岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 2733.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.03.004
闫林1, 冉启全1, 高阳2, 陈福利1, 王少军1, 李崇飞1
YAN Lin1, RAN Qiquan1, GAO Yang2, CHEN Fuli1, WANG Shaojun1, LI Chongfei1
摘要: 针对吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层溶蚀孔隙较发育,但控制因素及成因机理认识程度低的问题,利用岩心、铸体薄片和扫描电镜观察以及物性测试等方法,结合矿物成分、油气成藏演化和成岩演化等分析,对研究区孔隙类型及特征、溶蚀孔隙成因机理及分布规律进行了研究。结果表明:吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油陆源碎屑岩、内源沉积岩及火山碎屑岩3种岩石类型储层中均发育有溶蚀孔隙,其形成受内部和外部因素共同制约,有机酸溶蚀长石类及碳酸盐岩类等易溶矿物组分是其形成的主要方式;芦草沟组二段中部的岩屑长石粉细砂岩储层溶蚀孔隙发育程度高、物性好、厚度相对较大、平面分布较为稳定,是下一步致密油勘探开发的重点层位。
中图分类号:
[1] 邱振, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 等.国内外致密油勘探现状、主要地质特征及差异.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4):119-126. QIU Z, LI J Z, WU X Z, et al. Exploration status, main geologic characteristics and their differences of tight oil between America and China. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4):119-126. [2] 贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景.石油学报, 2012, 33(3):343-350. JIA C Z, ZOU C N, LI J Z, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3):343-350. [3] 刘新, 张玉纬, 张威, 等. 全球致密油的概念、特征、分布及潜力预测. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2013, 32(4):168-174. LIU X, ZHANG Y W, ZHANG W, et al. Concept, characteristics, distribution and potential prediction of the tight oil in the world. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2013, 32(4):168-174. [4] 杜金虎, 刘合, 马德胜, 等. 试论中国陆相致密油有效开发技术.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(2):198-205. DU J H, LIU H, MA D S, et al. Discussion on effective development techniques for continental tight oil in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(2):198-205. [5] 王秀娟, 王明磊, 赵爱彬.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7致密油储层微观特征.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3):79-83. WANG X J, WANG M L, ZHAO A B. Microscopic characteristics of Chang 7 tight sandstone reservoir in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3):79-83. [6] 陈丽华, 赵澄林, 纪友亮, 等.碎屑岩天然气储集层次生孔隙的三种成因机理.石油勘探与开发, 1999, 26(5):77-79. CHEN L H, ZHAO C L, JI Y L, et al. Three formation mechanisms of secondary porosity in clastic gas reservoir rocks. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1999, 26(5):77-79. [7] 邱隆伟, 姜在兴, 操应长, 等.泌阳凹陷碱性成岩作用及其对储层的影响. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2001, 31(9):752-759. QIU L W, JIANG Z X, CAO Y C, et al. Alkali diagenesis and their effect on the reservoirs in Biyang Sag. Science in China (Series D:Earth Sciences), 2001, 31(9):752-759. [8] 朱国华.碎屑岩储集层孔隙的形成、演化和预测.沉积学报, 1992, 10(3):114-123. ZHU G H. Origin and evolution and prediction of porosity in elastic reservoir rocks. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1992, 10(3):114-123. [9] 邵雨, 杨勇强, 万敏, 等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组沉积特征及沉积相演化.新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(6):635-641. SHAO Y, YANG Y Q, WAN M, et al. Sedimentary characteristic and facies evolution of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(6):635-641. [10] 彭永灿, 李映艳, 马辉树, 等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油藏原油性质影响因素.新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(6):656-659. PENG Y C, LI Y Y, MA H S, et al. Influencing factors of crude oil properties in Lucaogou tight reservoir in Jimsar Sag, eastern Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(6):656-659. [11] 吴承美, 郭智能, 唐伏平, 等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油初期开采特征.新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(5):570-573. WU C M, GUO Z N, TANG F P, et al. Early exploitation charac-teristics of Lucaogou tight oil of Permian in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(5):570-573. [12] 杨和山, 陈洪, 卞保利.吉木萨尔凹陷构造演化与油气成藏. 内蒙古石油化工, 2012(15):138-140. YANG H S, CHEN H, BIAN B L. Structure modeling and geometry analysis in the western Fukang fault zone. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2012(15):138-140. [13] 匡立春, 孙中春, 欧阳敏, 等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组复杂岩性致密油储层测井岩性识别. 测井技术, 2013, 37(6):638-642. KUANG L C, SUN Z C, OUYANG M, et al. Complication lithology logging identification of the Lucaogou tight oil reservoir in Jimsar Depression. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(6):638-642. [14] 靳军, 向宝力, 杨召, 等.实验分析技术在吉木萨尔凹陷致密储层研究中的应用.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3):18-25. JIN J, XIANG B L, YANG Z, et al. Application of experimental analysis technology to research of tight reservoir in Jimsar Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3):18-25. [15] 邓泳, 杨龙, 李琼, 等.准噶尔盆地二叠系芦草沟组致密油岩心覆压孔渗变化规律研究.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1):39-43. DENG Y, YANG L, LI Q, et al. Change rule of porosity and permeability of tight oil core of Permian Lucaogou Formation under reservoir condition in Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1):39-43. [16] 杨晓宁, 陈洪德, 寿建峰, 等.碎屑岩次生孔隙形成机制.大庆石油学院学报, 2004, 28(1):4-6. YANG X N, CHEN H D, SHOU J F, et al. The forming mechanism of secondary dissolved porosity in clastic reservoir. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2004, 28(1):4-6. [17] 赵追, 孙冲, 张本书.碎屑岩储层次生孔隙形成机制及其勘探意义.河南石油, 2001, 15(2):11-14. ZHAO Z, SUN C, ZHANG B S. The forming mechanism and exploration significance of secondary dissolved porosity in clastic reservoir. Henan Petroleum, 2001, 15(2):11-14. [18] 李汶国, 张晓鹏, 钟玉梅.长石砂岩次生溶孔的形成机理.石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(2):220-223. LI W G, ZHANG X P, ZHONG Y M. Formation mechanism of secondary dissolved pores in arcose. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(2):220-223. [19] 闫林, 周雪峰, 高涛, 等.徐深气田兴城开发区火山岩储层次生溶蚀孔隙研究.天然气工业, 2007, 27(8):16-19. YAN L, ZHOU X F, GAO T, et al. The secondary dissolved pores formation and distribution of the volcanic reservoir in Xingcheng development area, Xushen Gas Field. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(8):16-19. [20] 陈景山, 李忠, 王振宇, 等.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩古岩溶作用与储层分布.沉积学报, 2007, 25(6):858-868. CHEN J S, LI Z, WANG Z Y, et al. Paleokarstification and reservoir distribution of Ordovician carbonates in Tarim Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(6):858-868. [21] 王一刚, 文应初, 洪海涛, 等.四川盆地三叠系飞仙关组气藏储层成岩作用研究拾零.沉积学报, 2007, 25(6):831-839. WANG Y G, WEN Y C, HONG H T, et al. Diagenesis of Triassic Feixianguan Formation in Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(6):831-839. [22] 佘敏, 寿建峰, 沈安江, 等.从表生到深埋藏环境下有机酸对碳酸盐岩溶蚀的实验模拟.地球化学, 2014, 43(3):276-286. SHE M, SHOU J F, SHEN A J, et al. Experimental simulation of dissolution for carbonate rocks in organic acid under the conditions from epigenesis to deep burial environments. Geochimica, 2014, 43(3):276-286. [23] 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 等.致密储集层原油充注物理模拟——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例.石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2):219-227. ZHENG M, LI J Z, WU X Z, et al. Physical modeling of oil charging in tight reservoirs:a case study of Lucaogu Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2):219-227. [24] 方世虎, 宋岩, 徐怀民, 等.构造演化与含油气系统的形成——以准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷为例.石油实验地质, 2007, 29(2):149-153. FANG S H, SONG Y, XU H M, et al. Relationship between tectonic evolution and petroleum system formation-taking the Jimsar Sag of eastern Junggar Basin as an example. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2007, 29(2):149-153. [25] 方世虎, 徐怀民, 宋岩, 等.准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷复合含油气系统特征及其演化. 地球学报, 2005, 26(3):259-264. FANG S H, XU H M, SONG Y, et al. Characteristics and evolution of the composite petroleum system in Jimsar Depression, eastern Junggar Basin. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2005, 26(3):259-264. |
[1] | 余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55. |
[2] | 尹路, 李博, 齐雯, 孙东, 乐幸福, 马慧. 天然氢气规模生成的成因类型与成藏特点[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 1-11. |
[3] | 肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148. |
[4] | 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144. |
[5] | 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177. |
[6] | 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98. |
[7] | 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108. |
[8] | 王同川, 陈浩如, 温龙彬, 钱玉贵, 李玉琢, 文华国. 川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 109-121. |
[9] | 田亚, 李军辉, 陈方举, 李跃, 刘华晔, 邹越, 张晓扬. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带下白垩统南屯组致密储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 136-146. |
[10] | 朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158. |
[11] | 夏茂龙, 张本健, 曾乙洋, 贾松, 赵春妮, 冯明友, 李勇, 尚俊鑫. 川中地区蓬莱气田震旦系灯影组二段储层发育主控因素及分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 50-60. |
[12] | 邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71. |
[13] | 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18. |
[14] | 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145. |
[15] | 雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159. |
|