Application of dual laterolog interpretation of fracture parameters in Ar an Field, Iran

CAI Jia1; JIANG Hu1; ZHAO Zhong-xin2; CHEN Shao-ping3; LUO Jia-qun4

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2008.03.018

Lithologic Reservoirs >

2008 , Vol. 20 >Issue 3: 89 - 94

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2008.03.018

Application of dual laterolog interpretation of fracture parameters in Ar an Field, Iran

CAI Jia1 ,
JIANG Hu1 ,
ZHAO Zhong-xin2 ,
CHEN Shao-ping3 ,
LUO Jia-qun4

Expand

1. College of Energy Resources, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest (NWGI) , PetroChina, Lanzhou 730020, China

Online published: 2008-09-15

Fold

Abstract

The Tertiary Qom Formation of the Aran Field, located in the Kashan Block of Central Iran Basin, is a set of fractured carbonate reservoir with lowmatrix porosity and permeability. For the study of fractured reservoir, the drill core and imaging logging data are the most straightforward and credible means to discern the development situation of natural fracture in the reservoir, but these are expensive. In the traditional logging methods, the Dual Lateral Logging (DLL) is of stronger competence of convergence, it is very useful to recognize the fractures in the resistive formation. On the basis of previous studies on the numerical model and inversion methodology of dual laterolog response, we establish an interpretation model of fractured reservoir parameters to estimate the fracture parameters of sub-member C4 of the Qom Formation in this block, and then compare the results with the core, imaging logging data and well testing data. The result indicates that this method can exactly evaluate the fractured reservoir in this area.

Key words： sedimentary systerm；sedimentary facies； Xia‘ ermen Oilfield；Biyang Sag

Cite this article

CAI Jia1 , JIANG Hu1 , ZHAO Zhong-xin2 , CHEN Shao-ping3 , LUO Jia-qun4 . Application of dual laterolog interpretation of fracture parameters in Ar an Field, Iran[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008 , 20(3) : 89 -94 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2008.03.018

References

[ 1] 雍世和, 张超谟.测井数据处理与综合解释[M] .东营: 石油大学出版社, 1996.
[ 2] 金燕.测井裂缝参数估算与储层裂缝评价方法研究[ J] .天然气工业, 2002, 22( 增刊) : 64- 67.
[ 3] 刘兴刚.测井裂缝参数估算方法研究[ J] .天然气工业, 2003,23( 4) : 31- 34.
[ 4] 张树东.复杂高电阻率碳酸盐岩储层深浅双侧向的解释探讨[ J] .测井技术, 2005, 29( 1) : 33- 36.
[ 5] 李国全.电阻率的泥质校正与应用[ J] .国外测井技术, 1990, 5( 2) : 114- 120.
[ 6] 史謌.用正演数值计算方法开展双侧向测井对裂缝的响应研究[ J] .地球物理学报, 2004, 47( 2) : 359- 363.
[ 7] 李善军, 肖承文, 汪涵明, 等.裂缝双侧向测井响应的数学模型及裂缝孔隙度的定量解释[ J] .地球物理学报, 1996, 39( 6) :845- 852.
[ 8] 李善军, 肖承文.碳酸盐岩地层中裂缝孔隙度的定量解释[ J] .测井技术, 1997, 21( 3) : 205- 214.
[ 9] 汪涵明, 张庚骥, 李善军, 等.单一倾斜裂缝的双侧向测井响应[ J] .石油大学学报, 1995, 19( 6) : 12- 24.
[ 10] 汪涵明, 张庚骥.倾斜地层的双侧向测井响应[ J] .测井技术,1994, 18( 6) : 408- 412.
[ 11] Sibbit AM, Faivre Q. The dual laterolog response in fractured rocks [C] ∥SPWLA 26th Annual Logging Symposium, Dallas, Texas,1985: 17- 20.
[ 12] Philippe AP, Roger NA. In situ measurements of electrical resistivity,formation anisotropy and tectonic context [C] ∥SPWLA 31st Annual Logging Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana, 1990: 24- 27.
[ 13] 罗贞耀.用侧向资料计算裂缝张开度的初步研究[ J] .地球物理测井, 1990, 14( 2) : 83- 92.
[ 14] 邓攀.火山岩储层构造裂缝的测井识别及解释[ J] .石油学报,2002, 23( 6) : 32- 36.
[ 15] Zeng Liaobo, Tian Chonglu. Quantitative prediction of structural fracture in low-permeability reservoir [ J] .China Oil & Gas, 1996,3( 3) : 135- 137.
[ 16] 柏松章.裂缝性潜山基岩油藏开发模式[M] .北京: 石油工业出版社, 1997: 40- 43.
[ 17] 赵树栋. 任丘碳酸盐岩油藏[M] .北京: 石油工业出版社, 1997:11- 14.
[ 18] 曾联波, 张建英, 张跃明.辽河盆地静北潜山油藏裂缝发育规律[ J] .中国海上油气, 1998, 12( 6) : 381- 385.
[ 19] 黄捍东, 魏修成, 叶连池.碳酸盐岩裂缝性储层研究的地质物理基础[ J] .石油地球物理勘探, 2001, 36( 5) : 591- 596.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References