Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2010, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (Z1): 54-59.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2010.Z1.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Characteristics and controlling factors of Ordovician carbonate reservoir in Tuofutai area

ZHU He, MENG Wanbin, ZENG Haiyan, YANG Yongjian   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Online:2010-12-15 Published:2010-12-15

Abstract:

Based on well drilling and logging, as well as core observation, the reservoir rocks in the study area are mainly cryptite in open platform facies, followed by granular limestone. Combined with well logging interpretation and statistical data of fractures and cavity of core samples, it is concluded that the main reservoir space types are dissolved cavity and low angle dissolved fracture that is semi-filled and unfilled. The thick Upper Ordovician un-karstic strata made the Ordovician reservoir obstructed from the karst alteration. The paleokarst reservoir developed mainly below Caledonian parallel unconformity, and the reservoir quality is much poorer compared with the reservoirs in the main region of Tahe Oilfield where Upper Ordovician is absent. It is well developed when closer to the host of Tahe oilfield. The paleokarst reservoir developed at the top of the Ordovician Yijianfang Formation and the reservoir development decreased with the increase of burial depth. The reservoir development is controlled by sedimentary facies, Caledonian karstification, fault and fracture. It is concluded that Ordovician Yijianfang Formation may be the main reservoir space.

Key words: pre-stack inversion, reservoir prediction, Poisson ratio, Pinghu Oil and Gas Field

[1] 俞仁连.塔里木盆地塔河油田加里东期古岩溶特征及其意义[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(5):468-478.
[2] 叶德胜,王根长,林忠民,等.塔里木盆地北部寒武系—奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层特征及油气前景[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2000:88-102.
[3] 叶德胜,王恕一,张希明,等.新疆塔里木盆地北部储层沉积、成岩特征及储层评价[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1995:78-130.
[4] 胡九珍,冉启贵,刘树根,等.塔里木盆地东部地区寒武系—奥陶系沉积相分析[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(2):70-75.
[5] 祝贺,刘家铎,孟万斌,等.塔河油田托甫台地区中下奥陶统沉积相与储层特征分析[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2008,35(3):232-237.
[6] 闫相宾,韩振华,李永宏.塔河油田奥陶系油藏的储层特征和成因机理探讨[J].地质论评,2002,48(6):620-626.
[7] 张达景,吕海涛,张涛,等.塔河油田加里东期岩溶储层特征及分布预测[J].沉积学报,2007,25(2):408-411.
[8] 闫相宾,李铁军,张涛,等.塔中与塔河地区奥陶系岩溶储层形成条件的差异[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):202-207.
[9] 付兆辉,陈发景,高喜龙.渤海湾盆地胜海古2 潜山古生界储层特征[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(3):87-91.
[10] 王宏斌,张虎权,卫平生,等.碳酸盐岩地震储层学在塔中地区生物礁滩复合体油气勘探中的应用[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(2):18-23.
[11] 鲁新便,高博禹,陈姝媚.塔河油田下奥陶统碳酸盐岩古岩溶储层研究———以塔河油田 6 区为例[J].矿物岩石,2003,23(1):87-92.
[12] 康玉柱.塔里木盆地寒武—奥陶系古岩溶特征与油气分布[J].新疆石油地质,2005,26(5):472-480.
[13] 艾克拜尔·沙迪克,吕媛娥,吕海涛.塔河油田盐体覆盖区奥陶系储层发育特征及主控因素研究[J].新疆地质,2005,23(4):396-400.
[1] ZHOU Ziqiang, ZHU Zhengping, PAN Renfang, DONG Yu, JIN Jineng. Simulation and prediction of tight sandstone reservoirs based on waveform facies-controlled inversion:A case study from the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in southern Cangdong sag, Huanghua Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[2] HE Wenyuan, CHEN Keyang. Prediction method for lithologic reservoirs in Doshan slope zone of South Turgai Basin,Kazakhstan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[3] LI Bisong, SU Jianlong, PU Yong, MIAO Zhiwei, ZHANG Wenjun, XIAO Wei, ZHANG Lei, JIANG Yu. Facies-controlled karst characterization and effective reservoir prediction of Permian Maokou Formation in Yuanba area,Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[4] ZHANG Changmin, ZHANG Xianghui, ZHU Rui, FENG Wenjie, YIN Taiju, YIN Yanshu, Adrian J. HARTLEY. Research progress and application prospect of distributive fluvial system [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 11-25.
[5] LI Shengjun, GAO Jianhu, ZHANG Fanchang, HE Dongyang, GUI Jinyong. A strong seismic energy reduction method under compressed sensing [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4): 70-78.
[6] CHEN Yongbo, ZHANG Huquan, ZHANG Han, ZENG Huahui, WANG Bin, WANG Hongqiu, XU Duonian, MA Yongping, ZONG Zhaoyun. Dolomitic reservoir prediction technology based on OVT domain migration data and its application: A case study of Feng 3 member in Wuxia area,Mahu Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6): 145-155.
[7] ZHANG Wenting, LONG Liwen, XIAO Wenhua, WEI Haoyuan, LI Tiefeng, DONG Zhenyu. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir prediction of Xiagou Formation in Kulongshan structural belt,Qingxi Sag,Jiuquan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[8] SUN Xiping, ZHANG Xin, LI Xuan, HAN Yongke, WANG Chunming, WEI Jun, HU Ying, XU Guangcheng, ZHANG Ming, DAI Xiaofeng. Reservoir prediction for weathering and leaching zone of bedrock buried hill based on seismic pre-stack depth migration [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 220-228.
[9] CAO Sijia, SUN Zengjiu, DANG Huqiang, CAO Shuai, LIU Dongmin, HU Shaohua. Prediction technology of tight oil thin sand reservoir and its application effect: a case study of Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in Aonan block,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[10] WU Qingpeng, LYU Ximin, CHEN Juan, ZHOU Zaihua, YUAN Cheng. Sedimentary characteristics and exploration potentials of Lower Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Ying'er Sag,Jiuquan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[11] LUO Ze, XIE Mingying, TU Zhiyong, WEI Xihui, CHEN Yiming. A set of recognition techniques for thin reservoirs with unconsolidated high-argillaceous sandstone: a case study from X oilfield in Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6): 95-101.
[12] ZHOU Huajian. Prediction method of channel sand body based on prestack migration in OVT domain [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4): 112-120.
[13] SHI Zhanzhan, WANG Yuanjun, TANG Xiangrong, PANG Su, CHI Yuelong. Reservoir prediction based on seismic waveform classification in time-frequency domain [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4): 98-104.
[14] ZHANG Hui, GUAN Da, XIANG Xuemei, CHEN Yong. Prediction for fractured tight sandstone reservoir of Xu 4 member in eastern Yuanba area,northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1): 133-139.
[15] WU Aijun, XU Jianyong, TENG Binbin, XIAO Lingli, KANG Bo, LI Fanyi, YIN Binhao. Fine description method of dynamic provenance and its application:a case from Yanan Sag,Qiongdongnan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4): 55-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] LI Zaiguang,LI Lin. Automatic mapping based on well data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] CHENG Yuhong,GUO Yanru,ZHENG Ximing,FANG Naizhen,MA Yuhu. The interpretation method and application effect determined by multiple seismic and logging factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] LIU Juntian,JIN Zhenjia,LI Zaiguang,TAN Xinping,GUO Lin,WANG Bo,LIU Yuxiang. Controlling factors for lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs and petroleum prospecting target in Xiaocaohu area , Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] SHANG Changliang, FU Shouxian. Application of 3D seismic survey in loess tableland[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] WANG Changyong, ZHENG Rongcai, WANG Jianguo, CAO Shaofang, Xiao Mingguo. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of Badaowan Formation of Lower Jurassic in northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] WANG Ke1 LIU Xianyang, ZHAO Weiwei, SONG Jianghai, SHI Zhenfeng, XIANG Hui. Char acter istics and geological significance of seismites of Paleogene in Yangxin Subsag of J iyang Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] SUN Hongbin, ZHANG Fenglian. Structural-sedimentary evolution char acter istics of Paleogene in Liaohe Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] LI Chuanliang. Can uplift r esult in abnormal high pr essur e in formation?[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] WEI Qinlian,ZHENG Rongcai,XIAO Ling,MA Guofu,DOU Shijie,TIAN Baozhong. Study on horizontal heterogeneity in Serie Inferiere of Triassic in 438b block , Algeria[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .
TRENDMD: