Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 70-78.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230407

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A strong seismic energy reduction method under compressed sensing

LI Shengjun1, GAO Jianhu1, ZHANG Fanchang2, HE Dongyang1, GUI Jinyong1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    2. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
  • Received:2022-10-08 Revised:2022-12-04 Online:2023-07-01 Published:2023-07-01

PDF (PC)

244

Abstract: Based on the compressive sensing（CS）theory and the wavelet interference mechanism between strong and weak reflections，a dynamic dictionary strong reflection decomposition method by approximating arbitrary strong reflection waveforms and a strong reflection reduction method based on shielding function were proposed. The validity of the methods was verified using numerical models and physical models with large lateral variations of strongly reflected waveforms. The methods have been practically applied in the second member of Permian Maokou Formation in the central uplift tectonic zone of central Sichuan Basin. The results show that：（1）Compared with the conventional de-strong reflection method，the strong reflection reduction method based on shielding function has better lateral continuity of the seismic event，the strong reflection event is more thoroughly reduced， and the weak reflection of the blocky sand body shielded by the strong reflection is revealed. At the same time， the method has low dependence on the horizon and can process the strong reflection within the time window at one time without accurate strong reflection horizon data.（2）The strong reflection reduction method based on shielding function has a better elimination effect when the distance between the sand body and the strong reflection layer is less than λ（wavelength）and greater than λ/4. The strong reflection can be completely removed and the weak reflection is completely revealed. When the distance between the sand body and the strong reflection layer is less than λ/4，the elimination effect is poor. When the distance between the sand body and the strong reflection layer is less than λ/8，the elimination effect is worse.（3）This method is better applied in the second member of Permian Maokou Formation in the central uplift tectonic zone of central Sichuan Basin. The weak reflection of the reservoir is revealed when the distance between the reservoir and the strong reflection layer is less than λ/4. The reservoir response is enhanced when the distance between the reservoir and the strong reflection layer is greater than λ/4.

Key words: strong reflection reduction, seismic signal decomposition, compressed sensing, shielding function, dynamic dictionary, signal enhancement, reservoir prediction

CLC Number: 

  • TE319
[1] 符志国,李忠,赵尧,等.薄砂岩储层多波叠后地震反射特征分析及应用[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2017, 52(5):1016-1024. FU Zhiguo, LI Zhong, ZHAO Yao, et al. Post-stack multi-wave reflection characteristics of thin sand reservoirs[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 52(5):1016-1024.
[2] 张在金,张军华,李军,等.煤系地层地震强反射剥离方法研究及低频伴影分析[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2016, 51(2):376-383. ZHANG Zaijin, ZHANG Junhua, LI Jun, et al. A method for stripping coal seam strong reflection and low-frequency shadow analysis[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2016, 51(2):376-383.
[3] 刘化清,刘宗堡,吴孔友,等.岩性地层油气藏区带及圈闭评价技术研究新进展[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):25-36. LIU Huaqing, LIU Zongbao, WU Kongyou, et al. New progress in study of play and trap evaluation technology for lithostratigraphic reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):25-36.
[4] 谢占安,周锦明.提高隐蔽油气藏勘探能力的新思路[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2005, 40(5):609-615. XIE Zhan'an, ZHOU Jinming. New ideas improving capability of subtle oil/gas reservoir exploration[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2005, 40(5):609-615.
[5] 李胜军,高建虎,雍学善,等.小尺度体反射技术近似公式研究[J].岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(1):96-99. LI Shengjun, GAO Jianhu, YONG Xueshan, et al. Approximate formula of reflection coefficient for small-scale body[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(1):96-99.
[6] 李胜军,刘伟方,高建虎.正演模拟技术在碳酸盐岩溶洞响应特征研究中的应用[J].岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4):106-109. LI Shengjun, LIU Weifang, GAO Jianhu. Application of forward modeling to research of carbonate cave response[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(4):106-109.
[7] 汪恩华.相似地震背景分离提高分辨率处理方法与效果[C].北京:CPS/SEG国际地球物理会议, 2004:255-257. WANG Enhua. Resolution enhancement method based on similar seismic background separation technique[C]. Beijing:CPS/SEG International Geophysical Meeting, 2004:255-257.
[8] 赵铭海.地震相似背景分离技术在东营凹陷的应用[J].油气地质与采收率, 2004, 11(4):25-27. ZHAO Minghai. Application of separation technique in seismic similar background to Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004, 11(4):25-27.
[9] 张军华,刘振,刘炳杨,等.强屏蔽层下弱反射储层特征分析及识别方法[J].特种油气藏, 2012, 19(1):23-26. ZHANG Junhua, LIU Zhen, LIU Bingyang, et al. Analysis and identification of reservoirs characteristics of weak reflectors under strong shielding layer[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2012, 19(1):23-26.
[10] 金成志,秦月霜.利用长、短旋回波形分析法去除地震强屏蔽[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2017, 52(5):1042-1048. JIN Chengzhi, QIN Yueshuang. Seismic strong shield removal based on the long and short cycle analysis[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 52(5):1042-1048.
[11] 王宝江,张永常,王大兴,等.广义S变换用于含煤地层薄砂体预测研究[J].地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(3):1219-1226. WANG Baojiang, ZHANG Yongchang, WANG Daxing, et al. Predicting and detecting of the thin sand bodies by general transform in coal-bearing strata[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(3):1219-1226.
[12] 王大兴,王永刚,赵玉华,等.一种地震强反射振幅消除方法在鄂尔多斯盆地的试验[C].北京:SPG/SEG北京国际地球物理会议, 2016. WANG Daxing, WANG Yonggang, ZHAO Yuhua, et al. A seismic strong reflection amplitude suppressing method applied in the Ordos Basin[C]. Beijing:SPG/SEG Beijing International Geophysical Conference, 2016.
[13] 谢春临,黄伟,关晓巍,等.波形分解技术在强反射背景下薄砂层识别中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2017, 52(3):516-520. XIE Chunlin, HUANG Wei, GUAN Xiaowei, et al. Thin sand identification under strong reflection with volume-based waveform decomposition[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 52(3):516-520.
[14] WANG Yanghua. Seismic time-frequency spectral decomposition by matching pursuit[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(1):13-20.
[15] WANG Yanghua. Multichannel matching pursuit for seismic trace decomposition[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(4):61-66.
[16] 李海山,杨午阳,田军,等.匹配追踪煤层强反射分离方法[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2014, 49(5):866-870. LI Haishan, YANG Wuyang, TIAN Jun, et al. Coal seam strong reflection separation with matching pursuit[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014, 49(5):866-870.
[17] 许璐,吴笑荷,张明振,等.基于局部频率约束的动态匹配追踪强反射识别与分离方法[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2019, 54(3):587-593. XU Lu, WU Xiaohe, ZHANG Mingzhen, et al. Strong reflection identification and separation based on the local-frequencyconstrained dynamic matching pursuit[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2019, 54(3):587-593.
[18] 杨子鹏,宋维琪,刘军,等.多道联合约束的匹配追踪强反射轴压制方法[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2021, 56(1):77-85. YANG Zipeng, SONG Weiqi, LIU Jun, et al. A method of combining multi-channel signals to suppress the strong reflection through matching pursuit[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021, 56(1):77-85.
[19] 张生强,张志军,李尧,等.基于地震相位分解的自适应强反射分离方法[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2021, 56(6):1236-1243. ZHANG Shengqiang, ZHANG Zhijun, LI Yao, et al. Adaptive strong reflection separation method based on seismic phase decomposition[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021, 56(6):1236-1243.
[20] DONOHO D L. For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal l1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution[J]. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2006, 59:797-829.
[21] YUAN Sanyi, WANG Shangxu, MA Ming, et al. Sparse Bayesian learning-based time-variant deconvolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(11):6182-6194.
[22] DONOHO D L. Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(4):1289-1306.
[23] CANDES E J, WAKIN M B. An introduction to compressive sampling[J]. IEEE Signal Processing, 2008, 25(2):21-30.
[24] 张繁昌,兰南英,李传辉,等.地震匹配追踪技术与应用研究进展[J].石油物探, 2020, 59(4):491-504. ZHANG Fanchang, LAN Nanying, LI Chuanhui, et al. A review on seismic matching pursuit[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(4):491-504.
[25] ZHANG Fanchang, LAN Nanying. Seismic-gather wavelet-stretching correction based on multiwavelet decomposition algorithm[J]. Geophysics, 2020, 85(5):377-384.
[26] 张繁昌,刘汉卿,代荣获.基于Ricker子波的指数追踪地震信号分解算法[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2016, 45(1):128-132. ZHANG Fanchang, LIU Hanqing, DAI Ronghuo. Exponential pursuit algorithm based on Ricker wavelet for seismic signal decomposition[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2016, 45(1):128-132.
[27] LI Shengjun, WANG Tieyi, GAO Jianhu, et al. Lp norm inverse spectral decomposition and its multi-sparsity fusion interpretation[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2021, 18(4):569-578.
[28] 刘百红,李建华,郑四连.应用近似L0范数的稀疏脉冲反演[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2018, 53(5):961-968. LIU Baihong, LI Jianhua, ZHENG Silian. Seismic sparse spike inversion based on L 0 norm approximation[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2018, 53(5):961-968.
[29] 张军华.信号分析与处理[M].北京:中国石油大学出版社, 2020. ZHANG Junhua. Signal analysis and processing[M]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum Press, 2020.
[30] 李珊珊,姜鹏飞,刘磊,等.四川盆地高磨地区寒武系沧浪铺组碳酸盐岩颗粒滩地震响应特征及展布规律[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4):22-31. LI Shanshan, JIANG Pengfei, LIU Lei, et al. Seismic response characteristics and distribution law of carbonate shoals of Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4):22-31.
[1] ZHOU Ziqiang, ZHU Zhengping, PAN Renfang, DONG Yu, JIN Jineng. Simulation and prediction of tight sandstone reservoirs based on waveform facies-controlled inversion：A case study from the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in southern Cangdong sag， Huanghua Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[2] HE Wenyuan, CHEN Keyang. Prediction method for lithologic reservoirs in Doshan slope zone of South Turgai Basin，Kazakhstan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[3] LI Bisong, SU Jianlong, PU Yong, MIAO Zhiwei, ZHANG Wenjun, XIAO Wei, ZHANG Lei, JIANG Yu. Facies-controlled karst characterization and effective reservoir prediction of Permian Maokou Formation in Yuanba area，Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[4] ZHANG Changmin, ZHANG Xianghui, ZHU Rui, FENG Wenjie, YIN Taiju, YIN Yanshu, Adrian J. HARTLEY. Research progress and application prospect of distributive fluvial system [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 11-25.
[5] ZHANG Wenting, LONG Liwen, XIAO Wenhua, WEI Haoyuan, LI Tiefeng, DONG Zhenyu. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir prediction of Xiagou Formation in Kulongshan structural belt,Qingxi Sag,Jiuquan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[6] SUN Xiping, ZHANG Xin, LI Xuan, HAN Yongke, WANG Chunming, WEI Jun, HU Ying, XU Guangcheng, ZHANG Ming, DAI Xiaofeng. Reservoir prediction for weathering and leaching zone of bedrock buried hill based on seismic pre-stack depth migration [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 220-228.
[7] CAO Sijia, SUN Zengjiu, DANG Huqiang, CAO Shuai, LIU Dongmin, HU Shaohua. Prediction technology of tight oil thin sand reservoir and its application effect: a case study of Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in Aonan block,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[8] WU Qingpeng, LYU Ximin, CHEN Juan, ZHOU Zaihua, YUAN Cheng. Sedimentary characteristics and exploration potentials of Lower Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Ying'er Sag,Jiuquan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[9] LUO Ze, XIE Mingying, TU Zhiyong, WEI Xihui, CHEN Yiming. A set of recognition techniques for thin reservoirs with unconsolidated high-argillaceous sandstone: a case study from X oilfield in Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6): 95-101.
[10] ZHANG Yunyin, WEI Xinwei, TAN Mingyou, GAO Qiuju, ZHU Dingrong, LIN Shuxi. Removal of seismic strong shield interface based on compressed sensing technology and its application [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4): 85-91.
[11] ZHOU Huajian. Prediction method of channel sand body based on prestack migration in OVT domain [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4): 112-120.
[12] SHI Zhanzhan, WANG Yuanjun, TANG Xiangrong, PANG Su, CHI Yuelong. Reservoir prediction based on seismic waveform classification in time-frequency domain [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4): 98-104.
[13] ZHANG Hui, GUAN Da, XIANG Xuemei, CHEN Yong. Prediction for fractured tight sandstone reservoir of Xu 4 member in eastern Yuanba area,northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1): 133-139.
[14] WU Aijun, XU Jianyong, TENG Binbin, XIAO Lingli, KANG Bo, LI Fanyi, YIN Binhao. Fine description method of dynamic provenance and its application:a case from Yanan Sag,Qiongdongnan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4): 55-63.
[15] Zhang Jingsi， Chuai Yuanyuan， Bian Li’en. Application of forward modeling to study of sand body connectivity in X well field of Bohai Oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3): 127-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YANG Qiulian, LI Aiqin, SUN Yanni, CUI Panfeng. Classification method for extra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] ZHANG Jie, ZHAO Yuhua. Seismic sequence of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] YANG Zhanlong,ZHANG Zhenggang,CHEN Qilin,GUO Jingyi,SHA Xuemei,LIU Wensu. Using multi-parameters analysis of seismic information to evaluate lithologic traps in continental basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] ZHU Xiaoyan, LI Aiqin, DUAN Xiaochen, TIAN Suiliang, LIU Meirong. Fine stratigraphic classification and correlation of Chang 3 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Zhenbei Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] FANG Chaohe, WANG Yifeng, ZHENG Dewen, GE Zhixin. Maceral and petrology of Lower Tertiary source rock in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] HAN Chunyuan,ZHAO Xianzheng,JIN Fengming,WANG Quan,LI Xianping,WANG Suqing. “Multi-factor controlling, four-factor entrapping and key-factor enrichment”of stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs and exploration practice in Erlian Basin (Ⅳ)———Exploration practice[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] DAI Chaocheng, ZHENG Rongcai, WEN Huaguo, ZHANG Xiaobing. Sequence-based lithofacies and paleogeography mapping of Paleogene in Lvda area, Liaodongwan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] YIN Yanshu, ZHANG Shangfeng, YIN Taiju. High resolution sequence stratigraphy framework and the distribution of sandbodies in salt lake of Qianjiang Formation in Zhongshi Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] SHI Xuefeng, DU Haifeng. Study on the sedimentary facies of the member 3 and 4+5 of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] YAN Shibang, HUWangshui, LI Ruisheng, GUAN Jian, LI Tao, NIE Xiaohong. Structural features of contemporaneous thrust faults in Hongche fault belt of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .
TRENDMD:

Copyright © 2018 Lithologic Reservoirs

Support by Beijing Magtech support@magtech.com.cn