岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 97–103.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.012

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

胜利油田新增探明储量SEC评估现状与分析

田敏   

  1. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257015
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-24 修回日期:2016-01-26 出版日期:2017-01-21 发布日期:2017-01-21
  • 第一作者:田敏(1979-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气测井评价及储量研究工作。地址:(257015)山东省东营市东营区聊城路2号胜利油田勘探开发研究院。Email:tianmin502.slyt@sinopec.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化胜利油田分公司先导课题项目“胜利油田分公司上市储量替代率影响因素研究”（编号:YKY1006）资助

The status and analysis of SEC evaluation results for new-added proved reserves in Shengli Oilfield

TIAN Min   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-11-24 Revised:2016-01-26 Online:2017-01-21 Published:2017-01-21

PDF (PC)

567

摘要： SEC 储量评估结果是衡量油公司发展潜力的重要指标，为减少国内与国外新增探明储量评估差异，提高当年新增探明储量对总评估结果的贡献率，对胜利油田新增探明储量SEC 评估现状以及历年SEC 评估结果与国内评估结果的差异进行分析，认为SEC 规则变化、储量品位降低、井控差是造成国内新增探明储量SEC 评估结果呈台阶式下降的主要因素。根据SEC 准则，可将储量评估分为静态参数（含油面积、有效厚度、采收率）评估和动态参数（初始产量、递减率、钻井计划）评估2 类。结合历年评估实例详细说明了国内与国外对以上各参数的取值差异，提出了优化国内储量管理模式和规范资料等2 项减少储量评估差异的对策，以期为今后国内储量任务的完成，实现国内与国外储量评价体系的接轨提供借鉴。

Abstract: The SEC reserve evaluation results are important indicators to measure the development potential of oil companies. In order to decrease the difference between domestic new- added proved reserves and SEC reserves, and increase the proportion of new-added proved reserves to the total reserves,the status and difference between domestic reserves and SEC reserves in the past years in Shengli Oilfield were analyzed. It is considered that the SEC rules change,the low quality of reserves and unfavorable offset resulted the stepped down tendency of SEC results for domestic new-added proved reserves. The parameter differences were illustrated by using evaluation examples of past years,including static parameters(oil-bearing area,net pay and recovery factor)and dynamic parameters(initial rate,decline rate and drilling plan). Two countermeasures：management mode optimization for domestic reserves and normalization of evaluation data,were put forward to reduce the differences. This research has some reference significance for the reserves task completion of domestic oil companies and the integration of SEC reserves evaluation systems.

中图分类号: 

  • F416.22
[1] 刘桂玲,李红昌. 国内外油气储量管理模式对比. 油气地质与 采收率,2002,9(5):71-73. LIU G L,LI H C. Contrast between domestic and foreign management modes of oil-gas reserves. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2002,9(5):71-73.
[2] 张玲,魏萍,肖席珍. SEC 储量评估特点及影响因素. 石油与 天然气地质,2011,32(2):293-301. ZHANG L,WEI P,XIAO X Z. Characteristics and their influential factors of SEC reserve evaluation. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011,32(2):293-301.
[3] 胡允栋. 基于不确定性分析的油气储量分类与评估方法. 北 京:中国地质大学(北京),2007. HU Y D. The methods of oil- gas reserves classification and evaluation under uncertainty. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2007.
[4] 冯义娜. 经济可采储量评价研究. 岩性油气藏,2009,21(2): 106-109. FENG Y N. Evaluation research of economic recoverable reserves. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(2):106-109.
[5] 许进进,任玉林,凡哲元,等. 油价和成本对证实储量的影响. 石油与天然气地质,2012,33(4):646-649. XU J J,REN Y L,FAN Z Y,et al. Impacts of oil prices and operation costs on proved reserves. Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33 (4):646-649.
[6] 张付兴. SEC 剩余经济可采储量影响因素分析. 油气地质与 采收率,2013,20(3):95-98. ZHANG F X. Analysis on influencing factors of SEC reserves evaluation. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(3):95-98.
[7] 邓辞,陈同飞,刘志霞,等. 江苏油田SEC静态储量潜力研究. 石油实验地质,2012,34(5):527-530. DENG C,CHEN T F,LIU Z X,et al. Potential research of SEC static reserves about Jiangsu Oil Field. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2012,34(5):527-530.
[8] 邵明记,李洪成,李果年,等. SEC 证实储量静态评估方法应 用与实践.吐哈油气,2009,14(4):331-334. SHAO M J,LI H C,Li G N,et al. Application and practice of SEC proven reserves static evaluation method. Tuha Oil & Gas, 2009,14(4):331-334.
[9] 张玲,袁向春,林豪,等. 国内储量计算与上市储量评估对比 分析. 中国西部油气地质,2006,2(3):245-248. ZHANG L,YUAN X C,LIN H,et al. The comparison analysis of the domestic reserve calculation and reserve estimation on oversea market.West China Petroleum Geosciences,2006,2(3): 245-248.
[10] 李冰. SEC 标准确定容积法储量计算参数. 石油实验地质, 2014,36(3):381-384. LI B. Determination of parameters for volumetric method based on SEC rules. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2014,36(3): 381-384.
[11] 刘韵,张贵生,马丽梅. 中国与SEC储量评估差异分析——以 元坝长兴组元坝103H井区长二段气藏为例. 石油实验地质, 2012,34(5):514-517. LIU Y,ZHANG G S,MA L M. Reasons for differences of reserve estimation results between domestic and SEC rules:a case study of gas reservoir in 2 nd section of Changxing Formation, well Yuanba 103 H. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment, 2012,34(5):514-517.
[12] 赵文智,李建忠,王永祥,等. SEC 标准确定证实储量边界的 方法. 石油勘探与开发,2006,33(6):754-757. ZHAO W Z,LI J Z,WANG Y X,et al. Methods of determining proved reserves by SEC standard. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(6):754-757.
[13] 李红英,孙静. 基于SPE-PRMS准则下的3 P储量含油气边界 确定方法探讨.岩性油气藏,2013,25(4)6-10. LI H Y,SUN J. Determination method of oil- bearing area boundary of the 3 P reserves based on SPE- PRMS standard. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(4):6-10.
[14] 毕海滨,王永祥,胡允栋. 浅析SPE储量分类中三级储量的相 互关系. 新疆石油地质,2004,25(4):420-422. Bi Haibin,Wang Yongxiang,Hu Yundong. Analysis of correlation among Proved,Probable and Possible reserves in SPE reserves classification. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2004,25(4): 420-422.
[15] 赵文智,毕海滨. 浅析中国与西方在储量计算中确定有效厚 度之差异.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):125-129. ZHAO W Z,BI H B. Differences of net pay estimation between China and SEC petroleum exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(3):125-129.
[16] 王树华,许静华. 新增探明储量采收率预测方法评价与研究. 石油实验地质,2012,34(5):490-494. WANG S H,XU J H. Evaluation and study of recovery rate prediction method for newly-proved reserves. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment,2012,34(5):490-494.
[17] 庄丽,杜廷俊. SEC 油气储量评估结果解析. 西部探矿工程, 2014(12):47-48. ZHUANG L,DU T J. Analysis on SEC reserves evaluation results. West-China Exploration Engineering,2014(12):47-48.
[18] 赵庆辉,陈淑凤,陈超,等. 动态储量评估中关于储量价值、折 旧的影响因素探讨.特种油气藏,2011,18(2):132-134. ZHAO Q H,CHEN S F,CHEN C,et al. Discussion on influencing factors of reserves value and depreciation in dynamic reserves estimation. Special Oil and Gas Reservoir,2011,18(2): 132-134.
[19] 翟中喜,魏萍. SEC上市储量评估技术要点与对策研究. 石油 天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2011,33(5):156-160. ZHAI Z X,WEI P. Technical key points for sec reserves evaluation and Countermeasure study. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology( Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2011,33(5): 156-160.
[20] 张玲,魏萍. SEC储量替代率与国内储量替代率差异探讨. 当 代石油石化,2013(5):10-14. ZHANG L,WEI P. Probing into the difference between SEC reserve replacement ratio and domestic reserve replacement ratio. Petroleum ＆ Petrochemical Today,2013(5):10-14
[21] 钱明阳. 上市石油公司油气储量和产量披露研究. 国际石油 经济,2009,17(10):36-40 ． QIAN M Y. The research of oil and gas reserves and production reporting of listed oil companies. International Petroleum Economics, 2009,17(10):36-40 ．
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭　林,王　波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉，郑荣才，肖玲，马国富，窦世杰，田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发