Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1-11.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190501

• PETROLEUM GEOLOGY •     Next Articles

Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeastern Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin

GUO Yanqin1,2, HE Ziqiong1,2, GUO Bincheng3, HUI Lei1,2, CAI Zhicheng1,2, WANG Meixia1,2, LI Wenhou4, LI Baiqiang4   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China
  • Received:2019-07-16 Revised:2019-08-26 Online:2019-09-21 Published:2019-09-16

Abstract: Zhao 41 well area is the main gas producing area of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeast Sulige Gas Field. However,the single well production is low and the productivity varies greatly. The petrological characteristics,diagenesis,physical properties,pore structure and seepage characteristics of reservoir were studied and evaluated by using data of cast thin sections,scanning electron microscope,cathodoluminescence,highpressure mercury injection,petrophysical analysis,nuclear magnetic resonance,gas-water relative permeability experiment and gas test,and the relationship between reservoirs type and natural gas productivity was discussed. The results show that the reservoir rocks of He 8 member in the study area are mainly lithic quartz sandstone,followed by lithic sandstone and a small amount of quartz sandstone,and the fillings is basically cements which are mainly illite,chlorite,kaolinite,siliceous and ferron calcite. Diagenesis is mainly compaction-pressure solution,cementation and dissolution,which has generally entered the stage B of middle diagenesis. The pore types are mainly secondary pores such as debris dissolved pores and intercrystalline pores,followed by residual intergranular pores,and the pore structure mainly consists of coarse pore-middle throat and fine pore-small throat. The saturation of movable fluid varies greatly,which is closely related to physical properties and increases with the improvement of physical properties. Based on the characteristics of reservoir physical properties,pore structure,sedimentary facies zone and sand body distribution,the reservoir of He 8 member in the study area was divided into four types. The productivity of natural gas is obviously controlled by reservoir types,and with the decline of reservoir type,the productivity of natural gas gradually decreases.

Key words: tight sandstone, reservoir characteristics, diagenesis, pore, Shihezi Formation, Ordos Basin

CLC Number: 

  • TE122.2+3
[1] 曹锋,邹才能,付金华,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格大气区天然气近源运聚的证据剖析.岩石学报,2010,27(3):857-866. CAO F,ZOU C N,FU J H,et al. Evidence analysis of natural gas near-source migration-accumulation model in the Sulige large gas province,Ordos Basin,China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010,27(3):857-866.
[2] 李义军,王军杰,樊爱萍,等. 苏里格气田东区气井产能主控因素分析. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,29(2):14-19. LI Y J,WANG J J,FAN A P,et al. Analysis of main control factors on capacity of gas well in the east area of Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science),2010,29(2):14-19.
[3] YIN S,WANG Y,ZHAO J Z,et al. Energy distribution of weak deformed rock mass and its influence on gas well productivity. Interpretation,2019,7(2):423-435.
[4] 郭艳琴,蔡志成,余芳,等. 苏东南地区盒8段砂体叠置关系及其对气水分布的影响. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,33(4):1-7. GUO Y Q,CAI Z C,YU F,et al. Sandbody superimposition relation of 8th member of Shihezi Formation in southeastern Sulige and its influence on gas-water distribution. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2018,33(4):1-7.
[5] 孙诗,王峰,陈洪德,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘府谷剖面中二叠统盒8段沉积相特征. 地球科学与环境学报,2019,41(2):225-240. SUN S,WANG F,CHEN H D,et al. Sedimentary facies characteristics of He-8 member of Middle Permian in Fugu section,the northeastern margin of Ordos Basin,China. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2019,41(2):225-240.
[6] 肖红平,刘锐娥,张福东,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段沉积模式重建及其勘探意义. 石油勘探与开发,2019,46(2):268-280. XIAO H P,LIU R E,ZHANG F D,et al. Sedimentary model reconstruction and exploration significance of Permian He 8 member in Ordos Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(2):268-280.
[7] 惠威,贾昱昕,程凡,等. 苏里格气田东部盒8储层微观孔隙结构及可动流体饱和度影响因素.油气地质与采收率,2018, 25(5):10-16. HUI W,JIA Y X,CHENG F,et al. Impact of microscopic pore structure on moveable fluid saturation in He 8 reservoir of eastern Sulige Gas Field. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(5):10-16.
[8] 高洁,孙卫,段瑞芳. 苏里格气田苏东南地区盒8段储层孔隙结构研究. 西安科技大学学报,2017,37(2):194-199. GAO J,SUN W,DUAN R F. Reservoir pore structure in He 8 formation of the southeastern Sulige Gas Field. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2017,37(2):194-199.
[9] 刘晓鹏,刘新社,赵会涛,等. 一种计算致密砂岩油气藏有效孔喉下限的新方法:以苏里格气田盒8气藏为例. 新疆石油地质,2016,40(3):360-364. LIU X P,LIU X S,ZHAO H T,et al. A new method to calculate the lower limit of effective pore throat threshold of tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of He 8 gas reservoir in Sulige Gas Field. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,40(3):360-364.
[10] HUANG H X,CHEN L,SUN W,et al. Pore-throat structure and fractal characteristics of Shihezi Formation tight gas sandstone in the Ordos Basin,China. Fractals,2018,26(2):1-22.
[11] MA S W,REN D Z,ZHOU L F,et al. Impacts of diagenesis of tight sandstone gas reservoir on reservoir physical properties:a case study,Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin,China. Interpretation,2019,7(3):687-699.
[12] 张海涛,时卓,任战利,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田盒8气藏含水特征及气水分布主控因素分析.现代地质,2011,25(5):931-937. ZHANG H T,SHI Z,REN Z L,et al. Characteristics of water bearing-formation and gas-water distribution control factors in gas reservoir He 8 of Sulige Gas field,Ordos Basin. Geoscience,2011,25(5):931-937.
[13] 王波,陈义才,李小娟,等.苏里格气田盒8段气水分布及其控制因素. 天然气勘探与开发,2010,33(2):29-33. WANG B,CHEN Y C,LI X J,et al. Gas-water distribution and its control factors of He 8 member in Sulige Gas Field. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2010,33(2):29-33.
[14] 吴则鑫. 苏里格气田致密气井产能主控因素分析. 非常规油气,2018,5(5):62-67. WU Z X. Analysis of main control factors on capacity of tight gas well of Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2018,5(5):62-67.
[15] 侯明才,窦伟坦,陈洪德,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田北部盒8、山1段成岩作用及有利储层分布. 矿物岩石,2009,29(4):66-74. HOU M C,DOU W T,CHEN H D,et al. Study on diagenesis of the He 8 member and Shan 1 member in north of the Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin. Mineral Petrol,2009,29(4):66-74.
[16] 杜洋,欧阳诚,胡杨,等. 苏里格气田苏5区块储集层特征及有利勘探区域. 新疆石油地质,2013,34(6):636-639. DU Y,OUYANG C,HU Y,et al. The reservoir characteristics and the favorable prospecting target in Su 5 block in Sulige Gas Field. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2013,34(6):636-639.
[17] 费世祥,张保国,李洋,等. 苏里格东南召41井区盒8段沉积微相研究. 西安科技大学学报,2016,36(2):228-234. FEI S X,ZHANG B G,LI Y,et al. Sedimentary microfacies of He 8 Section in Zhao 41 area of southeast Sulige. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2016,36(2):228-234.
[18] 曹青,赵靖舟,柳益群. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界流体包裹体特征及其意义. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2013,43(5):749-756. CAO Q,ZHAO J Z,LIU Y Q. Characteristics and significance of fluid inclusions in Upper Paleozoic of southeast Ordos Basin. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2013, 43(5):749-756.
[19] 王振华,陈刚,李书恒,等. 核磁共振岩心实验分析在低孔渗储层评价中的应用. 石油实验地质,2014,36(6):773-779. WANG Z H,CHEN G,LI S H,et al. Application of NMR core experimental analysis in evaluation of low-porosity and lowpermeability sandstone reservoirs. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):773-779.
[20] 白松涛,程道解,万金彬,等. 砂岩岩石核磁共振谱定量表征. 石油学报,2016,37(3):382-391. BAI S T,CHENG D J,WAN J B,et al. Quantitative characterization of sandstone NMR T 2 spectrum. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016,37(3):382-391.
[21] 赵会涛,王怀厂,刘健,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部地区盒8段致密砂岩气低产原因分析.岩性油气藏,2014,26(5):75-79. ZHAO H T,WANG H C,LIU J,et al. Reasons of low yield of tight sandstone gas of He 8 member in eastern Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(5):75-79.
[22] 何自新. 鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003. HE Z X. Evolution and oil & gas of Ordos Basin. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.
[1] RAN Yixuan, WANG Jian, ZHANG Yi. Favorable exploration area and formation condition of bedrock reservoir in the of central paleo-uplift,northern Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[2] YAN Xueying, SANG Qin, JIANG Yuqiang, FANG Rui, ZHOU Yadong, LIU Xue, LI Shun, YUAN Yongliang. Main controlling factors for the high yield of tight oil in the Jurassic Da’anzhai Section in the western area of Gongshanmiao, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[3] Guan Yunwen, Su Siyu, Pu Renhai, Wang Qichao, Yan Sujie, Zhang Zhongpei, Chen Shuo, Liang Dongge. Palaeozoic gas reservoir-forming conditions and main controlling factors in Xunyi area,southern Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[4] WANG Zixin, LIU Guangdi, YUAN Guangjie, YANG Henglin, FU Li, WANG Yuan, CHEN Gang, ZHANG Heng. Characteristics and reservoir control of source rocks of Triassic Chang 7 member in Qingcheng area,Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[5] YIN Hu, QU Hongjun, SUN Xiaohan, YANG Bo, ZHANG Leigang, ZHU Rongxing. Characteristics of deep-water deposits and evolution law of Triassic Chang 7 reservoir in southeastern Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[6] KONG Lingfeng, XU Jiafang, LIU Ding. Pore structure characteristics and dehydration evolution of lignite reservoirs of Jurassic Xishanyao Formation in Santanghu Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[7] ZHANG Xiaoli, WANG Xiaojuan, ZHANG Hang, CHEN Qin, GUAN Xu, ZHAO Zhengwang, WANG Changyong, TAN Yaojie. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang area,northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[8] CHEN Kang, DAI Juncheng, WEI Wei, LIU Weifang, YAN Yuanyuan, XI Cheng, LYU Yan, YANG Guangguang. Lithofacies classification of tight sandstone based on Bayesian Facies-AVO attributes:A case study of the first member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[9] MOU Feisheng, YIN Xiangdong, HU Cong, ZHANG Haifeng, CHEN Shijia, DAI Linfeng, LU Yifan. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of tight oil of Triassic Chang 7 member in northern Shaanxi area,Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[10] BAO Hanyong, ZHAO Shuai, ZHANG Li, LIU Haotian. Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area,eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[11] SHEN Youyi, WANG Kaifeng, TANG Shuheng, ZHANG Songhang, XI Zhaodong, YANG Xiaodong. Geological modeling and“sweet spot”prediction of Permian coal measures shale reservoirs in Yushe-Wuxiang block,Qinshui Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[12] ZHU Biao, ZOU Niuniu, ZHANG Daquan, DU Wei, CHEN Yi. Characteristics of shale pore structure and its oil and gas geological significance of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Fenggang area,northern Guizhou [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 147-158.
[13] SHAO Wei, ZHOU Daorong, LI Jianqing, ZHANG Chengcheng, LIU Tao. Key factors and favorable exploration directions for oil and gas enrichment in back margin sag of thrust nappe in Lower Yangtze [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[14] DUAN Yifei, ZHAO Weiwei, YANG Tianxiang, LI Fukang, LI Hui, WANG Jianan, LIU Yuchen. Source-reservoir characteristics and accumulation rules of shale gas of Permian Shanxi Formation in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[15] HE Wenyuan, ZHAO Ying, ZHONG Jianhua, SUN Ningliang. Characteristics and significance of micron pores and micron fractures in shale oil reservoirs of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] LI Zaiguang,LI Lin. Automatic mapping based on well data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] CHENG Yuhong,GUO Yanru,ZHENG Ximing,FANG Naizhen,MA Yuhu. The interpretation method and application effect determined by multiple seismic and logging factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] LIU Juntian,JIN Zhenjia,LI Zaiguang,TAN Xinping,GUO Lin,WANG Bo,LIU Yuxiang. Controlling factors for lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs and petroleum prospecting target in Xiaocaohu area , Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] SHANG Changliang, FU Shouxian. Application of 3D seismic survey in loess tableland[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] WANG Changyong, ZHENG Rongcai, WANG Jianguo, CAO Shaofang, Xiao Mingguo. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of Badaowan Formation of Lower Jurassic in northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] WANG Ke1 LIU Xianyang, ZHAO Weiwei, SONG Jianghai, SHI Zhenfeng, XIANG Hui. Char acter istics and geological significance of seismites of Paleogene in Yangxin Subsag of J iyang Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] SUN Hongbin, ZHANG Fenglian. Structural-sedimentary evolution char acter istics of Paleogene in Liaohe Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] LI Chuanliang. Can uplift r esult in abnormal high pr essur e in formation?[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] WEI Qinlian,ZHENG Rongcai,XIAO Ling,MA Guofu,DOU Shijie,TIAN Baozhong. Study on horizontal heterogeneity in Serie Inferiere of Triassic in 438b block , Algeria[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .
TRENDMD: