岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 18–26.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.03.003

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗透砂岩微孔特征与孔隙结构类型的关系——以东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段为例

闫建平1,2, 梁强2, 耿斌3, 赖富强4, 温丹妮5, 汪宙峰2   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学 天然气地质四川省重点实验室, 成都 610500;
    2. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
    3. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257015;
    4. 重庆科技学院 复杂油气田勘探开发重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331;
    5. 中国石化西南油气工程有限公司 测井分公司, 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-08 修回日期:2016-11-06 出版日期:2017-05-21 发布日期:2017-05-21
  • 作者简介:闫建平(1980-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事测井沉积学、岩石物理及非常规储层测井评价方面的教学和科研工作。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院。Email:yanjp_tj@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“页岩气储层微观结构及岩石物理响应数值模拟研究”（编号：41202110）、“基于成像测井的页岩气层可压裂性评价方法研究”（编号：41402118），四川省应用基础研究项目“泥页岩地层周期及高分辨率沉积旋回测井识别研究”（编号：2015JY0200）和四川省测绘地理信息局支撑课题“地理国情监测支撑下的山区公路沿线地质生态环境承载力研究”（编号：J2014ZC12）联合资助

Relationship between micro-pore characteristics and pore structure of low permeability sandstone: a case of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in southern slope of Dongying Sag

YAN Jianping1,2, LIANG Qiang2, GENG Bin3, LAI Fuqiang4, WEN Danni5, WANG Zhoufeng2   

  1. 1. Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Geology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China;
    4. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Complex Oil & Gas Field Exploration and Development, Chongqing University of Science & echnology, Chongqing 401331, China;
    5. Well Logging Branch, Southwest Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Sinopec, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2016-09-08 Revised:2016-11-06 Online:2017-05-21 Published:2017-05-21

PDF (PC)

483

摘要： 低渗透砂岩已成为油气增储上产的重要勘探开发目标，但孔隙结构类型多样、微孔发育使得测井响应特征难以明显反映储层及其有效性。利用压汞、核磁共振、物性、薄片及CT等资料分析东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段（Es4）低渗透滩坝砂岩孔隙结构，并将其划分为三大类五小类，即：Ⅰ类（Ⅰ1和Ⅰ2）、Ⅱ类（Ⅱ1和Ⅱ2）和Ⅲ类。孔隙结构类型受控于矿物、粒径及成岩作用等的综合影响，微孔（孔喉半径<0.024 8 μm）含量及其特征是造成孔隙结构类型差异的重要因素。在此基础上，分析矿物含量、粒径、电性与微孔含量的关系，发现矿物、粒径影响微孔含量及特征，且微孔含量与电性特征关系密切。利用测井曲线对低渗透砂岩微孔含量变化的敏感性，有助于在井筒剖面进行孔隙结构类型划分及识别有效储层。

关键词: 致密砂岩气, 地质特征, 含水饱和度, 压力系统, 吸附气, 苏里格气田, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: The low permeability sandstone reservoir has become an important exploration target, but the variety of micro-pore structure makes the logging response characteristics difficult to reflect reservoir features clearly. The data of mercury injection, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), physical properties, thin sections and CT were used to analyze the pore structure of low permeability beach bar sandstone of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation (Es4) in southern slope of Dongying Sag. The pore structure were divided into three types and five subtypes:typeⅠ (Ⅰ1 and Ⅰ2), type II (Ⅱ1 and Ⅱ2)and type Ⅲ. The pore structure type is controlled by mineral content, grain size and diagenesis. The volume and features of micropores (pore throat radius less than 0.024 8 μm) are important factors that cause the differences of pore structure types. The relationships among micropore volume, mineral content, grain size and electric properties were analyzed. It is found that mineral content and grain size affect micropore volume and features. In addition, the micropore volume is closely related to the electric properties. Logging curves are sensitive to the change of micropore volume, so it is helpful for dividing pore structure type in wellbore and identifying effective reservoirs.

Key words: tight sandstone gas, geologic characteristics, water saturation, pressure system, adsorbed gas, Sulige Gasfield, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 田景春, 陈学华, 侯明才, 等.箕状断陷湖盆缓坡带储集砂体特征、演化及控制因素——以胜利油区东营凹陷南缓坡带沙河街组为例.地球学报, 2004, 25(3):331-336. TIAN J C, CHEN X H, HOU M C, et al. Characteristics,evolution and controlling factors of the terrigenous clastic reservoir sand bodies on the gentle slope zone of the half-graben rift lake basin:a case study of the Shahejie Formation on the southern gentle slope zone of the Dongying Depression. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2004, 25(3):331-336.
[2] 刘俊海, 胡芬, 宋文君, 等.东营凹陷南斜坡储集层成岩作用及对储集性能的影响. 新疆石油学院学报, 2003, 15(3):21-26. LIU J H, HU F, SONG W J, et al. Diagenesis and its influence on property of reservoirs in southern slope of Dongying Depression. Journal of Xinjiang Petroleum Institute, 2003, 15(3):21-26.
[3] BLOCH S, HELMOND K P. Approached to predicting reservoir quality in sandstones. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79(1):97-115.
[4] TAYLOR T R, GILES M R, HATHON L A, et al. Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction:models, myths and reality. AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94(8):1093-1132.
[5] 马明福, 李薇, 刘亚村.苏丹Melut盆地北部油田储集层孔隙结构特征分析.石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(6):121-124. MA M F, LI W, LIU Y C. Pore structure characteristics analysis of the oilfield in north Melut Basin, Sudan. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(6):121-124.
[6] 姜洪福, 陈发景, 张云春, 等. 松辽盆地三肇地区扶、杨油层储集层孔隙结构及评价.现代地质, 2006, 20(3):465-472. JIANG H F, CHEN F J, ZHANG Y C, et al. The pore texture and evaluation of Fu-Yang oil reservoirs in the Sanzhao area of Songliao Basin. Geoscience, 2006, 20(3):465-472.
[7] 耿斌, 胡心红.孔隙结构研究在低渗透储层有效性评价中的应用.断块油气田, 2011, 18(2):187-190. GENG B, HU X H. Application of pore structure study in effectiveness evaluation of low permeability reservoir. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2011, 18(2):187-190.
[8] 王奕, 陈恭洋, 谭思哲.安塞油田坪桥地区储层孔隙结构的研究.长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 8(2):59-61. WANG Y, CHEN G Y, TAN S Z. The research of pore structure of sandstone reservoirs of Ansai Oilfield in Pingqiao area. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2011,8(2):59-61.
[9] 蔡玥, 熊琦, 李勇, 等.低渗透砂岩储层孔隙结构对储层质量的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组为例.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5):69-74. CAI Y, XIONG Q, LI Y, et al. Influence of pore structure on reservoir quality of low permeability sandstone reservoir:a case study from Chang 8 oil reservoir set in the Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(5):69-74.
[10] 刘媛, 朱筱敏, 张思梦, 等.三肇凹陷扶余油层中-低渗透储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(2):270-275. LIU Y, ZHU X M, ZHANG S M, et al. Microcosmic pore structure in low-moderate permeability reservoir of Fuyu oil layer in Sanzhao Sag. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(2):270-275.
[11] 张一果, 孙卫, 任大忠, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地英旺油田长8储层微观孔隙结构特征研究.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3):71-76. ZHANG Y G, SUN W, REN D Z, et al. Study on micro-pore structure characteristics of Chang 8 reservoir in Yingwang Oilfield, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3):71-76.
[12] 李长政, 孙卫, 任大忠, 等.华庆地区长81储层孔隙微观结构特征研究.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(4):19-23. LI C Z, SUN W, REN D Z, et al. Microscopic pore structure characteristics of Chang 81 reservoir in Huaqing area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(4):19-23.
[13] SCHMITT M, FERNANDES C P, WOLF F G, et al. Characterization of Brazilian tight gas sandstones relating permeability and Angstrom-to micron-scale pore structures. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 27:785-807.
[14] 李海燕, 彭仕宓.苏里格气田低渗透储层成岩储集相特征.石油学报, 2007, 28(3):100-104. LI H Y, PENG S M. Characteristics of diagenetic reservoir facies of low-permeability reservoir in Sulige Gas Field. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(3):100-104.
[15] 李海燕, 岳大力, 张秀娟.苏里格气田低渗透储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类评价方法.地学前缘, 2012, 19(2):133-140. LI H Y, YUE D L, ZHANG X J. Characteristics of pore structure and reservoir evaluation of low permeability reservoir in Sulige Gas Field. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2):133-140.
[16] 赵靖舟, 吴少波, 武富礼. 论低渗透储层的分类与评价标准——以鄂尔多斯盆地为例. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3):28-31. ZHAO J Z, WU S B, WU F L. The classification and evaluation criterion of low permeability reservoir:an example from Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3):28-31.
[17] 应凤祥, 杨式升, 张敏, 等.激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究储层孔隙结构.沉积学报, 2002, 20(1):75-79. YING F X, YANG S S, ZHANG M, et al. Application of laser scanning confocal microscope to the measurement of pore texture in reservoirs. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(1):75-79.
[18] 国家能源局.油气储层评价方法:SY/T 6285-2011.北京:石油工业出版社, 2011. China National Energy Administration. Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoir:SY/T 6285-2011. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011.
[19] 闫建平, 温丹妮, 李尊芝, 等. 低渗透砂岩孔隙结构对岩电参数的影响及应用.天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(12):2227-2233. YAN J P, WEN D N, LI Z Z, et al. The influence of low permeable sandstone pore structure on rock electrical parameters and its applications. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(12):2227-2233.
[20] BERTRAND R, CHAGNON A, MALO M, et al. Sedimentologic, diagenetic and tectonic evolution of the Saint-Flavien gas reservoir at the structural front of the Quebec Appalachians. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2003, 51(2):126-154.
[21] 张琴, 朱筱敏, 钟大康, 等.山东东营凹陷古近系碎屑岩储层特征及控制因素.古地理学报, 2004, 6(4):493-502. ZHANG Q, ZHU X M, ZHONG D K, et al. Clastic reservoir properties and their controlling factors of the Paleogene in Dongying Sag, Shandong province. Journal of Paleogeography, 2004, 6(4):493-502.
[22] 游国庆, 潘家华, 刘淑琴, 等.东营凹陷古近系砂岩成岩作用与孔隙演化.岩石矿物学杂志, 2006, 25(3):237-242. YOU G Q, PAN J H, LIU S Q, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Paleogene sandstone reservoir in Dongying Depression. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2006, 25(3):237-242.
[23] 邹才能, 陶士振, 周慧, 等.成岩相的形成、分类与定量评价方法.石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5):526-540. ZOU C N, TAO S Z, ZHOU H, et al. Genesis, classification and evaluation method of diageneticfacies. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(3):526-540.
[1] 徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[2] 李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[3] 马乔雨, 张欣, 张春雷, 周恒, 武中原. 基于一维卷积神经网络的横波速度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 111-120.
[4] 赵军, 韩东, 何胜林, 汤翟, 张涛. 基于水气比计算的低对比度储层流体性质识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 128-136.
[5] 刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[6] 许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[7] 姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[8] 魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[9] 张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长81致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[10] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[11] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[12] 周新平, 邓秀芹, 李士祥, 左静, 张文选, 李涛涛, 廖永乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组下组合地层水特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 109-120.
[13] 高计县, 孙文举, 吴鹏, 段长江. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘神府区块上古生界致密砂岩成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 121-130.
[14] 曹江骏, 陈朝兵, 罗静兰, 王茜. 自生黏土矿物对深水致密砂岩储层微观非均质性的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部合水地区长6油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 36-49.
[15] 何维领, 罗顺社, 李昱东, 吴悠, 吕奇奇, 席明利. 斜坡背景下沉积物变形构造时空展布规律——以鄂尔多斯盆地镇原地区长7油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 62-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发