Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 141-151.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220612

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Composite sand body architecture and controlling factors of the lower Minghuazhen Formation of Neogene in northern Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield

REN Mengyi, HU Guangyi, FAN Tingen, FAN Hongjun   

  1. CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
  • Received:2021-08-23 Revised:2022-06-07 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-09

Abstract: Through logging,dominant seismic attribute fusion, spectrum attribute trend analysis and other methods, the reservoir architecture characteristics of the composite sand bodies in the second oil group(NmⅡ)of the lower Minghuazhen Formation of Neogene in northern Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield were studied,and the control effect of base-level cycle on the composite sand body architecture was clarified. The results shows that: (1)The composite sand bodies of the NmⅡ in northern Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield are mainly point bar and crevasse splay deposits,and the seepage barrier is mainly floodplain and abandoned channel deposits. According to logging facies and sand body structure rhythm,the internal structure of composite sand bodies is divided into box shape in the head and middle of point bar,bell shape in the end of point bar,funnel shape in crevasse splay,peak shape and low-amplitude tooth shape in floodplain and abandoned channel. The external stacking patterns of the composite sand bodies include isolated type,tight lateral stacking type,scattered lateral stacking type and stacking type. (2)In the early stage of NmⅡ,the intertwined channel mainly deposited point bar and crevasse splay. Sand bodies of tight side-stacking type and stacking type were widely developed. In the late stage of NmⅡ,the channel evolved into single band shape,and the crevasse splay was sporadically distributed on the convex bank of the channel. The scale of the composite sand bodies became smaller,mainly scattered lateral stacking type and isolated type,and the floodplain and abandoned channel became the seepage barrier between the composite sand bodies. (3)In long-term to middle-term cycles in the study area,heterocyclic factors such as tectonic activities affect the external morphology and stacking of composite sand bodies by adjusting the accommodation space and sediment supply,while in short-term cycles, the internal structure of sand bodies is affected by autogenetic cycle such as sediment types and hydrodynamics.

Key words: composite sand body architecture, point bar, crevasse splay, abandoned channel, meandering river deposits, based-level cycle, Minghuazhen Formation, Neogene, Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield

CLC Number: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 薛培华. 河流点坝相储层模式概论[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1991. XUE Peihua. An introduction to the reservoir model of point-bar facies in rivers[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1991.
[2] 岳大力, 吴胜和, 谭河清, 等. 曲流河古河道储层构型精细解剖:以孤东油田七区西馆陶组为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(1):101-109. YUE Dali, WU Shenghe, TAN Heqing, et al. An anatomy of paleochannel reservoir architecture of meandering river reservoir:A case study of Guantao Formation,the west 7th block of Gudong oilfield[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(1):101- 109.
[3] 于兴河. 油气储层地质学基础[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2009. YU Xinghe. Fundamentals of petroleum reservoir geology[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009.
[4] MIALL A D. Architectural-element analysis:A new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 1985, 22(4):261-308.
[5] MIALL A D. Architecture and sequence stratigraphy of Pleistocene fluvial systems in the Malay Basin, based on seismic timeslice analysis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(7):1201-1216.
[6] 吴胜和, 纪友亮, 岳大力, 等. 碎屑沉积地质体构型分级方案探讨[J]. 高校地质学报, 2013, 19(1):12-22. WU Shenghe, JI Youliang, YUE Dali, et al. Discussion on hierarchical scheme of architectural units in clastic deposits[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2013, 19(1):12-22.
[7] 胡光义, 范廷恩, 梁旭, 等. 河流相储层复合砂体构型概念体系、表征方法及其在渤海油田开发中的应用探索[J]. 中国海上油气, 2018, 3(1):89-98. HU Guangyi, FAN Tingen, LIANG Xu, et al. Concept system and characterization method of compound sandbody architecture in fluvial reservoir and its application exploration in development of Bohai oilfield[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2018, 3(1):89-98.
[8] 石书缘, 胡素云, 刘伟, 等. 基于野外资料和Google Earth影像的地质信息识别与提取方法:以塔里木盆地西克尔奥陶系古岩溶露头为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2016, 21(3):55-64. SHI Shuyuan, HU Suyun, LIU Wei, et al. Identification and acquirement methods of geological information based on integrating outcrops and google earth satellite images:A case at an Ordovician Paleokarst outcrop in Xekar, Tarim Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2016, 21(3):55-64.
[9] 王冬冬, 宋亚开, 郭宇鹏. 基于Google Earth软件对曲流河点坝的研究[J]. 中国锰业, 2017, 35(2):141-143. WANG Dongdong, SONG Yakai, GUO Yupeng. A google earthbased study on point bar of meandering river[J]. China's Manganese Industry, 2017, 35(2):141-143.
[10] 吴胜和, 岳大力, 刘建民, 等. 地下古河道储层构型的层次建模研究[J]. 中国科学D辑, 2008, 38(增刊1):111-121. WU Shenghe, YUE Dali, LIU Jianmin, et al. Study on hierarchical modeling of reservoir configuration in under-ground ancient river[J]. Science in China(Series D), 2008, 38(Suppl 1):111- 121.
[11] 束青林. 孤岛油田馆陶组河流相储层隔夹层成因研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(3):100-103. SHU Qinglin. Interlayer characterization of fluvial reservoir in Guantao Formation of Gudao oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(3):100-103.
[12] 吴小红, 韦阿娟, 王应斌, 等. 渤海海域QHD32-6亿吨级大油田的形成条件分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(1):112- 117. WU Xiaohong, WEI Ajuan, WANG Yingbin, et al. Formation conditions analysis of QHD32-6 oilfield in Bohai Sea[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(1):112- 117.
[13] 赵春明, 胡景双, 霍春亮, 等. 曲流河与辫状河沉积砂体连通模式及开发特征:以渤海地区秦皇岛32-6油田为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2009, 16(6):88-91. ZHAO Chunming, HU Jingshuang, HUO Chunliang, et al. Sandbody interconnectivity architecture and development characteristics of meandering river and braided river deposits:A case study of Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield, Bohai area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2009, 16(6):88-91.
[14] 李伟, 岳大力, 胡光义, 等. 分频段地震属性优选及砂体预测方法:秦皇岛32-6油田北区实例[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2017, 52(1):121-130. LI Wei, YUE Dali, HU Guangyi, et al. Frequency-segmented seismic attribute optimization and sandbody distribution prediction:An example in north Block, Qinghuangdao 32-6 oilfield[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 52(1):121-130.
[15] 周新茂, 胡永乐, 高兴军, 等. 曲流河单砂体精细刻画在老油田二次开发中的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2010, 31(3):284- 287. ZHOU Xinmao, HU Yongle, GAO Xingjun, et al. Application of fine description of single sand body in meandering river to old oilfield redevelopment[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2010, 31(3):284-287.
[16] 刘波, 赵翰卿, 王良书, 等. 古河流废弃河道微相的精细描述[J]. 沉积学报, 2001, 19(3):394-398. LI Bo, ZHAO Hanqing, WANG Liangshu, et al. The detailed description of ancient fluvial abandoned channel micro-facies[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2001, 19(3):394-398.
[17] 刘丽. 埕岛油田馆陶组曲流河砂体叠置模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):40-48. LIU Li. Sandbody superimposed pattern of meandering river facies of Guantao Formation in Chengdao Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):40-48.
[18] 任秋月. 地震属性提取方法的研究与应用[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2019. REN Qiuyue. Research and application of the extraction method of seismic attributes[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2019.
[19] 邓猛, 邵英博, 赵军寿, 等. 渤海A油田明化镇组下段河-坝砂体储层构型及剩余油分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6):154- 163. DENG Meng, SHAO Yingbo, ZHAO Junshou, et al. Reservoir architecture and remaining oil distribution of channel-bar:A case from lower Minghuazhen Formation in Bohai A oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6):154-163.
[20] 胡光义, 陈飞, 范廷恩, 等. 基于复合砂体构型样式的河流相储层细分对比方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2017, 36(2):12-18. HU Guangyi, CHEN Fei, FAN Tingen, et al. Subdividing and comparing method of the fluvial facies reservoirs based on the complex sandbody architectures[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2017, 36(2):12-18.
[21] 刘涛. 渤海湾盆地东部古近系-新近系沉积与物源特征研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2020. LIU Tao. Sedimentology and provenance analysis of PaleogeneNeogene strata in the eastern Bohai Bay Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2020.
[22] 任梦怡, 江青春, 刘震, 等. 南堡凹陷柳赞地区沙三段层序结构及其构造响应[J]. 岩性油气藏,2020, 32(3):93-103. REN Mengyi, JIANG Qingchun, LIU Zhen, et al. Sequence architecture and structural response of the third member of Shahejie Formation in Liuzan area, Nanpu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):93-103.
[23] 唐欢欢, 谢锐杰, 刘威. 应用INPEFA技术在源内层系中划分层序和识别高能砂:以川西坳陷新场构造带须五段为例[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 23(3):49-53. TANG Huanhuan, XIE Ruijie, LIU Wei. Sequence division and identification of high energy sand in source strata based on inpefa technology:Taking the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang structural belt in Western Sichuan Depression as an example[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(3):49-53.
[24] 王航, 杨海风, 黄振, 等. 基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用:以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):73-83. WANG Hang, YANG Haifeng, HUANG Zhen, et al. A new model for sedimentary evolution of fluvial faices based on accommodation space change and its impact on hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of Kenli-A structure in Laizhouwan Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):73-83.
[1] CHENG Yan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Tongyao, QI Yumin, YANG Jilei, HAO Peng, LI Kuo, WANG Xiaodong. Oil and gas migration characteristics of lithologic reservoirs of Neogene Minghuazhen Formation in Bozhong A-2 area,Bozhong Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[2] SUN Hui, FAN Guozhang, WANG Hongping, DING Liangbo, ZUO Guoping, MA Hongxia, PANG Xu, XU Xiaoyong. Deep-water sedimentary characteristics and sequence boundary identification of Middle Eocene in Rovuma Basin,East Africa [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 106-116.
[3] XU Zhongbo, WANG Libing, SHEN Chunsheng, CHEN Mingyang, GAN Liqin. Architecture characterization of meandering river reservoirs of lower Ming huazhen Formation of Neogene in Penglai 19-3 oilfield,Bohai Sea [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 100-107.
[4] YAO Xiutian, WANG Chao, YAN Sen, WANG Mingpeng, LI Wan. Reservoir sensitivity of Neogene Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[5] YANG Kaile, HE Shenglin, YANG Zhaoqiang, WANG Meng, ZHANG Ruixue, REN Shuangpo, ZHAO Xiaobo, YAO Guangqing. Diagenesis characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs with high temperature,overpressure and high CO2 content: A case study of Neogene Meishan-Huangliu Formation in LD10 area,Yinggehai Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1): 83-95.
[6] MA Dongye, CHEN Yuhang, ZHAO Jingzhou, WU Weitao, SONG Ping, CHEN Mengna. Architectural elements of fluvial sand bodies of the eighth member of Permian Xiashihezi Formation in eastern Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1): 63-73.
[7] LI Guoxin, SHI Yajun, ZHANG Yongshu, CHEN Yan, ZHANG Guoqing, LEI Tao. New progress and enlightenment of oil and gas exploration and geological understanding in Qaidam Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 1-18.
[8] MA Kuiqian, LIU Dong, HUANG Qin. Physical simulation experiment of steam flooding in horizontal wells of Neogene heavy oil reservoir in Lvda oilfield,Bohai Sea [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5): 152-161.
[9] ZHOU Donghong, TAN Huihuang, ZHANG Shengqiang. Seismic description technologies of Neogene composite channel sand bodies in Kenli 6-1 oilfield,Bohai Sea [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 13-21.
[10] WANG Lifeng, SONG Ruiyou, CHEN Dianyuan, XU Tao, PAN Guangchao, HAN Guangming. Seismic identification and gas-bearing prediction of large-scale submarine fans of Neogene Huangliu Formation in D13 area of Yinggehai Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 42-52.
[11] LI Xiaohui, DU Xiaofeng, GUAN Dayong, WANG Zhiping, WANG Qiming. Sedimentary characteristics of braided-meandering transitional river of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 93-103.
[12] NIU Chengmin, DU Xiaofeng, WANG Qiming, ZHANG Can, DING Yiran. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large-scale lithologic reservoirs of Cenozoic in Bohai Sea [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 1-14.
[13] YI Zhifeng, ZHANG Shangfeng, WANG Yaning, XU Enze, ZHAO Shaohua, WANG Yuyao. Quantitative characterization of point bar sand bodies in meandering river under different curvatures: A case study of modern deposition of Baihe river in the source area of Yellow River [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1): 34-42.
[14] YANG Lisha, CHEN Bintao, MA Lun, SHI Zhongsheng, XUE Luo, WANG Lei, SHI Jianglong, ZHAO Yanjun. Element feature and coupling model of source-to-sink system in depression lacustrine basin: A case study of Neogene Jimidi Formation in Melut Basin, South Sudan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(3): 27-38.
[15] FENG Dehao, LIU Chenglin, TIAN Jixian, TAI Wanxue, LI Pei, ZENG Xu, LU Zhendong, GUO Xuanhao. Basin modeling and favorable play prediction of Neogene in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(3): 74-84.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] HUANG Sijing,HUANG Peipei,WANG Qingdong,LIU Haonian,WU Meng,ZOU Mingliang. The significance of cementation in porosity preservation in deep-buried sandstones[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] LIU Zhen,CHEN Yanpeng,ZHAO Yang,HAO Qi,XU Xiaoming,CHANG Mai. Distribution and controlling factors of hydrocarbon reservoirs in continental fault basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] DING Chao,GUO Lan,YAN Jifu. Forming conditions of Chang 6 reservoir in Anding area of Zichang Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] LI Yanshan,ZHANG Zhansong,ZHANG Chaomo,CHEN Peng. Application of mercury injection data to Chang 6 reservoir classification in Changqing area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] LUO Peng,LI Guorong,SHI Zejin,ZHOU Dazhi,TANG Hongwei,ZHANG Deming. Analysis of sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary facies of M aokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] ZUO Guoping, TU Xiaolong, XIA Jiufeng. Study on volcanic reservoir types in Subei exploration area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] WANG Feiyu. Method to improve producing degree of thermal recovery horizontal wells and its application[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] YUAN Yunfeng,CAI Ye,FAN Zuochun,JIANG Yiyang,QIN Qirong, JIANG Qingping. Fracture characteristics of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in Hongche fault belt of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] YUAN Jianying, FU Suotang, CAO Zhenglin, YAN Cunfeng,ZHANG Shuichang, MA Dade. Multi-source hydrocarbon generation and accumulation of plateau multiple petroleum system in Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] SHI Zhanzhan, HE Zhenhua, WEN Xiaotao, TANG Xiangrong. Reservoir detection based on EMD and GHT[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(3): 102 -105 .
TRENDMD: