Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 135-148.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240613

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Characteristics and favorable zone distribution of tuff reservoirt of Cretaceous in A’nan sag,Erlian Basin

XIAO Boya   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development of Huabei Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China
  • Received:2024-02-27 Revised:2024-04-12 Online:2024-11-01 Published:2024-11-04

Abstract: The tuff reservoir in the lower part of the first member of Cretaceous system in A’nan sag has become one of the key fields for tight oil exploration in Erlian Basin in recent years. Based on core observation,thin section authentication,reservoir physical property analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis,using the experimental methods such as high pressure mercury injection,nitrogen adsorption,field emission scanning electron micros copy and CT scanning,the characteristics of lithology,physical property,reservoir space type and pore struc ture of tuff reservoir of Cretaceous system in A’nan sag in Erlin basin were analyzed. Favorable tight tuff reservoir zones were predicted according to favorable reservoir formation mechanism. The results show that:(1)The tuff tight reservoirs in the lower part of the first member of Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation of A’nan sag of Erlian Basi,are mainly composed of tuff,tuffite,tuffaceous mud and tuffaceous sandstone.(2)The range of physical properties of tuff reser-voirs in the study area is largely,with average porosity is 4.88%. Among them,the num ber of samples with ultra-low porosity and extra-low porosity accounted for 83.6%,with the average permeability is 0.067 mD. It is an ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir. The tuff reservoir space include dis solved pores and devitrified pores,and have stereoscopic network pore structures,the tuff is mainly composed of mesopores and macropores,the physical properties are the best. The main reservoir spaces of tuffaceous sand stone include dissolution pore and intergranular pores,have micro-thin pore-micro throat pore structures,and mainly develop mesopores,with good physical characteristics. Tuffite and tuffaceous mud mainly develop dis solved pores,intercrystal pores and microcracks,have isolated pore structures,the pore types are mainly meso pores,with poor physical properties.(3)Sedimentation,diagenesis and tectonism jointly control the formation of high-quality tuff reservoir in the study area,sedimentation provide the material basis for the formation of highquality reservoirs,which control reservoir formation and distribution,compaction and cementation reduces reser voir physical properties,dolo-mitization and devitrification improves reservoir performance,the dissolution is the key factor of effective reservoir forming,which has positive impact on improving the physical properties of reservoir.(4)The tuff reservoir can be classified into three types,class Ⅰ,class Ⅱ and class Ⅲ. the reservoir in class Ⅰ is mainly concentrated around trough area,the reservoir in class Ⅱ is distributed in the form of stripes along the western gentle slope zone,the distribution range of reservoir in class Ⅲ is the widest,the areas where develop the reservoir in class Ⅰsuch as the east blocks of A43 well,the north blocks of A27 well,the west blocks of H16 well and south west blocks of A11well are the next favorable targets for tuff tight oil exploration.

Key words: tuff, tight oil reservoir, ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir, dissolution, trough area, Tengger Formation, Cretaceous, A’nan sag, Erlian Basin

CLC Number: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 李庆,卢浩,吴胜和,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系长73亚段凝灰岩沉积成因及储层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(5):1141-1154. LI Qing,LU Hao,WU Shenghe,et al. Sedimentary origins and reservoir characteristics of the Triassic Chang 73 tuffs in the southern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(5):1141-1154.
[2] 马剑,黄志龙,钟大康,等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷二叠系条湖组凝灰岩致密储集层形成与分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2016, 43(5):714-722. MA Jian,HUANG Zhilong,ZHONG Dakang,et al. Formation and distribution of tuffaceous tight reservoirs in the Permian Tiaohu Formation in the Malang sag,Santanghu Basin,NW China [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(5):714- 722.
[3] 王建强,刘池洋,李行,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长7段凝灰岩形成时代、物质来源及其意义[J]. 沉积学报,2017,35(4):691-704. WANG Jianqiang,LIU Chiyang,LI Hang,et al. Geochronology, potential source and regional implications of tuff intervals in Chang- 7 member of Yanchang Formation,South of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2017,35(4):691-704.
[4] 钟蓉,孙善平,傅泽明.山东及邻区晚石炭世—早二叠世火山事件沉积及地层对比[J].地质学报,1996,70(2):142-152. ZHONG Rong,SUN Shanping,FU Zeming. Volcanic event deposits and stratigraphic correlation of the late Carboniferous-early Permianin Shandong and adjacent regions[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,1996,70(2):142-152.
[5] 刘书强,姚孟多,冯亚琴,等.马朗凹陷条湖组凝灰岩脱玻化孔影响因素与油气关系[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(1):16-19. LIU Shuqiang,YAO Mengduo,FENG Yaqin,et al. Influencing factor analysis of devitrification pore and its relationship with hydrocarbon in Tiaohu Formation of Malang Depression[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(1):16-19.
[6] 周健,单玄龙,迟唤昭,等.德惠断陷沙一段凝灰岩储层特征及测井识别[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(3):50-55. ZHOU Jian,SHAN Xuanlong,CHI Huanzhao,et al. Tuff reser voir properties and logging identification in the Sha1 member of Dehui fault Depression[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2018,25(3):50-55.
[7] 朱国华,张杰,姚根顺,等.沉火山尘凝灰岩:一种赋存油气资源的重要岩类:以新疆北部中二叠统芦草沟组为例[J].海相油气地质,2014,19(1):1-7. ZHU Guohua,ZHANG Jie,YAO Genshun,et al. Sedimentary volcanic dust tuff,an important kind of rock storing hydrocar bon resources:Discusion on the lithology of middle permian Lucaogou oil-bearing rocks in the North of Xinjiang[J]. Marine origin petroleum geology,2014,19(1):1-7.
[8] 焦立新,刘俊田,李留中,等.三塘湖盆地沉凝灰岩致密油藏测井评价技术与应用[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(2):83-91. JIAO Lixin,LIU Juntian,LI Liuzhong,et al. Logging evalution technology and application of tight tuff reservoir in Santanghu Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(2):83-91.
[9] 陈旋,司学强,刘书强,等.马朗凹陷沉凝灰岩致密储集层特征及主控因素[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(6):40-44. CHEN Xuan,SI Xueqiang,LIU Shuqiang,et al. Characteristics and main control factors of sedimentary tuff tight reservoirs in Malang Sag[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6):40-44.
[10] 蒋宜勤,柳益群,杨召,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷凝灰岩型致密油特征与成因[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):741-749. JIANG Yiqin,LIU Yiqun,YANG Zhao,et al. Characteristics and origin of tuff-type tight oil in Jimusar Depression,Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015, 42(6):741-749.
[11] 张晗,黄虎,侯明才.四川广元地区朝天剖面上二叠统吴家坪组凝灰岩成因及其地质意义[J].地球科学与环境学报,2020, 42(1):36-48. ZHANG Han,HUANG Hu,HOU Mingcai. Origin of tuffa from Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in Chaotian section if Guangyuan area,Sichuan,China and its geological significance[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2020,42(1):36-48.
[12] 徐雄飞,文川江,李玉平,等.马朗凹陷条湖组凝灰岩致密储层特征及形成条件分析[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(3):34-41. XU Xiongfei,WEN Chuanjiang,LI Yuping,et al. Characteris tics and formation condition of tight tuff reservoir of Tiaohu Formation in Malang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017, 29(3):34-41.
[13] 蓝宝锋,杨克兵,彭传利,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷致密油勘探潜力分析[J].复杂油气藏,2014,7(2):9-12. LAN Baofeng,YANG Kebing,PENG Chuanli,et al. Analysis of the exploration potential of tight oil in A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin [J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2014,7(2):9-12.
[14] 魏巍,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.阿南凹陷腾格尔组凝灰质混积岩岩相及储集空间特征[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(2):68-76. WEI Wei,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Shifa,et a1. Lithofacies and res ervoir space characteristics of the tuffaceous- siliciclastic mixed rocks of the Lower Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation in A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(2):68-76.
[15] 孙振孟,钱铮,陆现彩,等.内蒙古二连盆地阿南凹陷腾格尔组一段下部特殊岩性段储集性能[J].地质通报,2017,36(4): 644-653. SUN Zhenmeng,QIAN Zheng,LU Xiancai,et a1. Reservoir property of the special lithologic section in the lower Tengger Formation of A’nan depression,Er’lian Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,2017,36(4):644-653.
[16] 张以明,付小东,郭永军,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾一下段致密油有效储层物性下限研究[J].石油实验地质,2016, 38(4):551-558. ZHANG Yiming,FU Xiaodong,GUO Yongjun,et a1. Petro physical property limits of effective tight oil reservoirs in the lower part of the first member of Cretaceous Tengger Forma tion,A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin,North China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(4):551-558.
[17] 付小东,张天付,吴健平,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾格尔组致密油储层特征及主控因素[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(1):64-76. FU Xiaodong,ZHANG Tianfu,WU Jianping,et a1. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight oil reservoirs in Creta ceous Tengger Formation,A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Petro leum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(1):64-76.
[18] 魏巍,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷下白垩统腾格尔组湖相云质岩成因[J].地球科学,2017,42(2):258-272. WEI Wei,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Shifa,et al. Origin of lacustrine dolomitic rocks of the Lower Cretaceous Tengge’er Formation in A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Earth Science,2017,42(2): 258-272.
[19] 张文朝,雷怀玉,姜冬华,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷的演化与油气聚集规律[J].河南石油,1998,12(2):1-5. ZHANG Wenchao,LEI Huaiyu,JIANG Donghua,et al. Evolu tion of the A’nan Sag in the Erlian Basin and hydrocarbon ac cumulation[J]. Henan Petroleum,1998,12(2):1-5.
[20] 李秀英,肖阳,杨全凤,等.二连盆地阿南洼槽岩性油藏及致密油勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探,2013,18(6):56-61. LI Xiuying,XIAO Yang,YANG Quanfeng,et al. Lithologic reservoir and tight oil exploration potential in A’nan Subsag,Erlian Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2013,18(6):56-61.
[21] 魏巍,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.湖相富火山物质复杂储层的岩石学特征及成岩作用:以二连盆地阿南凹陷下白垩统腾一段为例[J].地学前缘,2018,25(2):147-158. WEI Wei,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Shifa,et al. Petrologic and dia genetic characteristics of the lacustrine volcanic-siliciclastic tight reservoir:An example form the first member of the Teng ger Formation in the Lower Cretaceous,A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin [J].Earth Science Frontiers,2018,25(2):147-158.
[22] 刘英辉,朱筱敏,朱茂,等.准噶尔盆地乌—夏地区二叠系风城组致密油储层特征[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(4):66-72. LIU Yinghui,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Mao,et al. Characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Wuxia area,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):66-72.
[23] 时保宏,李荣堃,田雯,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组长9 1段储层差异性特征及成因[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(4):1-10. SHI Baohong,LI Rongkun,TIAN Wen,et a1. Differences of characteristics and genetic of reservoirs in Chang 91 of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area,Ordons Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2019,43(4):1-10.
[24] 魏钦廉,王翀峘,刘军峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地樊家川地区长63储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):31-44. WEI Qinlian,WANG Chonghuan,LIU Junfeng,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Triassic Chang 63 reservoir in Fanjiachuan area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022, 34(2):31-44.
[25] 朱世发,徐黎明,朱筱敏,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长4+5致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(3):22-27. ZHU Shifa,XU Liming,ZHU Xiaomin,et al. Diagenetic char acteristics of tight sandstone of Chang4+5 reservoir in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(3):22-27.
[26] 薛晶晶,孙靖,朱筱敏,等.准噶尔盆地二叠系风城组白云岩储层特征及成因机理分析[J].现代地质,2012,26(4):755-761. XUE Jingjing,SUN Jing,ZHU Xiaomin,et a1. Characteristics and formation mechanism for dolomite reservoir of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Junggar Basin[J].Geoscience,2012, 26(4):755-761.
[27] 江文剑,侯明才,邢凤存,等.川东南地区娄山关群白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):44-51. JIANG Wenjian,HOU Mingcai,XING Fengcun,et al. Charac teristics and main controlling factors of dolomite reservoirs of Cambrian Loushanguan Group in the southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):44-51.
[28] 马剑,黄志龙,刘再振,等. 三塘湖盆地条湖组含沉积有机质凝灰岩致密储层特征[J].地学前缘,2015,22(6):185-196. MA Jian,HUANG Zhilong,LIU Zaizhen,et al. Tight reservoir characteristics of sedimentary organic matter-bearing tuff in Tiaohu Formation of Santanghu Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2015,22(6):185-196.
[29] 雷涵,黄文辉,孙启隆.等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部奥陶系马五段去白云石化成因及模式[J].现代地质,2021,35(2):378-387. LEI Han,HUANG Wenhui,SUN Qilong,et al. Dedolomitiza tion origin and model for the ordovician Majiagou Formation (5th member)in the Southern Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2021,35(2):378-387.
[30] 张振华,张小军,钟大康,等.柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(3):29-39. ZHANG Zhenhua,ZHANG Xiaojun,HONG Dakang,et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of upper mem ber of Paleogene Xiaganchaigou Formation in Nanyishan area, northwestern Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(3):29-39.
[1] QU Weihua, TIAN Ye, DONG Changchun, GUO Xiaobo, LI Lili, LIN Siya, XUE Song, YANG Shihe. Characteristics of Cretaceous source rocks and their controlling effect on hydrocarbon accumulation in Dehui Fault Depression,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[2] WANG Hongxing, HAN Shiwen, HU Jia, PAN Zhihao. Prediction and main controlling factors of tuff reservoirs of Cretaceous Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault depression,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 35-45.
[3] ZHOU Hongfeng, WU Haihong, YANG Yuxi, XIANG Hongying, GAO Jihong, HE Haowen, ZHAO Xu. Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta front of the fourth member of Cretaceous A’ershan Formation in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[4] TIAN Ya, LI Junhui, CHEN Fangju, LI Yue, LIU Huaye, ZOU Yue, ZHANG Xiaoyang. Tight reservoir characteristics and favorable areas prediction of Lower Cretaceous Nantun Formation in central fault depression zone of Hailar Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 136-146.
[5] YANG Weihua. Hydrocarbon accumulation model and main controlling factors of tight oil of the fourth member of Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Shuangcheng fault depression,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
[6] HE Wenyuan, ZHAO Ying, ZHONG Jianhua, SUN Ningliang. Characteristics and significance of micron pores and micron fractures in shale oil reservoirs of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[7] LONG Shengfang, HOU Yunchao, YANG Chao, GUO Yixuan, ZHANG Jie, ZENG Yali, GAO Nan, LI Shanghong. Sequence stratigraphy and evolution of Triassic Chang 7 to Chang 3 mebers in Qingcheng area,southwestern Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[8] SHI Buqing, DING Liangbo, MA Hongxia, SUN Hui, ZHANG Ying, XU Xiaoyong, WANG Hongping, FAN Guozhang. Characteristics of hydrocarbon accumulation in deep-water depositional system in offshore East Africa [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 10-17.
[9] MA Wenjie, WAGN Jingchun, TIAN Zuoji, MA Zhongzhen, WAN Xuepeng, LIN Jincheng, XU Xianglin, ZHOU Yubing. Accumulation model and favorable area prediction of structural-lithologic composite reservoirs in block W,the slope zone of Oriente Basin,South America [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[10] FAN Rui, LIU Hui, YANG Peiguang, SUN Xing, MA Hui, HAO Fei, ZHANG Shanshan. Identification of carbonate dissolution valleys filled with mudstones of Cretaceous in block A,Oman Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 72-81.
[11] LUO Beiwei, YIN Jiquan, HU Guangcheng, CHEN Hua, KANG Jingcheng, XIAO Meng, ZHU Qiuying, DUAN Haigang. Characteristics and controlling factors of high porosity and permeability limestone reservoirs of Cretaceous Cenomanian in the western United Arab Emirates [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[12] LIU Jiguo, ZHOU Hongpu, QIN Yanqun, ZOU Quan, ZHENG Fengyun, LI Zaohong, XIAO Gaojie. Exploration potential of lithologic reservoirs of Cretaceous AG Formation in Fula Sag,Muglad Basin,Africa [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[13] QI Yukai, GUO Jingxiang, LUO Liang, LUO Fusong, ZHOU Xuewen, YAO Wei, ZHANG Tan, LIN Huixi. Development model and exploration direction of subtle traps in the southern slope of Kuqa Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[14] DU Changpeng. Natural gas accumulation conditions and main controlling factors of Cretaceous tight volcanic rocks in Yingshan-Shuangcheng fault depression,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4): 115-124.
[15] XU Zhuang, SHI Wanzhong, WANG Ren, LUO Fusong, XIA Yongtao, QIN Shuo, ZHANG Xiao. Hydrocarbon accumulation law and model of Cretaceous clastic rocks in western Tabei uplift [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 31-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] PANG Xiongqi,CHEN Dongxia, ZHANG Jun. Concept and categorize of subtle reservoir and problems in its application[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] YANG Qiulian, LI Aiqin, SUN Yanni, CUI Panfeng. Classification method for extra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[3] ZHENG Rongcai,GENG Wei,ZHOU Gang,HAN Yonglin,WANG Haihong,WEN Huaguo. Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of Chang 6 sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Baibao area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 1 -8 .
[4] WANG Tianqi, WANG Jiangong, LIANG Sujuan, SHA Xuemei. Fine oil exploration of Putaohua Formation in Xujiaweizi area, Songliao Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[5] CHEN Yongbo,YONG Xueshan,LIU Huaqing. The research and application of lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs prediction in sedimentary system tract:An example from Mesozoic Yanchang Formation in northern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 62 -66 .
[6] HUANG Sijing,HUANG Peipei,WANG Qingdong,LIU Haonian,WU Meng,ZOU Mingliang. The significance of cementation in porosity preservation in deep-buried sandstones[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[7] YANG Hua,LIU Xianyang,ZHANG Caili,HAN Tianyou,HUI Xiao. The main controlling factors and distribution of low permeability lithologic reservoirs of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 1 -6 .
[8] SONG Ziqi, YI Junfeng, PANG Zhenyu,WANG Yan, LI Weifeng. 3D reservoir geologic modeling and potential tapping in glutenite reservoir :A case study from conglomerate reservoirs in Karamay Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 99 -105 .
[9] LIU Shugen, HUANGWenming, ZHANG Changjun, ZHAO Xiafei, DAI Sulan,ZHANG Zhijing, QIN Chuan. Resear ch status of dolomite genesis and its problems in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 6 -15 .
[10] QU Chunxia, YANG Qiulian, LIU Dengfei, LIU Xu, LI Aiqin, CUI Panfeng. Influencing factor s of low permeability r eservoir proper ty of Yanchang Formation in Changqing Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 43 -47 .
TRENDMD: