岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 51–59.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.06.007

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地神府地区太原组致密砂岩储层特征及成岩演化

刘再振, 刘玉明, 李洋冰, 柳雪青, 王月胜, 王海燕   

  1. 中海油能源发展股份有限公司 工程技术分公司, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-02 修回日期:2017-08-18 出版日期:2017-11-21 发布日期:2017-11-21
  • 第一作者:刘再振(1989-),男,硕士,主要从事石油实验地质方面的研究工作。地址:(300452)天津市滨海新区闸北路3号中海油能源发展股份有限公司。Email:liuzzh6@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中海油能源发展股份有限公司重大专项"非常规油气评价实验配套核心技术研究"（编号：HFKJ-CJFZ-1302）资助

Tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and diagenesis evolution of Taiyuan Formation in Shenmu-Fugu area,Ordos Basin

LIU Zaizhen, LIU Yuming, LI Yangbing, LIU Xueqing, WANG Yuesheng, WANG Haiyan   

  1. Ener Tech-Drilling & Production Company, CNOOC, Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2017-05-02 Revised:2017-08-18 Online:2017-11-21 Published:2017-11-21

PDF (PC)

435

摘要： 为阐明鄂尔多斯盆地神府地区太原组砂岩储层特征及其致密化成因，利用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、阴极发光及高压压汞等资料，分析胶结物及其与碎屑颗粒的胶结、交代作用，并研究了储层成岩序列、各类胶结物与孔隙的含量、孔隙度的演化过程等。结果表明：神府地区太原组储层以中-粗岩屑砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩为主，孔隙度为0.20%~12.00%，平均为6.95%，渗透率为0.10~5.00 mD，平均为0.91 mD，属于典型的低孔-特低孔、特低渗的致密砂岩储层；孔隙结构主要为小孔细喉和小孔微喉型；在孔隙演化中压实作用使孔隙度减少约15.5%，胶结作用减少孔隙约10.4%，溶蚀作用增加孔隙约4.41%，计算现今平均孔隙度为7.17%，与实测平均孔隙度6.95%相当。早期压实作用与晚期碳酸盐胶结作用是研究区储层致密的主要原因，而溶蚀作用有利于各类次生孔隙的发育，是改善储层孔渗性的关键因素。

关键词: CO2驱油, 灰色关联分析, 采收率, 适宜性

Abstract: In order to elucidate sandstone reservoir characteristics of Taiyuan Formation and its genesis of the densification in Shenmu-Fugu area,Ordos Basin,based on the data of cast thin section,scanning electron microscope,cathodoluminescence and high-pressure mercury,cementation and metasomatism between the cement and its relation with clastic particles,the diagenetic sequence and porosity evolution process were analyzed. The results show that the reservoir is dominated by medium-coarse lithic sandstone and feldspathic lithic sandstone. The reservoir porosity is 0.20%-12.00%, with average of 6.95%, and the permeability is 0.10-5.00 mD, with average of 0.91 mD,which belongs to typical low-porosity and extra-low-permeability tight sandstone reservoir.The pore structure is mainly small pore with fine throat and small pore with micro throat. The porosity evolution shows that the porosity decreased 15.5% by compaction,reduced about 10.4% by cementation,and increased about 4.41% by dissolution. The calculated reservoir porosity of Taiyuan Formation is 7.17%,which is similar to the analyzed porosity of 6.95% in the laboratory. Early compaction and late carbonate cementation are the main causes for the reservoir densification,while dissolution is beneficial to develop secondary pores for improving reservoirs properties.

Key words: CO2 flooding, grey correlation analysis, oil recovery, suitability

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+3
[1] 姚泾利, 唐俊, 庞国印, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹-华池地区长8段孔隙度演化定量模拟.天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1):38-46. YAO J L, TANG J, PANG G Y, et al. Quantitative simulation on porosity-evolution in member 8 of Yanchang Formation of Baibao-Huachi area, Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(1):38-46.
[2] 廖朋, 唐俊, 王凯, 等.砂岩成岩过程中的孔隙演化定量模拟——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区长8油层组储层为例. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5):15-22. LIAO P, TANG J, WANG K, et al. Quantitative simulation on pore evolution in diagenetic process of sandstone:a case study from Chang 8 oil reservoir set in Ansai area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(5):15-22.
[3] ATHY L F. Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 1930, 14(1):1-24.
[4] 陈发景, 田世澄.压实与油气运移.武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1989:113-134. CHEN F J, TIAN S C. Compaction and oil or gas migration. Wuhan:China University of Geoscience Press, 1989:113-134.
[5] 刘震, 邵新军, 金博, 等.压实过程中埋深和时间对碎屑岩孔隙度演化的共同影响.现代地质, 2007, 21(1):125-132. LIU Z, SHAO X J, JIN B, et al. Co-effect of depth and burial time on the evolution of porosity for clastic rocks during the stage of compaction. Geoscience, 2007, 21(1):125-132.
[6] 潘高峰, 刘震, 赵舒, 等.砂岩孔隙度演化定量模拟方法——以鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区延长组为例.石油学报, 2011, 32(2):249-256. PAN G F, LIU Z, ZHAO S, et al. Quantitative simulation of sandstone porosity evolution:a case from Yanchang Formation of the Zhenjing area, Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(2):249-256.
[7] 孟元林, 王粤川, 牛嘉玉, 等.储层孔隙度预测与有效天然气储层确定——以渤海湾盆地鸳鸯沟地区为例.天然气工业, 2007, 27(6):42-44. MENG Y L, WANG Y C, NIU J Y, et al. Prediction of reservoir porosity and determination of effective gas reservoirs:taking Yuanyanggou area of Bohai Bay Basin as an example. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(6):42-44.
[8] 王瑞飞, 沈平平, 赵良金.深层储集层成岩作用及孔隙度演化定量模型——以东濮凹陷文东油田沙三段储集层为例.石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(5):552-559. WANG R F, SHEN P P, ZHAO L J. Diagenesis of deep sandstone reservoir and a quantitative model of porosity evolution:taking the third member of Shahejie Formation in the Wendong Oilfield, Dongpu Sag as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(5):552-559.
[9] 潘新志, 叶建平, 孙新阳, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地神府地区中低阶煤层气勘探潜力分析.煤炭科学技术, 2015, 43(9):65-70. PAN X Z, YE J P, SUN X Y, et al. Analysis on exploration potential of mid-low rank coalbed methane in Shenfu area of Ordos Basin. Coal Science and Technology, 2015, 43(9):65-70.
[10] 樊爱萍, 赵娟, 杨仁超, 等.苏里格气田东二区山1段、盒8段储层孔隙结构特征.天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(3):482-487. FAN A P, ZHAO J, YANG R C, et al. Pore structure of reservoir rocks in Shan 1 and He 8 members, the EastⅡblock of Sulige gas field. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(3):482-487.
[11] 郝乐伟, 王琪, 唐俊.储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5):123-128. HAO L W, WANG Q, TANG J. Research progress of reservoir microscopic pore structure. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(5):123-128.
[12] 李永胜, 刘学刚, 章志锋, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田长8储层微观孔隙结构特征.石油化工应用, 2013, 32(4):63-69. LI Y S, LIU X G, ZHANG Z F, et al. Study microscopic pore structure characteristics of Chang 8 reservoir of Jiyuan oilfield by capillary curves. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2013, 32(4):63-69.
[13] 张宪国, 张涛, 林承焰.基于孔隙分形特征的低渗透储层孔隙结构评价.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(6):40-45. ZHANG X G, ZHANG T, LIN C Y. Pore structure evolution of low permeability reservoir based on pore fractal features. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(6):40-45.
[14] 曹剑, 张义杰, 胡文瑄, 等.油气储层自生高岭石发育特点及其对物性的影响.矿物学报, 2005,25(4):367-373. CAO J, ZHANG Y J, HU W X, et al. Developing characteristics of kaolinite in central Junggar Basin and their effect on the reservoir quality. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2005, 25(4):367-373.
[15] SURDAM R C, CROSSEY L J, HAGEN E S, et al. Organicinorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(1):1-23.
[16] HUNT J M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(1):1-12.
[17] 国家经济贸易委员会. 碎屑岩成岩阶段划分标准:SY/T 5477-2003.北京:石油工业出版社, 2003:1-4. State Economic and Trade Commission. The division of diagenetic stages in clastic rocks:SY/T5477-2003. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2003:1-4.
[18] 张莹莹, 黄思静.华庆地区长6油层组方解石胶结物特征.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2):48-52. ZHANG Y Y, HUANG S J. Characteristics of calcite cements of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Huaqing area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(2):48-52.
[19] 朱国华, 章卫平.煤系地层砂岩成岩作用和孔隙演化研究——以长广地区龙潭组为例.石油勘探与开发, 1993, 20(1):42-50. ZHU G H, ZHANG W P. A study of digenesis and the evolution of porosity of the sandstones coaliferous Formations:taking Longtan group in Changguang region as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1993, 20(1):42-50.
[20] 郑浚茂, 应凤祥.煤系地层(酸性水介质)的砂岩储层特征及成岩模式.石油学报, 1997, 18(4):19-24. ZHENG J M, YING F X. Reservoir characteristics and diagenetic model of sandstone intercalated in coal-bearing strata.Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1997, 18(4):19-24.
[21] 远光辉, 操应长, 杨田, 等.论碎屑岩储层成岩过程中有机酸的溶蚀增孔能力.地学前缘, 2013, 20(5):207-219. YUAN G H, CAO Y C, YANG T, et al. Porosity enhancement potential through mineral dissolution by organic acids in the diagenetic process of clastic reservoir. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(5):207-219.
[22] BEARD D C, WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unsolidated sand. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2):349-369.
[23] SCHERER M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones a model for sandstone porosity prediction. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5):485-491.
[24] 张兴良, 田景春, 王峰, 等.致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征与孔隙演化定量评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地高桥地区二叠系下石盒子组盒8段为例. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2):212-217. ZHANG X L, TIAN J C, WANG F, et al. Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity estimation of tight sandstone reservoirs:a case from the 8 th member of Permian Xiashihezi Formation in the Gaoqiao region, Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(2):212-217.
[25] 思玉琥, 郝世彦, 张林森, 等.延安地区上三叠统长6期储层成岩作用及孔隙演化.特种油气藏, 2011, 18(6):36-39. SI Y H, HAO S Y, ZHANG L S, et al. Diageneses of the Upper Triassic Chang 6 Formation in Yan' an area and pore evolution. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2011, 18(6):36-39.
[1] 崔传智, 李静, 吴忠维. 扩散吸附作用下CO2非混相驱微观渗流特征模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 181-188.
[2] 苏皓, 郭艳东, 曹立迎, 喻宸, 崔书岳, 卢婷, 张云, 李俊超. 顺北油田断控缝洞型凝析气藏衰竭式开采特征及保压开采对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 178-188.
[3] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[4] 白佳佳, 司双虎, 陶磊, 王国庆, 王龙龙, 史文洋, 张娜, 朱庆杰. DES+CTAB复配驱油剂体系提高低渗致密砂岩油藏采收率机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 169-177.
[5] 李传亮, 王凤兰, 杜庆龙, 由春梅, 单高军, 李斌会, 朱苏阳. 砂岩油藏特高含水期的水驱特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 163-171.
[6] 孙会珠, 朱玉双, 魏勇, 高媛. CO2驱酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 136-142.
[7] 钱真, 李辉, 乔林, 柏森. 碳酸盐岩油藏低矿化度水驱作用机理实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 159-165.
[8] 黄广庆. 离子组成及矿化度对低矿化度水驱采收率的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 129-133.
[9] 韩培慧, 闫坤, 曹瑞波, 高淑玲, 佟卉. 聚驱后油层提高采收率驱油方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 143-150.
[10] 景紫岩, 张佳, 李国斌, 竺彪, 韩国庆, 刘双双. 泡沫混排携砂解堵机理及影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 154-160.
[11] 马力, 欧阳传湘, 谭钲扬, 王长权, 宋岩, 林飞. 低渗透油藏CO2驱中后期提效方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 139-145.
[12] 杨红, 王宏, 南宇峰, 屈亚宁, 梁凯强, 江绍静. 油藏CO2驱油提高采收率适宜性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 140-146.
[13] 刘晨, 王凯, 王业飞, 周文胜. 针对A油田的抗温、抗盐聚合物/表面活性剂二元复合驱油体系研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 152-158.
[14] 郭 平，许清华，孙 振，杜建芬，汪周华. 天然气藏 CO2驱及地质埋存技术研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 6-11.
[15] 李海涛，李 颖，李亚辉，王 科. 低盐度注水提高碳酸盐岩油藏采收率[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 119-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广，刘博，吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良，曾溅辉，张善文，王永诗，王洪玉，刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷　明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发