Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 120-128.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200611

• EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Uncertainty analysis in AVO forward modeling for tight sandstone reservoirs

ZHANG Yan1, GAO Shichen2, MENG Wanying3, CHENG Yuhong4, JIANG Sisi3   

  1. 1. School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
    2. School of Science, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
    3. No.3 Gas Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710016, China;
    4. No.5 Gas Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710016, China
  • Received:2020-02-20 Revised:2020-04-20 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-10-30

Abstract: Traditional AVO forward modeling usually uses constant parameters to construct the petrophysics model,however,these parameters have uncertainties in the exploration process,resulting in great uncertainty for the process of forward modeling. The petrophysical model was firstly established based on the wireline logs and the tools of probability density function(PDF)and information entropy(IE)were used to characterize the uncertainty of petrophysical parameters. Then based on the typical reflection interfaces,the parameters of AVO forward modeling,including the ratio of compressional wave velocity,shear wave velocity and density between the media above and below of reflection interfaces,are analyzed to the influence of AVO forward modeling. Finally,the Markov Chain Monte Carlo(MCMC)simulation method was used to model the reflection characteristics and AVO attribute response of different lithological interfaces. The IE was then used to analyze the uncertainty in AVO analysis. The results show that the PDF and IE indicate that petrophysical parameters are different in different lithologies,but there is a certain overlap for each other,which results in uncertain and multi-solution for the identification of lithology using petrophysical parameters. The AVO response indicates that the changes of the petrophysical parameters of the upper and lower media and the differences of lithology of the lower media result in different responses of AVO reflection coefficient. The attribute of AVO intercept(P)and the AVO gradient(G) shift to the type Ⅲ,as the gas saturation increases. The study effectively evaluates the uncertainty in the AVO forward modeling through statistical methods,which can provide a priori understanding for reservoir prediction and is helpful for the risk assessment and decision-making optimization of reservoir prediction.

Key words: tight sandstone reservoirs, AVO forward modeling, petrophysical model, uncertainty, probability density function, information entropy, Markov Chain Monte Carlo

CLC Number: 

  • P631.4
[1] 杨华, 付金华.苏里格大型致密砂岩气藏形成条件及勘探技术.石油学报, 2012, 33(增刊1):27-36. YANG H, FU J H. Formation conditions and exploration technology of large-scale tight sandstone gas reservoir in Sulige. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(Suppl 1):27-36.
[2] 郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 等.苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5):1-11. GUO Y Q, HE Z Q, GUO B C, et al. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeastern Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5):1-11.
[3] 潘仁芳, 赵玉华, 史松群.苏里格庙气田盒8段砂岩AVO正演模型研究.天然气工业, 2002, 22(5):7-10. PAN R F, ZHAO Y H, SHI S Q. Study on the AVO forward modeling of sandstone He-8,Permian,Shuligemiao gas field. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(5):7-10.
[4] 王家华, 赵巍.基于统计岩石物理学的直接岩石物理反演.复杂油气藏, 2010, 3(4):6-8. WANG J H, ZHAO W. Direct rock physics inversion based on statistical rock physics. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2010, 3(4):6-8.
[5] MICHAEL R, STAN E D, LAURENS B. Uncertainty estimation for amplitude variation with offset(AVO)inversion. Geophysics, 2003, 68(5):1485-1496.
[6] RICHARD T H. Quantifying the uncertainty in an AVO interpretation. Geophysics, 2002, 67(1):117-125.
[7] 陈建江, 朱兴卉.AVO反演的不确定性分析. 地球物理学进展, 2009, 24(4):1461-1467. CHEN J J, ZHU X H. Uncertainty analysis for AVO inversion. Progress in Geophysics(in Chinese), 2009, 24(4):1461-1467.
[8] 何涛, 史謌, 邹长春, 等.砂岩储层AVO特征影响因素的不确定性研究.地球物理学报, 2011, 54(6):1584-1591. HE T, SHI G, ZOU C C, et al. The uncertainty analysis of the key factors that affect the AVO attributes in sandstone reservoir. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(6):1584-1591.
[9] FERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ J L. Model reduction and uncertainty analysis in inverse problems. The Leading Edge, 2015, 34(9):1006-1016.
[10] BOSCH M, BERTORELLI G, ALVAREZ G, et al. Reservoir uncertainty description via petrophysical inversion of seismic data. The Leading Edge, 2015, 34(9):1018-1026.
[11] BALL V, LUIS T, CHRISTIAN S, et al. Uncertainty in inverted elastic properties resulting from uncertainty in the low-frequency model. The Leading Edge, 2015, 34(9):1028-1035.
[12] GORAIN S, SHALIVAHAN, PRABHAKAR T. Uncertainty in attribute-based inversion for quantification of the estimation of stock-tank oil initially in place in Kalol reservoir, Cambay Basin, India. The Leading Edge, 2015, 34(9):1058-1063.
[13] 路大金.随机过程及其应用.北京:清华大学出版社, 1986:1-20. LU D J. Stochastic processes with applications. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 1986:1-20.
[14] M ETROPOLIS N, ULAM S. The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1949, 44(247):335-341.
[15] 盛骤, 谢式千, 潘承毅.概率论与数理统计.北京:高等教育出版社, 1979:300-333. SHENG Z, XIE S Q, PAN C Y. Probability and statistics. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 1979:300-333.
[16] 高世臣, 张丹.多参数概率融合法在叠前地震储层预测中的应用:以苏里格气田苏194区块为例. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(6):61-67. GAO S C, ZHANG D. Application of multi-parameter probability fusion method to pre-stack seismic reservoir prediction:a case study of Su194 block in Sulige Gas Field. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(6):61-67.
[17] 彭达, 肖富森, 冉崎, 等.基于KT模型流体替换的岩石物理参数反演方法.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5):82-90. PENG D, XIAO F S, RAN Q, et al. Inversion of rock physics parameters based on KT model fluid substitution. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5):82-90.
[18] 王秀姣, 黄家强, 姜仁, 等.AVO不同含气砂岩的AVO响应类型及其近似式误差分析. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):120-126. WANG X J, HUANG J Q, JIANG R, et al. AVO response of different types of gas-bearing sandstone and error analysis of approximate formulas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):120-126.
[19] WANG X C, PAN D Y. Application of AVO attribute inversion technology to gas hydrate identification in the Shenhu area, South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 80:23-31.
[20] 郭强, 张宏兵, 曹呈浩, 等.Zoeppritz方程叠前多参数反演及密度敏感性分析.石油地球物理勘探, 2017, 52(6):105-112. GUO Q, ZHANG H B, CAO C H, et al. Density-sensitivity analysis about prestack multi-parameter inversion based on the exact Zoeppritz equation. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 52(6):105-112.
[21] 周华建.基于叠前OVT域偏移的河道砂体预测方法.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4):112-120. ZHOU H J. Prediction method of channel sand body based on prestack migration in OVT domain. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4):112-120.
[22] 张艳, 张春雷, 高世臣.基于SOM和HSV染色技术的致密砂岩储层地震相分析.天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2):259-267. ZHANG Y, ZHANG C L, GAO S C. Seismic facies analysis of tight sandstone reservoir based on SOM and HSV color technique. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(2):259-267.
[23] SHUEY R T. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics, 1985, 50(4):609-614.
[24] HOSSEINI-SHOAR B, JAVAHERIAN A, KESHAVARZ-FARAJKHAH N, et al. Reflectivity template, a quantitative interceptgradient AVO analysis to study gas hydrate resources:a case study of Iranian deep sea sediments. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014, 51:184-196.
[1] ZHANG Peng, YANG Qiaoyun, FAN Yiren, ZHANG Yun, ZHANG Haitao. Gas-bearing property evaluation of tight sandstone reservoir based on Xu-White model [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6): 138-145.
[2] Zhong Guanghai, Xie Bing, Zhou Xiao. Well logging evaluation methods of shale gas reservoir: A case study from Shunan area, Sichuan Basin [J]. LITHOLOGIC RESERVOIRS, 2015, 27(4): 96-102.
[3] Dai Weiyan, Li Shaohua, Qiao Jiayi, Liu Shiyu. Progress of reservoir uncertainty modeling [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4): 127-133.
[4] RUAN Jifu,LI Xinling,TANG Qingsong. Application of facies—controlled modeling technology to gas reservoir of Jia 2 member in Moxi Gas Field [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(4): 83-88.
[5] XUE Yanxia, LIAO Xinwu, ZHAO Chunming, HUO Chunliang, ZHANG Rucai. Uncertainty analysis of fluvial reservoir in oilfield early development period based on stochastic modeling: A case study from A oilfield in Bohai Bay [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(1): 80-83.
[6] XU Liying, FANG Bingzhong, SUN Lixu, JIANG Dezhi, LI Dechun. Application of AVO technology to hydrocarbon detection in Tiejianglu area [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(5): 73-77.
[7] WANG Hui, ZHANG Yufen. Model-based multi-par ameter s non-linear inver sion method in pr estack domain [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 108-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YANG Zhanlong,ZHANG Zhenggang,CHEN Qilin,GUO Jingyi,SHA Xuemei,LIU Wensu. Using multi-parameters analysis of seismic information to evaluate lithologic traps in continental basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[2] FANG Chaohe, WANG Yifeng, ZHENG Dewen, GE Zhixin. Maceral and petrology of Lower Tertiary source rock in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[3] LIN Chengyan, TAN Lijuan, YU Cuiling. Research on the heterogeneous distribution of petroleum(Ⅰ)[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 16 -21 .
[4] WANG Tianqi, WANG Jiangong, LIANG Sujuan, SHA Xuemei. Fine oil exploration of Putaohua Formation in Xujiaweizi area, Songliao Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[5] WANG Xiwen,SHI Lanting,YONG Xueshan,YNAG Wuyang. Study on seismic impedance inversion[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 80 -88 .
[6] HE Zongbin,NI Jing,WU Dong,LI Yong,LIU Liqiong,TAI Huaizhong. Hydrocarbon saturation determined by dual-TE logging[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 89 -92 .
[7] YUAN Shengxue,WANG Jiang. Identification of the shallow gas reservoir in Shanle area,Tuha Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 111 -113 .
[8] CHEN Fei,WEI Dengfeng,YU Xiaolei,WU Shaobo. Sedimentary facies of Chang 2 oil-bearing member of Yanchang Formation in Yanchi-Dingbian area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 43 -47 .
[9] XU Yunxia,WANG Shanshan,YANG Shuai. Using Walsh transform to improve signal-to-noise ratio of seismic data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3): 98 -100 .
[10] LI Jianming,SHI Lingling,WANG Liqun,WU Guangda. Characteristics of basement reservoir in Kunbei fault terrace belt in southwestern Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(2): 20 -23 .
TRENDMD: