岩性油气藏 ›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 95–100.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.04.013

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

自然伽马反演模型重构方法研究

石小茜1,2   

  1. (1.中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院,甘肃兰州730020;2. 俄罗斯国立古勃金石油天然气大学,莫斯科107207)
  • 出版日期:2016-07-20 发布日期:2016-07-20
  • 作者简介:石小茜(1990-),女,硕士,主要从事储层建模方面的研究工作。地址:(730020)甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535 号中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院。E-mail:lanzhou_slt@163.com。
  • 基金资助:

    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技项目“柴达木盆地天然气勘探领域评价与目标优选”(编号:2011E-0302)资助

Study on natural gamma-ray model reconstruction method

Shi Xiaoqian 1,2   

  1. (1. PetroChina Research Institute of Exploration and Development?Northwest,Lanzhou 730020,China;2. Russian State Gunkin Oil and Gas University,Moscow 109807,Russia)
  • Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-20

摘要:

油气储层往往分布于多个不同沉积时期的地层中。由于不同沉积时期的砂泥岩地层在埋藏深度、岩性及矿物含量等方面均不相同,导致相同或相近岩性的测井响应值存在差异。在有些地区因受沉积作用等因素的影响,相同岩性的自然伽马测井值随埋藏深度的增加呈增大或减小的趋势,若利用其计算储层的泥质含量或进行储层参数反演,均无法采用统一的标准(公式)来进行评价。为此,在分析自然伽马测井曲线在不同沉积时期的测井响应差异及其随地层埋藏深度和地层岩性变化特征的基础上,利用测井资料综合解释中泥质含量计算方法的逆运算,对自然伽马测井曲线进行了重构处理。结果表明,重构后的自然伽马曲线可不受不同地层沉积时期等因素的影响,对多个不同地质时期的目的层可以采用统一的标准来进行岩性解释。该重构方法可适用于不同类型砂泥岩地层的储层反演及泥质含量计算。

Abstract:

Oil and gas reservoirs are often distributed in several strata in different sedimentary periods. Due to the differences of buried depth, lithology and mineral content in sand shale formation during different sedimentary periods, the logging responses of the same lithology are different. Natural gamma?ray logging curve is affected by sedimentation in some regions, so its log value increases or decreases with buried depth change. If use the log value to calculate the shale content of reservoirs or carry out reservoir parameter inversion, it is unable to use a unified standard(formula)to evaluate the shale content of target zone. Based on the analyses of logging response differences of natural gamma-ray logging curve during different sedimentary periods, as well as its change characteristics with buried depth and formation lithology, the inverse operation of shale content calculation method in the comprehensive interpretation of log data was used to reconstruct natural gamma ?ray logging curve. The result shows that the reconstructed natural gamma -ray logging curve is not affected by factors such as strata of different sedimentary periods, and a unified standard can be used to carry out lithology interpretation for the target zone during different geological periods. This reconstruction method can be applied for reservoir inversion and shale content calculation for different types of sand shale formation.

 [1]   李庆忠.岩性油气藏地震勘探若干问题讨论(Ⅰ)[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(2):1-5.

Li Qingzhong. Discussion on seismic exploration of lithologic reser?voirs (Ⅰ) [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(2):1-5.

[2]   王西文,石兰亭,雍学善,等.地震波阻抗反演方法研究[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(3):80-88.

Wang Xiwen,Shi Lanting,Yong Xueshan,et al. Study on seismic impedance inversion[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(3):80-88.

[3]   王晓欢,张阳.地震反演与地质建模技术联合储层预测方法[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2013,35(5):67-70.

Wang Xiaohuan,Zhang Yang. A reservoir prediction method by com?bining seismic inversion technology with geological simulation[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2013,35(5):67-70.

[4]   王西文,雍学善,王宇超,等.面对重点勘探领域的地震技术研究和应用实效[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(3):83-90.

Wang Xiwen,Yong Xueshan,Wang Yuchao,et al. Study and app?lication of seismic technologies for key exploration field[J]. Litho?logic Reservoirs,2010,22(3):83-90.

[5]   何谦,熊高君.自然伽马反演在鲕滩储层预测中应用[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2014,11(31):101-102.

He Qian,Xiong Gaojun. Application of natural gamma inversion in the prediction for oolitie beach reserveoir[J]. Journal of Yangtze niversity(Natural Science Edition),2014,11(31):101-102.

[6]   李玉君,邓宏文,田文,等.波阻抗约束下的测井信息在储集层岩相随机建模中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(5):569-571.

Li Yujun,Deng Hongwen,Tian Wen,et al. Application of impe?dance constrained logging data in reservoir facies modeling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(5):569-571.

[7]   司马立强,罗兴,张凤生,等.基于曲线重构的高伽马地层泥质含量计算方法[J].测井技术,2013,35(5):244-248.

Sima Liqiang,Luo Xing,Zhang Fengsheng,et al. On the method of clay content calculation based on the curve reconstruction of the formation with high gamma value[J]. Well Logging Technology,2013,35(5):244-248.

  [8]   王向公,况晏,杨林,等.高自然伽马储层泥质体积分数计算方法研究——以吴起地区长6油层组为例[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2013,35(9):80-83.

Wang Xianggong,Kuang Yan,Yang Lin,et al. Method of shale vo?lume fractional calculation for reservoirs with high natural gamma rate—By taking Chang 6 reservoir in Wuqi area for example[J]. Jour?nal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Insti?tute),2013,35(9):80-83.

  [9]   陈强,马在田.测井界面参数井约束反演及其应用[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(8):1117-1120.

Chen Qiang,Ma Zaitian. Well constrained inversion based on “well logging interface parameter” and its application[J]. Journal of ongji University(Natural Science),2006,34(8):1117-1120.

[10]   王绍忠,周红科.测井曲线重构技术在埕岛油田东斜坡储层预测中的应用[J].勘探地球物理进展,2009,32(5):376-379.

Wang Shaozhong,Zhou Hongke. Application of logging curve re?building technology in reservoir prediction at east slope of Cheng?dao Oilfield[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2009,32(5):376-379.

[11]   高峰,司马立强,闫建平,等.川东北大安寨段致密储层测井识别岩性技术研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2013,35(4):92-95.

Gao Feng,Sima Liqiang,Yan Jianping,et al. Lithologic identi?fication technology for tight reservoir logging in Da’anzhai section in northeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2013,35(4):92-95.

[12]   吴国平,苏江玉,成实,等.基于自然伽马测井信号的维纳滤波法求取泥质含量[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2008, 33(4):572-576.

Wu Guoping,Su Jiangyu,Cheng Shi,et al. A method for obtaining shaliness using Wiener filtering based on logging data natural gam?ma ray[J]. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences,2008,33(4):572-576.

[13]   汤永梅,梁兴,周松源,等.薄层测井评价技术在白驹凹陷的应用[J].油气地球物理,2009,7(1):43-47.

Tang Yongmei,Liang Xing,Zhou Songyuan,et al. Application of logging evaluation technique for thin layer in Baiju Sag[J]. Petro?leum Geophysics,2009,7(1):43-47.

[14]   黄隆基.放射性测井原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985.

Huang Longji. Principle of radioactive logging[M]. Beijing:Petro?leum Industry Press,1985.

[15]   欧阳健.石油测井解释与储层描述[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:1-11.

Ouyang Jian. Petroleum logging interpretation and reservoir des?cription[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1994:1-11.

[16]   王志峰,张元福,梁雪莉,等.四川盆地五峰组一龙马溪组不同水动力成因页岩岩相特征[J].石油学报,2014,35(4):623-632.

Wang Zhifeng,Zhang Yuanfu,Liang Xueli,et al. Characteristics of shale lithofacies formed under different hydrocarbon conditions in the Wufeng?Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petro?lei Sinica,2014,35(4):623-632.

[17]   汪涌,操应长,郑文涛,等.陆相深水沉积层序和体系域边界识别方法初探——以东营凹陷牛38井为例[J].现代地质,2004, 18(2):180-185.

Wang Yong,Cao Yingchang,Zheng Wentao,et al. The primary study on how to divide squences and system tracts of the lacustrine deep water environmental strata—A case study of well Niu 38 in Dongying Depression[J]. Geoscience,2004,18(2):180-185.

[18]   余俊清,王小燕,李军,等.湖泊沉积有机碳同位素与环境变化的研究进展[J].湖泊科学,2001,13(1):72-78.

Yu Junqing,Wang Xiaoyan,Li Jun,et al. Paleoenvironmental nterpretations on organic carbon isotopic records from lake sedi?ments:A critique[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences,2001,13(1):72-78.

[19]   刘春莲,杨建林,Röhl H J,等.影响湖相沉积岩中有机碳分布的主要因素——以三水盆地为例[J].沉积学报,2001,19(1):113-l16.

Liu Chunlian,Yang Jianlin,Röhl H J,et al. Factors influencing organic carbon distribution in lacustrine sediments[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2001,19(1):113-l16.

[20]   李薇,刘洛夫,王艳茹,等.应用测井数据计算泥页岩厚度——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长73油层为例[J].中国石油勘探,2012(5):32-35.

Li Wei,Liu Luofu,Wang Yanru,et al. Application of logging data in calculating mud shale thickness[J]. China Petroleum Explora?tion,2012(5):32-35.

[21]   沈华.文安斜坡泥质含量计算方法研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2010,32(6):410-411.

Shen Hua. Computational method of shale content in Wen’an Slope[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2010,32(6):410-411.

[22]   吴国平,苏江玉,成实,等.基于自然伽马测井信号的维纳滤波法求取泥质含量[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2008, 33(4):572-576.

Wu Guoping,Su Jiangyu,Cheng Shi,et al.  A method for obtaining shaliness using wiener filtering based on logging data natural gamma ray[J]. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences,2008,33(4):572-576.

[23]   谢灏辰,于炳松,曾秋楠,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组页岩有机碳测井解释方法与应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(6):731-736.

Xie Haochen,Yu Bingsong,Zeng Qiunan,et al. TOC logging interpretation ethod and its application to Yanchang Formation shales,the Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(6):731-736.

[24] 张静,张虎权,李延丽,等.蜀南地区须家河组致密砂岩含气性综合预测[J].天然气工业,2009,29(1):45-47.

Zhang Jing,Zhang Huquan,Li Yanli,et al. Gas-bearing prediction n tight sandstone gas reservoirs of Xujiahe formation in south ichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(1):45-47.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .