Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2011, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 87-95.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2011.05.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pre-stack reverse-time noise suppressing method based on Laplacian operator

CHEN Keyang   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, PetroChina, Daqing 163712, China
  • Online:2011-10-20 Published:2011-10-20

Abstract:

Low frequency noise is the main problem of the pre-stack reverse-time migration section. The figure noise removal mechanism based on Laplacian operator and the raising mechanism of the pre-stack reverse-time migration are analyzed. Laplacian operators are used to carry out the pre-stack reverse-time noise suppressing experiments in stacking image domain, common imaging domain and common shot domain respectively, and the results are compared with highpass filter method. The numerical simulation results show that the low-frequency reverse-time migration noise is mainly caused by the inaccuracy of migration velocity, and other reasons of low-frequency reverse-time migration noise are the inconsistency of wavelet form between numerical simulating wavelet and numerical records and the application of the correlation type reverse-time imaging condition. The noise suppressing effects based on the Laplacian operator in the above different domains are obvious, and the result in common shot domain is the best. The above methods in three domains are better than that of the conventional high-pass filter method, the formation detail characteristics of the processed section are clearer, and the horizontal cophasal axes of the common imaging gather are correctly depicted.

Key words: energy attenuation gradient, time-frequencyanalysis, Pseudo-Margenau-Hill distribution, reservoir prediction

[1] 陆基孟.地震勘探原理(上、下册)[M].北京:石油大学出版社,2004:40-300.
[2] 凌云.地震数据采集·处理·解释一体化实践与探索[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007:23-140.
[3] 渥·伊尔马滋.地震资料分析———地震资料处理、反演和解释(上、下册)[M].刘怀山,王克斌,童思友,等译.北京:石油工业出版社,2006:10-540.
[4] 陈可洋.地震波数值模拟中差分近似的各向异性分析[J].石油物探,2010,49(1):19-22.
[5] 陈可洋.标量声波波动方程高阶交错网格有限差分法[J].中国海上油气,2009,21(4):232-236.
[6] 陈可洋.起伏地表地震波正演数值模拟[J].高原地震,2010,22(2):39-44.
[7] 陈可洋.基于交错网格的弹性波波场分离数值模拟方法[J].中国石油勘探,2010,14(3):33-37.
[8] 陈可洋.边界吸收中镶边法的评价[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2010,27(2):170-175.
[9] 陈可洋.完全匹配层吸收边界条件研究[J].石油物探,2010,49(5):472-477.
[10] 杨微,陈可洋.加权吸收边界条件的优化设计[J].石油物探,2009,48(3):244-246.
[11] 陈可洋,杨微.优化的三维地震波双重吸收边界条件[J].勘探地球物理进展,2009,32(3):179-181.
[12] 陈可洋.基于高阶有限差分的波动方程叠前逆时偏移方法[J].石油物探,2009,48(5):475-478.
[13] 陈可洋,杨微,吴清岭,等.几种地震波叠后深度偏移方法的比较[J].勘探地球物理进展,2009,32(4):257-260.
[14] 陈可洋.地震波旅行时计算方法及其模型试验分析[J].石油物探,2010,49(2):153-157.
[15] 陈可洋.地震波逆时偏移方法研究综述[J].勘探地球物理进展,2010,33(3):153-159.
[16] 陈可洋.声波和弹性波叠后逆时深度偏移[J].天然气勘探与开发,2010,33(3):20-21.
[17] 杨仁虎,常旭,刘伊克.叠前逆时偏移影响因素分析[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(8):1 902-1 913.
[18] 孙文博,孙赞东.基于伪谱法的VSP 逆时偏移及其应用研究[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(9):2 196-2 203.
[19] 董春晖,王尚旭.变时间步长有限差分法逆时偏移[J].地球物理学进展,2010,25(4):1 298-1 305.
[20] 徐义.格子法在起伏地表叠前逆时深度偏移中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(3):839-845.
[21] 李信富,张美根.显式分形插值在有限元叠前逆时偏移成像中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(5):1 406-1 411.
[22] 丁仁伟,李振春,孙小东,等.叠前逆时深度偏移中的激发时间成像条件[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(6):1 859-1 865.
[23] 常旭,刘伊克,桂志先.反射地震零偏移距逆时偏移方法用于隧道超前预报[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(5):1 482-1 488.
[24] 王童奎,付兴深,朱德献,等.谱元法叠前逆时偏移研究[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(3):681-685.
[25] 杜启振,秦童.横向各向同性介质弹性波多分量叠前逆时偏移[J].地球物理学报,2009,52(3):801-807.
[26] 刘红伟,李博,刘洪,等.地震叠前逆时偏移高阶有限差分算法及GPU 实现[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(7):1 725-1 733.
[27] 刘红伟,刘洪,邹振,等.地震叠前逆时偏移中的去噪与存储[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(9):2 171-2 180.
[28] 陈可洋.宽频双程走时计算方法及其波场照明分析[J].勘探地球物理进展,2010,33(4):270-274.
[29] 陈可洋.各向异性弹性波动方程多分量联合叠后逆时偏移[J].内陆地震,2009,23(4):455-460.
[30] 陈可洋.时限时移相关法叠前逆时成像条件及其应用[J].石油物探,2011,50(1):22-26.
[31] 于常青,杨午阳,杨文采.关于油气地震勘探的基础研究问题[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):117-120.
[32] 肖盈,贺振华,黄德济.碳酸盐岩礁滩相储层地震波场数值模拟[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):99-101.
[1] ZHOU Ziqiang, ZHU Zhengping, PAN Renfang, DONG Yu, JIN Jineng. Simulation and prediction of tight sandstone reservoirs based on waveform facies-controlled inversion:A case study from the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in southern Cangdong sag, Huanghua Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[2] HE Wenyuan, CHEN Keyang. Prediction method for lithologic reservoirs in Doshan slope zone of South Turgai Basin,Kazakhstan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[3] LI Bisong, SU Jianlong, PU Yong, MIAO Zhiwei, ZHANG Wenjun, XIAO Wei, ZHANG Lei, JIANG Yu. Facies-controlled karst characterization and effective reservoir prediction of Permian Maokou Formation in Yuanba area,Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[4] ZHANG Changmin, ZHANG Xianghui, ZHU Rui, FENG Wenjie, YIN Taiju, YIN Yanshu, Adrian J. HARTLEY. Research progress and application prospect of distributive fluvial system [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 11-25.
[5] LI Shengjun, GAO Jianhu, ZHANG Fanchang, HE Dongyang, GUI Jinyong. A strong seismic energy reduction method under compressed sensing [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4): 70-78.
[6] ZHANG Wenting, LONG Liwen, XIAO Wenhua, WEI Haoyuan, LI Tiefeng, DONG Zhenyu. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir prediction of Xiagou Formation in Kulongshan structural belt,Qingxi Sag,Jiuquan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[7] SUN Xiping, ZHANG Xin, LI Xuan, HAN Yongke, WANG Chunming, WEI Jun, HU Ying, XU Guangcheng, ZHANG Ming, DAI Xiaofeng. Reservoir prediction for weathering and leaching zone of bedrock buried hill based on seismic pre-stack depth migration [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 220-228.
[8] CAO Sijia, SUN Zengjiu, DANG Huqiang, CAO Shuai, LIU Dongmin, HU Shaohua. Prediction technology of tight oil thin sand reservoir and its application effect: a case study of Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in Aonan block,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[9] WU Qingpeng, LYU Ximin, CHEN Juan, ZHOU Zaihua, YUAN Cheng. Sedimentary characteristics and exploration potentials of Lower Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Ying'er Sag,Jiuquan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[10] LUO Ze, XIE Mingying, TU Zhiyong, WEI Xihui, CHEN Yiming. A set of recognition techniques for thin reservoirs with unconsolidated high-argillaceous sandstone: a case study from X oilfield in Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6): 95-101.
[11] ZHOU Huajian. Prediction method of channel sand body based on prestack migration in OVT domain [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4): 112-120.
[12] SHI Zhanzhan, WANG Yuanjun, TANG Xiangrong, PANG Su, CHI Yuelong. Reservoir prediction based on seismic waveform classification in time-frequency domain [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4): 98-104.
[13] ZHANG Hui, GUAN Da, XIANG Xuemei, CHEN Yong. Prediction for fractured tight sandstone reservoir of Xu 4 member in eastern Yuanba area,northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1): 133-139.
[14] WU Aijun, XU Jianyong, TENG Binbin, XIAO Lingli, KANG Bo, LI Fanyi, YIN Binhao. Fine description method of dynamic provenance and its application:a case from Yanan Sag,Qiongdongnan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4): 55-63.
[15] Zhang Jingsi, Chuai Yuanyuan, Bian Li’en. Application of forward modeling to study of sand body connectivity in X well field of Bohai Oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3): 127-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WEI Qinlian, ZHENG Rongcai, XIAO Ling,WANG Chengyu, NIU Xiaobing. Influencing factors and characteristics of Chang 6 reservoir in Wuqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] WANG Dongqi, YIN Daiyin. Empirical formulas of relative permeability curve of water drive reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] LI Yun, SHI Zhiqiang. Study on fluid inclusion of tight sandstone reservoir of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] JIANG Ren, FAN Tailiang, XU Shouli. Concept and techniques of seismic geomorphology[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] ZOU Mingliang, HUANG Sijing, HU Zuowei, FENG Wenli, LIU Haoniannian. The origin of carbonate cements and the influence on reservoir quality of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] WANG Bingjie, HE Sheng, NI June, FANG Du. Activity analysis of main faults in Qianquan area, Banqiao Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] CHEN Zhenbiao, ZHANG Chaomo, ZHANG Zhansong, LING Husong, SUN Baodian. Using NMR T2 spectrum distribution to study fractal nature of pore structure[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] ZHANG Houfu, XU Zhaohui. Discussion on stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs exploration in the aspect of the research history of reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] ZHANG Xia. Cultivation of exploration creativity[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] YANG Wuyang, YANG Wencai, LIU Quanxin, WANG Xiwen. 3D frequency and space domain amplitude-preserved migration with viscoelastic wave equations[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .
TRENDMD: