岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 72–83.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240307

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律

段逸飞1,2, 赵卫卫1,2, 杨天祥3, 李富康4, 李慧1,2, 王嘉楠1,2, 刘钰晨1,2   

  1. 1. 西安石油大学 地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065;
    2. 西安石油大学 陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室, 西安 710065;
    3. 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 气田公司, 陕西 延安 716000;
    4. 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司 天然气研究院分公司, 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-15 修回日期:2023-03-10 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-04-30
  • 第一作者:段逸飞（1997—），男，西安石油大学在读硕士研究生，研究方向为页岩气储层。地址:（710065）西安市雁塔区电子二路东段 18 号西安石油大学。Email:2580082431 @qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 赵卫卫（1976—），男，博士，副教授，主要从事非常规油气地质及油气成藏地质学研究。Email:zhaoww@xsyu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“陆相页岩储气机理与储层精细描述研究”（编号：2017ZX05039-001-002）资助。

Source-reservoir characteristics and accumulation rules of shale gas of Permian Shanxi Formation in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

DUAN Yifei1,2, ZHAO Weiwei1,2, YANG Tianxiang3, LI Fukang4, LI Hui1,2, WANG Jianan1,2, LIU Yuchen1,2   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    3. Gas Field Company, Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum(Group)Co., Ltd., Yan'an 716000, Shaanxi, China;
    4. Natural Gas Research Institute Branch, Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum(Group)Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710065, China
  • Received:2023-02-15 Revised:2023-03-10 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-04-30

PDF (PC)

361

摘要： 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气勘探潜力较大。通过分析钻井、录井以及测井资料，结合泥页岩样品的分析化验资料，深入分析了延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及成藏过程，并探讨页岩气聚集机理。研究结果表明：①鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组大面积分布的泥页岩有机碳（TOC）含量较高，平均质量分数为 2.12%，干酪根类型主要为Ⅲ型，Ro为2.0%~3.7%，处于高成熟—过成熟阶段，为优质烃源岩。②研究区山西组泥页岩矿物组成整体上具有富黏土特征，黏土矿物平均质量分数为 56.7%，有利于吸附气的赋存；主要发育无机矿物孔、有机孔和微裂缝 3 种储集空间类型；岩石含气性受不同岩性组合的影响而差异较大，山 2 段相较于山 1段具有较高的含气量（平均质量体积为1.38 m3/t）。按照源储配置关系，可划分为厚层泥页岩夹薄砂层、泥页岩与粉砂岩和细砂岩互层、泥页岩与煤层混层 3 种类型，不同的源储配置具有不同的含气特征。③研究区页岩气主要以吸附态、游离态赋存，在成藏过程处于动态平衡的状态，随着地层条件的变化而不断转化。其聚集过程可分为 3 个阶段：早侏罗世，有机质开始生成气态烃，页岩气开始吸附聚集；中—晚侏罗世，气态烃大量生成膨胀造隙，气态烃排出，裂缝关闭，循环运移聚集；早白垩世，有机质达到高—过成熟阶段，进入最后一个生排烃时期，直至地层抬升，生烃终止。泥页岩良好的封盖作用为页岩气藏的形成提供了坚实的保障。

关键词: 页岩气, 源储配置, 吸附态, 游离态, 聚集规律, 封盖作用, 山西组, 二叠系, 延安地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Permian Shanxi Formation has great exploration potential for shale gas in Yan’an area of Ordos Basin.By analyzing drilling, mud-logging and wire-logging data, combined with the analysis and laboratory data of shale samples, the source-reservoir characteristics and accumulation process of shale gas of Permian Shanxi Formation in Yan’an area were analyzed, and the accumulation mechanism of shale gas was discussed. The results show that:（1）The organic carbon（TOC）content of shale of Permian Shanxi Formation in Yan’an area of Ordos Basin is relatively high, with an average mass fraction of 2.12%. The main type of kerogen is type Ⅲ, with Ro ranging from 2.0% to 3.7%. It is in the high to over mature stage and high-quality source rocks.（2）The mineral composition of the shale of Shanxi Formation in the study area seems to be rich in clay, with an average mass fraction of clay minerals of 56.7%, which is conducive to the occurrence of adsorbed gas. There are mainly three types of reservoir spaces:inorganic mineral pores, organic pores, and micro-fractures. The gas content of rocks varies greatly due to the influence of different lithology combinations. The Shan 2 member has a higher gas content than Shan 1 member（with an average mass volume of 1.38 m3/t）. According to different lithology combinations, the source-reservoir configuration of shale gas of Shanxi Formation can be divided into three types:thick shale interbedded with thin sand layer, shale interbedded with siltstone and fine sandstone, and shale mixed with coal seam. Different source-reservoir configurations have different gas-bearing characteristics.（3）The shale gas is mainly in adsorbed state and free state in the study area, and is in a dynamic equilibrium state during the accumulation process, continuously transforming with the change of formation conditions. The accumulation process can be divided into three stages:In Early Jurassic, organic matter began to generate gaseous hydrocarbons, and shale gas began to adsorb and accumulate；During Middle-Late Jurassic, a large number of gaseous hydrocarbons were generated and expanded, gaseous hydrocarbons were discharged, fractures closed, and cyclic migration and accumulation occurred；In Early Cretaceous, organic matter reached a high-over mature stage, entering the final stage of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion, until the formation uplifted and hydrocarbon generation ended. The good sealing effect of shale provides a solid guarantee for the formation of shale gas reservoirs.

Key words: shale gas, source-reservoir configuration, adsorbed state, free state, accumulation rules, sealing effect, Shanxi Formation, Permian, Yan’an area, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] ZHANG Jinchuan,SHI Miao,WANG Dongsheng,et al. Fields and directions for shale gas exploration in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry B,2022,9(1):20-32.
[2] 张君峰,周志,宋腾,等. 中美页岩气勘探开发历程、地质特征和开发利用条件对比及启示[J]. 石油学报,2022,43(12):1687-1701. ZHANG Junfeng,ZHOU Zhi,SONG Teng,et al. Comparison of exploration and development history,geological characteristics and exploration conditions of shale gas in China and the United States and its enlightenment[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(12):1687-1701.
[3] 邹才能,朱如凯,董大忠,等.页岩油气科技进步、发展战略及政策建议[J]. 石油学报,2022,43(12):1675-1686. ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,DONG Dazhong,et al. Scientific and technological progress,development strategy and policy suggestion regarding shale oil and gas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022,43(12):1675-1686.
[4] 于荣泽,王成浩,张晓伟,等.北美Eagle Ford深层页岩气藏开发特征及启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(9):32-41. YU Rongze,WANG Chenghao,ZHANG Xiaowei,et al. Development characteristics and enlightenment of Eagle Ford deep shale gas reservoirs in North America[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(9):32-41.
[5] 陈小东,淮银超,丁黎,等.加拿大西加盆地泥盆系页岩气储层特征[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2019,39(3):483-491. CHEN Xiaodong,HUAI Yinchao,DING Li,et al. Reservoir characteristics of Devonian shale gas in the western Canada sediment basin,Canada[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2019,39(3):483-491.
[6] 邹才能,赵群,丛连铸,等.中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):1-14. ZOU Caineng,ZHAO Qun,CONG Lianzhu,et al. Development progress,potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):1-14.
[7] 郭艳琴,李文厚,郭彬程,等.鄂尔多斯盆地沉积体系与古地理演化[J]. 古地理学报,2019,21(2):293-320. GUO Yanqin,LI Wenhou,GUO Bincheng,et al. Sedimentary system and paleogeographic evolution of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2019,21(2):293- 320.
[8] 刘桂珍,张丹丹,李盼. 鄂尔多斯东南部上古生界混积层沉积特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,40(2):25-34. LIU Guizhen,ZHANG Dandan,LI Pan. Sedimentary characteristics of Upper Paleozoic mixed deposits in southeastern Ordos[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2018,40(2):25-34.
[9] 张烈辉,何骁,李小刚,等. 四川盆地页岩气勘探开发进展、挑战及对策[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(8):143-152. ZHANG Liehui,HE Xiao,LI Xiaogang,et al. Shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin:Progress,challenge and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(8):143- 152.
[10] 马新华,谢军,雍锐,等.四川盆地南部龙马溪组页岩气储集层地质特征及高产控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(5):841-855. MA Xinhua,XIE Jun,YONG Rui,et al. Geological characteristics and high production control factors of shale gas reservoirs in Silurian Longmaxi Formation,southern Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(5):841-855.
[11] 王文川,赵俊兴,向芳,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部山西组、下石盒子组储层特征及差异性对比[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2018,45(2):199-209. WANG Wenchuan,ZHAO Junxing,XIANG Fang,et al. Reservoir characteristics and comparative analysis of otherness of Shanxi Formation and lower Shihezi Formation in southeastern Ordos Basin,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2018,45(2):199-209.
[12] 赵晨帆,于兴河,付超,等.曲流河三角洲-辫状河三角洲控制因素及演化过程探讨[J]. 沉积学报,2019,37(4):768-784. ZHAO Chenfan,YU Xinghe,FU Chao,et al. Control factors and evolution progress of deposition system transition from meandering river delta to braided river delta:Case study of Shan 2 member to He 8 member,Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2019,37(4):768-784.
[13] 赵帮胜,李荣西,覃小丽,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中部上古生界山西组页岩储层特征[J]. 沉积学报,2019,37(6):1140-1151. ZHAO Bangsheng,LI Rongxi,QIN Xiaoli,et al. Characteristics of shale reservoirs in the Upper Paleozoic Shanxi Formation, central Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2019,37(6):1140-1151.
[14] 孙建博,刘刚,史鹏,等. 延安地区山西组页岩气储层特征及资源潜力分析[J]. 非常规油气,2023,10(1):44-51. SUN Jianbo,LIU Gang,SHI Peng,et al. Reservoir characteristics and analysis of shale gas resource potential of Shanxi Formation in Yan'an area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2023,10(1):44-51.
[15] 王玥,郭彦如,张延玲,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部山西组层序格架下的砂体成因类型、构型及分布[J]. 岩性油气藏,2018, 30(3):80-91. WANG Yue,GUO Yanru,ZHANG Yanling,et al. Genetic types, configuration and distribution of sand bodies of Shanxi Formation in northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018, 30(3):80-91.
[16] 杜燕,刘超,高潮,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区陆相页岩气勘探开发进展、挑战与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探,2020,25(2):33-42. DU Yan,LIU Chao,GAO Chao,et al. Progress,challenges and prospects of the continental shale gas exploration and development in Yanchang exploration area of the Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(2):33-42.
[17] 王克,王媛媛,王凤琴. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部山西组页岩气形成条件及富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2022,33(10):1661-1674. WANG Ke,WANG Yuanyuan,WANG Fengqin. Formation conditions and the main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale gas of Shanxi Formation in the southeastern of Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geosciences,2022,33(10):1661-1674.
[18] 孙建博,郝世彦,赵谦平,等.延安地区二叠系山西组1段页岩气储层特征及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 中国石油勘探,2022, 27(3):110-120. SUN Jianbo,HAO Shiyan,ZHAO Qianping,et al. Reservoir characteristics and key technologies for shale gas exploration and development of the first member of the Permian Shanxi Formation in Yan'an area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2022, 27(3):110-120.
[19] 席颖洋,文志刚,赵伟波,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部石炭系本溪组页岩气地质特征及富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学,2022, 33(12):1936-1950. XI Yingyang,WEN Zhigang,ZHAO Weibo,et al. Study on geological characteristics and enrichment law of shale gas of Carboniferous Benxi Formation in eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2022,33(12):1936-1950.
[20] 魏新,唐建云,宋红霞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区上古生界烃源岩地球化学特征及生烃潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(6):92-100. WEI Xin,TANG Jianyun,SONG Hongxia,et al. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of Upper Paleozoic source rocks in Ganquan area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(6):92-100.
[21] 卢双舫,张敏. 油气地球化学[M].2版. 北京:石油工业出版社,2017. LU Shuangfang,ZHANG Min. Oil and gas geochemistry[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2017.
[22] 付金华,郭少斌,刘新社,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界山西组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(2):382-389. FU Jinhua,GUO Shaobin,LIU Xinshe,et al. Shale gas accumulation conditions and exploration potential of the Upper Paleozoic Shanxi Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2013,43(2):382-389.
[23] 赵桂萍. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区上古生界烃源岩热演化特征模拟研究[J]. 石油实验地质,2016,38(5):641-646. ZHAO Guiping. Thermal evolution modeling of Neopaleozoic source rocks in Hangjinqi region,Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(5):641-646.
[24] 焦堃,姚素平,吴浩,等.页岩气储层孔隙系统表征方法研究进展[J]. 高校地质学报,2014,20(1):151-161. JIAO Kun,YAO Suping,WU Hao,et al. Advances in characterization of pore system of gas shales[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities,2014,20(1):151-161.
[25] 赵笑笑,闫建平,王敏,等. 沾化凹陷沙河街组湖相泥页岩夹层特征及测井识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):118- 129. ZHAO Xiaoxiao,YAN Jianping,WANG Min,et al. Logging identification method of lacustrine shale interlayers of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(1):118-129.
[26] 董敏,郭伟,张林炎,等.川南泸州地区五峰组-龙马溪组古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):43-51. DONG Min,GUO Wei,ZHANG Linyan,et al. Characteristics of paleotectonic stress field and fractures of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(1):43-51.
[27] ZHENG Da,WANG Wendong,REZA Z. Integrated pore-scale characterization of mercury injection/imbibition and isothermal adsorption/desorption experiments using dendroidal model for shales[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019, 178:751-765.
[28] 文志刚,罗雨舒,刘江艳,等. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(6):47-59. WEN Zhigang,LUO Yushu,LIU Jiangyan,et al. Pore structure characteristics and genetic mechanism of Triassic Chang 7 shale oil reservoir in Longdong area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022, 34(6):47-59.
[29] 方朝强. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界页岩气成藏条件评价[D]. 西安:西安石油大学,2012. FANG Chaoqiang. Evaluation of the reservoir-forming conditions of shale gas potential of the Upper Paleozoic in eastern Ordos Basin[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University,2012.
[30] 苗凤彬,彭中勤,王传尚,等.雪峰隆起西缘湘张地1井牛蹄塘组页岩含气性特征及控制因素[J]. 地球科学,2019,44(11):3662-3677. MIAO Fengbin,PENG Zhongqin,WANG Chuanshang,et al. Gas-bearing capacity and controlling factors of Niutitang Formation shale in well XZD-1,western margin of Xuefeng Uplift[J]. Earth Science,2019,44(11):3662-3677.
[31] 陈尚斌,张楚,刘宇.页岩气赋存状态及其分子模拟研究进展与展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2018,46(1):36-44. CHEN Shangbin,ZHANG Chu,LIU Yu. Research progress and prospect of shale gas occurrence and its molecular simulation[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(1):36-44.
[32] 李勇,许卫凯,高计县,等. "源-储-输导系统"联控煤系气富集成藏机制:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘为例[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(8):2440-2453. LI Yong,XU Weikai,GAO Jixian,et al. Mechanism of coal measure gas accumulation under integrated control of"source reservoir-transport system":A case study from east margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(8):2440-2453.
[33] 朱志良,高小明. 陇东煤田侏罗系煤层气成藏主控因素与模式[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):86-94. ZHU Zhiliang,GAO Xiaoming. Main controlling factors and models of Jurassic coalbed methane accumulation in Longdong coalfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(1):86-94.
[1] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[3] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[4] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[5] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[6] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[7] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[8] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[9] 闫建平, 来思俣, 郭伟, 石学文, 廖茂杰, 唐洪明, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 页岩气井地质工程套管变形类型及影响因素研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[10] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[11] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[12] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[13] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[14] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[15] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发