Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 159-168.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230215

• PETROLEUM ENGINEERING AND OIL & GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENT • Previous Articles    

Reservoir sensitivity of Neogene Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

YAO Xiutian, WANG Chao, YAN Sen, WANG Mingpeng, LI Wan   

  1. Gudao Oil Production Plant, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2022-08-21 Revised:2022-09-01 Published:2023-03-07

Abstract: Reservoir sensitivity analysis is an important means to evaluate the degree of reservoir damage, which is of great significance for the later efficient development and remaining oil tapping. The core samples from Neogene Guantao Formation in Kenxi oilfield of Zhanhua Sag in Bohai Bay Basin were selected to analyze the damage index and sensitivity characteristics of reservoirs of Guantao Formation in combination with thin section observation, X-ray diffraction analysis, mercury injection test and flowing water drive experiment. The results show that:(1) The Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag of Bohai Bay Basin is loosely cemented. The pore structure is characterized by large pore size, uniform distribution of pore throat and good connectivity. The rock minerals are mainly composed of quartz, plagioclase, K-feldspar and rock debris, and the clay minerals mainly include kaolinite, illite, chlorite and chlorite-illite mixed layer. The upper member of Guantao Formation is dominated by fine grains, while the lower member is dominated by medium grains.(2) The reservoirs of Guantao Formation are generally characterized by medium velocity sensitivity, weak alkali sensitivity and weak salt sensitivity. The acid sensitivity characteristics of the upper and lower members are quite different. The upper member has non-acid sensitivity characteristics, while the lower member has strong acid sensitivity characteristics with index of 78.25%.(3) The content of ankerite and chlorite and pore structure of Guantao Formation in the study area control the reservoir sensitivity.(4) Controlling of injection-production flow rate is an important content of the development plan in the study area, while the reservoir damage caused by acid sensitivity in the lower member of Guantao Formation should be protected and treated.

Key words: reservoir sensitivity, pore structure, clay mineral, reservoir damage, Guantao Formation, Neogene, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

CLC Number: 

  • TE122.2+3
[1] 韩长城, 徐子煜, 王文峰, 等. 南图尔盖盆地Aryskum坳陷中侏罗统多尚组储层敏感性研究[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 38(5):599-606. HAN Changcheng, XU Ziyu, WANG Wenfeng, et al. Study on reservoir sensitivity of the Upper Jurassic Duoshang Formation in the Aryskum Depression, South Turgay Basin[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 38(5):599-606.
[2] 单祥, 徐洋, 郭华军, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷北斜坡玛131井区块三叠系百口泉组储层敏感性评价[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(1):176-182. SHAN Xiang, XU Yang, GUO Huajun, et al. Reservoir sensitivity evaluation of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 block of Mabei slope in Mahu Depression, Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2017, 36(1):176-182.
[3] 李勇, 王延斌, 孟尚志, 等. 煤系非常规天然气合采地质基础理论进展及展望[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(4):1406-1418. LI Yong, WANG Yanbin, MENG Shangzhi, et al. Theoretical basis and prospect of coal measure unconventional natural gas co-production[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(4):1406-1418.
[4] 徐豪飞, 马宏伟, 尹相荣, 等. 新疆油田超低渗透油藏注水开发储层损害研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(2):100-106. XU Haofei, MA Hongwei, YIN Xiangrong, et al. Study on formation damage with water flooding for ultra-low permeability reservoir in Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(2):100-106.
[5] 熊山, 王学生, 张遂, 等. WXS油藏长期水驱储层物性参数变化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):120-129. XIONG Shan, WANG Xuesheng, ZHANG Sui, et al. Physical properties variation of WXS reservoir after long-term water flooding[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):120-129.
[6] CIVAN F. Formation damage mechanisms and their phenomenological modeling:An overview[C]. Oklahoma:Proceedings of 7 th European Formation Damage Conference(EFDC), 2007.
[7] 江涛, 韦涛, 范旭, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘C-P煤系致密砂岩储层敏感性分析[J]. 高校地质学报, 2020, 26(3):313-322. JIANG Tao, WEI Tao, FAN Xu, et al. Sensitivity analysis of tight sandstone reservoirs of Carboniferous-Permian coal-series in the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2020, 26(3):313-322.
[8] 王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4):981-990. WANG Yuxia, ZHOU Lifa, JIAO Zunsheng, et al. Sensitivity evaluation of tight sandstone reservoir in Yanchang Formation in Shanbei area, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4):981-990.
[9] 邵东波, 陈建文. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密砂岩储层敏感性特征及其控制因素:以新安边地区延长组长6储层为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(3):55-60. SHAO Dongbo, CHEN Jianwen. Sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoir in Ordos Basin and its controlling factor:Taking the Chang 6 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Xin'anbian area as example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(3):55-60.
[10] 段春节, 魏旭光, 李小冬, 等. 深层高压低渗透砂岩油藏储层敏感性研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32(3):94-99. DUAN Chunjie, WEI Xuguang, LI Xiaodong, et al. Formation sensitivity of the deep section high pressure and low-permeability sandstone reservoir[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(3):94-99.
[11] 党犇, 赵虹, 康晓燕, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北斜坡中部延长组深部层系特低渗储层敏感性微观机理[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(3):1100-1107.DANG Ben, ZHAO Hong, KANG Xiaoyan, et al. Sensitivity microscopic mechanism study of super-low permeability reservoirs in depth of Yanchang Formation in central of Shanbei slop Ordos Basin NW China[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2013, 44(3):1100-1107.
[12] 李琴. 孤岛油田孤北1地区稠油油藏特征及储层敏感性分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2005, 12(4):28-30. LI Qin. The characteristic of the viscous oil reservoirs and analysis of reservoir sensitivity in Gudao Oilfield Gubei 1 area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2005, 12(4):28-30.
[13] 张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3):293-306. ZHANG Jianguo, JIANG Zaixing, LIU Li'an, et al. Lithofacies and depositional evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the lower submember of the member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3):293-306.
[14] 赵笑笑, 闫建平, 王敏, 等. 沾化凹陷沙河街组湖相泥页岩夹层特征及测井识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):118-129. ZHAO Xiaoxiao, YAN Jianping, WANG Min, et al. Logging identification method of lacustrine shale interlayers of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):118-129.
[15] 陈雨茂, 邓文秀, 滕彬彬. 曲流河点坝内部构型精细解剖:以垦西油田垦71断块馆陶组为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(4):25-27. CHEN Yumao, DENG Wenxiu, TENG Binbin. Internal detailed description on bar sand of meandering river based on multiscale data:Case study of Guantao Formation, Ken 71 fault block, Kenxi Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18(4):25-27.
[16] 孙淑云, 曾晚丽, 周丽君, 等. 垦西垦71断块特高含水期产能挖潜方向[J]. 国外油田工程, 2004(8):40-41. SUN Shuyun, ZENG Wanli, ZHOU Lijun, et al. Production potential tapping direction in Kenxi Ken 71 fault block during extra high water cut period[J]. Foreign Oilfield Engineering, 2004(8):40-41.
[17] 王可君. 深层特稠油油藏HDCS开发技术政策界限[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(6):93-95. WANG Kejun. Technical limits of HDCS for developing deep extra-heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20(6):93-95.
[18] 国家能源局. 储层敏感性流动实验评价方法:SY/T 5358-2010[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2020. National Energy Administration. Formation damage evaluation by flow test:SY/T 5358-2010[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2020.
[19] 任大忠, 张晖, 周然, 等. 塔里木盆地克深地区巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层敏感性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):27-36. REN Dazhong, ZHANG Hui, ZHOU Ran, et al. Sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoir of Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen area, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):27-36.
[20] 成赛男, 田继军, 张鹏辉. 伊通盆地莫里青断陷西北缘双阳组二段储层敏感性流动实验评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(3):76-78. CHENG Sainan, TIAN Jijun, ZHANG Penghui. Study on flow test evaluation of reservoir sensitivity in second member of Shuangyang Formation, northwest edge of Moliqing fault depression, Yitong Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2013, 20(3):76-78.
[21] 李冠男, 孙卫, 刘登科. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起薛岔地区长6储层敏感性研究及其主控因素[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(6):138-147. LI Guannan, SUN Wei, LIU Dengke. Sensitivity of Chang 6 reservoir in Wuqi-Xuecha area of Ordos Basin and its main controlling factors[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(6):138-147.
[22] 徐铠烔, 王纳申, 申彪, 等. 银额盆地巴北凹陷二叠系埋汗哈达组储层敏感性[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(10):1600-1607. XU Kaitong, WANG Nashen, SHEN Biao, et al. Maihanhada Formation reservoir sensitivity of Permian in Babei Sag, Yin'e Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(10):1600-1607.
[23] 徐会林, 王新海, 魏少波, 等. 四川盆地高石梯-磨溪区块震旦系储层敏感性实验评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2):13-17. XU Huilin, WANG Xinhai, WEI Shaobo, et al. Evaluation of reservoir sensitivity of Sinian in Gaoshiti-Moxi block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(2):13-17.
[24] 李云, 祁利褀, 胡作维, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡中侏罗统头屯河组储层敏感性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(1):52-57. LI Yun, QI Liqi, HU Zuowei, et al. Reservoir sensitivity of Middle Jurassic Toutunhe Formation in Fudong slope, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(1):52-57.
[25] 曾伟, 董明, 孔令明, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田中、下二叠统砂岩储层敏感性影响因素分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2011, 34(3):31-34. ZENG Wei, DONG Ming, KONG Lingming, et al. Influencing factors of reservoir sensitivity in Middle and Lower Permian sandstone, Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2011, 34(3):31-34.
[26] 束青林. 孤岛油田河流相储层结构与剩余油分布规律研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2005. SHU Qinglin. Study on the fluvial reservoir architecture and distribution modes of remaining oil in Gudao oil field[D]. Guangzhou:Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry), 2005.
[27] 石砥石. 沾化凹陷东部北西向断裂系统与油气成藏研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2006. SHI Dishi. Northwestward(NW) faults and its relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation in the eastern part of Zhanhua Sag[D]. Guangzhou:Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry), 2006.
[28] 郇金来, 杨丽, 代百祥, 等. 乌石凹陷X油田流沙港组三段储层敏感性分析[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(5):49-53. HUAN Jinlai, YANG Li, DAI Baixiang, et al. Reservoir sensitivity analysis of the third member of Liushagang Formation in X oilfield of Wushi Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2020, 34(5):49-53.
[1] XIAO Ling, CHEN Xi, LEI Ning, YI Tao, GUO Wenjie. Characteristics and main controlling factors of shale oil reservoirs of Triassic Chang 7 member in Heshui area, Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[2] YANG Kaile, HE Shenglin, YANG Zhaoqiang, WANG Meng, ZHANG Ruixue, REN Shuangpo, ZHAO Xiaobo, YAO Guangqing. Diagenesis characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs with high temperature,overpressure and high CO2 content: A case study of Neogene Meishan-Huangliu Formation in LD10 area,Yinggehai Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1): 83-95.
[3] Lü Dongliang, YANG Jian, LIN Liming, ZHANG Kaili, CHEN Yanhu. Characterization model of oil-water relative permeability curves of sandstone reservoir and its application in numerical simulation [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1): 145-159.
[4] WEN Zhigang, LUO Yushu, LIU Jiangyan, ZHAO Chunyu, LI Shixiang, TIAN Weichao, FAN Yunpeng, GAO Heting. Pore structure characteristics and genetic mechanism of Triassic Chang 7 shale oil reservoir in Longdong area [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
[5] REN Mengyi, HU Guangyi, FAN Tingen, FAN Hongjun. Composite sand body architecture and controlling factors of the lower Minghuazhen Formation of Neogene in northern Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 141-151.
[6] LI Guoxin, SHI Yajun, ZHANG Yongshu, CHEN Yan, ZHANG Guoqing, LEI Tao. New progress and enlightenment of oil and gas exploration and geological understanding in Qaidam Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 1-18.
[7] MA Kuiqian, LIU Dong, HUANG Qin. Physical simulation experiment of steam flooding in horizontal wells of Neogene heavy oil reservoir in Lvda oilfield,Bohai Sea [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5): 152-161.
[8] ZHANG Fengqi, LI Yinong, LUO Julan, REN Xiaofeng, ZHANG Lanxin, ZHANG Jieyu. Microscopic pore structure characteristics of shale of Ordovician Wulalike Formation in western Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5): 50-62.
[9] WANG Lifeng, SONG Ruiyou, CHEN Dianyuan, XU Tao, PAN Guangchao, HAN Guangming. Seismic identification and gas-bearing prediction of large-scale submarine fans of Neogene Huangliu Formation in D13 area of Yinggehai Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 42-52.
[10] ZHANG Jigang, DU Meng, CHEN Chao, QIN Ming, JIA Ninghong, LYU Weifeng, DING Zhenhua, XIANG Yong. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of shale reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 89-102.
[11] LIU Yangping, WU Boran, YU Zhongliang, YU Chenglin, WANG Lixin, YIN Yanshu. Reconstruction of 3D geological model of braided river sandstone reservoirs: A case study of Neogene Guantao Formation in Gaoshangpu block,Jidong Oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 159-170.
[12] ZHOU Donghong, TAN Huihuang, ZHANG Shengqiang. Seismic description technologies of Neogene composite channel sand bodies in Kenli 6-1 oilfield,Bohai Sea [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 13-21.
[13] LI Xiaohui, DU Xiaofeng, GUAN Dayong, WANG Zhiping, WANG Qiming. Sedimentary characteristics of braided-meandering transitional river of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 93-103.
[14] LEI Haiyan, GUO Pei, MENG Ying, QI Jing, LIU Jin, ZHANG Juan, LIU Miao, ZHENG Yu. Pore structure and classification evaluation of shale oil reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 142-153.
[15] HE Yu, ZHOU Xing, LI Shaoxuan, DING Hongbo. Genesis and logging response characteristics of formation overpressure of Paleogene in Bozhong Sag,Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 60-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
TRENDMD: