Origin of super-low permeability sand bodies of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin

  • LI Wei ,
  • WEN Zhigang
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China

Online published: 2012-10-20

Abstract

The theory of sandy debris flowis partial negation and improvement of deep-water sediments concepts such as Bouma sequence and turbidite fan. Based on crop, core observation, sample analysis, combined with sand body characteristics, it is considered that the sandy debris flow is the dominant sediments of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huaqing area, which changes the traditional concept of that there is only small-scale turbidite in the center of the lake basin. The further study suggested that the sandy debris flow is mainly controlled by deep water sedimentation slope break belt. The thick-bedded super-lowpermeability sand bodies of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huaqing area is typical gentle slope sandy debris flowsediment.

Cite this article

LI Wei , WEN Zhigang . Origin of super-low permeability sand bodies of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012 , 24(5) : 61 -64 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2012.05.011

References

[1] Kuenen Ph H,Migliorini C I. Turbidity currents as a cause of graded bedding[J]. Journal of Geology,1950,58:91-127.
[2] Arnold H Bouma,Phillip Henrry Kuenen,Francis P shepard. Sedimentology of Some Flysch Deposits:a Graphic Approach to Facies Interpretation[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier publishing company,1962:88-123.
[3] Bouma A H. Recent and ancient turbidites and contourites[J]. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies,1972,22:205-221.
[4] NormarkWR. Growth pattems of deep sea fans[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1970,54:2170-2195.
[5] Walker R G. Deep-water sandstone facies and ancient submarine fans models for exploration for stratigraphic traps[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1978,62:932-966.
[6] Mutti E,Ricci,Lucchi F. Turbidites of the northem Apennines introduction to facies analysis[J]. Intemational Geology Review,1972,20:125-166.
[7] Walker R G. Turbidites and submarine fans[M]∥Walker R G,James N P. Facies models:Response to sea level chang. Newfoundland:Geological Associaton of Canada,1992:239-263.
[8] Curray J R,Moore D G. Growth of the Bengal deep-sea fan and denuation in the Hinalayas[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,1971,82:563-572.
[9] Shanmugam G. High-Density turbidity currents:are they sandy debris flow?[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1996,66:2-10.
[10] Shanmugam G. 50 years of the turbidite paradigm(1950-1990s):deep-water processes and facies models—A critical perspective[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2000,17:285-342.
[11] Shanmugam G. Ten turbidite myths[J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2002,58:311-341.
[12] 王德坪,刘守义.东营盆地渐新世早期前三角洲缓坡区的泥石流砂质碎屑沉积[J].沉积学报,1987,5(4):14-24.
[13] 邹才能,陶士振,袁选俊,等.连续型油气藏形成条件与分布特征[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):324-331.
[14] Elverhoi A,Issler D,Blasio F V De,et al. Emerging insights into the dynamics of submarine debris flows[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences ,2005,5:633-648.
[15] 邹才能,赵政璋,杨华,等.陆相湖盆深水砂质碎屑流成因机制与分布特征———以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J].沉积学报,2009,27(6): 1065-1073.
[16] 王德坪.湖相内成碎屑流的沉积及形成机理[J].地质学报,1991,65(4):299-316.
[17] 夏青松,田景春.鄂尔多斯盆地西南部上三叠统长6 油层组湖底扇特征[J].古地理学报,2007,9(1):33-43.
[18] 傅强,吕苗苗,刘永斗.鄂尔多斯盆地晚三叠世湖盆浊积岩发育特征及地质意义[J].沉积学报,2008, 26(2):186-192.
[19] 郑荣才,文华国,韩永林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6 油层组湖底滑塌浊积扇沉积特征及其研究意义[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2006,33( 6):566-575.
[20] 陈全红,李文厚,郭艳琴,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组浊积岩体系及油气勘探意义[J].地质学报,2006,80(5):656-663.
[21] 惠潇,张海峰,张东阳,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组湖盆中部长6厚层砂体成因分析[J].中国地质,2008,35( 3):482-488.
[22] 操应长,刘晖.湖盆三角洲沉积坡度带特征及其与滑塌浊积岩分布关系的初步探讨[J].地质论评,2007,53(4):454-459.
[23] 樊太亮,李卫东.层序地层应用于陆相油藏预测的成功实例[J].石油学报,1999,20(2):12-17.
[24] 张善文,王英民,李群.应用坡折带理论寻找隐蔽油气藏[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):5-7.
[25] 李相博,付金华,陈启林,等.砂质碎屑流概念及其在鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水沉积研究中的应用[J].地球科学进展,2011,26(3):286-294.
Outlines

/