岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 121–132.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.012

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

测井资料用于页岩岩相划分及识别——以涪陵气田五峰组—龙马溪组为例

车世琦   

  1. 中国石化重庆涪陵页岩气勘探开发有限公司, 重庆 408000
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-13 修回日期:2017-09-25 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 作者简介:车世琦(1989-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事页岩气地质评价方面的研究工作。地址:(408000)重庆市涪陵区焦石镇焦石大道页岩气勘探开发有限公司。Email:csqslowwalker@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“涪陵页岩气开发示范工程”(编号:2016ZX05060)资助

Shale lithofacies identification and classification by using logging data: a case of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling Gas Field,Sichuan Basin

CHE Shiqi   

  1. Sinopec Chongqing Fuling Shale Gas Exploration and Development Co., Ltd., Chongqing 408000, China
  • Received:2017-07-13 Revised:2017-09-25 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要: 随着涪陵页岩气田钻探项目的推进,不断揭示出区内海相页岩具有非均质性强、岩性复杂等特征。以涪陵气田主力气层五峰组—龙马溪组页岩为例,首先采用详细、准确的ECS(Elemental CaptureSpectroscopy Sonde)特殊测井资料,开展页岩中硅质成分来源分析,根据ECS测井和岩石薄片资料,结合页岩硅质成分来源分析结果,建立页岩矿物组分三端元图版,准确划分出页岩岩相;再运用常规测井资料,总结不同页岩岩相的测井响应特征,选取对页岩岩相敏感的去铀伽马和密度测井曲线建立测井识别图版。结果表明:常规测井资料识别出的页岩岩相与ECS特殊测井资料识别结果一致,匹配程度较高。整体而言,当TOC质量分数≥ 2%时,涪陵气田五峰组—龙马溪组页岩硅质成分来源以生物成因为主;当TOC质量分数< 2%时,硅质成分来源以陆源碎屑为主。涪陵气田主要发育硅质页岩、混合型硅质页岩、富黏土硅质页岩、富钙硅质页岩、混合页岩、富黏土-粉砂混合页岩、富黏土粉砂质页岩和富粉砂黏土质页岩等8种页岩岩相,其中,具有高硅质含量、高TOC含量的硅质页岩和混合型硅质页岩岩相为开发较有利页岩岩相。研究成果提高了页岩岩相分类的准确性和实用性,对页岩气资源的高效开发具有指导意义。

关键词: 粘弹性波动方程;Q 模型, 成像条件, 有限差分, 保幅偏移, 数据处理

Abstract: With the development of Fuling shale gas field production,the marine shale reservoirs in Fuling Gas Field show obvious heterogeneity and complex lithology. Based on the comprehensive and accurate ECS(Elemental Capture Spectroscopy Sonde)special well logging data of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shale,the siliceous component sources were analyzed,and according to the ECS special well logging data and thin section,combined with the different sources of siliceous components,the ternary diagram of shale mineral component was established to accurately divide shale lithofacies. The log response characteristics of different shale lithofacies were analyzed by using conventional logging data,and uranium-free gamma ray and density logging which are sensitive to shale lithofacies were selected to establish shale lithofacies identification logging plate. The result shows that the shale facies identified by conventional logging data is in accordance with the recognition results by ECS special logging data. When the TOC mass fraction of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shale is greater than 2%,the source of siliceous components is dominated by biogenic factors,when the TOC mass fraction is less than 2%, the source is mainly terrigenous debris. Eight kinds of lithofacies of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shales were identified,including siliceous shale,mixed siliceous shale,clay-rich siliceous shale,carbonate-rich siliceous shale,mixed shale,argillaceous-silty mixed shale,clay-rich silty shale and silty-rich argillaceous shale. The most favorable shale lithofacies was defined as the siliceous shale and mixed siliceous shale with high siliceous content and high TOC content. The result could effectively improve the accuracy and practicability of shale lithofacies classification and it is significant for the efficient development of shale gas resources.

Key words: viscoelastic wave equation, Q model, imaging condition, finite difference;amplitude-preserved migration, data processing

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 张金川,聂海宽,徐波,等.四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件.天然气工业,2008,28(2):151-156. ZHANG J C,NIE H K,XU B,et al. Geological condition of shale gas accumulation in Sichuan basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2008,28(2):151-156.
[2] 曾祥亮,刘树根,黄文明,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比. 地质通报,2011,30(2/3):372-384. ZENG X L,LIU S G,HUANG W M,et al. Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in China and Carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States. Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):372-384.
[3] 董大忠,程克明,王玉满,等.中国上扬子区下古生界页岩气形成条件及特征.石油与天然气质,2010,31(3):288-299. DONG D Z,CHENG K M,WANG Y M,et al. Forming conditions and characteristics of shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of the Upper Yangtze region,China. Oil & Gas Geology,2010,31(3):288-299.
[4] 王志刚.涪陵页岩气勘探开发重大突破与启示.石油与天然气地质,2015,36(1):1-6. WANG Z G. Breakthrough of Fuling shale gas exploration and development and its inspiration. Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(1):1-6.
[5] 赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境.石油学报,2016,37(5):572-586. ZHAO J H,JIN Z J,JIN Z K,et al. Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):572-586.
[6] 朱逸青,王兴志,冯明友,等.川东地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相划分及其与储层关系.岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):59-66. ZHU Y Q,WANG X Z,FENG M Y,et al. Lithofacies classification and its relationship with reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):59-66.
[7] 冉波,刘树根,孙玮,等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相分类.地学前缘,2016,23(2):96-107. RAN B,LIU S G,SUN W,et al. Lithfacies classification of shales of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in the Sichuan Basin and its surrounding areas,China. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):96-107.
[8] 蒋裕强,宋益滔,漆麟,等.中国海相页岩岩相精细划分及测井预测:以四川盆地南部威远地区龙马溪组为例.地学前缘, 2016,23(1):107-118. JIANG Y Q,SONG Y T,QI L,et al. Fine lithofacies of China's marine shale and its logging prediction:a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi marine shale in Weiyuan area,southern Sichuan Basin,China. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):107-118.
[9] 吴蓝宇,胡东风,陆永潮,等.四川盆地涪陵气田五峰组-龙马溪组页岩优势岩相.石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):189-197. WU L Y,HU D F,LU Y C,et al. Advantageous shale lithofacies of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling gas field of Sichuan Basin,SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):189-197.
[10] 王玉满,王淑芳,董大忠,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩岩相表征.地学前缘,2016,23(1):119-133. WANG Y M,WANG S F,DONG D Z,et al. Lithofacies characterization of Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian,southern Sichuan. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):119-133.
[11] 童崇光.新构造运动与四川盆地构造演化及气藏形成.成都理工学院学报,2000,27(2):123-130. TONG C G. Relationship between neotectonic movement and structural evolution and gas pools formation of Sichuan Basin. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology,2000,27(2):123-130.
[12] 佘晓宇,陈洁,张士万,等.焦石坝地区中、古生界构造特征及其页岩气地质意义.石油与天然气地质,2016,37(6):828-837. SHE X Y,CHEN J,ZHANG S W,et al. Tectonic characteristics and their shale gas geological significance of the MesozoicPaleozoic in Jiaoshiba area,the Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(6):828-837.
[13] 牟传龙,周恳恳,梁薇,等.中上扬子地区早古生代烃源岩沉积环境与油气勘探.地质学报,2011,85(4):526-532. MOU C L,ZHOU K K,LIANG W,et al. Early Paleozoic sedimentary environment of hydrocarbon source rocks in the MiddleUpper Yangtze region and petroleum and gas exploration. Acta Geologica Sinica,2011,85(4):526-532.
[14] BLATT H. Oxygen isotopes and the origin of quartz. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1987,57(2):372-377.
[15] 付小东,秦建中,滕格尔,等.烃源岩矿物组成特征及油气地质意义——以中上扬子古生界海相优质烃源岩为例.石油勘探与开发,2011,38(6):671-684. FU X D,QIN J Z,TENGER,et al. Mineral components of source rocks and their petroleum significance:a case from Paleozoic marine source rocks in the Middle-Upper Yangtze region. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(6):671-684.
[16] 张春明,张维生,郭英海.川东南-黔北地区龙马溪组沉积环境及对烃源岩的影响.地学前缘,2012,19(1):136-145. ZHANG C M,ZHANG W S,GUO Y H. Sedimentaty environment and its effect on hydrocarbon source of Longmaxi Formation in southeast Sichuan and north Guizhou,China. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):136-145.
[17] 梁超,姜在兴,杨镱婷,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相及储集空间特征.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):691-698. LIANG C,JIANG Z X,YANG Y T,et al. Characteristics of shale lithofacies and reservoir space of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):691-698.
[18] 秦建中,申宝剑,付小东,等.中国南方海相优质烃源岩超显微有机岩石学与生排烃潜力.石油与天然气地质,2010,31(6):826-837. QIN J Z,SHEN B J,FU X D,et al. Ultramicroscop-ic organic petrology and potential of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of quality marine source rocks in South China. Oil & Gas Geology,2010,31(6):826-837.
[19] 张正顺,胡沛青,沈娟,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩矿物组成与有机质赋存状态.煤炭学报,2013,38(5):766-771. ZHANG Z S,HU P Q,SHEN J,et al. Mineral compositions and organic matter occurrence modes of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013,38(5):766-771.
[20] 王淑芳,邹才能,董大忠,等.四川盆地富有机质页岩硅质生物成因及对页岩气开发的意义. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2014,50(3):476-486. WANG S F,ZHOU C N,DONG D Z,et al. Biogenic silica of organic-rich shale in Sichuan Basin and its significance for shale gas.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2014, 50(3):476-486.
[21] 王秀平,牟传龙,葛详英,等.川南及邻区龙马溪组黑色岩系矿物组分特征及评价.石油学报,2015,36(2):150-162. WANG X P,MOU C L,GE X Y,et al. Mineral component characteristics and evaluation of black rock series of Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan and its periphery. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(2):150-162.
[22] 李延钧,刘欢,张烈辉,等.四川盆地南部下古生界龙马溪组页岩气评价指标下限.中国科学:地球科学,2013,43(7):1088-1095. LI Y J,LIU H,ZHANG L H,et al. Lower limits of evaluation parameters for the Lower Paleozoic Longmaxi shale gas in southern Sichuan province. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2013,43(7):1088-1095.
[23] 周文,徐浩,余谦,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因.岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):18-25. ZHOU W,XU H,YU Q,et al. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):18-25.
[24] 曾凡辉,刘林,林立世,等.碳酸盐岩储层加砂压裂改造的难点及对策.天然气工业,2009,29(12):56-58. ZENG F H,LIU L,LIN L S,et al. Difficulties and countermeasures of sand fracturing in carbonate reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(12):56-58.
[25] 苏建政,张素青.碳酸盐岩非均质性对水力裂缝起裂影响的有限元法研究.石油钻采工艺,2008,30(4):63-66. SU J Z,ZHANG S Q. Studying the effect of carbonatite heterogeneity on hydraulic fracture initiation by using finite element method. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2008,30(4):63-66.
[26] 徐祖新,韩淑敏,王启超.中扬子地区陡山沱组页岩储层中黄铁矿特征及其油气意义.岩性油气藏,2015,27(2):31-37. XU Z X,HAN S M,WANG Q C. Characteristics of pyrite and its hydrocarbon significance of shale reservoir of Doushantuo Formation in middle Yangtze area. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015, 27(2):31-37.
[27] CURRAN K J,HILLPS,SCHELLT M,et al. Inferring the mass fraction of floc-deposited mud:application to fine-grained turbidites. Sedimentology,2004,51(5):927-944
[28] LOUCKS R G,RUPPEL S C. Mississippian Barnett Shale:lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin,Texas. AAPG Bulletin, 2007,91(4):579-601.
[29] SHANMUGAM G. 50 years of the turbidite paradigm(1950 s-1990 s):deep-water processes and facies models-a critical perspective. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2000,17(2):285-342.
[30] 张晋言. 页岩油测井评价方法及其应用. 地球物理学进展, 2012,27(3):1154-1162. ZHANG J Y. Well logging evaluation method of shale oil reservoirs and its applications. Progress in Geophysics,2012,27(3):1154-1162.
[31] 张博,吕雄,曹长城,等.自然伽玛能谱资料在塔里木盆地乌什凹陷目的层段体系域划分及地层对比中的应用.天然气地球科学,2008,19(1):89-93. ZHANG B,LYU X,CAO C C,et al. Application of natural gamma ray spectrolog in the classification systems tracts and the sequence stratigraphic correlation,Wushen Depression. Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(1):89-93.
[32] 李贵杰,张建民,岳爱忠,等.砂泥岩地层中气体对补偿中子测井的影响.测井技术,2005,29(6):515-516. LI G J,ZHANG J M,YUE A Z,et al. Effect of gas in the sand mudstone layer on compensated neutron log. Well Logging Technology,2005,29(6):515-516.
[33] 张大权,邹妞妞,姜杨,等.火山岩岩性测井识别方法研究——以准噶尔盆地火山岩为例.岩性油气藏,2015,27(1):108-114. ZHANG D Q,ZOU N N,JIANG Y,et al. Logging identification method of volcanic rock lithology:a case study from volcanic rock in Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(1):108-114.
[1] 杨哲, 刘威, 胡自多, 王述江, 韩令贺, 王艳香. 时空域波动方程混合网格有限差分数值模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 93-109.
[2] 陈可洋. 逆时成像技术在大庆探区复杂构造成像中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 91-100.
[3] 陈可洋. 基于拉普拉斯算子的叠前逆时噪声压制方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(5): 87-95.
[4] 吕 彬,王宇超,李 斐. 保幅型裂步傅里叶叠前深度偏移方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 101-105.
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106-110.
[6] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .