Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 97-103.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The status and analysis of SEC evaluation results for new-added proved reserves in Shengli Oilfield

TIAN Min   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-11-24 Revised:2016-01-26 Online:2017-01-21 Published:2017-01-21

PDF (PC)

567

Abstract: The SEC reserve evaluation results are important indicators to measure the development potential of oil companies. In order to decrease the difference between domestic new- added proved reserves and SEC reserves, and increase the proportion of new-added proved reserves to the total reserves,the status and difference between domestic reserves and SEC reserves in the past years in Shengli Oilfield were analyzed. It is considered that the SEC rules change,the low quality of reserves and unfavorable offset resulted the stepped down tendency of SEC results for domestic new-added proved reserves. The parameter differences were illustrated by using evaluation examples of past years,including static parameters(oil-bearing area,net pay and recovery factor)and dynamic parameters(initial rate,decline rate and drilling plan). Two countermeasures：management mode optimization for domestic reserves and normalization of evaluation data,were put forward to reduce the differences. This research has some reference significance for the reserves task completion of domestic oil companies and the integration of SEC reserves evaluation systems.

CLC Number: 

  • F416.22
[1] 刘桂玲,李红昌. 国内外油气储量管理模式对比. 油气地质与 采收率,2002,9(5):71-73. LIU G L,LI H C. Contrast between domestic and foreign management modes of oil-gas reserves. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2002,9(5):71-73.
[2] 张玲,魏萍,肖席珍. SEC 储量评估特点及影响因素. 石油与 天然气地质,2011,32(2):293-301. ZHANG L,WEI P,XIAO X Z. Characteristics and their influential factors of SEC reserve evaluation. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011,32(2):293-301.
[3] 胡允栋. 基于不确定性分析的油气储量分类与评估方法. 北 京:中国地质大学(北京),2007. HU Y D. The methods of oil- gas reserves classification and evaluation under uncertainty. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2007.
[4] 冯义娜. 经济可采储量评价研究. 岩性油气藏,2009,21(2): 106-109. FENG Y N. Evaluation research of economic recoverable reserves. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(2):106-109.
[5] 许进进,任玉林,凡哲元,等. 油价和成本对证实储量的影响. 石油与天然气地质,2012,33(4):646-649. XU J J,REN Y L,FAN Z Y,et al. Impacts of oil prices and operation costs on proved reserves. Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33 (4):646-649.
[6] 张付兴. SEC 剩余经济可采储量影响因素分析. 油气地质与 采收率,2013,20(3):95-98. ZHANG F X. Analysis on influencing factors of SEC reserves evaluation. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(3):95-98.
[7] 邓辞,陈同飞,刘志霞,等. 江苏油田SEC静态储量潜力研究. 石油实验地质,2012,34(5):527-530. DENG C,CHEN T F,LIU Z X,et al. Potential research of SEC static reserves about Jiangsu Oil Field. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2012,34(5):527-530.
[8] 邵明记,李洪成,李果年,等. SEC 证实储量静态评估方法应 用与实践.吐哈油气,2009,14(4):331-334. SHAO M J,LI H C,Li G N,et al. Application and practice of SEC proven reserves static evaluation method. Tuha Oil & Gas, 2009,14(4):331-334.
[9] 张玲,袁向春,林豪,等. 国内储量计算与上市储量评估对比 分析. 中国西部油气地质,2006,2(3):245-248. ZHANG L,YUAN X C,LIN H,et al. The comparison analysis of the domestic reserve calculation and reserve estimation on oversea market.West China Petroleum Geosciences,2006,2(3): 245-248.
[10] 李冰. SEC 标准确定容积法储量计算参数. 石油实验地质, 2014,36(3):381-384. LI B. Determination of parameters for volumetric method based on SEC rules. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2014,36(3): 381-384.
[11] 刘韵,张贵生,马丽梅. 中国与SEC储量评估差异分析——以 元坝长兴组元坝103H井区长二段气藏为例. 石油实验地质, 2012,34(5):514-517. LIU Y,ZHANG G S,MA L M. Reasons for differences of reserve estimation results between domestic and SEC rules:a case study of gas reservoir in 2 nd section of Changxing Formation, well Yuanba 103 H. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment, 2012,34(5):514-517.
[12] 赵文智,李建忠,王永祥,等. SEC 标准确定证实储量边界的 方法. 石油勘探与开发,2006,33(6):754-757. ZHAO W Z,LI J Z,WANG Y X,et al. Methods of determining proved reserves by SEC standard. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(6):754-757.
[13] 李红英,孙静. 基于SPE-PRMS准则下的3 P储量含油气边界 确定方法探讨.岩性油气藏,2013,25(4)6-10. LI H Y,SUN J. Determination method of oil- bearing area boundary of the 3 P reserves based on SPE- PRMS standard. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(4):6-10.
[14] 毕海滨,王永祥,胡允栋. 浅析SPE储量分类中三级储量的相 互关系. 新疆石油地质,2004,25(4):420-422. Bi Haibin,Wang Yongxiang,Hu Yundong. Analysis of correlation among Proved,Probable and Possible reserves in SPE reserves classification. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2004,25(4): 420-422.
[15] 赵文智,毕海滨. 浅析中国与西方在储量计算中确定有效厚 度之差异.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):125-129. ZHAO W Z,BI H B. Differences of net pay estimation between China and SEC petroleum exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(3):125-129.
[16] 王树华,许静华. 新增探明储量采收率预测方法评价与研究. 石油实验地质,2012,34(5):490-494. WANG S H,XU J H. Evaluation and study of recovery rate prediction method for newly-proved reserves. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2012,34(5):490-494.
[17] 庄丽,杜廷俊. SEC 油气储量评估结果解析. 西部探矿工程, 2014(12):47-48. ZHUANG L,DU T J. Analysis on SEC reserves evaluation results. West-China Exploration Engineering,2014(12):47-48.
[18] 赵庆辉,陈淑凤,陈超,等. 动态储量评估中关于储量价值、折 旧的影响因素探讨.特种油气藏,2011,18(2):132-134. ZHAO Q H,CHEN S F,CHEN C,et al. Discussion on influencing factors of reserves value and depreciation in dynamic reserves estimation. Special Oil and Gas Reservoir,2011,18(2): 132-134.
[19] 翟中喜,魏萍. SEC上市储量评估技术要点与对策研究. 石油 天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2011,33(5):156-160. ZHAI Z X,WEI P. Technical key points for sec reserves evaluation and Countermeasure study. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology( Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2011,33(5): 156-160.
[20] 张玲,魏萍. SEC储量替代率与国内储量替代率差异探讨. 当 代石油石化,2013(5):10-14. ZHANG L,WEI P. Probing into the difference between SEC reserve replacement ratio and domestic reserve replacement ratio. Petroleum ＆ Petrochemical Today,2013(5):10-14
[21] 钱明阳. 上市石油公司油气储量和产量披露研究. 国际石油 经济,2009,17(10):36-40 ． QIAN M Y. The research of oil and gas reserves and production reporting of listed oil companies. International Petroleum Economics, 2009,17(10):36-40 ．
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] LI Zaiguang,LI Lin. Automatic mapping based on well data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] CHENG Yuhong,GUO Yanru,ZHENG Ximing,FANG Naizhen,MA Yuhu. The interpretation method and application effect determined by multiple seismic and logging factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] LIU Juntian,JIN Zhenjia,LI Zaiguang,TAN Xinping,GUO Lin,WANG Bo,LIU Yuxiang. Controlling factors for lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs and petroleum prospecting target in Xiaocaohu area , Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] SHANG Changliang, FU Shouxian. Application of 3D seismic survey in loess tableland[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] WANG Changyong, ZHENG Rongcai, WANG Jianguo, CAO Shaofang, Xiao Mingguo. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of Badaowan Formation of Lower Jurassic in northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] WANG Ke1 LIU Xianyang, ZHAO Weiwei, SONG Jianghai, SHI Zhenfeng, XIANG Hui. Char acter istics and geological significance of seismites of Paleogene in Yangxin Subsag of J iyang Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] SUN Hongbin, ZHANG Fenglian. Structural-sedimentary evolution char acter istics of Paleogene in Liaohe Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] LI Chuanliang. Can uplift r esult in abnormal high pr essur e in formation?[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] WEI Qinlian，ZHENG Rongcai，XIAO Ling，MA Guofu，DOU Shijie，TIAN Baozhong. Study on horizontal heterogeneity in Serie Inferiere of Triassic in 438b block , Algeria[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .
TRENDMD:

Copyright © 2018 Lithologic Reservoirs

Support by Beijing Magtech support@magtech.com.cn