岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 156–166.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240515

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟

杨海波1, 冯德浩2,3, 杨小艺2,3, 郭文建1, 韩杨1, 苏加佳2,3, 杨皩1, 刘成林2,3   

  1. 1. 中国石油新疆油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与工程全国重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-25 修回日期:2023-07-17 出版日期:2024-09-01 发布日期:2024-09-04
  • 第一作者:杨海波(1967—),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事油气资源评价方面的研究工作。地址:(834000)新疆克拉玛依市克拉玛依区准噶尔路29号。Email:yhb@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 通信作者: 刘成林(1970—),男,博士,教授,主要从事油气地球化学与资源评价、非常规油气地质方面的教学与研究工作。Email:liucl@cup.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“中石油十四五油气资源评价”(编号:2023YQX201)资助。

Characteristics of source rocks and thermal evolution simulation of Permian Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi Sag,Junggar Basin

YANG Haibo1, FENG Dehao2,3, YANG Xiaoyi2,3, GUO Wenjian1, HAN Yang1, SU Jiajia2,3, YANG Huang1, LIU Chenglin2,3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2023-05-25 Revised:2023-07-17 Online:2024-09-01 Published:2024-09-04

摘要: 基于钻井、录井、测井及烃源岩分析测试等资料,对准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩的生烃潜力和热演化史进行了系统研究。研究结果表明:①准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩主要为深灰色、灰黑色泥岩,颜色深且厚度普遍较大,自东北部斜坡区向凹陷中部厚度逐渐增大,并向西部莫索湾凸起逐渐减小,最大泥岩厚度可达536 m。②研究区平地泉组烃源岩有机质丰度综合评价为中等—极好,纵向上以平一段有机质丰度最高,平面上以凹陷东北部滴南7井区和滴南19井区最高;平地泉组有机质类型主要为Ⅱ2—Ⅲ型,少部分为Ⅱ1型,纵向上以平二段有机质类型最好,平面上凹陷区烃源岩有机质类型主要为Ⅱ1—Ⅱ2型。③热演化史模拟结果显示,凹陷区和斜坡区烃源岩分别在晚三叠世和晚侏罗世达到生烃高峰,现今分别处于高成熟阶段和成熟阶段。④研究区发育“下生上储”和“自生自储”2类油气藏,其中平地泉组烃源岩与上乌尔禾组储集层形成“下生上储”油气藏,平二段和平一段的优质烃源岩与湖盆边缘的小型扇三角洲沉积在平地泉组内部形成“自生自储”油气藏,二者油气勘探潜力均较大。

关键词: 烃源岩, 高有机质丰度, 生烃潜力, 热演化史模拟, 下生上储, 自生自储, 平地泉组, 二叠系, 东道海子凹陷, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: Based on the data of drilling,mud-logging,wire-logging and source rock analysis and testing,the hydrocarbon generation potential and thermal evolution history of the source rocks of the Permian Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi Sag of Junggar Basin were systematically studied. The results show that:(1)The hydrocarbon source rocks of the Permian Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi Sag of Junggar Basin are mainly darkgray and gray black mudstones,which are dark in color and generally large in thickness. The thickness gradually increases from the northeastern slope area to the center of the sag,and gradually decreases toward the western Mosuowan uplift,with a maximum thickness of 536 m.(2)The organic matter abundance of the source rocks of Pingdiquan Formation in the study area is evaluated as medium to excellent levels,with the highest organic matter abundance in the first member of Pingdiquan Formation in the vertical direction and in Dinan 7 and Dinan 19 well areas in the northeast of the sag on plane. The organic matter type is mainly type Ⅱ2-Ⅲ,with a few type Ⅱ1,and it is the best in the second member of Pingdiquan Formation in the vertical direction. The organic matter type of source rocks near the central sag is mainly type Ⅱ1-Ⅱ2 on plane.(3)The simulation results of thermal evolution history show that the source rocks in the sag and slope areas reached their hydrocarbon generation peaks in the Late Triassic and Late Jurassic,respectively,and are currently in the high mature stage and mature stage,respectively.(4)There are two types of hydrocarbon accumulation models in the study area: “lowergeneration and upper-reservoir” and “self-generation and self-reservoir” . The source rocks of Pingdiquan Formation and the reservoirs of the Upper Urho Formation form “lower-generation and upper-reservoir” reservoirs, while the high-quality source rocks of the first and second members of Dingdiquan Formation and the small-scale fan delta deposits at the edge of the lake basin form “self-generation and self-reservoir” reservoirs within the Pingdiquan Formation,both of which have great potential for oil and gas exploration.

Key words: source rock, high organic matter abundance, hydrocarbon generation potential, thermal evolution simulation, lower-generation and upper-reservoir, self-generation and self-reservoir, Pingdiquan Formation, Permian, Dongdaohaizi Sag, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 匡立春, 支东明, 王小军, 等. 新疆地区含油气盆地深层-超深层成藏组合与勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):1-16. KUANG Lichun, ZHI Dongming, WANG Xiaojun, et al. Oil and gas accumulation assemblages in deep to ultra-deep formations and exploration targets of petroliferous basins in Xinjiang region[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):1-16.
[2] 何文军, 费李莹, 阿布力米提·依明, 等. 准噶尔盆地深层油气成藏条件与勘探潜力分析[J].地学前缘, 2019, 26(1):189-201. HE Wenjun, FEI Liying, ABLIMITI Yiming, et al. Accumulation conditions of deep hydrocarbon and exploration potential analysis in Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(1):189-201.
[3] 马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):57-70. MA Yongping, ZHANG Xianwen, ZHU Ka, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of fan-delta of the Upper Urho Formation of Permian in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):57-70.
[4] 何海清, 支东明, 唐勇, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷康探1井重大突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(2):1-11. HE Haiqing, ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, et al. A great discovery of well Kangtan 1 in the Fukang Sag in the Junggar Basin and its significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(2):1-11.
[5] 江梦雅, 王江涛, 刘龙松, 等. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系-二叠系天然气特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3):138-151. JIANG Mengya, WANG Jiangtao, LIU Longsong, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of natural gas of CarboniferousPermian in western well Pen-1 sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3):138-151.
[6] 杨智, 邹才能, 陈建军, 等". 进(近)源找油":油气地质理论创新与重点领域勘探思考[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10):1310-1324. YANG Zhi, ZOU Caineng, CHEN Jianjun, et al."Exploring petroleum inside or near the source kitchen":Innovations in petroleum geology theory and reflections on hydrocarbon exploration in key fields[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(10):1310-1324.
[7] 王小军, 宋永, 郑孟林, 等. 准噶尔盆地复合含油气系统与复式聚集成藏[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):29-43. WANG Xiaojun, SONG Yong, ZHENG Menglin, et al. Composite petroleum system and multi-stage hydrocarbon accumulation in Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):29-43.
[8] 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 曾治平, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3):126-137. LIU Zhongquan, ZHAO Leqiang, ZENG Zhiping, et al. Shale oil accumulation conditions of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Fukang fault zone, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3):126-137.
[9] 罗锦昌, 田继军, 马静辉, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷吉页1井区二叠系芦草沟组沉积环境及有机质富集机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):73-85. LUO Jinchang, TIAN Jijun, MA Jinghui, et al. Sedimentary environment and organic matter enrichment mechanism of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jiye-1 well area, Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):73-85.
[10] 李艳平, 邹红亮, 李雷, 等. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷上乌尔禾组油气勘探思路及发现[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(2):127-134. LI Yanping, ZOU Hongliang, LI Lei, et al. Petroleum exploration ideas and discoveries in upper Wuerhe Formation, Dongdaohaizi Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(2):127-134.
[11] 李博一, 刘洛夫, 卫倩倩, 等. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起二叠系、三叠系油气来源及成藏模式[J]. 地质科技情报, 2014, 33(5):141-148. LI Boyi, LIU Luofu, WEI Qianqian, et al. Hydrocarbon origin and reservoir forming model of Permian and Triassic petroleum, Baijiahai swell, Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(5):141-148.
[12] ZHOU Zengyuan, LI Yong, LU Jungang, et al. Origin and genesis of the Permian hydrocarbon in the northeast of the Dongdaohaizi Depression, Junggar Basin, China[J]. ACS Omega, 2022, 7:24157-24173.
[13] 靳军, 罗小平, 廖健德, 等. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷平地泉组烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 42(2):196-202. JIN Jun, LUO Xiaoping, LIAO Jiande, et al. Geochemical characteristics of Permian Pingdiquan Formation hydrocarbon source rock in Dongdaohaizi Sag, Junggar Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 42(2):196-202.
[14] 丁湘华. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷油气成因及成藏期次分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(10):80-84. DING Xianghua. Analysis of hydrocarbon genesis and accumulation stage of Dongdaohaizi Sag in Junggar Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(10):80-84.
[15] 乔锦琪. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷东部二叠系油气成藏条件研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2017. QIAO Jinqi. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of the Permian reservoirs in the eastern Dongdaohaizi Sag, Junggar Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2017.
[16] 李博一, 刘洛夫, 卫倩倩, 等. 彩南探区二叠系平地泉组烃源岩展布与潜力评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(24):195-202. LI Boyi, LIU Luofu, WEI Qianqian, et al. Distribution and hydrocarbon-generating potential evaluation of Permian Pingdiquan source rock in Cainan exploratory area[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(24):195-202.
[17] 冯陶然. 准噶尔盆地二叠系构造-地层层序与盆地演化[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2017. FENG Taoran. Permian tectono-stratigraphic sequence and basin evolution in Junggar Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2017.
[18] 王绪龙, 赵孟军, 向宝力, 等. 准噶尔盆地陆东-五彩湾地区石炭系烃源岩[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(5):523-530. WANG Xulong, ZHAO Mengjun, XIANG Baoli, et al. Carboniferous source rocks in the Ludong-Wucaiwan area, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(5):523-530.
[19] 王大伟. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组油气资源潜力评价[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2014. WANG Dawei. Oil and gas resource potential assessment in Permian Pingdiquan Formation of Dongdaohaizi depression in Junggar[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
[20] 唐勇, 王智强, 庞燕青, 等.准噶尔盆地西部坳陷二叠系下乌尔禾组烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4):16-28. TANG Yong, WANG Zhiqiang, PANG Yanqing, et al. Hydrocarbon-generating potential of source rocks of Permian lower Urho Formation in western depression, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4):16-28.
[21] 杨有星, 张君峰, 张金虎, 等. 新疆博格达山周缘中上二叠统与中上三叠统沉积特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4):670-682. YANG Youxing, ZHANG Junfeng, ZHANG Jinhu, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle-Upper Permian and Middle-Upper Triassic around Bogda Mountain of Xinjiang, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(4):670-682.
[22] 薛楠, 邵晓州, 朱光有, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地平凉北地区三叠系长 7段烃源岩地球化学特征及形成环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3):51-65. XUE Nan, SHAO Xiaozhou, ZHU Guangyou, et al. Geochemical characteristics and formation environment of source rocks of Triassic Chang 7 member in northern Pingliang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3):51-65.
[23] 潘宾锋, 高月泉, 潘涛, 等. 银额盆地拐子湖凹陷北部地区白垩系烃源岩特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):114-123. PAN Binfeng, GAO Yuequan, PAN Tao, et al. Characteristics of Cretaceous source rocks in northern Guaizihu Sag, YingenEjinaqi Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):114-123.
[24] 冯德浩, 刘成林, 田继先, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系盆地模拟及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3):74-84. FENG Dehao, LIU Chenglin, TIAN Jixian, et al. Basin modeling and favorable play prediction of Neogene in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(3):74-84.
[25] THOMAS H, ARMIN I K. Fundamentals of basin and petroleum systems modeling[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2009.
[26] CAO Zhe, GAO Jin, LIU Guangdi, et al. Investigation of oil potential in saline lacustrine shale:A case study of the Middle Permian Pingdiquan shale(Lucaogou equivalent) in the Junggar Basin, Northwest China[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31:6670 6688.
[27] 谭开俊, 张帆, 尹路, 等. 准噶尔盆地陆东地区侏罗系剥蚀厚度恢复[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2009, 5(1):5-7. TAN Kaijun, ZHANG Fan, YIN Lu, et al. The restoration of the Jurassic strata erosion thickness in the Ludong of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2009, 5(1):5-7.
[28] WYGRALA B. Integrated study of an oil field in the southern Po Basin, Northern Italy[D]. Cologne:University of Cologne, Germany, 1989.
[29] 饶松, 胡圣标, 朱传庆, 等. 准噶尔盆地大地热流特征与岩石圈热结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(8):2760-2770. RAO Song, HU Shengbiao, ZHU Chuanqing, et al. The characteristics of heat flow and lithospheric thermal structure in Junggar Basin, northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(8):2760-2770.
[30] 饶松, 朱亚珂, 胡迪, 等. 准噶尔盆地热史恢复及其对早-中二叠世时期盆地构造属性的约束[J]. 地质学报, 2018, 92(6):1176-1195. RAO Song, ZHU Yake, HU Di, et al. The thermal history of Junggar Basin:constraints on the tectonic attribute of the EarlyMiddle Permian Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2018, 92(6):1176-1195.
[31] BURNHAM A K, SWEENEY J J. A chemical kinetic model of vitrinite maturation and reflectance[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1989, 53(10):2649-2657.
[32] 匡立春, 支东明, 王小军, 等. 准噶尔盆地上二叠统上乌尔禾组大面积岩性-地层油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(3):325-340. KUANG Lichun, ZHI Dongming, WANG Xiaojun, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration directions of large-scale lithologic-stratigraphic oil and gas reservoirs in Upper Wuerhe Formation of Upper Permian in Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(3):325-340.
[33] 胡鑫, 邹红亮, 胡正舟, 等. 扇三角洲砂砾岩储层特征及主控因素:以准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷东斜坡二叠系上乌尔禾组为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2021, 45(6):15-26. HU Xin, ZOU Hongliang, HU Zhengzhou, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir in fan dalta glutenite:A case study of the Upper Urho Formation of Permian in the east slope of Dongdaohaizi Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2021, 45(6):15-26.
[1] 余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[2] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[3] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[4] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[5] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[6] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[7] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[8] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[9] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[10] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[11] 程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[12] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[13] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[14] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[15] 杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[3] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[4] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[5] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[6] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[7] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[8] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[9] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[10] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .