鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田主力油层有效储层厚度

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20210510

岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 107–119.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210510

鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田主力油层有效储层厚度

许璟^1,2, 贺永红², 马芳侠², 杜彦军², 马浪², 葛云锦², 王瑞生³, 郭睿², 段亮¹

1. 西北大学地质学系, 西安 710069;
2. 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司研究院, 西安 710065;
3. 延长油田股份有限公司定边采油厂, 陕西榆林 718699

收稿日期:2021-01-15 修回日期:2021-04-06 出版日期:2021-10-01 发布日期:2021-09-30
第一作者:许璟(1984-),女,高级工程师,西北大学在读博士研究生,主要从事储层预测与石油地质综合研究。地址:(710069)陕西省西安市太白北路229号。Email:lily_jing_2003@163.com
通信作者: 段亮(1985-),男,副教授,博士生导师,从事沉积地质学的教学和研究。Email:duanl@nwu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“典型碎屑岩结构非均质性输导层的地质模型研究”（编号：2017ZX05008-004-004-002）资助

Effective reservoir thickness of main oil layers in Dingbian Oilfield, Ordos Basin

XU Jing^1,2, HE Yonghong², MA Fangxia², DU Yanjun², MA Lang², GE Yunjin², WANG Ruisheng³, GUO Rui², DUAN Liang¹

1. Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China;
2. Research Institute of Yanchang Petroleum(Group) Co., Ltd, Xi'an 710065, China;
3. Dingbian Oil Production Plant, Yanchang Oilfield Co., Ltd, Yulin 718699, Shaanxi, China

Received:2021-01-15 Revised:2021-04-06 Online:2021-10-01 Published:2021-09-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田沙涧区的中生界具有储层非均质性强、多套油水系统相互叠置和低电阻率与常规电阻率油层并存的特点。为了识别有效储层，基于岩心、测井、录井、试油试采、高压物性和密闭取心等资料建立了主力油层延9、长6和长9储层参数测井解释模型，综合分析了各油层组的有效厚度下限，并探讨了储层物性和电性下限的差异性成因。结果表明：①定边油田沙涧区延9、长6和长9油层组有效厚度孔隙度下限分别为12.5%，9.0%，7.0%，渗透率下限分别为2.0 mD，0.2 mD，0.3 mD，声波时差下限分别为239 μs/m，222 μs/m，213 μs/m，电阻率下限分别为6.0 Ω·m，13.0 Ω·m，17.5 Ω·m，含油饱和度下限分别为47.5%，44.0%，41.5%。②差异化成岩作用造成了各油层组物性下限的不同，其中压实和碳酸盐岩胶结作用发育较弱的延9油层组物性条件相对长6、长9油层组好；长6油层组中绿泥石膜的发育使部分粒间孔得以保存，而自生黏土易堵塞孔喉，导致渗透率低；长9油层组因强压实和胶结作用而减少的孔隙度大于长6油层组，但后期溶蚀作用对储层渗透性的改善作用较长6油层组强。③钻井液的侵入、储层物性和黏土附加导电作用的影响是导致延9油层电阻率下限值低的主要原因。客观理解主力油层有效储层厚度下限的不同和差异的成因，有助于深入认识鄂尔多斯盆地中生界油藏的储层变化规律，提高储层有利区预测的精度。

关键词: 有效厚度下限, 成岩作用, 低电阻率油层, 中生界, 定边油田, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: The Mesozoic reservoirs in Shajian area of Dingbian Oilfield, Ordos Basin are characterized by strong reservoir heterogeneity, overlapping of multiple oil-water systems and coexistence of low resistivity and conventional resistivity reservoirs. In order to identify effective reservoirs, based on core, logging, formation test and production test, high-pressure physical properties and sealed coring data, the logging interpretation models of Yan 9, Chang 6 and Chang 9 reservoirs were established. Then, lower limits of effective thickness of each reservoir were comprehensively analyzed, and the origin of the difference of lower limits of physical and electrical properties were discussed. The results show that:①The lower limits of effective thickness porosity of Main oil reservoirs in Shajian area of Dingbian Oilfield are 12.5%, 9.0%, 7.0% respectively, the lower limits of permeability are 2.0 mD, 0.2 mD, 0.3 mD respectively, the lower limits of acoustic time difference are 239 μs/m, 222 μs/m, 213 μs/m respectively, the lower limits of resistivity are 6.0 Ω·m, 13.0 Ω·m, 17.5 Ω·m respectively, and the lower limits of oil saturation are 47.5%, 44.0%, 41.5% respectively.② Differential diagenesis results in the difference of the lower limits of physical property of each reservoir. The physical property conditions of Yan 9 reservoir with weak compaction and carbonate cementation are better than those of Chang 6 and Chang 9;The development of chlorite film in Chang 6 reservoir preserves some intergranular pores, while authigenic clay mineral is easy to block the pore throats, resulting in low permeability. The porosity of Chang 9 oil reservoir reduced by strong compaction and cementation is larger than that of Chang 6 oil reservoir, but the improvement of permeability by dissolution is stronger than that of Chang 6 oil-bearing formation. ③The intrusion of drilling fluid, the influence of reservoir physical properties and additional conductivity of clay are the main reasons for the lower limits of resistivity of Yan 9 oil reservoir. Understanding the difference and the origin of the lower limits of effective thickness for the main oil-bearing formations will help to understand the variation of Mesozoic reservoirs in Ordos Basin and improve the prediction accuracy of favorable reservoir areas.

Key words: lower limits of effective thickness, diagenesis, low resistivity reservoir, Mesozoic, Dingbian Oilfield, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122

许璟, 贺永红, 马芳侠, 杜彦军, 马浪, 葛云锦, 王瑞生, 郭睿, 段亮. 鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田主力油层有效储层厚度[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 107–119.

XU Jing, HE Yonghong, MA Fangxia, DU Yanjun, MA Lang, GE Yunjin, WANG Ruisheng, GUO Rui, DUAN Liang. Effective reservoir thickness of main oil layers in Dingbian Oilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5): 107–119.

参考文献

[1] 杨通佑, 范尚炯, 陈元千, 等.石油及天然气储量计算方法.北京:石油工业出版社, 1990:31-46. YANY T Y, FAN S J, CHEN Y Q, et al. Petroleum and natural gas reservoirs calculation methods. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1990:31-46.
[2] 刘达林.试油层位选择及提高探井试油成功率之我见.油气井测试, 2002, 11(2):39-42. LIU D L. The opinion of both choosing layer location and improving success ratio about production testing in deep wells. Well Testing, 2002, 11(2):39-42.
[3] 郭睿.储集层物性下限值确定方法及其补充.石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(5):140-144. GUO R. Supplement to determining method of cut-off value of net pay. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(5):140-144.
[4] 刘震, 黄艳辉, 潘高峰, 等.低孔渗砂岩储层临界物性确定及其石油地质意义.地质学报, 2013, 86(11):1815-1825. LIU Z, HUANG Y H, PAN G F, et al. Determination of critical properties of low porosity and permeability sandstone reservoir and its significance in petroleum geology. Acta Geological Sinica, 2013, 86(11):1815-1825.
[5] 路智勇, 韩学辉, 张欣, 等.储层物性下限确定方法的研究现状与展望. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5):32-42. LU Z Y, HAN X H, ZHANG X, et al. Research status and outlookfor methods of determining petrophysical property cutoffs. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2016, 40(5):32-42.
[6] 刘冬冬. 鄂尔多斯盆地靖边地区ZJ4区块延9段储层特征及地质建模.成都:成都理工大学, 2018. LIU D D. Reservoir Characteristics and geological modeling model of ZJ4 block Yan 9 section in Jingbian area of Ordos Basin. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2018.
[7] 张宇, 周冕, 李文斌, 等.靖边油田侏罗系延安组延9油藏有效厚度下限研究.辽宁化工, 2020, 49(6):729-731. ZHANG Y, ZHOU M, LI W B, et al. Research on effective thickness lower limit of Yan 9 oil reservoir of Yan'an Formation of Jurassic in Jingbian Oilfield. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(6):729-731.
[8] 王媛媛, 王桂成, 徐勇强, 等.杏子川油田长6低渗透储层有效厚度下限研究.地质科技情报, 2013, 32(3):113-117. WANG Y Y, WANG G C,XU Y Q,et al. Research on the minimum net pay thickness for Chang 6 oil reservoirs with low permeability in Xingzichuan oilfield,Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(3):113-117.
[9] 姜锐.鄂尔多斯盆地柴上塬区长6储层地质建模与储量计算研究.西安:西安石油大学, 2020. JIANG Y. Study on geological modeling and reserve calculation of Chang6 in Chaishangyuan area of Ordos Basin. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2020.
[10] 张晓龙.鄂尔多斯盆地志丹油区长6油层组低孔低渗储层地质特征及测井评价.西安:西北大学, 2017. ZHANG X L. Reservoirs characteristics and well-logging evaluation of the low porosity and low permeability reservoirs of Chang 6 member,Triassic Yanchang Formation in Zhidan area, Ordos Basin. Xi'an:Northwest University, 2017.
[11] 刘溪, 李文厚, 韩伟.华庆地区长6储层四性关系及有效厚度下限研究.西北地质, 2010, 43(1):124-129. LIU X, LI W H, HAN W. Research on the four-property relation and net pay cut-off thickness of Chang-6 reservoir in Huaqing Region. Northwestern Geology, 2010, 43(1):124-129.
[12] 张凤奇, 钟红利, 魏登峰, 等, 刘伟.鄂尔多斯盆地陕北斜坡东南部长7段致密砂岩油藏成藏物性下限.天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2):232-240. ZHANG F Q, ZHONG H L, WEI D F, et al. Lower limits of porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 member 9 southeastern Shaanbei slope 9 Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(2):232-240.
[13] 付金华, 罗安湘, 张妮妮, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7油层组有效储层物性下限的确定.中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(6):82-88. FU J H, LUO A X, ZHANG N N, et al. Determine lower limits of physical properties of effective reservoirs in Chang 7 oil formation in Ordos Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014, 19(6):82-88.
[14] 康鹏兴.致密油储层物性动用下限确定方法研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地吴仓堡油区长7储层为例.西安:西安石油大学, 2016. KANG P X. Study on methods for determining the physical lower limit of tight oil,taking the Chang 7 reservoir of Wucangbao oilfield in Ordos Basin as example. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2016.
[15] 曲长伟, 张霞, 林春明, 等.镇泾油田长9储层四性关系及有效厚度下限研究.辽宁化工, 2013, 42(2):131-135. QU C W, ZHANG X, LIN C M, et al. Study on four-property relationship and effective thickness lower limit of Chang 9 reservoir in Zhenjing Oilfield. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2013, 42(2):131-135.
[16] 杨琼英, 汤小燕.吴仓堡油田长9油层有效厚度起算标准研究.国外测井技术, 2012, 33(1):29-32. YANG Q Y, TANG X Y. The effective thickness standard of Chang 9 reservoir in Wucangbao Oilfield. World Well Logging Technology, 2012, 33(1):29-32.
[17] 王居峰, 赵文智, 郭彦如, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组石油资源现状与勘探潜力分析.现代地质, 2010, 24(5):957-964. WANG J F, ZHAO W Z, GUO Y R, et al. Analyses of petroleum resources status and exploration potentialities, Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Geoscience, 2010, 24(5):957-964.
[18] 曹江骏, 陈朝兵, 程皇辉, 等.成岩作用对深水致密砂岩储层微观非均质性的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长7油层组为例.沉积学报, 2020:1-20. CAO J J, CHEN C B, CHEN H H, et al. Effect of diagenesis on microheterogeneity of deepwater tight sandstone reservoirs:A case study from the Triassic Chang 7 oil-bearing formation in Heshui area,Ordos Basin,NW China. Acta Sedimentological Sinica, 2020:1-20.
[19] 屈红军, 蒲仁海, 陈硕, 等.相-势耦合控制鄂尔多斯盆地中生界石油聚集.石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4):752-762. QU H J, PU R H, CHEN S, et al. Controls of facies-potential coupling on oil accumulation in the Mesozoic Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4):752-762.
[20] 李相博, 姚泾利, 刘化清, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生界低幅度隆起构造成因类型及其对油气分布的控制作用. 现代地质, 2013, 27(4):755-764. LI X B, YAO J L, LIU H Q, et al. Tectonic origin type of the low amplitude uplifted structure and its role in the control of the distribution of oil and gas in Mesozoic,the Ordos Basin. Geoscience, 2013, 27(4):755-764.
[21] FOLK R L.Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Austin, TX:Hemphill Publishing Co.1974, 184.
[22] 胡宗全. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界砂岩储层方解石胶结物特征.石油学报, 2003, 24(4):40-43. HU Z Q. Calcite cements in Upper Paleozoic sand reservoir of Ordos Basin. Acta Petroleum Sinica.2003, 24(4):40-43.
[23] 冯弋秦, 赵俊兴, 王冰, 等.定北地区盒一段致密砂岩储层"四性"关系及有效下限, 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(2):141-149. FENG Y Q, ZHAO J X, WANG B, et al. The "four-property" relation and effective lower limit of tight sandstone reservoirs of the first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in Dingbei Block. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 47(2):141-149.
[24] 宋子齐, 程国建, 王静, 等.特低渗透油层有效厚度确定方法研究.石油学报, 2006(6):103-106. SONG Z Q, CHENG G J, WANG J, et al. Determination of effective thickness for oil reservoirs with extra-low permeability. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006(6):103-106.
[25] 郑浚茂, 庞明.碎屑储集岩的成岩作用研究.武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1989. ZHENG J M, PANG M. Study on clastic diagenesis. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press, 1989.
[26] 王继伟, 朱玉双, 饶欣久, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长6¹致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):34-43. WANG J W, ZHU Y S, RAO X J, et al. Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity restoration of Chang 6¹ tight sandstone reservoir in Hujianshan area,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):34-43.
[27] 李红, 柳益群, 刘林玉. 鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田延长组长8¹低渗透储层成岩作用.石油与天然气地质, 2006(2):209-217. LI H, LIU Y Q, LIU L Y. Diagenesis of Chang 8¹ reservoir with low permeability in Xifeng Oilfield,Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2006(2):209-217.
[28] 张霞, 林春明, 陈召佑.鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾区块上三叠统延长组砂岩中绿泥石矿物特征.地质学报, 2011, 85(10):1659-1671. ZHANG X, LIN C M, CHEN Z Y. characteristics of Chlorite Minerals from Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Zhenting area,Ordos Basin. Acta Geological Sinica, 2011, 85(10):1659-1671.
[29] 朱世发, 徐黎明, 朱筱敏, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长4+5致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3):22-27. ZHU S F, XU L M, ZHU X M, et al. Diagenetic characteristics of tight sandstone of Chang 4+5 reservoir in Longdong area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3):22-27.
[30] 周晓峰, 丁黎, 杨卫国, 宋鹏, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组砂岩中绿泥石膜的生长模式. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):1-10. ZHOU X F, DING L, YANG W G, et al. Growth pattern of chlorite film in Chang 8 sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):1-10.
[31] 李阳, 李树同, 牟炜卫, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6段致密砂岩中黏土矿物对储层物性的影响. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7):1043-1053. LI Y, LI S T, MOU W W, et al. Influences of clay minerals on physical properties of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(7):1043-1053.
[32] 张守鹏, 方正伟.低渗透砂岩储集层渗透性伤害的微观机理与改造技术:以济阳坳陷胜利油田为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2):349-356. ZHANG S P, FANG Z W. Permeability damage micro-mechanisms and stimulation of low-permeability sandstone reservoirs:A case study from Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin, China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2):349-356.
[33] BAKER J C, UWINS P J R, MACKINNON I D R. ESEM study of authigenic chlorite acid sensitivity in sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 1993, 8(4):269-277.
[34] 杨晓萍, 赵文智, 邹才能, 等.低渗透储层成因机理及优质储层形成与分布.石油学报, 2007(4):57-61. YANG X P, ZHAO W Z, ZOU C N, et al. Origin of low-permeability reservoir and distribution of favorable reservoir. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007(4):57-61.
[35] SURDAM R. The chemistry of secondary porosity.AAPG memoir 37, 1984:127-149.
[36] 李长喜, 石玉江, 周灿灿, 等.淡水钻井液侵入低幅度-低电阻率油层评价方法.石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):696-702. LI C X, SHI Y J, ZHOU C C, et al. Evaluation of low amplitude and low resistivity pay zones under the fresh drilling mud invasion condition. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):696-702.
[37] 董杨坤.鄂尔多斯盆地任山地区长2油层组低阻油层成因研究.西安:西北大学, 2019. DONG Y K. The origin of Chang 2 reservoir group low-resistivity oil-bearing layers in Renshan area in Ordos Basin. Xi'an:Northwest University,2019
[38] 斯扬, 牛小兵, 梁晓伟, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长2油层低阻主控因素及有效识别方法研究. 地质与勘探, 2019, 55(3):882-890. SI Y, NIU X B, LIANG X W, et al. Main controlling factors of low resistivity and effective identification methods for the Chang 2 reservoir in the Jiyuan area,Ordos Basin. Geology and Exploration, 2019, 55(3):882-890.
[39] 欧阳健, 修立军, 石玉江, 等.测井低对比度油层饱和度评价与分布研究及其应用.中国石油勘探, 2009, 14(1):38-52. OUYANY J, XIU L J, SHI Y J, et al. Saturation evaluation and distribution of low-contrast oil reservoirs. China Petroleum Exploration, 2009, 14(1):38-52.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田主力油层有效储层厚度

Effective reservoir thickness of main oil layers in Dingbian Oilfield, Ordos Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2]	易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[3]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[4]	尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[5]	牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[6]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[7]	王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[8]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[9]	李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[10]	雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[11]	翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.
[12]	龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[13]	杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五₅亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[14]	李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[15]	魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.