油气地质

冀中坳陷碳酸盐岩潜山内幕盖层特征与评价

  • 曹继华 ,
  • 刘俊丰 ,
  • 李伟
展开
  • 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院杭州地质研究院; 2.中国石油勘探开发研究院;3.中国石油华北油田分公司勘探开发研究院
吴兴宁,1973 年生,男,高级工程师,在读博士研究生,从事海相碳酸盐岩沉积、储层方面的研究工作。地址:(310023)浙江省 杭州市西溪路920 号杭州地质研究院。E-mail:wuxn_hz@petrochina.com.cn

网络出版日期: 2011-06-20

基金资助

中国石油天然气股份公司“十一五”重大专项“海相碳酸盐岩有效储层形成条件、分布特征与有利目标区评价”(编号:2008E-0703)资助

Characteristics and evaluation of carbonate buried hill inner cap rock in Jizhong Depression

  • CAO Jihua ,
  • LIU Junfeng ,
  • LI Wei
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Hangzhou, PetroChina, Hangzhou 310023, China; 2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China; 3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Huabei Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Renqiu 062552, China

Online published: 2011-06-20

摘要

根据岩心及薄片观察、实验分析、录井及测井解释,认为杨庄组、洪水庄组和馒头组是冀中坳陷中上元古界—下古生界碳酸盐岩潜山内幕最主要的盖层。盖层岩性以泥质岩为主,其次为泥质白云岩、泥质灰岩及致密白云岩或灰岩,孔、渗性普遍较差。盖层在宏观上受岩性、泥质含量、分布规模等因素的影响,微观上受突破压力、物性、遮盖系数等的约束。依据上述因素,将冀中坳陷碳酸盐岩潜山内幕盖层划分为4 类。综合评价得出,杨庄组为Ⅲ类(中等)盖层、洪水庄组为Ⅱ类(较好)盖层、馒头组为Ⅰ类(好)盖层。

本文引用格式

曹继华 , 刘俊丰 , 李伟 . 冀中坳陷碳酸盐岩潜山内幕盖层特征与评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011 , 23(3) : 49 -54 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2011.03.010

Abstract

Based on the observation of core and thin section, experimental analysis and well logging interpretation, it is considered that Yangzhuang Formation, Hongshuizhuang Formation and Mantou Formation are the main carbonate buried hill inner cap rocks fromChangcheng systemto Ordovician in Jizhong Depression. The lithology of the cap rock is mainly argillaceous rock, followed by argillaceous dolomite, argillaceous limestone and dense dolomite or limestone. Both the porosity and permeability are low. The essential macroscopical controlling factors for the cap rock are lithology, shale content and distribution scale, while the microcosmic controlling factors are breaking pressure, porosity and permeability, envelop coefficient etc. Based on the above factors, the carbonate buried hill inner cap rock in Jizhong Depression is divided into four types. Yangzhuang Formation is evaluated as type Ⅲ (middling cap rock), Hongshuizhuang Formation is evaluated as typeⅡ (better cap rock), andMantou Formation is evaluated as typeⅠ(best cap rock).

参考文献

[1] 金凤鸣,张锐锋,杨彩虹,等.冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷大王庄东断层下降盘岩性油藏勘探[J].中国石油勘探,2004,(3):58-62.
[2] 杨伟荣,钱铮,张欣,等.冀中地区文安斜坡带成藏特征研究[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(3):49-52.
[3] 袁选俊,靳久强,孟庆仁,等.冀中坳陷杨村斜坡结构成因及油气成藏模式[J].石油学报,2004,25(4):19-22.
[4] 赵贤正,金凤鸣,王余泉,等.冀中坳陷长洋淀地区“古储古堵”潜山成藏模式[J].石油学报,2008,29(4):489-493.
[5] 杜金虎,易士威,王权.华北油田隐蔽油藏勘探实践与认识[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(1):1-11.
[6] 赵贤正,卢学军,王权.华北油田地层-岩性油藏勘探发现与启示[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(5):597-604.
[7] 王权,金凤鸣,王索卿,等.饶阳凹陷岩性地层油藏控制因素与成藏模式[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(5):595-598.
[8] 郑荣才,胡诚,董霞.辽西凹陷古潜山内幕结构与成藏条件分析[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(4):10-18.
[9] 降栓奇,陈彦君,赵志刚,等.二连盆地潜山成藏条件及油藏类型[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(4):22-27.
[10] 窦立荣,张志伟,程顶胜,等.苏丹Muglad 盆地区域盖层对油藏特征的控制作用[J].石油学报,2006,27(3):22-26.
[11] 金凤鸣,赵贤正,邹伟宏,等.二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(Ⅱ)———“四元成藏”机理[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(3):23-27.
[12] 王曦莎,易小燕,陈青,等.缝洞型碳酸盐岩井间连通性研究———以S48 井区缝洞单元为例[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):126-133.
[13] 方杰.天然气藏的封存条件研究———以冀中坳陷北部地区为例[J].天然气地球科学,2004,15(6):572-579.
[14] 付广,刘博,吕延防.泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(1):21-26.
[15] 吕延防,张绍臣,王亚明,等.盖层封闭能力与盖层厚度的定量关系[J].石油学报,2000,21(2):27-30.
[16] 武卫锋,石巍,杨荣军,等.泥岩盖层封闭游离相天然气的演化特征及其意义[J].大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(6):101-104.
[17] 杨殿军.超压对泥岩盖层封闭各种相态天然气的作用研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(2):12-15.
文章导航

/