岩性油气藏 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 125–131.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.06.017

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

非稳态油藏理论及其在伊朗 A 油田的应用

陈 杰1,杜 洋1,彭 湃1,黄贺雄2,童明胜1,熊 舒 3   

  1. 1. 中国石油川庆钻探工程公司 地质勘探开发研究院,成都 610051 ;2. 中国石油(伊朗)公司,北京 100034 ; 3. 中国石油大学(北京),北京 102249
  • 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-20
  • 作者简介:陈杰( 1980- ),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事碳酸盐岩储层综合地质研究方面的工作。 地址:( 610051 )四川省成都市建设北路一段 83 号川庆钻探工程公司地质勘探开发研究院。 电话:( 028 ) 86015340 。 E-mail : chenj-sc@cnpc.com.cn 。
  • 基金资助:

    中国石油川庆钻探工程有限公司科技项目“海外油气田快速评价技术研究”(编号: CQ2015B-7-1-1 )资助

Theory of unsteady reservoir and its application in A oilfield of Iran

Chen Jie 1,Du Yang 1,Peng Pai 1,Huang Hexiong 2,Tong Mingsheng 1,Xiong Shu 3   

  1.  1. Research Institute of Geology Exploration and Development , CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Ltd. ,Chengdu 610051 , China ; 2. CNPC ( Iran ) Company , Beijing 100034 , China ; 3. China Universtity of Petroleum ,Beijing 102249 , China
  • Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-20

摘要:

通过对伊朗 A 油田上白垩统 Sarvak 组油藏油水界面倾斜原因进行分析,认为水动力作用不是造成该现象的主要原因,储层非均质性能够造成该现象但也不是主要原因,而晚期的构造急剧调整是造成该现象的主要原因。在区域沉积与构造演化分析的基础上,运用地震层拉平技术对伊朗 A 油田不同时期古构造圈闭进行恢复,结合成藏研究认为,新近纪末扎格罗斯构造运动造成油田圈闭超晚期调整,构造调整速率远大于流体调整速率,从而造成了 Sarvak 组油藏油水界面大幅度倾斜,油藏目前仍处于新的运移、聚集与调整过程中,为非稳态油藏;古新世晚期 Sarvak 组地层形成北高南低的古背斜圈闭,新近纪扎格罗斯造山运动导致圈闭形态发生改变,南部原古构造低点大幅度抬升,快速演变为现今南高北低的构造形态;圈闭条件的改变打破了古油藏内流体的动力平衡,烃类发生二次运移,现今大幅度倾斜的油水界面为古油藏尚未调整完毕所显示的特征。油藏优势开发区域为古构造高部位,即现今 Sarvak 组油藏北高点的西侧,其次为古构造与现今构造高部位之间的过渡带。

关键词: 页岩, 孔隙结构, 低压氮气吸附, 高压压汞, 核磁共振, 定量表征, 龙马溪组, 四川盆地

Abstract:

 The oil-water contract (OWC) of Sarvak reservoir of A oilfield in Iran is characterized by a large-amplitude one tilting from north to south. The hydrodynamic force is not the cause and the reservoir heterogeneity is not the main reason for the tilted OWC of the Sarvak reservoir. The main reason for the large-amplitude tilted OWC is the structure adjustment. Based on the analysis of sedimentary and tectonic evolution, formation flattening technique is utilized to recover the paleo-structure of different geologic stages. Combined with accumulation factor analysis, it is considered that the adjustment of traps is caused by Zagros orogeny and the structure adjustment rate is faster than the hydrocarbon adjustment rate. Now, the Sarvak reservoir is still in the new condition of migration, accumulation and adjustment, which is an unsteady reservoir. A paleo-trap which decreased from north to south formed in the Sarvak Formation in A oilfield after the late Paleocene. The Zagros orogeny during the Neogene caused the adjustment of the trap, and the former low point in the south uplifted significantly and gave birth to a new secondary trap. So, today the structure in the south of Sarvak Formation is higher than that in the north. The balance in the paleo-trap was broken, and hydrocarbon migrated to the secondary trap in the south. The large-amplitude tilted oil-water contract showed that the paleoreservoir was still adjusting and unstable. The favorable development zone is the high zone of paleostructure which is in the western Sarvak reservoir, followed by the belt of transition between paleostructure and current structure.

Key words: shale , pore structure , low-pressure nitrogen adsorption , high-pressure mercury injection , nuclear magnetic resonance , quantitative characterization , Longmaxi Formation , Sichuan Basin

[1]孙龙德,江同文,徐汉林,等.塔里木盆地哈得逊油田非稳态油藏[J].石油勘探与开发,2009,36(1):62-67.

Sun Longde,Jiang Tongwen,Xu Hanlin,et al. Unsteady reservoir in Hadson oilfield,Tarim basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(1):62-67.

[2]赵靖舟,李秀荣.晚期调整再成藏———塔里木盆地海相油气藏形成的一个重要特征[J].新疆石油地质,2002,23(2):89-91.

Zhao Jingzhou,Li Xiurong. Late adjustment and re-accumulation as a major feature of marine petroleum accumulation in Tarim basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2002,23(2):89-91.

[3]徐汉林,江同文,顾乔元,等.塔里木盆地哈得逊油田成藏研究探讨[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,30(5):17-21.

Xu Hanlin,Jiang Tongwen,Gu Qiaoyuan,et al. The Research of oil generation in Hadson oilfield,Tarim basin[J]. Joumal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2008,30 (5): 17-21.

[4]苏劲,张水昌,杨海军,等.原生油藏调整过程的有机地球化学与岩石学证据———由乡 3 井看哈得逊油田的调整机制[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1886-1898.

Su Jin,Zhang Shuichang,Yang haijun,et al. Evidence of the organic geochemistry and petrology for the adjustment process of primary reservoir:insight into the adjustment mechanism of Hadexun oil field visa Xiang-3 well[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6): 1886-1898.

[5]王飞宇,张水昌,梁狄刚.塔中 4 油田油气水界面的变迁与成藏期[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(5):560-562.

Wang Feiyu,Zhang Shuichang,Liang Digang. Evolvement of oil-gaiwater contract and timing of petroleum accumulation in Tazhong-4 field,Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2004,25(5): 560-562.

[6]徐德军,张文才,杜秀娟,等.伊朗扎格罗斯盆地白垩质灰岩储层特征及开发建议[J].石油实验地质,2010,32(1):15-18.

Xu Dejun,Zhang Wencai,Du Xiujuan,et al. Reservoir characteristics and development suggestion of chalkey limestone in the Zagros basin,Iran[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2010,32 (1): 15-18.

[7]林景晔,童英,王新江.大庆长垣砂岩储层构造油藏油水界面控制因素研究[J].中国石油勘探,2007(3):13-16.

Lin Jinye,Tong Ying,Wang Xinjiang. Research on controlling factors of oil-water interface of structural oil reservoirs in sandstone reservoirs of Daqing placanticline structure[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2007(3):13-16

[8]江同文,徐汉林,练章贵,等.倾斜油水界面成因分析与非稳态成藏理论探索[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,30(5):1-5.

Jiang Tongwen,Xu Hanlin,Lian Zhanggui,et al. Origin of tilted oilwater contract and probe into the theory of unsteady hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Joumal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2008,30(5):1-5.

[9]孙龙德,江同文,徐汉林,等.非稳态成藏理论探索与实践[J].海相油气地质,2008,13(3):1103-1112.

Sun Longde,Jiang Tongwen,Xu Hanlin,et al. Exploration and practice for theory of unsteady-state hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2008,13(3):1103-1112.

[10]杨海军,孙龙德,朱光有,等.塔里木盆地非稳态油藏特征与形成机制[J].石油学报,2012,33(6):1103-1112.

Yang Haijun,Sun Longde,Zhu Guangyou,et al. Characters and formation mechanism of unsteady reservoirs in Tarim basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(6):1103-1112.

[11]李传亮.毛管压力是油气运移的动力吗?———与李明诚教授商榷[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(3):17-20.

Li Chuanliang. Is capillary pressure the driving force in oil and gas migration? —Discussion with Prof. Li Mingcheng[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(3):17-20.

[12]韩涛,彭仕宓,马鸿来.地下水侵入对三间房组油藏油水界面的影响[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(4):70-73.

Han Tao,Peng Shimi,Ma Honglai. Influence of groundwater encroachment on oil-water contract in SanJianFang reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University,2007,29(4):70-73.

[13]冯一波,丁晓琪,谢世文,等.麻黄山地区中生界油气分布规律及控制因素分析[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(3):60-64.

Feng Yibo,Ding Xiaoqi,Xie Shiwen,et al. Oil and gas distribution and controlling factors of Mesozoic in Mahuangshan area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(3):60-64.

[14]李传亮.油水界面倾斜原因分析(续)[J].新疆石油地质,2009,30(5):653-654.

Li Chuanliang. Theoretical analysis of dipping water-oil contacts (Ⅱ)[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2009,30(5):653-654.

[15]王世虎,李政,周文,等.伊朗库姆盆地油气成藏机理分析[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(3):236-240.

Wang Shihu,Li Zheng,Zhou Wen,et al. A preliminary study on petroleum accumulation in the Qom Basin,Iran[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2004,26(3):236-240.

[16]许丽,王拥军,李政.伊朗库姆盆地原油地球化学特征[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(2):168-172.

Xu Li,Wang Yongjun,Li Zheng. Geochemical characteristics of oil in the Qom basin of Iran[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2006,28(2):168-172.

[17]Alavi M. Structures of the Zagros fold-thrust belt in Iran[J]. American Journal of Science,2007,307:1064-1095.

[18]Sepehr M,Cosgrove J W. Structures framework of the Zagros foldthrust Belt in Iran[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2004,21:829-843.

[19]久凯,丁文龙,李春燕,等.含油气盆地古构造恢复方法研究及进展[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(1):13-19.

Jiu Kai,Ding Wenlong,Li Chunyan,et al. Advance of paleostructure restoration methods for petroliferous basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(1):13-19.

[20]马如辉,王安志.利用构造恢复原理制作古构造演化图[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(2):185-188.

Ma Ruhui,Wang Anzhi. Creation of structural evolution diagrams with structural recovery principal[J]. West China Petroleum Geosciences,2006,2(2):185-188.

[21]李凤杰,郑荣才,蒋斌.中国大陆主要盆山耦合系统及其特征[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(4):26-32.

Li Fengjie,Zheng Rongcai,Jiang Bin. Main basin and mountain coupling systems and their characteristics in China continent[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(4):26-32.

[1] 张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[2] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[3] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[4] 向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 李军, 郭宇豪, 张浩. 页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
[5] 杨荣军, 彭平, 张静, 叶茂, 文华国. 四川盆地奉节地区上古生界古隆起特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 1-9.
[6] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[7] 何绪全, 黄东, 赵艾琳, 李育聪. 川中地区大安寨段页岩油气储层测井评价指标体系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 129-137.
[8] 许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[9] 魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[10] 张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长81致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[11] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[12] 杨洋, 石万忠, 张晓明, 王任, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 曹沈厅, 冯芊. 页岩岩相的测井曲线识别方法——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 135-146.
[13] 王立辉, 夏惠芬, 韩培慧, 曹瑞波, 孙先达, 张思琪. 剩余油分布的微观特征及其可动用程度的定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 147-154.
[14] 薛培, 张丽霞, 梁全胜, 师毅. 基于逸度与压力计算页岩吸附甲烷的等量吸附热差异分析——以延长探区延长组页岩为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 171-179.
[15] 杜金玲, 林鹤, 纪拥军, 江洪, 许文莉, 伍顺伟. 地震与微地震融合技术在页岩油压后评估中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 127-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .