CHENG Xubin，WU Lei，WANG Xingzhi. Reservoir characteristics of Callovian-Oxfordian in Chashgui area, Amu Darya Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(2): 41-48.
[10]	ZHANG Wen， WANG Luchun， GUO Weiqi， ZHAO Xin. Study on fracturing potential of water driving oil wells in extra-high water cut stage [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(4): 115-120.
[11]	DONG Xia，ZHENG Rongcai，WU Lei，CHEN Renjin，YANG Rui，LI Fengjie. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of carbonate reservoirs in Samandepe Gas Field，Turkmenistan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(2): 54-61.
[12]	CAI Hanpeng，HE Zhenhua，HUANG Deji. Application of frequency information to the prediction of hydrocarbon potential in carbonate reef flat reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(4): 113-117.