Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 129-137.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200612

• EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Conventional logging evaluation method for carbonate fractured reservoir

REN Jie   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Zhengzhou 450000, China
  • Received:2019-12-23 Revised:2020-03-15 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-10-30

Abstract: The reservoir of KT-Ⅱmember of Carboniferous in K oilfield of Kazakhstan is a limestone reservoir with medium low porosity and ultra-low permeability in open platform facies. Fractures are very important to improve the seepage capacity of the reservoir. The methods of using conventional logging data to evaluate fractures in carbonate reservoir studied by predecessors is of poor certainty and easy to be influenced by many factors such as fracture occurrence,saturation and mud invasion depth. Based on the limited coring and electrical imaging logging data of the target interval in the study area,combined with the study of logging response characteristics of pore reservoir and fracture-pore reservoir,a method was proposed to determine the resistivity of base block rock and acoustic time difference of base block by using compensated neutron logging. By comparing the difference characteristics of these two parameters with deep lateral resistivity and acoustic time difference respectively,fracture development sections with different occurrence in reservoirs were comprehensively identified,then the logging interpretation models of fracture porosity,secondary porosity,fracture permeability,total permeability were established,realizing and the fracture identification and parameter quantitative evaluation of carbonate reservoir by using conventional logging data. The comprehensive evaluation results of logging applied by this method can better match the coring physical property analysis and production performance,which provides a basis for reasonable and efficient development of this kind of reservoir.

Key words: fracture-pore reservoir, rock resistivity of base block, acoustic time difference of base block, fracture identification, fracture porosity, fracture permeability

CLC Number: 

  • TE122
[1] 邓模, 瞿国英, 蔡忠贤. 常规测井方法识别碳酸盐岩储层裂缝.地质学刊, 2009, 33(1):75-78. DENG M, QU G Y, CAI Z X. Fracture identification for carbonate reservoir by conventional well logging. Journal of Geology, 2009, 33(1):75-78.
[2] 闫建平, 言语, 司马立强, 等.泥页岩储层裂缝特征及其与"五性" 之间的关系.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3):87-93. YAN J P, YAN Y, SIMA L Q, et al. Relationship between fracture characteristics and "five-property" of shale reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3):87-93.
[3] 李健伟, 王磊, 陈利雯, 等.碳酸盐岩储层裂缝识别技术研究. 工程地球物理学报, 2013, 10(6):885-890. LI J W, WANG L, CHEN L W, et al. Research of fracture identification technology on carbonate reservoir. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2013, 10(6):885-890.
[4] 孙加华, 肖洪伟, 幺忠文, 等.声电成像测井技术在储层裂缝识别中的应用.大庆石油地质与开发, 2006, 25(3):100-102. SUN J H, XIAO H W, YAO Z W, et al. Application of acoustoelectric image-forming logging technique in reservoir fracture identification. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2006, 25(3):100-102.
[5] 李善军, 肖承文, 汪涵明, 等.裂缝的双侧向测井响应的数学模型及裂缝孔隙度的定量解释.地球物理学报, 1996, 39(6):845-852. LI S J, XIAO C W, WANG H M, et al. Mathematical model of dual laterolog response of fractures and quantitative interpretation of fracture porosity. Journal of Geophysics, 1996, 39(6):845-852.
[6] 司马立强.碳酸盐岩缝-洞性储层测井综合评价方法及应用研究.南充:西南石油大学, 2005. SIMA L Q. Study on comprehensive evaluation method and application of well logging for fracture vuggy carbonate reservoir. Nanchong:Southwest Petroleum University, 2005.
[7] 王晓畅, 范宜仁, 张庚骥.基于双侧向测井资料的裂缝孔隙度计算及其标定.物探化探计算技术, 2008, 30(5):377-380. WANG X C, FAN Y R, ZHANG G J. Fracture porosity calculation and calibration based on dual laterolog data. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Calculation Technology, 2008, 30(5):377-380.
[8] 李毓. 储层裂缝的测井识别及其地质建模研究. 测井技术, 2009, 33(6):575-578. LI Y. Evaluating fractures by logging data and its modeling technology studies. Well Logging Technology, 2009, 33(6):575-578.
[9] 薛辉, 刘红岐, 李秋英, 等. M油田Mishrif层碳酸盐岩储层裂缝识别及裂缝发育程度评价.石油地质与工程, 2006, 30(1):80-83. XUE H, LIU H Q, LI Q Y, et al. Fracture identification and fracture development evaluation of carbonate reservoir in Mishrif Formation of M oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2006, 30(1):80-83.
[10] 周伟, 张翔.碳酸盐岩储层裂缝测井识别方法研究.国外测井技术, 2012(11):40-41. ZHOU W, ZHANG X. Study on fracture logging identification method of carbonate reservoir. World Well Logging Technology, 2012(11):40-41.
[11] 陈科贵, 刘思序, 王兆峰, 等. 基于曲线重构的缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层测井识别研究:以南图尔盖盆地Karabulak油田Pz层为例. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11):1154-1160. CHEN K G, LIU S X, WANG Z F, et al. A logging identification method for fractured vuggy carbonate reservoirs based on curve reconstruction:a case study from the Pz Formation in Karabulak oilfield in the south Turgai Basin. Advances in Earth Science, 2018, 33(11):1154-1160.
[12] 闫建平, 司马立强, 谭学群, 等.伊朗Zagros盆地西南部白垩系Sarvak组碳酸盐岩储层特征. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3):409-415. YAN J P, SIMA L Q, TAN X Q, et al. Carbonate reservoir characteristics of the Cretaceous Sarvak Formation in southwestern Zagros Basin, Iran. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(3):409-415.
[13] 郭振华, 李光辉, 吴蕾, 等.碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构评价方法:以土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸气田为例.石油学报, 2011, 32(3):459-465. GUO Z H, LI G H, WU L, et al. Pore texture evaluation of carbonate reservoirs in Gasfield A, Turkmenistan. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(3):459-465.
[14] 程芳, 宁维林, 蔡云, 等.利用常规测井资料识别某碳酸盐岩储层次生孔隙类型.国外测井技术, 2005, 20(2):8-13. CHENG F, NING W L, CAI Y, et al. Using conventional logging data to identify the type of secondary pores in a carbonate reservoir. World Well Logging Technology, 2005, 20(2):8-13.
[15] 申本科, 薛大伟, 赵君怡, 等.碳酸盐岩储层常规测井评价方法.地球物理学进展, 2004, 29(1):261-270. SHEN B K, XUE D W, ZHAO J Y, et al. The logging evaluating method on carbonates reservoirs. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(1):261-270.
[16] 陈长安.电成像测井资料处理及碳酸盐岩裂缝评价.武汉:长江大学, 2016. CHEN C A. Data processing of electrical imaging logging and fracture evaluation of carbonate rock. Wuhan:Yangtze University, 2016.
[17] 陈忠, 黄惠.求解非线性最小二乘问题的迭代法.武汉大学学报(理学版), 2003, 49(1):14-16. CHEN Z, HUANG H. Iterative method for solving nonlinear least-squares problems. Journal of Wuhan University(Natural Science Edition), 2003, 49(1):14-16.
[18] 雍世和, 张超谟.测井数据处理与综合解释.北京:石油工业出版社, 2006:67-74. YONG S H, ZHANG C M. Well logging data processing and comprehensive interpretation. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2006:67-74.
[19] 邓少贵, 卢春利.裂缝-孔隙双孔介质的双侧向测井解释方法初探.测井技术, 2010, 34(6):537-541. DENG S G,LU C L. Investigation on interpreting dual laterolog responses in fractured-porous media. Well Logging Technology, 2010, 34(6):537-541.
[20] 邓少贵, 李国欣, 范宜仁, 等.低孔低渗储层岩石的双孔介质导电模型研究. 重庆:中国石油学会第十五届测井年会, 2007:205-211. DENG S G, LI G X, FAN Y R, et al. A study on the conductivity model of dual porosity media in low porosity and low permeability reservoir rocks. Proceedings of the 15 th Annual Well Logging Conference of the Chinese Petroleum Society, 2007:205-211.
[21] 测井学编写组. 测井学. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2004:279-282. Well Logging Compilation Group. Well logging. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2004:279-282.
[22] 焦翠华, 王绪松, 才巨宏, 等.双孔隙结构对声波时差的影响及孔隙度的确定方法.测井技术, 2003, 27(4):288-290. JIAO C H, WANG X S, CAI J H, et al. Double pores systems effect on acoustic transit time measurements and porosity quantification methods in carbonate formation. Well Logging Technology, 2003, 27(4):288-290.
[23] 卢颖忠, 黄智辉, 管志宁, 等.储层裂缝特征测井解释方法综述.地质科技情报, 1998, 17(1):85-89. LU Y Z, HUANG Z H, GUAN Z N, et al. Summary of logging interpretation methods for reservoir fracture characteristics. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1998, 17(1):85-89.
[24] 罗贞耀. 用侧向资料计算裂缝张开度的初步研究.地球物理测井, 1990(2):83-92. LUO Z Y. A preliminary study on the calculation of fracture opening using lateral data. Geophysical Logging, 1990(2):83-92.
[25] 中国石油勘探与生产分公司.低孔低渗油气藏测井评价技术及应用.北京:石油工业出版社, 2009:123-125. PetroChina Exploration and Production Company. Logging evaluation technology and application of low porosity and low permeability reservoir. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009:123-125.
[26] 陈翠雀, 罗菊兰, 韩焘, 等.低渗透率储层裂缝发育程度与储层产能关系研究.测井技术, 2009, 33(5):475-479. CHEN C Q, LUO J L, HAN T, et al. Study on relationship between low-permeability reservoir fracture growth and reservoir productivity. Well Logging Technology, 2009, 33(5):475-479.
[1] LI Luping, LIANG Jintong, LIU Sibing, GUO Yanbo, LI Kunyu, HE Yuan, JIN Jiuxiang. Diagenesis and pore evolution of dolomite reservoirs of Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in central Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 39-48.
[2] LI Juan, ZHENG Xi, SUN Songling, ZHANG Bin, CHEN Guangpo, HE Weiwei, HAN Qianfeng. Prediction of fracture-pore reservoirs in metamorphic clastic rocks using logging reservoir factors: A case study of basement in Beier Sag,Hailar Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6): 165-176.
[3] WANG Bei, LIU Xiangjun, SIMA Liqiang, XU Wei, LI Qian, LIANG Han. Multi-scale discrete fracture modeling technology for carbonate reservoir of Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi area and its application [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2): 124-133.
[4] WANG Qingru, LI Jinggong. Logging evaluation method of reserve parameters of carbonate gas reservoir [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(6): 98-102.
[5] WANG Hui, HU Guangyi. Realization and optimization of discrete fracture network model of buried hill fractured reservoir in C oilfield, Bohai Bay [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(1): 74-79.
[6] ZHANG Juan,ZHOU Wen,DENG Hucheng,WANG Xu,LV Jing. Fracture identification of reservoir of Yan’an and Yanchang Formation in Mahuangshan area [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 53-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YANG Zhanlong,ZHANG Zhenggang,CHEN Qilin,GUO Jingyi,SHA Xuemei,LIU Wensu. Using multi-parameters analysis of seismic information to evaluate lithologic traps in continental basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[2] FANG Chaohe, WANG Yifeng, ZHENG Dewen, GE Zhixin. Maceral and petrology of Lower Tertiary source rock in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[3] LIN Chengyan, TAN Lijuan, YU Cuiling. Research on the heterogeneous distribution of petroleum(Ⅰ)[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 16 -21 .
[4] WANG Tianqi, WANG Jiangong, LIANG Sujuan, SHA Xuemei. Fine oil exploration of Putaohua Formation in Xujiaweizi area, Songliao Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[5] WANG Xiwen,SHI Lanting,YONG Xueshan,YNAG Wuyang. Study on seismic impedance inversion[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 80 -88 .
[6] HE Zongbin,NI Jing,WU Dong,LI Yong,LIU Liqiong,TAI Huaizhong. Hydrocarbon saturation determined by dual-TE logging[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 89 -92 .
[7] YUAN Shengxue,WANG Jiang. Identification of the shallow gas reservoir in Shanle area,Tuha Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 111 -113 .
[8] CHEN Fei,WEI Dengfeng,YU Xiaolei,WU Shaobo. Sedimentary facies of Chang 2 oil-bearing member of Yanchang Formation in Yanchi-Dingbian area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 43 -47 .
[9] XU Yunxia,WANG Shanshan,YANG Shuai. Using Walsh transform to improve signal-to-noise ratio of seismic data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3): 98 -100 .
[10] LI Jianming,SHI Lingling,WANG Liqun,WU Guangda. Characteristics of basement reservoir in Kunbei fault terrace belt in southwestern Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(2): 20 -23 .
TRENDMD: