Characteristics of gravity flow and controlling factors of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huachi area, Ordos Basin

  • ZHENG Hui ,
  • BAI Yubin ,
  • HAO Xiaorong ,
  • CAO Qing ,
  • LIU Peng
Expand
  • Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

Online published: 2014-02-05

Abstract

Based on core observation, this paper analyzed the petrology characteristics and primary sedimentary structure and other sedimentary facies symbols, and concluded that the gravity current sedimentation of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huachi area is mainly consist of sandy debris flow and turbidity current sedimentation. These two kinds of gravity current sedimentation stay quite different in their growing location. Sandy debris flow locates in upstream, while turbidity current sedimentation stays in downstairs. This difference leads to the zonation in reservoir characteristics between south and north. Sandy debris flow has lower compositional maturity and interstitial fillings but better reservoir physical properties and oiliness, while turbidity current sandstone reservoir performs by contraries. The types of interstitial fillings of reservoir sand body of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huachi area are mostly illite, calcareous cementitious and chlorite film. Sandy debris flow has higher contents of illite and calcareous cementitious, but turbidity sand body possesses higher contents of chlorite film. The main reservoir space of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huachi area is primary intergranular pores and intragranular dissolved pores. The surface porosity of sandy debris flood is apparently higher than that of turbidity sand body. The feldspar which consists more sandy debris flood provides more physical foundation of dissolution, thus the content of intragranular dissolved pores in sandy debris flow sand body is larger than that of turbidity sand body.

Cite this article

ZHENG Hui , BAI Yubin , HAO Xiaorong , CAO Qing , LIU Peng . Characteristics of gravity flow and controlling factors of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huachi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014 , 26(1) : 18 -24 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2014.01.003

References

[1] 郑荣才,李云,戴朝成,等.白云凹陷珠江组深水扇砂质碎屑流沉积学特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(6):1581-1589.
[2] 李云,郑荣才,高博禹,等.深水扇沉积研究现状和展望———以珠江口盆地白云凹陷珠江深水扇系统为例[J].地质论评,2010,56(4):549-560.
[3] 郑荣才,郑哲,高博禹,等.珠江口盆地白云凹陷珠江组海底扇深水重力流沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):1-8.
[4] Srivatsan L,Lake L W,Bonnecaze R T. Scaling analysis of deposition from turbidity currents[J]. Geo-Mar Lett,2004,24:63-74.
[5] 陈全红,李文厚,郭艳琴,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组浊积岩体系及油气勘探意义[J].地质学报,2006,80(5):656-663.
[6] 郑荣才,文华国,韩永林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6 油层组湖底滑塌浊积扇沉积特征及其研究意义[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2006,33( 6):566-575.
[7] 傅强,吕苗苗,刘永斗.鄂尔多斯盆地晚三叠世湖盆浊积岩发育特征及地质意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2):186-192.
[8] 李相博,付金华,陈启林,等.砂质碎屑流概念及其在鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水沉积研究中的应用[J].地球科学进展,2011,26(3)286-294.
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3 种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(3):16-21.
[10] 夏青松,田景春.鄂尔多斯盆地西南部上三叠统长6 油层组湖底扇特征[J].古地理学报,2007,9(1):33-43.
[11] 田景春,隆昊,苏楠,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹—华池地区长6-3厚层块状砂岩成因[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2010,37(4):359-365.
[12] 田景春,王文之,王峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华池—庆阳地区上三叠统延长组长6 油层组古地震变形构造及砂体叠置关系[J].古地理学报,2012,14(3):303-310.
[13] 邹才能,赵政璋,杨华,等.陆相湖盆深水砂质碎屑流成因机制与分布特征———以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J].沉积学报,2009,27(6): 1065-1073.
[14] 潘树新,郑荣才,卫平生,等.陆相湖盆块体搬运体的沉积特征、识别标志与形成机制[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):9-18.
[15] Dott R H. Dynamics of subaqueous gravity depositional processes[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1963,47(1):104-128.
[16] 高红灿,郑荣才,魏钦廉,等.碎屑流与浊流的流体性质及沉积特征研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2012,27(8):815-827.
[17] 文华国,郑荣才,陈洪德,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹—华池地区长6 砂岩储层特征[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):46-51.
[18] 郑荣才,耿威,周刚,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6 砂岩成岩作用与成岩相研究[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):1-8.
[19] 黄思静,黄可可,冯立文,等.成岩过程中长石、高岭石、伊利石之间的物质交换与次生孔隙的形成:来自鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界和川西凹陷三叠系须家河组的研究[J].地球化学,2009,38(5):498-506.
Outlines

/