岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 61–71.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240306

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向

邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃   

  1. 中国地质调查局 南京地质调查中心, 南京 210016
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-15 修回日期:2023-05-15 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-04-30
  • 第一作者:邵威(1988—),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事石油与天然气地质研究工作。地址:(210016)南京市中山东路 534 号南京地质调查中心。Email:18013912742@163.com。
  • 通信作者: 周道容(1983—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事石油与天然气地质研究。Email:zdr650@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地质调查局项目“下扬子地区油气页岩气调查评价”(编号:DD20221662)和“苏皖赣地区页岩油气战略选区调查”(编号:DD20190565)联合资助。

Key factors and favorable exploration directions for oil and gas enrichment in back margin sag of thrust nappe in Lower Yangtze

SHAO Wei, ZHOU Daorong, LI Jianqing, ZHANG Chengcheng, LIU Tao   

  1. Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing 210016, China
  • Received:2023-03-15 Revised:2023-05-15 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-04-30

摘要: 通过开展系统的构造特征、沉积环境、油气富集规律分析,在钻探新发现的新资料基础上,对下扬子北缘逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集规律和有利勘探方向进行了研究。研究结果表明:①下扬子北缘逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷中油气显示表现为“三气两油”特征,即二叠系大隆组和孤峰组页岩气、龙潭组煤层气和致密砂岩气、大隆组页岩油和三叠系殷坑组灰岩裂隙油。②以宣城凹陷为代表的下扬子北缘逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷带油气富集受3个关键要素控制,即后缘凹陷块体稳定,已形成的油气体系具有较好的保存环境;该地区二叠系大隆组(P3d)和孤峰组(P2g)沉积环境属深水陆棚环境,是有利的沉积相带,发育2套富有机质的烃源岩层系;顶、底板有效封存条件均较好,烃源岩上部有三叠系泥灰岩地层覆盖,下部有栖霞组生物碎屑灰岩为垫层,顶、底地层控制了纵向油气的散逸。③研究区下三叠统—上二叠统自上而下依次富集泥灰岩裂隙油、页岩油、页岩气、煤层气、致密砂岩气,整体呈“上油下气”多种非常规油气同生共存的特征,形成了特殊的油气富集模式。④宣城凹陷与南陵凹陷、句容凹陷和常州凹陷具有相似的地质条件,是下一步页岩油气勘探的首选有利区。

关键词: 逆冲推覆构造, 三元富集模式, 页岩油气, 煤层气, 致密砂岩气, 油气富集要素, 非常规油气, 二叠系, 下扬子北缘

Abstract: Through systematic analysis of structural characteristics, sedimentary environment and hydrocarbon enrichment law, on the basis of newly discovered drilling data, the oil and gas enrichment law and favorable exploration direction of the back margin sag of thrust nappe in northern margin of Lower Yangtze were studied. The result shows that:(1)The oil and gas in the sag is characterized by“three gas and two oil”, namely, shale gas of Permian Dalong Formation and Gufeng Formation, coalbed methane and tight sandstone gas of Longtan Formation, shale oil of Dalong Formation and limestone fracture oil of Triassic Yinkeng Formation.(2)The oil and gas enrichment in the sag, represented by Xuancheng Sag, is controlled by three key factors:The sag is a stable block and the formed oil and gas system has a good preservation environment;The sedimentary environment of Dalong Formation(P3d)and Gufeng Formation(P2g)in this area is a deep-water shelf environment, which is a favorable sedimentary facies zone, with two sets of organic matter rich source rock series developed;The effective sealing conditions of the top and bottom are good, with the upper part of the source rocks covered byTriassic marl formation, and the lower part being of bioclastic limestone of Qixia Formation, controlling the longitudinal oil and gas escape.(3)The Lower Triassic to Upper Permian strata in the study area are enriched in marl fracture oil, shale oil, shale gas, coalbed methane and tight sandstone gas from top to bottom, showing the characteristics of“upper oil and lower gas”multiple unconventional oil and gas coexisting together, forming a special oil and gas enrichment pattern.(4)Xuancheng sag has similar geological conditions to Nanling sag, Jurong sag and Changzhou sag, making it the preferred favorable area for next shale oil and gas exploration.

Key words: thrust nappe, ternary enrichment model, shale oil and gas, coalbed methane, tight sandstone gas, hydrocarbon enrichment factors, unconventional oil and gas, Permian, northern margin of Lower Yangtze

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 邹才能,赵群,丛连铸,等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(1):1-14. ZOU Caineng,ZHAO Qun,CONG Lianzhu,et al. Development progress,potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):1-14.
[2] 霍凤斌,张涛,徐发,等."两层·六端元"页岩评价方法在下扬子地区的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2013,25(3):87-91. HUO Fengbin,ZHANG Tao,XU Fa,et al. Application of"two layer and six terminal element"shale evaluation method in Lower Yangtze area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(3):87-91.
[3] 花彩霞. 下扬子句容地区海相上组合油气地质条件评价[J]. 地质学刊,2014,38(2):200-205. HUA Caixia. Evaluation on oil and gas geological conditions of upper marine formation assemblage in Jurong area of Lower Yangtze area[J]. Journal of Geology,2014,38(2):200-205.
[4] 石刚,徐振宇,郑红军,等. 下扬子地区"三气一油"钻探发现及成藏地质条件:以皖南港地1井钻探发现为例[J]. 地质通报,2019,38(9):1564-1570. SHI Gang,XU Zhenyu,ZHENG Hongjun,et al."Three-GasOne-Oil"drilling findings and reservoir formation geological conditions in the Lower Yangtze area:Exemplified by Gang Di 1 well in south Anhui[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,2019, 38(9):1564-1570.
[5] 潘继平,乔德武,李世臻,等. 下扬子地区古生界页岩气地质条件与勘探前景[J]. 地质通报,2011,30(2):337-343. PAN Jiping,QIAO Dewu,LI Shizhen,et al. Shale-gas geological conditions and exploration prospect of the Paleozoic marine strata in Lower Yangtze area[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011,30(2):337-343.
[6] 朱光,徐嘉炜,刘国生,等. 下扬子地区前陆变形构造格局及其动力学机制[J]. 中国区域地质,1999,18(1):74-80. ZHU Guang,XU Jiawei,LIU Guosheng,et al. Tectonic pattern and dynamic mechanism of the foreland deformation in the Lower Yangtze region[J]. Regional Geology of China,1999,18(1):74-80.
[7] 李海滨,贾东,武龙,等. 下扬子地区中-新生代的挤压变形与伸展改造及其油气勘探意义[J]. 岩石学报,2011,27(3):770-778. LI Haibin,JIA Dong,WU Long,et al. The Mesozoic-Cenozoic compressional deformation,extensional modification and their significance for hydrocarbon exploration in Lower Yangtze region[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(3):770-778.
[8] 姚柏平,陆红,郭念发. 论下扬子地区多期构造格局叠加及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1999,26(4):10-13. YAO Baiping,LU Hong,GUO Nianfa. The multil stage structure frame of Lower Yangtze basin evolution and its significance in petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1999,26(4):10-13.
[9] 梅廉夫,戴少武,沈传波,等. 中、下扬子区中、新生代陆内对冲带的形成及解体[J].地质科技情报,2008,27(4):7-14. MEI Lianfu,DAI Shaowu,SHEN Chuanbo,et al. Formation and disintegration of Mesozoic-Cenozoic intra-continental ramp zone in Middle and Lower Yangtze region[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2008,27(4):7-14.
[10] 石刚,李建青,廖圣兵,等. 安徽宣城地区皖油地1井钻获二叠系页岩气[J]. 中国地质,2021,48(2):669-670. SHI Gang,LI Jianqing,LIAO Shengbing,et al. Discovery of Permian shale gas in the Wanyoudi-1 well of Xuancheng,Anhui Province[J]. Geology in China,2021,48(2):669-670.
[11] 谭元隆,王宗秀,冯兴强,等. 复杂构造区油气构造保存条件分析:来自皖泾地1井的构造解析[J]. 地质力学学报,2021, 27(3):441-452. TAN Yuanlong,WANG Zongxiu,FENG Xingqiang,et al. Structural preservation conditions analysis of oil and gas in complex structural area:A case study of structural analysis in the well Wanjingdi-1,Anhui,China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2021,27(3):441-452.
[12] 李文强,郭兴伟,王艳忠,等.基于海陆对比建立苏北-南黄海盆地晚二叠世-早三叠世地层格架[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2020,50(1):18-30. LI Wenqiang,GUO Xingwei,WANG Yanzhong,et al. Establishment of stratigraphic framework of Late Permian to Early Triassic in northern Jiangsu and south Yellow Sea Basin based on land-sea Comparison[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2020,50(1):18-30.
[13] 张涛,尹宏伟,贾东,等. 下扬子区构造变形特征与页岩气保存条件[J]. 煤炭学报,2013,38(5):883-889. ZHANG Tao,YIN Hongwei,JIA Dong,et al. Structural deformation characteristics and shale gas preservation of Lower Yangtze region[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):883-889.
[14] 张鹏辉,梁杰,陈建文,等. 中国叠合盆地深部海相地层油气保存条件剖析[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2019,35(1):1-11. ZHANG Penghui,LIANG Jie,CHEN Jianwen,et al. Hydrocarbon preservation analysis for marine strata in superimposed basins of China[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2019,35(1):1-11.
[15] 吴林,陈清华,庞飞,等. 下扬子地区中新生代构造变形单元及构造变形样式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(6):1722-1734. WU Lin,CHEN Qinghua,PANG Fei,et al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic deformation units and styles in Lower Yangtze region[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2015, 45(6):1722-1734.
[16] 吕庆田,刘振东,董树文,等."长江深断裂带"的构造性质:深地震反射证据[J]. 地球物理学报,2015,58(12):4344-4359. LYU Qingtian,LIU Zhendong,DONG Shuwen,et al. The nature of Yangtze River deep fault zone:Evidence from deep seismic data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2015,58(12):4344-4359.
[17] 解东宁,何明喜,周立发,等. 东秦岭-大别造山带北缘逆冲推覆构造特征及油气前景[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(1):48-55. XIE Dongning,HE Mingxi,ZHOU Lifa,et al. Characteristics of overthurst structures on northern edge of east Qinling-Dabie orogenic belt and hydrocarbon potentials[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2006,27(1):48-55.
[18] 佘晓宇,徐宏节,何治亮. 江苏下扬子区中、古生界构造特征及其演化[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):226-230. SHE Xiaoyu,XU Hongjie,HE Zhiliang. Tectonic characteristics and evolution of Mesozoic and Paleozoic in Lower Yangtze region,Jiangsu[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2004,25(2):226-230.
[19] 蔡周荣,夏斌,黄强太,等. 上、下扬子区古生界页岩气形成和保存的构造背景对比分析[J]. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(8):1446-1454. CAI Zhourong,XIA Bin,HUANG Qiangtai,et al. Comparative study of the tectonic setting on the formation and preservation of Paleozoic shale gas between the Upper Yangtze and the Lower Yangtze platforms[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(8):1446-1454.
[20] LYU Qingtian,SHI Danian,LIU Zhendong,et al. Crustal structure and geodynamics of the Middle and Lower reaches of Yangtze metallogenic belt and neighboring areas:Insights from deep seismic reflection profiling[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2015,114:704-716.
[21] 丁燕云,李占奎. 基于航磁信息分析下扬子区及华南区基底性质[J]. 物探与化探,2009,33(5):493-496. DING Yanyun,LI Zhankui. An analysis of basement properties of Lower Yangtze area and South China area based on aeromagnetic information[J]. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration, 2009,33(5):493-496.
[22] 阴钰毅,姚志纯,郭小波,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘二叠系隐伏构造特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(4):79-88. YIN Yuyi,YAO Zhichun,GUO Xiaobo,et al. Characteristics of Permian concealed structures in western margin of Ordos Basin and its significance for oil and gas exploration[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(4):79-88.
[23] 姜波.下扬子地区推覆构造特征及演化[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,1992,21(1):43-50. JIANG Bo. Characteristics and evolution of nappe structures in Lower Yangtze River area[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,1992,21(1):43-50.
[24] 徐曦,朱晓颖,单希鹏,等. 下扬子区中新生代沿江盆地群的盆地结构与沉积特征[J]. 石油实验地质,2018,40(3):303-314. XU Xi,ZHU Xiaoying,SHAN Xipeng,et al. Structure and sedimentary characteristics of the Meso-Cenozoic basin group along the Yangtze River in the Lower Yangtze region[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(3):303-314.
[25] 王鹏程,李三忠,刘鑫,等. 长江中下游燕山期逆冲推覆构造及成因机制[J]. 岩石学报,2012,28(10):3418-3430. WANG Pengcheng,LI Sanzhong,LIU Xin,et al. Yanshanian fold-thrust tectonics and dynamics in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River area,China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28(10):3418-3430.
[26] 郭念发,赵红格,陈红,等. 下扬子地区海相地层油气赋存条件分析及选区评价[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2002, 32(5):526-530. GUO Nianfa,ZHAO Hongge,CHEN Hong,et al. Oil-gas occurrence conditions and evaluation of chosen belts of the marine strata in Yangtze area[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition),2002,32(5):526-530.
[27] 马永生,陈洪德,王国力,等. 中国南方层序地层与古地理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009. MA Yongsheng,CHEN Hongde,WANG Guoli,et al. Sequence stratigraphy and paleogeography in south China[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2009.
[28] 徐曦,杨风丽,赵文芳. 下扬子区海相中、古生界上油气成藏组合特征分析[J]. 海洋石油,2011,31(4):48-53. XU Xi,YANG Fengli,ZHAO Wenfang. Analysis of characteristics of upper hydrocarbon play of Mesozoic-Paleozoic marine group,Lower Yangtze region[J]. Offshore Oil,2011,31(4):48- 53.
[29] 姚素平,吴聿元,余文端,等. 下扬子区孤峰组-大隆组露头剖面特征与岩相变化[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2022,12(1):215-232. YAO Suping,WU Yuyuan,YU Wenduan,et al. Outcrop characteristic and lithofacies changes of both Gufeng and Dalong formations in Lower Yangtze region[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2022,12(1):215-232.
[30] 李红敬,林正良,解习农. 下扬子地区古生界硅岩地球化学特征及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):232-239. LI Hongjing,LIN Zhengliang,XIE Xinong. Geochemical characteristics and origin of Palaeozoic siliceous rocks in Lower Yangtze area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):232-239.
[31] 丁江辉,张金川,石刚,等. 皖南地区上二叠统大隆组页岩沉积环境与有机质富集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2021,42(1):158-172. DING Jianghui,ZHANG Jinchuan,SHI Gang,et al. Sedimentary environment and organic matter enrichment mechanisms of the Upper Permian Dalong Formation shale,southern Anhui Province,China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2021,42(1):158-172.
[32] 周冰,金之钧,刘全有,等.苏北盆地黄桥地区富CO2流体对油气储-盖系统的改造作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2020,41(6):1151-1161. ZHOU Bing,JIN Zhijun,LIU Quanyou,et al. Alteration of reservoir-caprock systems by using CO2-rich fluid in the Huangqiao area,north Jiangsu Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020,41(6):1151-1161.
[33] 潘文蕾,彭金宁,翟常博,等. 苏北盆地海相地层残存状况及成藏类型分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2022,44(2):231-240. PAN Wenlei,PENG Jinning,ZHAI Changbo,et al. Residual strata and hydrocarbon accumulation model of marine sediments in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022,44(2):231-240.
[34] 陈洪德,倪新锋,刘文均,等. 中国南方盆地覆盖类型及油气成藏[J]. 石油学报,2008,29(3):317-323. CHEN Hongde,NI Xinfeng,LIU Wenjun,et al. Overlay relationship of basins and hydrocarbon accumulation in South China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(3):317-323.
[35] 张涛,尹宏伟,贾东,等. 下扬子区构造变形特征与页岩气保存条件[J]. 煤炭学报,2013,38(5):883-889. ZHANG Tao,YIN Hongwei,JIA Dong,et al. Structural deformation characteristics and shale gas preservation of Lower Yangtze region[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):883- 889.
[36] 姜培海,张政,唐衔,等. 非常规油气聚集主控因素及油气富集综合分析[J]. 非常规油气,2017,4(3):110-118. JIANG Peihai,ZHANG Zheng,TANG Xian,et al. Comprehensive analysis for hydrocarbon accumulation main control factors and enrichment of unconventional oil and gas[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2017,4(3):110-118.
[37] 李建青,章诚诚,黄正清,等. 下扬子复杂构造区超高压含气层的发现及油气富集关键要素[J]. 地质通报,2021,40(4):577-585. LI Jianqing,ZHANG Chengcheng,HUANG Zhengqing,et al. Discovery of overpressure gas reservoirs in the complex structural area of the Lower Yangtze and its key elements of hydrocarbon enrichment[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,2021,40(4):577-585.
[38] 吴通,李建青,章诚诚,等. 下扬子无为凹陷中三叠世周冲村组天然气成藏物质基础分析[J]. 华东地质,2020,41(4):425-433. WU Tong,LI Jianqing,ZHANG Chengcheng,et al. Analysis on the gas reservoir forming conditions of Middle Triassic Zhouchongcun Formation in Wuwei Depression,Lower Yangtze Basin[J]. East China Geology,2020,41(4):425-433.
[39] 刘桃,吴通,方朝刚,等. 下扬子地区无为凹陷三叠系气藏超压特征及其成因分析[J]. 华东地质,2023,44(4):415-423. LIU Tao,WU Tong,FANG Chaogang,et al. Overpressure characteristics and genesis of the Triassic gas reservoirs in Wuwei Depression of Lower Yangtze Region[J]. East China Geology, 2023,44(4):415-423.
[1] 余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[2] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[3] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[4] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[5] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[6] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[7] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[8] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[9] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[10] 雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[11] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[12] 邓远, 陈轩, 覃建华, 李映艳, 何吉祥, 陶鑫, 尹太举, 高阳. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 136-144.
[13] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[14] 王小娟, 陈双玲, 谢继容, 马华灵, 朱德宇, 庞小婷, 杨田, 吕雪莹. 川西南地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 78-87.
[15] 李二庭, 米巨磊, 张宇, 潘越扬, 迪丽达尔·肉孜, 王海静, 高秀伟. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 88-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .