岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 32–43.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260203

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

川东地区下侏罗统陆相页岩岩相组合特征及其成藏条件

余川1,2,3(), 吴晓川1,2(), 汪威1,2,3, 汪生秀1,2,3, 张跃磊1,2,3, 郭东鑫1,2,3, 刘爱华1,2,4   

  1. 1 页岩气勘探开发国家地方联合工程研究中心（重庆地质矿产研究院）， 重庆 401120
    2 自然资源部页岩气资源勘查重点实验室（重庆地质矿产研究院）， 重庆 401120
    3 重庆华地资环科技有限公司， 重庆 401120
    4 中国石化中原油田普光分公司， 四川 达州 635000
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-11 修回日期:2025-09-24 出版日期:2026-03-01 发布日期:2026-02-05
  • 第一作者:余川（1985—），男，硕士，正高级工程师，主要从事非常规油气地质勘探方面的研究工作。地址：（401120）重庆市渝北区兰馨大道111号。Email:yuchuan03041512@aliyun.com。
  • 通信作者: 吴晓川（1991—），男，博士，高级工程师，主要从事地震地质方面的研究工作。Email:469690078@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金面上项目“深层页岩孔隙系统差异化发育机制及优质储层预测研究”(cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0624);及重庆市地矿集团矿业基金“陆相页岩油气选区选层关键技术研究”(华油-26-03)

Lithofacies combination characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation condition of lacustrine shale in Lower Jurassic, eastern Sichuan Basin

YU Chuan1,2,3(), WU Xiaochuan1,2(), WANG Wei1,2,3, WANG Shengxiu1,2,3, ZHANG Yuelei1,2,3, GUO Dongxin1,2,3, LIU Aihua1,2,4   

  1. 1 National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Shale Gas Exploration and Development (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China
    2 Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Exploration, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China
    3 Chongqing Huadi Resources and Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401120, China
    4 Puguang Branch, Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield, Dazhou 635000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2025-07-11 Revised:2025-09-24 Online:2026-03-01 Published:2026-02-05

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

22

摘要：

川东地区下侏罗统凉高山组和自流井组湖相暗色泥页岩广泛发育，是页岩油气勘探的重要领域。通过对重点钻井、典型地层剖面进行描述和取样分析测试，开展了陆相页岩岩相组合类型的划分，并对不同岩相页岩的油气成藏条件进行了对比。研究结果表明：①川东地区下侏罗统陆相页岩层系沉积相变快、岩相组合复杂，与下古生界海相页岩相比，前者具有“发育层数多、累积厚度大（40~115 m）、单层厚度小（< 25 m）、连续性较差”的特征。②研究区下侏罗统陆相页岩可划分为硅质页岩、黏土质页岩、介壳灰质页岩等三大类，不同岩相类型的岩性特征差异大，主要受控于其原始沉积环境。③纹层状含碳黏土质页岩和含碳含介壳黏土质页岩的生烃能力及储集性能都相对较好，其有机质类型主要为偏腐泥混合型（Ⅱ1型为主），TOC多在1.2%以上，有机质孔和微裂隙较发育，有效孔隙度多在3.0%以上，具备压裂改造的有利条件，是油气富集成藏的有利岩相类型。④研究区凉高山组页岩油气成藏有利区分布在万州—梁平地区和垫江—丰都地区；自流井组大安寨段油气成藏有利区分布在梁平—开江—万州地区；自流井组东岳庙段油气成藏有利区分布在垫江—梁平—忠县地区。

关键词: 陆相页岩, 生烃能力, 储集性能, 脆性指数, 凉高山组, 自流井组, 下侏罗统, 川东地区

Abstract:

Lower Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation and Ziliujing Formation lacustrine facies dark mud shales widely develop in eastern Sichuan Basin, making them key fields for shale oil and gas exploration. Through the description and sampling analysis of key drilling and typical stratigraphic profiles, lithofacies combinations of terrestrial shale were classified, and comparative analyses were conducted on reservoir formation conditions of shale oil and gas in different lithofacies. The results show that: （1） Lower Jurassic terrestrial shale series in eastern Sichuan Basin exhibit fast sedimentary facies changes and complex lithofacies combinations. Compared with Lower Paleozoic marine shales, they have geological characteristics of “multiple development layers, large cumulative thickness (40-115 m), small single-layer thickness (< 25 m), poor continuity”. （2） Lower Jurassic continental shale in the study area can be divided into three categories: siliceous shale, clayey shale, and shell calcareous shale. Lithological characteristics of different lithofacies types vary greatly and are mainly controlled by their original sedimentary environment. （3） The hydrocarbon generation capacity and storage performance of laminated carbon-bearing clayey shale and carbon-bearing shell-bearing clayey shale are relatively good, organic types of the shale are mainly mixed type of sapropelic mud (mainly type Ⅱ1), with TOC generally exceeding 1.2%. Organic matter pores and microcracks are well-developed, with effective poro-sity mostly above 3.0%, which have favorable conditions for hydraulic fracturing and transformation, and also are favorable lithofacies types for oil and gas enrichment and accumulation. （4） Favorable areas for shale hydrocarbon accumulation in Lianggaoshan Formation of the study area are distributed in Wanzhou-Liangping area and Dianjiang-Fengdu area. Favorable areas for hydrocarbon accumulation in Da’anzhai section of Ziliujing Formation are distributed in Liangping-Kaijiang-Wanzhou area. Favorable areas for hydrocarbon accumulation in Dongyuemiao section of Ziliujing Formation are distributed in Dianjiang-Liangping-Zhongxian area.

Key words: continental shale, hydrocarbon generation capacity, storage performance, brittleness index, Lianggaoshan Formation, Ziliujing Formation, Lower Jurassic, eastern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.31

图1

川东地区构造位置（a）及下侏罗统岩性地层柱状图（b）"

图2

川东地区敖家营剖面下侏罗统岩性地层综合柱状图"

图3

川东地区下侏罗统岩石薄片显微照片 (a) 中粒质细粒长石岩屑砂岩，凉高山组，TD021井，深度为1 793.73 m；(b) 含粉砂页岩，凉高山组，敖家营剖面，海拔为621.00 m；(c) 细砂质介壳灰岩，凉高山组，敖家营剖面，海拔为621.00 m；(d) 页岩，发育浅色砂质碎屑纹层，凉高山组，YD003井，深度为2 017.77 m；(e) 含细晶—粉晶介壳灰岩，大安寨段，敖家营剖面，海拔为621.00 m；(f) 含介壳页岩，大安寨段，敖家营剖面，海拔为621.00 m；(g) 含泥介壳灰岩，大安寨段，TD002井，深度为1 483.65 m；(h) 含介壳页岩，大安寨段，LG83井，深度为2 342.07 m；(i) 含粉砂细粒岩屑砂岩，东岳庙段，敖家营剖面，海拔为621.00 m；(j) 含介壳页岩，东岳庙段，敖家营剖面，海拔为621.00 m；(k) 含钙粉砂质细粒岩屑石英砂岩，东岳庙段，FT1井，深度为1 847.72 m；(l) 含介壳页岩，东岳庙段，MX001井，深度为1 849.15 m。"

图4

川东地区下侏罗统硅质岩相组合代表岩心及薄片显微照片 (a) 硅质页岩岩心，凉高山组，TD021井，1 796.40 m；(b) 硅质页岩薄片，凉高山组，TD021井，1 796.40 m；(c) 含碳硅质页岩岩心，凉高山组，YD003井，2 015.25 m；(d) 含碳硅质页岩薄片，凉高山组，YD003井，2 015.25 m；(e) 含介壳硅质页岩岩心，大安寨段，TD002井，1 495.59 m；(f) 含介壳硅质页岩薄片，大安寨段，TD002井，1 495.59 m；(g) 含碳含介壳硅质页岩岩心，东岳庙段，MX001井，1 855.85 m；(h) 含碳含介壳硅质页岩薄片，东岳庙段，MX001井，1 855.85 m。"

图5

川东地区下侏罗统陆相暗色泥页岩TOC分布特征"

图6

川东地区下侏罗统黏土质岩相组合的岩心及薄片显微照片 (a) 黏土质页岩岩心，大安寨段，TD021井，1 987.00 m；(b) 黏土质页岩薄片，大安寨段，TD021井，1 987.00 m；(c) 含碳黏土质页岩岩心，凉高山组，YD003井，2 017.77 m；(d) 含碳黏土质页岩薄片，凉高山组，YD003井，2 017.77 m；(e) 含介壳黏土质页岩岩心，大安寨段，TD007井，1 179.30 m；(f) 含介壳黏土质页岩薄片，大安寨段，TD007井，1 179.30 m；(g) 含碳含介壳黏土质页岩岩心，大安寨段，FT1井，1 724.12 m；(h) 含碳含介壳黏土质页岩薄片，大安寨段，FT1井，1 724.12 m。"

图7

川东地区下侏罗统介壳灰质岩相组合的岩心及薄片显微照片 (a) 介壳灰质页岩岩心，大安寨段，TD007井，1 166.00 m；(b) 介壳灰质页岩薄片，大安寨段，TD007井，1 166.00 m；(c) 含碳介壳灰质页岩岩心，大安寨段，FT1井，1 729.93 m；(d) 含碳介壳灰质页岩薄片，大安寨段，FT1井，1 729.93 m。"

图8

川东地区下侏罗统5种含碳页岩岩相中干酪根显微组分 (a) 含碳黏土质页岩，凉高山组，YA002井，1 654.00 m；(b) 含碳含介壳黏土质页岩，大安寨段，LG83井，2 312.30 m；(c) 含碳含介壳黏土质页岩，东岳庙段，SF1井，1 970.00 m；(d) 含碳介壳灰质页岩，大安寨段，FT1井，1 724.12 m；(e) 含碳含介壳硅质页岩，东岳庙段，FT1井，1 837.12 m；(f) 含碳硅质页岩，凉高山组，YD003井，2 017.77 m。"

图9

川东地区下侏罗统5种含碳页岩岩相中TOC含量分布特征"

图10

川东地区下侏罗统5种含碳页岩岩相中有效孔隙度分布特征"

图11

川东地区下侏罗统页岩储集空间类型 (a) 有机质孔隙，大安寨段，YA012井，深度为2 471.33 m；(b) 矿物质粒间孔隙，凉高山组，敖家营剖面，海拔621.00 m；(c) 黏土矿物层间孔隙，东岳庙段，FT1井，深度为1 839.45 m；(d) 有机质孔隙、有机质与矿物质之间的孔隙，凉高山组，敖家营剖面，海拔621.00 m；(e) 黏土矿物层间孔隙，大安寨段，YT1井，深度为2 302.58 m；(f) 纹层理之间的微裂缝，大安寨段，FT1井，深度为1 730.60 m；(g) 有机质纹层与矿物质纹层之间的微裂隙，大安寨段，FT1井，深度为1 724.12 m；(h) 碳酸盐矿物溶蚀孔隙，大安寨段，敖家营剖面，海拔621.00 m；(i) 黄铁矿晶间孔隙，大安寨段，YT1井，深度为2 302.58 m。"

图12

川东地区下侏罗统5种含碳页岩岩相的脆性指数分布特征"

图13

川东地区下侏罗统含碳页岩的沉积构造 (a) 含碳硅质页岩，呈块状构造，层理不发育，凉高山组，TD109井，1 328.90 m；(b) 含碳硅质页岩，发育砂质条带和纹层，凉高山组，YT1井，2 165.14 m；(c) 含碳含介壳硅质页岩，呈厚层状构造，层理不发育，东岳庙段，YT1井，2 446.01 m；(d) 含碳黏土质页岩，发育砂质纹层，凉高山组，YD003井，2 015.25 m；(e) 含碳含介壳黏土质页岩，发育介壳纹层，东岳庙段，FT1井，1 835.86 m；(f) 含碳含介壳黏土质页岩，发育介壳纹层，东岳庙段，MX001井，1 864.00 m；(g) 含碳介壳灰质页岩，呈块状构造，介壳密集杂乱分布，大安寨段，FT1井，1 729.93 m；(h) 含碳介壳灰质页岩，呈块状构造，介壳密集杂乱分布，大安寨段，YT1井，2 436.76 m。"

表1

川东地区下侏罗统5种含碳页岩岩相的参数对比及储层综合评价"

岩相类型 TOC/% 有机质类型 孔隙度/% 沉积构造 脆性指数 储集性能综合评价
含碳硅质页岩 0.52~1.66/0.84 Ⅲ 0.98~4.05/2.11 厚层—块状 0.44~0.59/0.51 较差
含碳含介壳硅质页岩 0.52~1.73/0.94 Ⅲ 0.68~2.08/1.60 厚层—块状 0.46~0.60/0.51 较差
含碳黏土质页岩 0.68~3.56/1.67 Ⅱ1 0.81~5.89/4.06 细纹层状 0.25~0.46/0.36 较好
含碳含介壳黏土质页岩 0.84~2.11/1.40 Ⅱ2 1.09~6.81/3.81 介壳纹层状 0.30~0.46/0.37 较好
含碳介壳灰质页岩 0.51~1.41/0.97 Ⅱ2 1.01~2.52/1.69 块状 0.40~0.46/0.43 一般

图14

川东地区下侏罗统陆相页岩油气成藏有利区"

[1] 杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):560-568.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.003
DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types,potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):560-568.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.003
[2] 金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 等. 中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7):821-835.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202107001
JIN Zhijun, WANG Guanping, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):821-835.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202107001
[3] ZHU Yixiu, LI Zezhou, ZENG Lianbo. Diagenesis and its impact on the reservoir quality of continental shales:A case study of the Lower Jurassic Da’anzhai Member of the Ziliujing Formation in the Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Geofluids,2022:5942370.
[4] 朱逸青, 王兴志, 冯明友, 等. 川东地区下古生界五峰组—龙马溪组页岩岩相划分及其与储层关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):59-66.
ZHU Yiqing, WANG Xingzhi, FENG Mingyou, et al. Lithofacies classification and its relationship with reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):59-66.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.05.007
[5] 黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 金之钧, 等. 中国海、陆相页岩层系岩相组合多样性与非常规油气勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1):1-25.
LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIN Zhijun, et al. Diversity in the lithofacies assemblages of marine and lacustrine shale strata and significance for unconventional petroleum exploration in China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1):1-25.
[6] 姜在兴, 张建国, 孔祥鑫, 等. 中国陆相页岩油气沉积储层研究进展及发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1):45-71.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202301004
JIANG Zaixing, ZHANG Jianguo, KONG Xiangxin, et al. Research progress and development direction of continental shale oil and gas deposition and reservoirs in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1):45-71.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202301004
[7] 朱彤, 龙胜祥, 王烽, 等. 四川盆地湖相泥页岩沉积模式及岩石相类型[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(8):22-28.
ZHU Tong, LONG Shengxiang, WANG Feng, et al. Sedimentary models and lithofacies types of lacustrine mud shale in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(8):22-28.
[8] 曹香妮, 姜振学, 朱德宇, 等. 川东北地区自流井组陆相页岩岩相类型及储层发育特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(12):1782-1793.
doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.09.009
CAO Xiangni, JIANG Zhenxue, ZHU Deyu, et al. Lithofacies types and reservoir characteristics of continental shales of Ziliujing Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(12):1782-1793.
doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.09.009
[9] 刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 等. 高成熟陆相页岩油气源—储特征及富集层段评价方法:以川东复兴地区侏罗系东岳庙段为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(10):11-24.
LIU Zhongbao, HU Zongquan, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Source-reservoir features and favorable enrichment interval evaluation methods of high mature continental shale:A case study of the Jurassic Dongyuemiao Member in the Fuxing area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(10):11-24.
[10] 舒志国, 舒逸, 陈绵琨, 等. 陆相页岩岩相非均质性及储层孔隙发育特征:以四川盆地自流井组东岳庙段页岩为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2024, 43(2):1-15.
SHU Zhiguo, SHU Yi, CHEN Miankun, et al. Lithofacies hete-rogeneity and reservoir pore development characteristics of con-tinental shale:A case study of the Dongyuemiao shale of the Ziliujing Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2024, 43(2):1-15.
[11] 邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. “进源找油”:论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7):1551-1562.
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, WANG Hongyan, et al. “Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen”:Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan basin,China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7):1551-1562.
[12] 胡东风, 魏志红, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地拔山寺向斜泰页l井页岩油气重大突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(2):21-32.
HU Dongfeng, WEI Zhihong, LIU Ruobing, et al. Major breakthrough of shale oil and gas in Well Taiye l in Bashansi Syncline in the Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(2):21-32.
[13] 胡德高, 舒志国, 郭战峰, 等. 川东复兴地区侏罗系(涪页10HF井)发现国内首个页岩凝析气藏[J]. 中国地质, 2021, 48(6):1980-1981.
HU Degao, SHU Zhiguo, GUO Zhanfeng, et al. Discovery of the first shale condensate gas reservoir in Jurassic strata in the Fuxin area,eastern Sichuan[J]. Geology in China, 2021, 48(6):1980-1981.
[14] 杨雨, 文龙, 周刚, 等. 四川盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12):2045-2069.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202312004
YANG Yu, WEN Long, ZHOU Gang, et al. New fields,new types and resource potentials of hydrocarbon exploration in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(12):2045-2069.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202312004
[15] 邹连松, 徐文礼, 梁西文, 等. 川东地区下侏罗统自流井组东岳庙段泥页岩沉积特征及物质来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4):122-135.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240411
ZOU Liansong, XU Wenli, LIANG Xiwen, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and sources of shale of Dongyuemiao member of Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4):122-135.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240411
[16] 马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1):155-171.
MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1):155-171.
[17] 谢瑞, 张尚锋, 周林, 等. 川东地区侏罗系自流井组大安寨段致密储层油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1):108-119.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230110
XIE Rui, ZHANG Shangfeng, ZHOU Lin, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of tight reservoirs of Da’anzhai member of Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1):108-119.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230110
[18] 邹玉涛, 段金宝, 赵艳军, 等. 川东高陡断褶带构造特征及其演化[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(11):2046-2052.
ZOU Yutao, DUAN Jinbao, ZHAO Yanjun, et al. Tectonic characteristics and evolution of the high and steep fault folding belt in East Sichuan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(11):2046-2052.
[19] 聂海宽, 马鑫, 余川, 等. 川东下侏罗统自流井组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3):438-447.
NIE Haikuan, MA Xin, YU Chuan, et al. Shale gas reservoir characteristics and its exploration potential-analysis on the Lower Jurassic shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3):438-447.
[20] 何龙, 郑荣才, 梁西文, 等. 川东涪陵地区大安寨段裂缝控制因素及期次分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):88-96.
HE Long, ZHENG Rongcai, LIANG Xiwen, et al. Controlling factors and development periods of fracture of Da’anzhai member in Fuling area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):88-96.
[21] 何文渊, 白雪峰, 蒙启安, 等. 四川盆地陆相页岩油成藏地质特征与重大发现[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7):885-898.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202207001
HE Wenyuan, BAI Xuefeng, MENG Qi’an, et al. Accumulation geological characteristics and major discoveries of lacustrine shale oil in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7):885-898.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202207001
[22] 郭娟, 赵迪斐, 梁孝柏, 等. 页岩纳米孔隙的结构量化表征:以川东南地区五峰组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):113-121.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200512
GUO Juan, ZHAO Difei, LIANG Xiaobo, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale nanopore structure:A case study of Wufeng Formation in southeastern Sichuan[J]. Lithologic Re-servoirs, 2020, 32(5):113-121.
[23] 韩文中, 窦煜, 李昊东, 等. 陆相富有机质页岩脆性评价方法优选与应用:以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2022, 44(2):191-198.
HAN Wenzhong, DOU Yu, LI Haodong, et al. Optimization and application of brittleness evaluation methods for continental organic-rich shale:A case study of the 2nd Member of Kongjiadian Formation,Cangdong Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2022, 44(2):191-198.
[24] 唐颖, 邢云, 李乐忠, 等. 页岩储层可压裂性影响因素及评价方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(5):356-363.
TANG Ying, XING Yun, LI Lezhong, et al. Influence factors and evaluation methods of the gas shale fracability[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(5):356-363.
[25] 窦亮彬, 杨浩杰, XIAO Yingjian, 等. 页岩储层脆性评价分析及可压裂性定量评价新方法研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(2):576-584.
DOU Liangbin, YANG Haojie, XIAO Yingjian, et al. Probabi-lity study of formation brittleness and new quantitative evaluation of fracability for shale reservoirs[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36(2):576-584.
[26] 王冠民, 钟建华. 湖泊纹层的沉积机理研究评述与展望[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2004, 23(1):43-48.
WANG Guanmin, ZHONG Jianhua. A review and the prospects of the researches on sedimentary mechanism of lacustrine laminae[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2004, 23(1):43-48.
[27] 朱如凯, 张婧雅, 李梦莹, 等. 陆相页岩油富集基础研究进展与关键问题[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(9) :2874-2895.
ZHU Rukai, ZHANG Jingya, LI Mengying, et al. Advances and key issues in the basic research of non-marine shale oil enrichment[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2023, 97(9):2874-2895.
[28] 杨雪, 杨雨然, 张景缘, 等. 川北地区开江—梁平海槽二叠系海相页岩特征及优质储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3):108-119.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250310
YANG Xue, YANG Yuran, ZHANG Jingyuan, et al. Characte-ristics and formation mechanism of Permian marine shale of Kaijiang-Liangping trough in northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(3):108-119.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250310
[29] 白斌, 戴朝成, 侯秀林, 等. 陆相湖盆页岩自生硅质特征及其油气意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(5):896-907.
doi: 10.11698/PED.20220118
BAI Bin, DAI Chaocheng, HOU Xiulin, et al. Authigenic silica in continental lacustrine shale and its hydrocarbon significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(5):896-907.
[30] 陈旺, 王兴志, 韦明洋, 等. 川东地区侏罗系自流井组东岳庙段陆相页岩岩相类型及储集层特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(3):696-713.
CHEN Wang, WANG Xingzhi, WEI Mingyang, et al. Lithofacies types and reservoir characteristics of continental shale in the Dongyuemiao Member of Jurassic Ziliujing Formation,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2025, 27(3):696-713.
[1] 陆江, 王健, 吴楠, 李程善, 冯子飞. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘奥陶系乌拉力克组页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 34-48.
[2] 詹淋, 范存辉, 唐雯, 杨西燕, 刘冬玺, 李博, 杨昕睿. 四川盆地东部南雅地区二叠系吴家坪组构造特征及其控藏机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 133-144.
[3] 钱永新, 赵毅, 刘新龙, 刘鸿, 刘国梁, 朱涛, 邹阳, 陈方文. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 115-125.
[4] 吴松, 冯冰, 于继良, 蓝宝锋, 李龙, 王胜, 沈家宁, 李刚权. 黔北正安地区安场向斜奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 182-193.
[5] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[6] 邱玉超, 李亚丁, 文龙, 罗冰, 姚军, 许强, 文华国, 谭秀成. 川东地区寒武系洗象池组构造特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[7] 何文渊, 陈可洋. 哈萨克斯坦南图尔盖盆地Doshan斜坡带岩性油气藏储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[8] 邹连松, 徐文礼, 梁西文, 刘皓天, 周坤, 霍飞, 周林, 文华国. 川东地区下侏罗统自流井组东岳庙段泥页岩沉积特征及物质来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 122-135.
[9] 包汉勇, 刘皓天, 陈绵琨, 盛贤才, 秦军, 陈洁, 陈凡卓. 川东地区高陡构造带寒武系洗象池群天然气成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 43-51.
[10] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[11] 温思宇, 张兵, 姚永君, 马恺, 王艳, 杨凯. 川东地区二叠系吴家坪组页岩中黄铁矿形态及其对大洋缺氧事件的指示意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 71-80.
[12] 胡忠贵, 王纪煊, 李世临, 郭艳波, 左云安, 庞宇来. 川东地区寒武系高台组白云岩-蒸发岩共生地层高频层序划分及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 113-124.
[13] 文华国, 罗冰, 钟克修, 冯青平, 刘磊, 廖义沙, 彭才, 蔡家兰, 徐文礼, 朱宜新, 郝静, 罗鑫, 徐姁. 川东地区三叠系嘉陵江组邻水-丰都台凹的发现及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 12-24.
[14] 谢瑞, 张尚锋, 周林, 刘皓天, 姚明君, 蒋雪桂. 川东地区侏罗系自流井组大安寨段致密储层油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 108-119.
[15] 康家豪, 王兴志, 谢圣阳, 曾德铭, 杜垚, 张芮, 张少敏, 李阳. 川中地区侏罗系大安寨段页岩岩相类型及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 53-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发