四川盆地西南部东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积特征及有利储层预测

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20250209

岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 92–102.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250209

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

四川盆地西南部东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积特征及有利储层预测

吴冠桦¹, 刘宏¹, 宋林珂², 曾琪², 杨涛³

1. 西南石油大学天然气地质四川省重点实验室, 成都 610500;
2. 中国石油西南油气田公司致密油气勘探开发项目部, 成都 610500;
3. 中国石油西南油气田公司川西北气矿, 四川江油 621000

收稿日期:2024-10-15 修回日期:2024-12-03 发布日期:2025-03-06
第一作者:吴冠桦（1999—），男，西南石油大学在读硕士研究生，研究方向为地震沉积学。地址：（610500）成都市新都区新都大道8号西南石油大学。Email：1398058685@qq.com。
通信作者: 刘宏(1981—),男,博士,教授,主要从事地震沉积学和储层地质学方面的教学和研究工作。Email:nd123@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“成岩体系演化对致密砂岩储层流体-岩石相互作用的控制项目”（编号：41872154）资助。

The deposition characteristics and favorable reservoir prediction of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Dongguachang area, southwestern Sichuan Basin

WU Guanhua¹, LIU Hong¹, SONG Linke², ZENG Qi², YANG Tao³

1. Sichuan Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Geology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
2. Tight Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Project Department, Southwest Oil and Gas Field Branch, PetroChina, Chengdu 610500, China;
3. Northwest Sichuan Gas Mine, Southwest Oil and Gas Field Branch, PetroChina, Jiangyou 621000, Sichuan, China

Received:2024-10-15 Revised:2024-12-03 Published:2025-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对四川盆地西南部东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组河道砂体分布规律不清的问题，基于地震沉积学理论，结合钻井岩心、测井、地震等资料，通过地震岩性分析、地层切片、RGB属性融合等技术，对四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积体系展开了研究。研究结果表明：①东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组主要发育2个三级层序（SQ1，SQ2）、5个四级层序（ssq1—ssq5），其中SQ1属于湖退体系域，SQ2属于湖侵体系域。②研究区沙溪庙组沉积时期，主要发育浅水三角洲沉积，可进一步划分为三角洲平原和三角洲前缘2种亚相，三角洲平原发育于ssq2和ssq3，三角洲前缘发育于ssq1，ssq4和ssq5。③研究区沙溪庙组河道砂体受基准面旋回和物源供给影响，ssq1—ssq3可容纳空间较小，物源供给充足，河道规模较大，以叠置型河道和侧切型河道为主；ssq4—ssq5可容纳空间较大，物源供给较弱，河道相对独立发育，规模较小。③研究区大规模连通河道砂体主要发育于ssq1—ssq3的河道中，储层物性好，为勘探有利区。

关键词: 地震沉积学, 浅水三角洲, 叠置型河道, 侧切型河道, 基准面旋回, 物源供给, 沙溪庙组, 侏罗系, 东瓜场地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: In response to the unclear distribution patterns of channel sand bodies of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Dongguajing area of Sichuan Basin，this study utilized seismic sedimentology theory and integrated data from drilling，core samples，well logging，and seismic data. Various techniques，including seismic lithology analysis，stratigraphic slicing，and RGB attribute fusion，were employed to study the sedimentary system of the Shaximiao Formation in the research area. The results show that：（1）In the Dongguajing area，the Shaximiao Formation mainly consists of two third-order sequences（SQ1-SQ2）and five fourth-order sequences（ssq1-ssq5）. SQ1 belongs to the overall lake retreat system，while SQ2 belongs to the lake transgression system.（2） During the sedimentation period of the Shaximiao Formation，the dominant sedimentary facies in the study area were shallow-water delta deposits，which can be divided into two types：delta plain and delta front subfacies. Delta plain subfacies developed during ssq2 and ssq3，while delta front subfacies developed during ssq1，ssq4， and ssq5.（3）The development of channel sand bodies in the Shaximiao Formation is influenced by base-level cycles and sediment supply. The ssq1-ssq3 can accommodate lower space and have stronger sediment supply，resulting in larger channel sizes with overlapping and incised channel configurations. The ssq4-ssq5，on the other hand，have higher accommodation space and weaker sediment supply，leading to relatively independent and smaller channel development.（4）Large-scale connected channel sand bodies are mainly found in the channels of ssq1-ssq3，with the characteristics of good reservoir，and shoes are the favorable reservoir

Key words: seismic sedimentology, shallow-water delta, overlapping channel, incised channel, base-level cycles, sediment supply, Shaximiao Formation, Jurassic, Dongguachang area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.1

吴冠桦, 刘宏, 宋林珂, 曾琪, 杨涛. 四川盆地西南部东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积特征及有利储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 92–102.

WU Guanhua, LIU Hong, SONG Linke, ZENG Qi, YANG Tao. The deposition characteristics and favorable reservoir prediction of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Dongguachang area, southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(2): 92–102.

参考文献

[1] 贾爱林,位云生,郭智,等.中国致密砂岩气开发现状与前景展望[J].天然气工业,2022,42(01):83-92. JIA Ailin,WEI Yunsheng,GUO Zhi,et al. Development status and prospect of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(1):83-92.
[2] 杨跃明,王小娟,陈双玲,等.四川盆地中部地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积体系演化及砂体发育特征[J].天然气工业,2022, 42(1):12-24. YANG Yueming,WANG Xiaojuan,CHEN Shuangling,et al. Sedimentary system evolution and sandbody development char-acteristics of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in the central Sich-uan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(1):12-24.
[3] 胡晓强,陈洪德,纪相田,等.川西前陆盆地侏罗系三角洲沉积体系与沉积模式[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(3):226-231. HU Xiaoqiang,CHEN Hong de,JI Xiangtian,et al. The Jurassic delta deposit system tract and sedimentation model in the western Sichuan foreland basin,China[J]. Petroleum Geology And Experiment,2005,27(3):226-231.
[4] 王小娟,陈双玲,谢继容,等.川西南地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩成藏特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(1):78-87. WANG Xiaojuan,CHEN Shuangling,XIE Jirong,et al. Accu-mulation characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):78-87.
[5] 熊亮,隆轲,曹勤明,等.四川盆地川西气田多层系成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报,2024,45(3):595-614. XIONG Liang,LONG Ke,CAO Qinming. et al. Mulilayer accumulation conditions and key technologies for exploration and development of the West Sichuan gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(3);595-614.
[6] 董春梅,张宪国,林承焰.有关地震沉积学若干问题的探讨[J].石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(4):405-409. DONG Chunmei,ZHANG Xianguo,LIN Chengyan. Discussions on several issues about seismic sedimentolog[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2006,41(4):405-409.
[7] 谢格云,田云英,刘柏,等.川西南部地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组优质储层形成条件与控制因素[J].天然气工业,2022,42(7):45-54. XIE Geyun,TIAN Yunying,LIU Bai,et al. Formation conditions and controlling factors of high-quality reservoirs in the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation of the southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(7):45-54.
[8] 张坤,刘宏,谭磊,等.川中北部蓬莱地区灯影组二段地震沉积学特征[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(2):189-200. ZHANG Kun,LIU Hong,TAN Lei,et al. Seismic sedimentology characteristics of the second member of Dengying Formation in Penglai area,central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Litho-logic Reservoirs,2025,37(2):189-200.
[9] Nio S D,Brouwer H,Smith D,et al. Spectral trend attribute analysis:Applications in the stratigraphic analysis of wireline logs[J]. First Break,2005,23(4):71-75.
[10] 姚鑫阳,胡忠贵,武赛军,等.川东北地区开江-梁平海槽东侧长兴组沉积特征及有利区预测[J].沉积学报,2024,42(6):2102-2118. YAO Xinyang,HU Zhonggui,WU Saijun,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and prediction of favorable areas of the Changxing Formation on the eastern side of the Kaijiang-Liangping Trough in Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Acts Sedimentologica Sinica, 2024,42(6):2102-2118.
[11] 曲星宇.东营凹陷梁东地区古近系沙三中亚段层序地层划分及石油地质意义[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(2):166-177. QU Xingyu. Sequence stratigraphy division and petroleum geo-logical significance in the middle submember of the third member of Shahejie Formation in Liangdong area,Dongying Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2025,37(2):166-177.
[12] 文华国,梁金同,周刚,等.四川盆地及周缘寒武系洗象池组层序-岩相古地理演化与天然气有利勘探区带[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):1-16. WEN Huaguo,LIANG Jintong,ZHOU Gang,et al. Sequencebased lithofacies paleogeography and favorable natural gas ex-ploration areas of Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):1-16.
[13] 徐兆辉,李江涛,李剑,等.九分量横波三维地震在生物气区沉积储层研究中的应用:以柴达木盆地三湖坳陷台东地区更新统七个泉组为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2024,51(3):565-577. XU Zhaohui,LI Jiangtao,LI Jian,et al. Application of 9-com-ponent S-wave 3D seismic data to study sedimentary facies and reservoirs in a biogas-bearing area:A case study on the Pleisto-cene Qigequan Formation in Taidong area,Sanhu Depression, Qaidam Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and De-velopment,2024,51(3):565-577.
[14] 罗冰,文华国,廖义沙,等.川东北地区二叠系吴家坪组二段页岩储层特征及有利区分布[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(1):1-12. LUO Bing,WEN Huaguo,LIAO Yisha,et al. Shale reservoirs characteristics and favorable areas distribution of the second member of Permian Wujiaping Formation in northeastern Sich-uan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reserviors,2025,37(1):1-12.
[15] 文雯,杨西燕,向曼,等.四川盆地开江-梁平海槽东侧三叠系飞仙关组鲕滩储层特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2023,35(2):68-79. WEN Wen,YANG Xiyan,XIANG Man. et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of oolitic shoal reservoirs of Triassic Feixianguan Formation in eastern Kaijiang-Liangping trough, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(2):68-79.
[16] 刘宗堡,李雪,郑荣华,等.浅水三角洲前缘亚相储层沉积特征及沉积模式:以大庆长垣萨北油田北二区萨葡高油层为例[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):1-13. LIU Zong bao,LI Xue,ZHENG Ronghua,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and models of shallow water delta front subfacies reservoirs:A case study of Sapugao oil layer in north-block of Sabei oilfield,Daqing placanticline. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022,34(1):1-13.
[17] 朱筱敏,董艳蕾,曾洪流,等.中国地震沉积学研究现状和发展思考[J].古地理学报,2020,22(3):397-411. ZHU Xiaomin,DONG Yanlei,ZENG Hongliu,et al. Research status and thoughts on the development of seismic sedimentology in China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2020,22(3):397-411.
[18] 章学刚,杨飞,左中航,等.地震沉积学中90°相位转换技术适用性的讨论[J].石油物探,2024,63(4):890-896. ZHANG Xuegang,YANG Fei,ZUO Zhonghang,et al.A discussion on applicability of 90° phase shift in seismic sedimentology[J]. Geophysical Prospecting forPetroleum,2024,63(4):890-896.
[19] 杨民鑫,赵晓明,梁岳立,等.基于分频RGB融合技术的储层构型精细解剖:以东海盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组为例[J].天然气地球科学,2024,35(7):1323-1338. YANG Minxin,ZHAO Xiaoming,LIANG Yueli,et al. Fine anatomy of reservoir architecture based on frequency division RGB fusion technology:A case study of the Oligocene Hua-gang Formation in Xihu Depression,East Sea Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(7):1323-1338.
[20] 曾洪流,朱筱敏,朱如凯,等.砂岩成岩相地震预测:以松辽盆地齐家凹陷青山口组为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):266-274. ZENG Hongliu,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Rukai,et al. Seismic prediction of sandstone diagenetic facies:Applied to Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Qijia Depression,Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):266-274.
[21] Posamentier H W.Seismic geomorphology and depositional systems of deep water environments;observations from offshore Nigeria,Gulf of Mexico,and Indonesia (abstract)[J]. AAPG Annual Convention Program,2001,10:160.
[22] 韩飞鹏,宋光建,吴振坤,等.致密油"甜点"多属性融合预测技术[J].特种油气藏,2019,26(1):94-99. HAN Feipeng,SONG Guangjian,WU Zhenkun,et al. Multi-attribute fusion prediction technique for tight Oil "sweets" [J]. Special Oil and Gas Reserviors,2019,26(1):94-99.
[23] 徐兆辉,曾洪流,胡素云,等.地震沉积学在塔里木盆地古城地区下寒武统沉积结构与储层预测中的应用[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(2):153-165. XU Zhaohui,ZENG Hongliu,HU Suyun,et al. Application of seismic sedimentology in predicting the Lower Cambrian sedimentary structure and reservoir rocks in Gucheng area,Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2025,37(2):153-165.
[24] 师庆民,王双明,王生全,等.神府南部延安组富油煤多源判识规律[J].煤炭学报,2022,47(5):2057-2066. SHI Qingmin,WANG Shuangming,WANG Shengquan,et al. Multi-source identification and internal relationship of tar-rich coal of the Yan'an Formation in the south of Shenfu[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(5):2057-2066.
[25] 王俊,赵家宏,腾军,等.浅水三角洲前缘砂体地震沉积学研究:以松南乾安地区上白垩统青三段为例[J].沉积学报, 2018,36(3):570-583. WANG Jun,ZHAO Jia hong,TENG Jun,et al. Seismic sedimentology research on shallow water delta front sandbodies:A case study on member 3 of upper cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Qian'an area,south Songliao Basin,NE China[J]. Acts Sedimentologica Sinica,2018,36(3):570-583.
[26] 冯烁,李胜利,于兴河,等.四级层序格架内浊流沉积特征及演化模式:以鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区三叠系延长组7段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(4):859-876. FENG Shuo,LI Shengli,YU Xinghe,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution model of turbidites within a fourthordersequence stratigraphic framework:A case study of the Tri-assic Chang 7 Member in Zhenjing area,Ordos Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology,2022,43(4):859-876.
[27] 孙少川,李令喜,刘懿,等.基于地震沉积学的古河道展布特征与演变过程:以川东北通南巴背斜中下侏罗统为例[J].东北石油大学学报,2021,45(3):62-72. SUN Shaochuan,LI Lingxi,LIU Yi,et al. Distribution characteristics and evolution of ancient river channels based on seis-mic sedimentology:a casestudy of the Middle-Lower Jurassic in the Tongnanba Anticline,Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University. 2021,45(3):62-72.
[28] 方锐,蒋裕强,陈沁,等.川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(2):47-58. FANG Rui,JIANG Yuqiang,CHEN Qin,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang area,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023,35(2):47-58.
[29] 张文文,韩长城,田继军,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组层序地层划分及演化特征[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(5):45-58. ZHANG Wenwen,HAN Changcheng,TIAN Jijun,et al. Se-quence stratigraphy division and evolutionary features of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(5):45-58.
[30] 武恒志,叶泰然,赵迪,等.川西坳陷陆相致密气藏河道砂岩储层精细刻画技术及其应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2015, 36(2):230-239. WU Hengzhi,YE Tairan,ZHAO Di,et al.Fine characterization technique and its application to channel sandstone in continental tight gas reservoirs of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2015,36(2):230-239.
[31] 周洪锋,吴海红,杨禹希,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2024,36(4):85-97. ZHOU Hongfeng,WU Haihong,YANG Yuxi,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta front of the fourth member of Cre-taceous A'ershan Formation in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(4):85-97.
[32] 程静,闫建平,宋东江,等.川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(3):31-39. CHENG Jing,YAN Jianping,SONG Dongjiang,et al. Low re-sistivity response characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Changning area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(3):31-39.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

四川盆地西南部东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积特征及有利储层预测

The deposition characteristics and favorable reservoir prediction of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Dongguachang area, southwestern Sichuan Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	廖新武, 杨庆红, 李超, 郭诚, 赵大林. 渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 1-11.
[2]	尹艳树, 黄圣斌, 黄奇志, 谢鹏飞, 王立鑫, 吴伟. 尼日尔Termit盆地Koulele油田始新统浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及成因模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 12-25.
[3]	李凌, 邓禹, 张新宇, 罗文军, 赵东方, 曾建军, 刘耘, 谭秀成. 川中蓬莱—高磨地区震旦系灯二段泡沫绵层白云岩成因及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 60-69.
[4]	李亚, 王尉, 赵立可, 刘冉, 张玺华, 陈延贵, 黄天海, 肖笛. 四川盆地德阳—绵阳凹陷南缘二叠系栖霞组沉积演化及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 81-91.
[5]	何岩, 许维娜, 党思思, 牟蕾, 林少玲, 雷章树. 准噶尔盆地陆梁地区侏罗系西山窑组钙质夹层成因及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 90-101.
[6]	李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[7]	张培军, 谢明贤, 罗敏, 张良杰, 陈仁金, 张文起, 乐幸福, 雷明. 巨厚膏盐岩形变机制解析及其对油气成藏的影响——以阿姆河右岸东部阿盖雷地区侏罗系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 36-44.
[8]	余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[9]	张天择, 王红军, 张良杰, 张文起, 谢明贤, 雷明, 郭强, 张雪锐. 射线域弹性阻抗反演在阿姆河右岸碳酸盐岩气藏储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 56-65.
[10]	苟红光, 林潼, 房强, 张华, 李山, 程祎, 尤帆. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷中下侏罗统水西沟群天文旋回地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 89-97.
[11]	闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[12]	乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[13]	孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[14]	周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[15]	张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.