岩性油气藏 ›› 2007, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 9–15.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.01.002

• 论坛与综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨

王英民1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京) 资源与信息学院; 2. 教育部油气藏勘探国家重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2007-03-15 发布日期:2007-03-15
  • 作者简介:王英民,1954年生,男,博士,教授,主要致力于应用层序地层学、地层岩性圈闭形成条件、机理和预测方法、地震储层预测技术方法、含油气盆地分析等方向的研究。地址:(102249)北京昌平中国石油大学资源与信息学院。电话:(010)89733506。E-mail:wym3939@vip.sina.com

Analysis of the mess in sequence hierarchy applied in the industrialized application of the sequence stratigraphy

WANG Yingming 1, 2   

  1. 1. Resources and Information Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijng ) ;
    2. State Key Laboratory of the Hydrocarbon Resource and Prospecting , Ministry of Education
  • Online:2007-03-15 Published:2007-03-15

摘要:

层序分级混乱是制约层序地层学工业化应用的关键问题之一。层序分级混乱的原因主要在于不同学者对层序发育主控因素的理解不同, 对层序界面的把握有别, 混淆了旋回性和阶段性。该文提出了在层序地层学工业化应用中克服层序级别混乱问题的对策, 从油气勘探开发的实用性出发, 提出3 个层次、六级层序、兼顾旋回性和阶段性的分级方案, 以三级层序作为标准层序, 将其按一定原则可组合成一、二级层序, 按一定原则可细分为四、五、六级层序。三级层序划分的唯一标准就是以不整合面为界, 内部没有明显的不整合面, 并可根据首次水进面和最大水进面划分出多个体系域。四级层序就是体系域, 不具有旋回性。按地震资料可分辨性将三级层序分为A、B 两类。3 个层次大体上与盆地分析与资源评价、区带评价与目标预测、油藏描述与滚动勘探开发3 个大的勘探阶段相对应。四级层序在沉积相编图和岩性地层圈闭发育有利区带预测中最为重要。

关键词: 陆相断陷盆地, 东营凹陷, 沉积充填模式, 岩性地层圈闭

Abstract:

The mess and absence of unified criterion of sequence hierarchy have constrained the industrialized application and its assurance and effect. The origin of the present confusion mainly contributes to the different analysis about the control on sequence pattern which lead to them issue of both nomenclature cyclist and stage. Based on the practical effect and feasibility and consideration of both cyclist and stage, a suite of terminology system is presented. Firstly 3rd sequence is considered as the base which can be grouped into 2nd or 1st order sequence or subdivided in to 4th, 5th even 6th sequence based on the suite of criterion. The only criterion of the division of 3rd sequence is the unconformity, which also implies the absence of the unconformity in such sequence. Owning to such base, the system tracts can be discriminated and divided according to the first flooding surface and the maximum flooding surface. So called 4th sequence is a system tract practically with no cyclist. Based on the reconcilability of seismic data, the 3rd sequence can be subdivided in to A and B type. Such three hierarchies could correspond to the basin analysis & resource evaluation, play evaluation and objective prediction, reservoir characterization and progressive exploration and development respectively. Among the above mentioned terminology, the 4th sequence plays the key role in sedimentary mapping and the prediction of the promising area of the subtle traps.

Key words: fault basins of terrestrial facies, Dongying Sag, depositional filling model, lithologic and stratigraphic trap

[1] 贾承造,赵文智,邹才能,等.岩性地层油气藏勘探研究的两项核心技术[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(3),3-9.
[2] Brett C E,Goodman W M, Lo Duca S T. Sequences, cycles, and basin dynamics in the Silurian of the Appalachian Basin[J].Sedimentary Geology,1990,69:191-224.
[3] 林畅松,刘景彦,刘丽军,等.高精度层序地层分析:建立沉积相和储层规模的等时地层格架[J].现代地质,2002,16(3):276-281.
[4] 王训练.露头层序地层学研究中定义和识别不同级别沉积层序的标准[J].中国科学(D辑),2003,33(11):1057-1068.
[5] 许仕策.预测勘探目标中的层序地层学理论与实践——以珠江口盆地为例[J].中国海上油气(地质),1999,13(3):152-158.
[6] Vail P R, Audemard F, Bowman S A, et al. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics,eustasy and sedimentology an overview[A].In: Einsele G, Ricken W, Seilacher A,eds.Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy[C].Berlin Heidberg: Springer Verlag,1991:617-659.
[7] Mitchum R M, Vanwagoner J C.High frequency sequences and their stacking,patterns: sequence stratigraphic evidence of high frequency eustatic cycles[J].Sediment Geology,1991,70:131-160.
[8] 王鸿祯,史晓颖.沉积层序及海平面旋回的分类级别——旋回周期的成因讨论[J].现代地质,1998,12(1):12-16.
[9] 王英民,王成善,钱弈中,等.地质2地震综合地层划分对比方法及其在海拉尔叠合盆地中的应用[J].成都地质学院学报,1990,17(2):87-93.
[10] 李思田,林畅松,解习农,等.大型陆相盆地层序地层学研究——以鄂尔多斯中生代盆地为例[J].地学前缘,1995,2(324):133-136.
[11] 解习农,程守田,陆永潮.陆相盆地幕式构造旋回与层序构成[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1996,21(1):27-33.
[12] 郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2):2492255.
[13] Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysis I:architecture and genesis of flooding surface bounded depositional units[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989a,73:125-142.
[14] Cross T A. Controls on coal distribution in transgressive regressive cycles,Upper Cretaceous, Western Interior, U. S. A. In: Wilgaus C K, et al. Sea-level changes: An intergraded approach[J].SEPM SepcialPublication,1988,42:371-380.
[15] 邓宏文.美国层序地层研究的新学派——高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):92-97.
[16]Vail P R,Mitchum R M, Tbompson S. Global cycles of relative changes of sea level. In: Paytoned. Seismic stratigraphy: applications to hydrocarbon exploration[J]. AAPG Mem,1977,26:83-97.
[17] Mitchum R M. Seismic Stratigraphy and Globalchangesofsealevel,PartÉ:GlossaryofIermsusedinSeismicstratigraphy.In:PaytonCEed.,Seismicstratigraphy:applicalionstohydrocarhonexploration[J].AAPGMemoir,1977,26:2052212.
[18] Van Wagoner J C, Posamentier H W, Mitchum R M, et al.层序地层学基础综述和关键定义[M].徐怀大,等译.层序地层学原理——海平面变化综合分析.北京:石油工业出版社,1993:49-55.
[19] Embry A F. Sequence boundaries and sequence hierarchies: problems and proposal. In: Sequence Stratigraphy on the Northwest European Margin[M]. Amsterdam: Elevier,1995:1-11.
[20] 薛良清.论沉积层序级别的划分[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(3):10-14.
[1] 卿繁, 闫建平, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 赵振宇, 晁静. 砂砾岩体沉积期次划分及其与物性的关系——以东营凹陷北部陡坡带Y920区块沙四上亚段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 50-61.
[2] 彭军, 许天宇, 于乐丹. 东营凹陷沙河街组四段湖相细粒沉积特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 1-12.
[3] 闫建平, 梁强, 耿斌, 赖富强, 温丹妮, 汪宙峰. 低渗透砂岩微孔特征与孔隙结构类型的关系——以东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 18-26.
[4] 闫建平,言 语,李尊芝,耿 斌,梁 强. 砂砾岩储层物性演化及影响因素研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 1-6.
[5] 曹 刚,邹婧芸,曲全工,侯加根. 东营凹陷永 1 块沙四段砂砾岩体有效储层控制因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 30-37.
[6] 鲜本忠,路智勇,佘源琦,王欣,王璐,黄捍东. 东营凹陷陡坡带盐 18—永 921 地区砂砾岩沉积与储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4): 28-35.
[7] 汪旭东,查明,曲江秀,高长海,陈中红,张守春. 东营凹陷古近系超压封闭层特征及其封盖能力研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(5): 76-82.
[8] 张鹏飞. 东营凹陷洼陷带沙三中亚段浊积岩成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(3): 61-65.
[9] 赵卫卫,査明. 陆相断陷盆地岩性油气藏成藏过程物理模拟及机理初探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(6): 37-43.
[10] 葛志丹,王兴志,朱萌,濮瑞,王伟,张金友. 东营凹陷太古界岩浆岩储层特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 48-32.
[11] 李继亭,曾溅辉,吴嘉鹏. 利用东营凹陷典型剖面分析地层压力演化与油气成藏关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 58-64.
[12] 李波,田美荣,张帆,徐兵,王兴志. 东营凹陷太古界基岩储层特征及分布规律研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 52-56.
[13] 张俊杰,闫长辉,陈青,刘惠民,王永诗. 东营凹陷北带砂砾岩扇体相-势控藏定量化研究———以利85区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 53-58.
[14] 夏景生,王志坤,陈刚,朱鑫,张一航,冀晓静. 东营凹陷东部深层浊积扇油藏成藏条件与模式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 55-60.
[15] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .