沁水盆地南部地区古构造恢复及其油气意义

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.06.006

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 43–50.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.06.006

沁水盆地南部地区古构造恢复及其油气意义

尹帅¹, 赵威², 范子宜³

1. 西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065;
2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司第二采油厂, 黑龙江大庆 163414;
3. 中国石化河南油田分公司采油二厂, 河南南阳 473400

收稿日期:2017-05-16 修回日期:2017-07-16 出版日期:2017-11-21 发布日期:2017-11-21
第一作者:尹帅(1989-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事石油构造及地质力学方面的研究工作。地址:(710065)陕西省西安市雁塔区电子二路18号。Email:speedysys@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金"硬脆/塑性泥页岩微裂缝产生的岩石物理学机制基础研究"（编号：41572130）及国家"十三五"重大科技专项"四川盆地周缘海相页岩气有利区优选及重点目标评价"（编号：2017ZX05035001-007）联合资助

Paleo-tectonic restoration in southern Qinshui Basin and its hydrocarbon significance

YIN Shuai¹, ZHAO Wei², Fan Ziyi³

1. School of Earth Science and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
2. No.2 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company, Daqing 163414, Heilongjiang, China;
3. No.2 Oil Production Plant, Henan Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Nanyang 473400, Henan, China

Received:2017-05-16 Revised:2017-07-16 Online:2017-11-21 Published:2017-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 古构造的高点通常是致密气长期运移和聚集的有利低势区，古构造恢复对致密砂岩气勘探尤为重要。以沁水盆地南部地区为例，基于该地区丰富的钻井、录井、测井等资料，对该地区在燕山早期（J₁-J₂）、燕山晚期（J₃-K₁）及喜马拉雅中期（E-N）等3个关键构造演化期的古构造进行了恢复。结果表明，自晚三叠世以来，本区表现为整体隆升剥蚀，强剥蚀区沿着NE-SW方向展布。燕山运动期间古隆起具有继承性，晚二叠世地层挤压变形强烈，古构造表现出"多隆多坳"特征；喜马拉雅运动中期出现"夷平化"现象，逐渐接近现今构造特征，部分古隆起逐渐变得宽缓，构造形态表现为"背斜宽缓，向斜紧闭"。将喜马拉雅运动中期的古构造单元划分为相对隆起带、相对斜坡带及相对坳陷带。相对隆起带是下一步该区煤系致密砂岩气勘探的有利区域。

关键词: 深水储层, 浊积扇, 长7油层组, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: The paleohighs are generally favorable accumulation areas for tight gas,so paleo-tectonic restoration is particularly important. Taking southern Qinshui Basin as an example,paleo-tectonic restoration was carried out for key tectonic stages of early Yanshanian(J₁-J₂), late Yanshan(J₃-K₁)and middle Himalayan(E-N)periods based on drilling,log and logging data. The results show that the whole area has been uplifted and eroded since the Late Triassic,and the strong erosion area distributed along the NE-SW direction. During the period of Yanshan movement, the paleouplift was inherited, the Permian strata were deformed strongly, and the paleo-tecnonic shows "multi-highs and multi-lows" features. Deplanation occurs during the middle Himalaya movement,and the paleo-tecnonic is gradually close to the current feature. Some of the paleo uplifts gradually become wide and gentle,and their tectonic forms are characterized by wide anticline and closed syncline. The paleo-tectonic units during the middle period of Himalayan movement were divided into highs,ramp and lows. It is suggested that paleo highs should be exlpored for tight sandstone gas in coal measure.

Key words: deep-water reservoir, turbidite fan, Chang 7 oil layers, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.2

尹帅, 赵威, 范子宜. 沁水盆地南部地区古构造恢复及其油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 43–50.

YIN Shuai, ZHAO Wei, Fan Ziyi. Paleo-tectonic restoration in southern Qinshui Basin and its hydrocarbon significance[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6): 43–50.

参考文献

[1] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 黄士鹏,等.煤成气研究对中国天然气工业发展的重要意义.天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(1):1-17. DAI J X, NI Y Y, HUANG S P, et al. Significant function of coal-derived gas study for natural gas industry development in China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(1):1-17.
[2] 梁建设, 王存武, 柳迎红, 等.沁水盆地致密气成藏条件与勘探潜力研究.天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(10):1509-1517. LIANG J S, WANG C W, LIU Y H, et al. Study on the tight gas accumulation conditions and exploration potential in the Qin-shui Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(10):1509-1517.
[3] 张凤奇,严小鳙,武富礼, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长1油层组古地貌特征与油气富集规律-以陕北W地区为例. 石油与天然气地质,2013,34(5):619-624. ZHANG F Q, YAN X Y, WU F L, et al. Paleogeomorphology characteristics and oil accumulation patterns of Chang 1 oil reservoir in the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin:a case study of Warea in the northern of Shaanxi. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(5):619-624.
[4] 王延章, 宋国奇, 王新征, 等.古地貌对不同类型滩坝沉积的控制作用-以东营凹陷东部南坡地区为例.油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(4):13-16. WANG Y Z, SONG G Q, WANG X Z, et al. The control effect of palaeogeography on different types of beach and bar sand reservoir:case study of the south slope area in eastern Dongying depression. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18(4):13-16.
[5] 张银德, 周文, 邓坤, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地高桥构造平缓地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶古地貌特征与储层分布.岩石学报, 2014, 30(3):757-767. ZHANG Y D, ZHOU W, DENG K, et al. Palaeogeomorphology and reservoir distribution of the Ordovician karstified carbonate rocks in the structurally gentle Gaoqiao area, Ordos Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(3):757-767.
[6] 郭正权,张立荣,楚美娟, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部前侏罗纪古地貌对延安组下部油藏的控制作用. 古地理学报, 2008, 10(1):63-71. GUO Z Q, ZHANG L R, CHU M J, et al. Pre-Jurassic palaeogeomorphic control on the hydrocarbon accumulation in the Lower Yan' an Formation in southern Ordos Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2008, 10(1):63-71.
[7] 林玉祥, 刘虎, 郭凤霞, 等.沁水盆地地层剥蚀量研究.地质与勘探, 2014, 50(1):114-121. LIN Y X, LIU H, GUO F X, et al. Strata erosion amount of the Qinshui Basin. Geology and Exploration, 2014, 50(1):114-121.
[8] 袁玉松, 郑和荣, 涂伟.沉积盆地剥蚀量恢复方法.石油实验地质, 2008, 30(6):636-642. YUAN Y S, ZHENG H R, TU W. Methods of eroded strata thickness restoration in sedimentary basins. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(6):636-642.
[9] 真柄钦次.压实与流体运移.陈荷立, 译.北京:石油工业出版社, 1981. MAGARA K. Compaction and fluid migration. CHEN H L trans. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1981.
[10] 李儒峰, 张刚雄, 阮小飞.渤海海域古近系-新近系不整合剥蚀量恢复研究.地质论评, 2012, 58(3):542-552. LI R F, ZHANG G X, RUAN X F. Study on the recovery of erosion quantity of unconformities of Paleogene-Neogene in Bohai sea area. Geological Review, 2012, 58(3):542-552.
[11] 李月, 林玉祥, 于腾飞.沁水盆地构造演化及其对游离气藏的控制作用.桂林理工大学学报, 2011, 31(4):481-487. LI Y, LIN Y X, YU T F. Tectonic evolution of Qinshui Basin and free gas reservoir control. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2011, 31(4):481-487.
[12] 任纪舜. 中国大陆的组成、结构、演化和动力学. 地球学报, 1994(3/4):5-13. REN J S. The continental tectonics of China. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 1994(3/4):5-13.
[13] ZHU G, JIANG Z D, ZHANG B L, et al. Destruction of the eastern North China craton in a backarc setting:evidence from crustal deformation kinematics. Gondwana Research, 2012, 22(1):86-103.
[14] TANG Y J, ZHANG H F, YING J F. Asthenosphere-lithospheric mantle interaction in an extensional regime:implication from the geochemistry of Cenozoic basalts from Taihang mountains, North China craton. Chemical Geology, 2006, 233(3):309-327.
[15] 郭颖, 汤良杰, 倪金龙.碎屑岩地层压实规律及其在古构造恢复中的应用.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):43-49. GUO Y, TANG L J, NI J L. Clastic strata compaction law and its application to paleostructure restoration. Lithologic reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):43-49.
[16] 斯伦贝谢测井公司.测井解释常用岩石矿物手册.北京:石油工业出版社, 1998. Schlumberger Logging Company. Logging interpretation common mineral rock handbook. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1998.
[17] 李超, 张立强, 张立宽, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区中生代地层剥蚀厚度估算及古构造恢复. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):72-80. LI C, ZHANG L Q, ZHANG L K, et al. Estimation of denudation thickness of Mesozoic strata and paleostructure restoration in Zhenjing area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):72-80.
[18] SU X B, LIN X Y, ZHAO M J, et al. The upper Paleozoic coalbed methane system in the Qinshui Basin, China. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(1):81-100.
[19] 赵志刚, 王飞宇, 王洪波, 等.二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷烃源岩有机相与烃源灶.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):28-35. ZHAO Z G, WANG F Y, WANG H B, et al. Source kitchen and organic facies of source rocks in Sahantala Sag, Erlian Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):28-35.
[20] 张晶, 李双文, 付立新, 等.黄骅坳陷孔南地区碎屑岩潜山内幕储层特征及控制因素.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6):50-56. ZHANG J, LI S W, FU L X, et al. Characteristics of inner buried hill clastic reservoirs and their main controlling factors in Kongnan area, Huanghua Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(6):50-56.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

沁水盆地南部地区古构造恢复及其油气意义

Paleo-tectonic restoration in southern Qinshui Basin and its hydrocarbon significance

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[3]	尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[4]	牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[5]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[6]	王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[7]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[8]	李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[9]	雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[10]	翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.
[11]	龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[12]	李恒萱, 温志新, 宋成鹏, 刘祚冬, 季天愚, 沈一平, 耿珂. 塞内加尔盆地演化过程与岩性油气藏勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 45-53.
[13]	杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五₅亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[14]	魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.
[15]	尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长6₁¹储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.