岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 32–42.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.06.005

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地正宁地区长8油层组储层特征

曾源1, 陈世加1, 李士祥2, 路俊刚1   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
    2. 中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 西安 710018
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-26 修回日期:2017-06-10 出版日期:2017-11-21 发布日期:2017-11-21
  • 作者简介:曾源(1993-),女,西南石油大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气成藏。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号地球科学与技术学院。Email:598761410@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金"泥质岩层对低渗透砂岩储层油气成藏的控制机理研究"（编号：41502146）、国家重点基础研究发展（973计划）项目"致密油（页岩油）赋存与运聚机理"（编号：2014CB239005）和中国石油科技创新基金项目"源储间的薄层泥岩对致密砂岩储层含油性的控制机理研究"（编号：2015D-5006-0101）联合资助

Characteristics of Chang 8 reservoir in Zhengning area,Ordos Basin

ZENG Yuan1, CHEN Shijia1, LI Shixiang2, LU Jungang1   

  1. 1. School of Earth Science and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China
  • Received:2017-04-26 Revised:2017-06-10 Online:2017-11-21 Published:2017-11-21

PDF (PC)

410

摘要： 为推进鄂尔多斯盆地正宁地区致密油气的勘探开发，基于长8油层组岩心薄片、扫描电镜及压汞资料，分析了储层发育特征、储层致密化的原因及物性与含油性的关系。结果表明，长8油层组岩性以岩屑长石砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩为主，填隙物含量较高，碎屑颗粒结构成熟度低。储层孔隙包括基质孔隙和裂缝两大类，基质孔隙主要发育粒间孔和长石溶孔，裂缝主要发育构造裂缝和成岩微裂缝。基质孔隙以小孔、细喉为主。压实作用和胶结作用均是储层致密的主要原因，天然裂缝是油气重要的渗流通道，溶蚀作用和天然裂缝均改善了储层物性。物性分布与砂体分布具有较好的一致性，长81小层物性明显优于长82小层。良好的物性是油井高产的关键因素。

关键词: 致密气储层, 应力-应变曲线, 单轴抗压实验, 脆性指数, 储层脆性评价

Abstract: In order to promote the exploration and development of tight oil and gas in Zhengning area, Ordos Basin, based on core slice,scanning electron microscope and mercury injection data, reservoir characteristics, reservoir densification and relationship between physical properties and oil-bearing property were analyzed. The Chang 8 sandstone is mainly composed of feldspar lithic sandstone and lithic feldspar sandstone,with high content of interstitial matter, which is mainly composed by ferroan calcite, hydromica, chlorite membrane, kiesel, and kaolinite. The Chang 8 sandstone is low in clastic structure maturity, which is mainly medium-sorted subangular particles. Matrix pores and natural fractures jointly form reservoir pore system,and matrix pores are mainly small pores with fine throat. Compaction and cementation are main densification origins for Chang 8 tight reservoir. Natural fractures are main percolation pathway,and together with dissolution,they improved reservoir physical properties. Physical properties of Chang 81 reservoir are obviously better than that of Chang 82 reservoir. Oil-bearing is relative with physical property. Better physical property is the key for high oil production.

Key words: tight gas reservoirs, stress-strain curve, uniaxial compressive experiments, brittleness index, reservoir brittleness evaluation

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+2
[1] 梁承春, 郭景祥.鄂尔多斯盆地红河油田延长组长81小层致密砂岩成岩作用与储层特征. 油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(1):57-63. LIANG C C, GUO J X. Diagenesis and reservoir characteristics of tight sandstones of Chang 81 member of Yanchang Formation in Honghe oilfield, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017, 24(1):57-63.
[2] 巩磊, 高铭泽, 曾联波, 等.影响致密砂岩储层裂缝分布的主控因素分析——以库车前陆盆地侏罗系-新近系为例.天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2):199-208.GONG L, GAO M Z, ZENG L B, et al. Controlling factors on fracture development in the tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of Jurassic-Neogene in the Kuqa forland basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(2):199-208.
[3] 王维斌, 朱静, 马文忠, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地周家湾地区长8致密砂岩储层特征及影响因素.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):51-58. WANG W B, ZHU J, MA W Z, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of Chang 8 tight sandstone reservoir of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Zhoujiawan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):51-58.
[4] 李会军, 吴泰然, 吴波, 等.中国优质碎屑岩深层储层控制因素综述.地质科技情报, 2004, 23(4):76-82. LI H J, WU T R, WU B, et al. Distribution and controlling factors of high quality clastic deeply buried reservoirs in China. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2004, 23(4):76-82.
[5] 冯佳睿, 高志勇, 崔京钢, 等.深层、超深层碎屑岩储层勘探现状与研究进展.地球科学进展, 2016, 31(7):718-736. FENG J R, GAO Z Y, CUI J G, et al. The exploration status and research advances of deep and ultra-deep clastic reservoirs. Advances in Earth Science, 2016, 31(7):718-736.
[6] BLOCH S, LANDER R H, BONNELL I. Anom alously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs:origin and predictability. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(2):301-328.
[7] WILKINSON M D, HASZELDINE R S, COUPLES G D. Secondary porosity generation during deep burial associated with overpressure leak-off:Fulmar Formation, United Kingdom central Graben. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(5):803-813.
[8] 于波, 崔智林, 刘学刚, 等.西峰油田长8储层砂岩成岩作用及对孔隙影响. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2008, 38(3):405-410. YU B, CUI Z L, LIU X G, et al. The diagenesis of Chang 8 reservoir sandstone and its effect on porosity in Xifeng oilfield. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2008, 38(3):405-410.
[9] 张一果,孙卫,任大忠,等.鄂尔多斯盆地英旺油田长8储层微观孔隙结构特征研究.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3):71-76. ZHANG Y G, SUN W, REN D Z, et al. Study on micro-pore structure characteristics of Chang 8 reservoir in Yingwang oilfield, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3):71-76.
[10] 张创, 孙卫, 高辉, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地华池长8储层成岩相与孔隙度演化.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2014, 39(4):411-420. ZHANG C, SUN W, GAO H, et al. Reservoir diagenetic facies and porosity evolution pathways of Chang 8 formation in Huachi, Ordos Basin. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2014, 39(4):411-420.
[11] 王志坤, 王多云,郑希民,等. 陕甘宁盆地陇东地区三叠系延长统长6-长8储层沉积特征及物性分析.天然气地球科学, 2003, 14(5):380-385. WANG Z K, WANG D Y, ZHENG X M, et al. Depositional characteristics and physical behavior analysis of the Chang 6-8 reservoir of Triassic Yanchang formation in Longdong area, Shanganning. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2003, 14(5):380-385.
[12] 段悦, 侯长冰, 郑荣才, 等.镇原地区长8油层组层序-岩相古地理特征及砂体展布规律.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(1):36-44. DUAN Y, HOU C B, ZHENG R C, et al. Sequence based lithofacies paleogeography and sand body distribution of Chang 8 oil reservoir set in Zhenyuan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(1):36-44.
[13] 刘春雷, 李文厚, 袁珍, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南缘上三叠统长8段砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化. 地质通报, 2013, 32(5):807-814. LIU C L, LI W H, YUAN Z, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Chang 8 oil bearing in southeast Ordos Basin. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(5):807-814.
[14] 曾联波, 张建英.大民屯凹陷静北潜山油藏裂缝及其渗流特征.石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(1):34-36. ZENG L B, ZHANG J Y. Characteristics of fractures and their percolation in Jingbei buried-hill pool in Damingtun depression. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Edition of Natural Science), 2001, 25(1):34-36.
[15] 曾联波, 高春宇, 漆家福, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区特低渗透砂岩储层裂缝分布规律及其渗流作用.中国科学:D辑地球科学, 2008,(增刊1):41-47. ZENG L B, GAO C Y, QI J F, et al. Distribution and percolation of fractures in low permeability sandstone reservoir in Longdong area, Ordos Basin. Science in China:Series D Earth Science, 2008,(Suppl 1):41-47.
[16] 张晓磊, 刘鑫, 陈振波, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部黄陵地区延长组裂缝特征及形成期次探讨. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(19):11-14. ZHANG X L, LIU X, CHEN Z B, et al. Fracture characteristics and stages of Yanchang Formation in Huangling area of southeastern Ordos Basin. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(19):11-14.
[17] 张晓磊, 章辉若, 刘鑫, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地黄陵油田延长组长6储层致密成因.石油地质与工程, 2014, 28(6):34-35. ZHANG X L, ZHANG H R, LIU X, et al. Densification factors of Chang 6 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Huangling oil field of southeastern Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2014,28(6):34-35.
[1] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[2] 曹茜, 戚明辉, 张昊天, 黄毅, 张烨毓. 一种基于应力-应变特征的岩石脆性指数评价改进方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 54-61.
[3] 张杰, 张超谟, 张占松, 张冲, 聂昕. 基于应力-应变曲线形态的致密气储层脆性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 126-131.
[4] 艾林, 周明顺, 张杰, 梁霄, 钱博文, 刘迪仁. 基于煤岩脆性指数的煤体结构测井定量判识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 139-144.
[5] 周立宏，蒲秀刚，邓 远，陈世悦，鄢继华，韩文中. 细粒沉积岩研究中几个值得关注的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 6-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发