岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 122–128.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200213

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

储层非均质性对自生CO2调驱效果的影响

郑玉飞1, 李翔1, 徐景亮1, 郑伟杰2, 于萌1   

  1. 1. 中海油田服务股份有限公司, 天津 300459;
    2. 中国石油大学 (华东)石油工程学院, 山东 青岛 266555
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-22 修回日期:2019-10-08 出版日期:2020-03-21 发布日期:2020-01-19
  • 作者简介:郑玉飞(1964-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事海上油田调剖调驱技术的研究和推广工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区塘沽海洋高新技术开发区海川路1581号。Email:zhengfei19861014@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”子课题“渤海油田高效开发示范工程”（编号：2016ZX05058-003）与中海油科研项目“SZ36-1油田层内生成CO2调驱关键技术优化研究及应用”（编号：YSB15YF002）联合资助

Influence of vertical heterogeneity of reservoirs on in-situ CO2 profile control and flooding effects

ZHENG Yufei1, LI Xiang1, XU Jingliang1, ZHENG Weijie2, YU Meng1   

  1. 1. China Oilfield Services Limited, Tianjin 300459, China;
    2. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266555, Shandong, China
  • Received:2019-07-22 Revised:2019-10-08 Online:2020-03-21 Published:2020-01-19

PDF (PC)

332

摘要： 为了研究海上油田储层纵向非均质性对自生CO2调驱效果的影响规律，分别建立了12组层间非均质物理模型和3组层内非均质物理模型，利用驱油实验考察了自生CO2调驱对层内非均质性、层间非均质性和渗透率级差等因素的适应性。实验结果表明：在各层渗透率都相同的条件下，自生CO2调驱技术对层内非均质模型提高采收率的幅度可达27.40%～31.03%，而对层间非均质模型提高采收率的幅度仅为17.38%～22.05%，说明CO2调驱技术受层间非均质性的影响更大；对于中—低渗透层相同层间非均质模型，渗透率级差越大，自生CO2调驱提高采收率的效果越好；用渗透率均值来表征层间非均质性的影响，自生CO2调驱提高采收率的幅度随渗透率均值的增大呈现出先增大后减小的趋势。矿场试验结果表明，自生CO2调驱技术对海上油田具有良好的增油效果，应用前景广阔。

关键词: 自生CO2, 纵向非均质, 调驱, 渗透率均值, 海上油田

Abstract: In order to study the influence of vertical heterogeneity of offshore oil reservoirs on in-situ CO2 profile control and flooding effect,12 groups of inter-layer heterogeneity models and 3 groups of in-layer heterogeneity models were established respectively. The adaptability of in-situ CO2 profile control and flooding to in-layer heterogeneity,interlayer heterogeneity and permeability ratio was investigated by displacement experiments. The results show that under the condition of the same permeability of each layer,the recovery improvement range of insitu CO2 profile control and flooding on the in-layer heterogeneity models can reach 27.40%-31.03%,while that on the inter-layer heterogeneity models was only 17.38%-22.05%,indicating that the CO2 profile control and flooding technology was mainly affected by inter-layer heterogeneity. For inter-layer heterogeneity models with same medium and low permeability layer,the higher the permeability ratio,the better the enhanced oil recovery effect of in-situ CO2 profile control and flooding. Permeability mean value were used to characterize the effect of inter-layer heterogeneity. Enhanced oil recovery of in-situ CO2 profile control and flooding showed a trend of increasing and decreasing with the increase of permeability mean value. Field tests showed that in-situ CO2 profile control and flooding technology had good oil-increasing effect in offshore oilfields and had broad application prospects.

Key words: in-situ CO2, vertical heterogeneity, profile control and flooding, permeability mean value, offshore oilfield

中图分类号: 

  • TE357.46
[1] 梁爽, 刘义坤, 张玮, 等.纵向非均质性对海上稠油油田水驱油开发效果的影响研究. 数学的实践与认识, 2017, 47(1):128-134. LIANG S, LIU Y K, ZHANG W, et al. Influence of vertical heterogeneity on the water flooding development effect in offshore heavy oilfield. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2017, 47(1):128-134.
[2] 高尚, 张璐, 刘义刚, 等.渤海油田聚驱受效井液气交注复合深部解堵工艺.石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(3):375-381. GAO S, ZHANG L, LIU Y G, et al. In-depth combined blockage removing technology with liquid alternating gas injection for polymer flooding response wells in Bohai Oilfield. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2017, 39(3):375-381.
[3] 胡治华, 马奎前, 刘宗宾, 等.海上S油田注水开发后期储层物性变化规律及应用. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(15):164-168. HU Z H, MA K Q, LIU Z B, et al. Research and application of the properties variation regularity of water injection reservoirs in S offshore oilfield. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(15):164-168.
[4] 王婷婷, 卢祥国, 陈阳, 等.渤海油田大尺寸优势通道封堵剂性能评价.油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(6):103-107. WANG T T, LU X G, CHEN Y, et al. Performance evaluation of plugging agent for large-size preferential channels in Bohai Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017, 24(6):103-107.
[5] 周焱斌, 何逸凡, 章威, 等.海上注水开发油田单井经济极限含水率分析.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):130-134. ZHOU Y B, HE Y F, ZHANG W, et al. Economic limit water cut of single well in offshore waterflooding oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):130-134.
[6] 李廷礼, 刘彦成, 于登飞, 等.海上大型河流相稠油油田高含水期开发模式研究与实践. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3):141-146. LI T L, LIU Y C, YU D F, et al. Innovation and practice of development mode in high water-cut stage of large offshore fluvial heavy oilfield. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(3):141-146.
[7] 张保康, 徐国瑞, 铁磊磊, 等. "堵水+调剖" 工艺参数优化和油藏适应性评价:以渤海SZ36-1油田为例.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):155-161. ZHANG B K, XU G R, TIE L L, et al. Optimization of technological parameters and evaluation of reservoir adaptation by water plugging and profile control:a case from Bohai SZ36-1 oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):155-161.
[8] 刘光普, 刘述忍, 李翔, 等.淀粉胶体系调剖性能的影响因素. 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(1):118-122. LIU G P, LIU S R, LI X, et al. Factors influencing the profile control performance of starch gel. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 40(1):118-122.
[9] 张云宝, 薛宝庆, 卢祥国.渤海油田多轮次凝胶调驱参数优化实验研究:以LD5-2油田A22井为例. 石油与天然气化工, 2015, 44(4):87-92. ZHANG Y B, XUE B Q, LU X G. Experimental study of parameters optimization of rotational profile control operations in Bohai Oilfield:an example of A22 well in LD5-2 Oilfield. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2015, 44(4):87-92.
[10] 耿艳宏. 海上油田注水开发效果评价. 石油地质与工程, 2018, 32(4):83-86. GENG Y H. Effectiveness evaluation of water injection development in offshore oilfields. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2018, 32(4):83-86.
[11] 陈华兴, 高建崇, 唐晓旭, 等.绥中36-1油田注聚井注入压力高原因分析及增注措施. 中国海上油气, 2011, 23(3):189-192. CHEN H X, GAO J C, TANG X X, et al. Cause analysis of high injection pressure and measure of augmented injection in polymer injectors of SZ 36-1 oilfield. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2011, 23(3):189-192.
[12] 靳国兴, 夏宏南.海上油田注水井缓速酸深部酸化解堵增注技术研究. 当代化工, 2019, 48(2):323-325. JIN G X,XIA H N. Research of retarded acid deep acidification blocking removal and augmented injection technology for water injection wells in offshore oilfields. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2019, 48(2):323-325.
[13] 张博, 徐景亮, 李翔, 等.层内生成CO2技术提高采收率机理研究及应用.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(3):94-98. ZHANG B, XU J L, LI X, et al. Mechanism research and application of enhancing oil recovery by in-situ CO2 generating technology. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(3):94-98.
[14] 张国萍, 肖良, 胡艳霞, 等.层内生气提高采收率技术在中原断块油田的应用.油气地质与采收率, 2004, 11(5):60-61. ZHANG G P,XIAO L,HU Y X,et al. Applications of in situ gas generating for enhanced oil recovery to Zhongyuan faulted block oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004, 11(5):60-61.
[15] 林波, 蒲万芬, 赵金洲, 等.利用就地CO2技术提高原油采收率.石油学报, 2007, 28(2):98-101. LIN B, PU W F, ZHAO J Z, et al. In-situ carbon dioxide-generation technology applied to enhance oil recovery. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(2):98-101.
[16] 杨红, 王宏, 南宇峰, 等.油藏CO2驱油提高采收率适宜性评价.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):140-146. YANG H, WANG Y, NAN Y F, et al. Suitability evaluation of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 flooding. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):140-146.
[17] 李友全, 孟凡坤, 阎燕, 等.考虑流体非均质性的低渗透油藏CO2驱试井分析.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):106-112. LI Y Q, MENG F K, YAN Y, et al. Pressure transient analysis on CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs considering fluid heterogeneity. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):106-112.
[18] 何吉波, 陈蕾, 赵海涛, 等.稠油油藏自生CO2吞吐油藏参数敏感性研究.复杂油气藏, 2018, 11(2):62-65. HE J B, CHEN L, ZHAO H T, et al. Parametric sensitivity research of heavy-oil reservoir by self-generating carbon dioxide huff-n-puff. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2018, 11(2):62-65.
[19] 汤勇, 汪勇, 邓建华, 等.自生CO2结合表面活性剂复合吞吐数值模拟. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(4):107-113. TANG Y, WANG Y, DENG J H, et al. Numerical simulation on increasing oil recovery by in-situ-generated CO2 compound surfactant huff-puff. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 35(4):107-113.
[20] 张相春, 张军辉, 宋志学, 等.绥中36-1油田泡沫凝胶调驱体系研究与性能评价. 石油与天然气化工, 2012, 41(4):419-421. ZHANG X C, ZHANG J H, SONG Z X, et al. Performance evaluation control of foam gel and study of flooding in SZ36-1 oilfield. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2012, 41(4):419-421.
[1] 蔡晖, 屈丹, 陈民锋. 组合井网储量动用规律及水平井加密合理技术策略——以渤海HD油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 147-155.
[2] 周焱斌, 何逸凡, 章威, 张吉磊, 杨磊. 海上注水开发油田单井经济极限含水率分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 130-134.
[3] 王飞, 胥元刚, 万玲侠, 张和斌. 抗盐耐温颗粒调驱剂在文南油田的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 121-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广，刘博，吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良，曾溅辉，张善文，王永诗，王洪玉，刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷　明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发