岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1–12.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200501

• 油气地质 •    下一篇

东营凹陷沙河街组四段湖相细粒沉积特征及其控制因素

彭军, 许天宇, 于乐丹   

  1. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-27 修回日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2020-10-01 发布日期:2020-08-08
  • 通讯作者: 许天宇(1996-),男,西南石油大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积学。Email:15531516085@163.com。 E-mail:15531516085@163.com
  • 作者简介:彭军(1968-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事沉积学、储层地质学及层序地层学方面的教学和研究工作。地址:(610550)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号西南石油大学。Email:445371976@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“湖相泥页岩天文地层周期及高分辨率沉积旋回测井研究”(编号:41872166)资助

Characteristics and controlling factors of lacustrine fine-grained Sediments of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression

PENG Jun, XU Tianyu, YU Ledan   

  1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2020-02-27 Revised:2020-04-08 Online:2020-10-01 Published:2020-08-08

摘要: 为研究东营凹陷沙河街组四段上亚段的湖相细粒沉积特征及其控制因素,开展了精细岩心描述、薄片鉴定、X射线衍射全岩分析等。结果表明:①研究区细粒沉积岩可划分为15种岩相类型,其中富有机质平直纹层灰质黏土岩、富有机质块状黏土岩、富有机质块状含灰黏土岩、含有机质波状纹层黏土质灰岩和含有机质波状纹层含黏土灰岩等5种岩相类型较为发育。②依据岩石中黄铁矿含量、Ca(/Ca+Fe)、Zr/Al和Sr/Ca在垂向上的变化,将东营凹陷沙四上亚段沉积演化分为4个阶段,即干旱气候阶段、干旱—暖湿气候过渡阶段、暖湿气候阶段和暖湿—干旱气候过渡阶段。③古气候条件控制了岩石类型及特征,干旱气候阶段发育含有机质波状纹层黏土质灰岩;干旱—暖湿气候条件发育富有机质平直纹层灰质黏土岩;暖湿气候条件发育富有机质块状黏土岩;暖湿—干旱气候条件发育富有机质块状黏土岩和灰质黏土岩。该研究成果对细粒沉积岩的油气勘探具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 湖相细粒沉积岩, 岩相类型, 沉积环境, 沙河街组四段, 东营凹陷

Abstract: In order to study the characteristics and controlling factors of lacustrine fine-grained sediments of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression,core description,thin section identification and X-ray diffraction whole-rock analysis were carried out. The results show that:(1)The fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the study area can be divided into 15 types of lithofacies,among which five types of litho-facies are relatively developed,including organic-rich flat ruled lime clay rock,organic-rich blocky clay rock,organic-rich blocky lime-containing clay rock,organic-lean corrugated clay limestone,organic-lean corrugated clay-containing limestone.(2)According to the changes of pyrite content, Ca(/Ca+ Fe), Zr/Al, and Sr/Ca ratios in the vertical direction,the sedimentary evolution of the upper submember of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression can be divided into four stages:drought stage,drought-warm wet transition stage,warm and wet stage and warm wet-drought transition stage.(3)Palaeoclimate conditions controlled the types and characteristics of rocks. In the drought stage,organic-lean corrugated clay limestone was developed. In the drought-warm wet transition stage,organic-rich flat ruled lime clay rock was developed. In the warm stage,organic-rich blocky clay rock was developed. In the warm wet-drought transition stage,organic-rich blocky clay rock and lime clay rock were developed. The results of this study can be used as a reference for oil and gas exploration of finegrained sedimentary rocks.

Key words: lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary rock, lithofacies type, sedimentary environment, the fourth member of Shahejie Formation, Dongying Depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 姜在兴, 梁超, 吴靖, 等.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题. 石油学报, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039. JIANG Z X, LIANG C, WU J, et al. Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039.
[2] 邓宏文, 钱凯. 深湖相泥岩的成因类型和组合演化. 沉积学报, 1990(3):1-21. DENG H W, QIAN K. Genetic types and combined evolution of deep lake facies mudstones. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1990(3):1-21.
[3] 王慧中, 梅洪明. 东营凹陷沙三下亚段油页岩中古湖泊学信息. 同济大学学报, 1998, 26(3):315-318. WANG H Z, MEI H M. Paleo-lake studies on oil shale in the lower third member of the Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression. Journal of Tongji University, 1998, 26(3):315-318.
[4] 王冠民. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩的纹层组合及成因分类. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(3):666-671. WANG G M. Laminae combination and genetic classification of Eogene shale in Jiyang Depression. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(3):666-671.
[5] 袁剑英, 黄成刚, 夏青松, 等. 咸化湖盆碳酸盐岩储层特征及孔隙形成机理:以柴西地区渐新统下干柴沟组为例.地质论评, 2016, 62(1):111-126. YUAN J Y, HUANG C G, XIA Q S, et al. The characteristics of carbonate reservoir, and formation mechanism of pores in the saline lacustrine basin:a case study of the Lower Eocene Ganchaigou Formation in western Qaidam Basin. Geological Review, 2016, 62(1):111-126.
[6] 王勇, 刘惠民, 宋国奇, 等.湖相泥页岩中碳酸盐成因及页岩油气地质意义:以东营凹陷沙河街组四段上亚段-沙河街组三段下亚段烃源岩为例.石油学报, 2017, 38(12):1390-1400. WANG Y, LIU H M, SONG G Q, et al. Carbonate genesis and geological significance of shale hydrocarbon in lacustrine facies mud shale:a case study of source rocks in the upper submember of member 4 and lower submember of member 3 of Shahejie Formation, Dongying Sag. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(12):1390-1400.
[7] 王苗, 陆建林, 左宗鑫, 等. 纹层状细粒沉积岩特征及主控因素分析:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上-沙三下亚段为例. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4):470-478. WANG M, LU J L, ZUO Z X, et al. Characteristics and dominating factors of lamellar fine-grained sedimentary rocks:a case study of the upper Es4 member-lower Es3 member, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4):470-478.
[8] 吴靖, 姜在兴, 梁超. 东营凹陷沙河街组四段上亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征及与沉积环境的关系. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10):1110-1122. WU J, JIANG Z X, LIANG C. Facies characteristics of finegrained sedimentary rocks in the upper subsection of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(10):1110-1122.
[9] 郑和荣,高波,彭勇民,等. 中上扬子地区下志留统沉积演化与页岩气勘探方向. 古地理学报,2013,15(5):645-656. ZHENG H R, GAO B, PENG Y M, et al. Sedimentary evolution and shale gas exploration direction of the Lower Silurian in Middle-Upper Yangtze area. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15(5):645-656.
[10] 徐希旺, 陈世悦, 王越, 等. 吐哈盆地大河沿地区塔尔朗组细粒沉积岩特征. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(4):705-713. XU X W, CHEN S Y, WANG Y, et al. Characteristics of finegrained sedimentary rocks in Taerlang Formation, Daheyan area, Turpan-Hami Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(4):705-713.
[11] 刘姝君, 操应长, 梁超. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系细粒沉积岩特征及沉积环境. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(3):479-489. LIU S J, CAO Y C, LIANG C, et al. Lithologic characteristics and sedimentary environment of fine-grained sedimentary rocks of the Paleogene in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2019, 21(3):479-489.
[12] 张少敏, 操应长, 朱如凯, 等.湖相细粒混合沉积岩岩石类型划分:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(4):198-209. ZHANG S M, CAO Y C, ZHU R K, et al. Lithofacies classification of fine-grained mixed sedimentary rocks in the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(4):198-209.
[13] 黄成刚, 李智勇, 倪祥龙, 等. 柴达木盆地英西地区E32盐类矿物成因及油气地质意义. 现代地质, 2017, 31(4):779-790. HUANG C G, LI Z Y, NI X L, et al. Origin of salt minerals and oil-gas geological significance of E32 reservoirs in saline lacustrine basin of the Yingxi area, Qaidam Basin. Geoscience, 2017, 31(4):779-790.
[14] KNITZER S F, DAVIES S J, STEPHENSON M H, et al. Depositional controls on mudstone lithofacies in a basinal setting:Implications for the delivery of sedimentary organic matter. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2014, 84(3):198-214.
[15] COHEN A S. Paleolimnology. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2003:500.
[16] 杜学斌, 刘辉, 刘惠民, 等. 细粒沉积物层序地层划分方法初探:以东营凹陷樊页1井沙三下-沙四上亚段泥页岩为例. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(4):1-11. DU X B, LIU H, LIU H M, et al. A preliminary study on the method of sequence stratigraphic division of fine sediment:a case study of the mud shale in the upper Es4 member-lower Es3 member of Fanye 1 well in Dongying Depression. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(4):1-11.
[17] ANDERSON R Y, DEAN W E. Lacustrine varve formation through time. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1988, 62(1/4):215-235.
[18] 王建功, 张道伟, 易定红, 等. 柴西地区下干柴沟组上段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征及相模式. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):1-13. WANG J G, ZHANG D W, YI D H, et al. Depositional characteristics and facies model of lacustrine carbonate rocks in the upper member of Lower Ganchaigou Formation in Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):1-13.
[19] RYAN W B. Initial reports of the deep sea drilling project. Washington:National Science Foundation, 1977:1-30.
[20] OCHOA J, WOLAK J, GARDNER M H. Recognition criteria for distinguishing between hemipelagic and pelagic mud rocks in the characterization of deep-water reservoir heterogeneity. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97:1785-1803.
[21] ZHANG J G, JIANG Z X, JIANG X L, et al. Oil generation induces sparry calcite formation in lacustrine mudrock, Eocene of east China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 71:344-359.
[22] SCHIEBER J. Facies and origin of shales from the Mid-Proterozoic Newland Formation, Belt Basin, Montana, USA. Sedimentology, 1989, 36(2):203-219.
[23] LOUCKS R G, RUPPEL S C. Mississippian Barnett shale:Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):579-601.
[24] 闫建平, 梁强, 耿斌, 等. 湖相泥页岩地球化学参数测井计算方法及应用:以沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙三下亚段为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):108-116. YAN J P, LIANG Q, GENG B, et al. Log calculation method of geochemical parameters of lacustrine shale and its application:a case of lower Es 3 in Bonan Subsag, Zhanhua Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):108-116.
[25] 杜江民, 龙鹏宇, 杨鹏, 等.中国陆相湖盆碳酸盐岩储集层特征及其成藏条件. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1):52-69. DU J M, LONG P Y, YANG P, et al. Characteristics of carbonate reservoir and its forming conditions in continental lake basin of China. Advances in Earth Science, 2020, 35(1):52-69.
[26] WANG G C, TIMOTHY R C. Organic-rich Marcellus shale lithofacies modeling and distribution pattern analysis in the Appalachian Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(12):2173-2205.
[27] YANG T, CAO Y C, LIU K Y, et al. Origin of deep-water finegrained sediments as revealed from the Lower Cretaceous rifting basin sequence in the Lingshan Island, Yellow Sea, Eastern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019(186):1-15.
[28] 张顺, 陈世悦, 鄢继华, 等. 东营凹陷西部沙三下亚段-沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相及储层特征. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(2):320-332. ZHANG S, CHEN S Y, YAN J H, et al. Characteristics of shale lithofacies and reservoir space in the 3 rd and 4 th members of Shahejie Formation, the west of Dongying Sag. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(2):320-332.
[29] 梁超. 含油气细粒沉积岩沉积作用与储层形成机理. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2015. LIANG C. The sedimentation and reservoir formation mechanism of hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2015.
[30] 宋明水, 刘惠民, 王勇, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2):225-235. SONG M S, LIU H M, WANG Y, et al. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2):225-235.
[31] URBAN N R, LU X, CHAI Y, et al. Sediment trap studies in Lake Superior:Insights into resuspension, cross-margin transport, and carbon cycling. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2004, 30:147-161.
[32] SCHWAB D J, EADIE B J, ASSEL R A, et al. Climatology of large sediment resuspension events in southern Lake Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2009, 32(1):50-62.
[33] BOHACS K M, CARROLL A R, NEAL J E, et al. Lake-basin type, source potential,and hydrocarbon character:an integrated sequence-stratigraphic-geochemical framework. AAPG Studies in Geology, 2000, 46:3-34.
[34] 张顺, 刘惠民, 陈世悦, 等. 中国东部断陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相划分方案探讨:以渤海湾盆地南部古近系细粒沉积岩为例. 地质学报, 2017, 91(5):1108-1119. ZHANG S, LIU H M, CHEN S Y, et al. Classification scheme for lithofacies of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in faulted basins of eastern China:Insights from the fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Paleogene,southern Bohai Bay Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(5):1108-1119.
[1] 陈亚军, 荆文波, 宋小勇, 何伯斌, 伍宏美, 王睿, 解士建, 宋凯辉, 马强. 三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷上石炭统沉积岩层地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 63-75.
[2] 卿繁, 闫建平, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 赵振宇, 晁静. 砂砾岩体沉积期次划分及其与物性的关系——以东营凹陷北部陡坡带Y920区块沙四上亚段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 50-61.
[3] 叶亚培, 唐书恒, 郗兆栋, 张耀选. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组页岩矿物组成特征与脆性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 62-71.
[4] 高乔, 王兴志, 朱逸青, 赵圣贤, 张芮, 肖哲宇. 川南地区龙马溪组元素地球化学特征及有机质富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 72-84.
[5] 易定红, 王建功, 石兰亭, 王鹏, 陈娟, 孙松领, 石亚军, 司丹. 柴达木盆地英西地区E32碳酸盐岩沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 46-55.
[6] 李森, 朱如凯, 崔景伟, 柳涵. 古环境与有机质富集控制因素研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地南缘长7油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 87-95.
[7] 闫建平, 梁强, 耿斌, 赖富强, 温丹妮, 汪宙峰. 低渗透砂岩微孔特征与孔隙结构类型的关系——以东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 18-26.
[8] 吴嘉鹏, 万丽芬, 张兰, 王英民, 赵千慧, 李昆, 王思琦. 西湖凹陷平湖组岩相类型及沉积相分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 27-34.
[9] 闫建平,言 语,李尊芝,耿 斌,梁 强. 砂砾岩储层物性演化及影响因素研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 1-6.
[10] 曹 刚,邹婧芸,曲全工,侯加根. 东营凹陷永 1 块沙四段砂砾岩体有效储层控制因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 30-37.
[11] 杨晓利,董雪华,郭爱华,陈启艳,王海龙. 高北斜坡带沙三沉积期沉积环境及储层特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 65-71.
[12] 徐祖新,韩淑敏,王启超. 中扬子地区陡山沱组页岩储层中黄铁矿特征及其油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 31-37.
[13] 于兴河,李顺利,杨志浩. 致密砂岩气储层的沉积-成岩成因机理探讨与热点问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1): 1-13.
[14] 鲜本忠,路智勇,佘源琦,王欣,王璐,黄捍东. 东营凹陷陡坡带盐 18—永 921 地区砂砾岩沉积与储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4): 28-35.
[15] 宫博识,文华国,李丛林,王亮,郑荣才,祁利祺. 准噶尔盆地乌尔禾地区风城组沉积环境分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 59-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 孙洪斌,张凤莲. 断陷盆地优质储层的成因———以辽河坳陷古近系沙河街组储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 51 -54 .
[5] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[6] 梁晓伟,韩永林,王海红,王成玉,牛小兵,辛红刚. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区上三叠统延长组裂缝特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 49 -53 .
[7] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[8] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[9] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[10] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .