岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 70–83.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190508

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗—特低渗白云岩储层成岩相分析及测井识别——以伊陕斜坡马五段为例

李百强1, 张小莉1, 王起琮2, 郭彬程3, 郭艳琴2, 尚晓庆2, 程浩2, 卢俊辉1, 赵希1   

  1. 1. 西北大学 地质学系/二氧化碳捕集与封存技术国家地方联合工程研究中心, 西安 710069;
    2. 西安石油大学 地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-30 修回日期:2019-04-03 出版日期:2019-09-21 发布日期:2019-09-16
  • 第一作者:李百强(1989-),男,西北大学在读博士研究生,研究方向为沉积学与储层地质学、测井地质学。地址:(710069)陕西省西安市太白北路229号。Email:15249246598@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“十二五”专题“鄂尔多斯盆地南部奥陶系碳酸盐岩成岩作用及储层分布与演化”(编号:2011ZX05005-004-008HZ)、国家科技重大专项“十三五”专题“塔里木深层—超深层白云岩成岩作用与储层表征”(编号:2017ZX05005-002-004)和“十三五”国家油气重大专项“致密油甜点预测方法与甜点区评价”(编号:2016ZX05046-002)联合资助

Analysis and logging identification of diagenetic facies of dolomite reservoir with low and ultra-low permeability:a case study from Ma 5 member in Yishan slope,Ordos Basin

LI Baiqiang1, ZHANG Xiaoli1, WANG Qicong2, GUO Bincheng3, GUO Yanqin2, SHANG Xiaoqing2, CHENG Hao2, LU Junhui1, ZHAO Xi1   

  1. 1. Department of Geology, Northwest University/National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology, Xi'an 710069, China;
    2. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2019-01-30 Revised:2019-04-03 Online:2019-09-21 Published:2019-09-16

摘要: 为研究低渗—特低渗白云岩储层的成岩相测井识别方法并进行定量划分,明确白云岩成岩相的空间展布及其有利区,依据岩心观察、普通薄片和铸体薄片鉴定、以及阴极发光分析等,结合X射线衍射和物性资料,对伊陕斜坡中东部马五段白云岩储层的成岩环境及成岩作用进行剖析,通过测井曲线的交会分析与软件的综合应用,构建了低渗—特低渗白云岩储层成岩相的定量识别标准。结果表明,低渗—特低渗白云岩储层成岩相可划分为早期大气淡水溶蚀亚相、表生期大气淡水溶蚀亚相、浅埋藏活跃回流渗透云化亚相、浅埋藏隐伏回流渗透云化亚相、钙质胶结相和泥质充填相等6类;以Pe-DENRLLD-DEN交会及RLLD-AC交会为代表的测井参数交会图法及软件综合应用是进行低渗—特低渗白云岩储层不同成岩相单井纵向上定量识别与连续划分的有效方法;白云岩储层成岩相在空间的分布具有纵向分带、横向分区的典型特征。有利储层主要分布于早期大气淡水溶蚀亚相和浅埋藏活跃回流渗透云化亚相,其次为表生期大气淡水溶蚀亚相,浅埋藏隐伏回流渗透云化亚相储层分布最少。

关键词: 低渗-特低渗, 白云岩储层, 成岩相, 测井识别, 马五段, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: In order to study the logging identification method and quantitative classification of diagenetic facies of dolostone reservoir with low and ultra-low permeability and clarify the spatial distribution characteristics of diagenetic facies and the favorable exploration area of dolostone reservoir". Based on core observation,identification of ordinary and casting thin section,and cathodoluminescence analysis,combined with X-ray diffraction and physical property data,the diagenetic environment and diagenesis of dolomite reservoir with low and ultralow permeability of Ma 5 member in Yishan slope were analyzed. Then the quantitative identification standard for diagenetic facies of dolomite reservoir with low and ultra-low permeability was established through the crossplot analysis of conventional logging curves and application of software program. The results show that the diagenetic facies of the dolomite reservoirs with low and ultra-low permeability can be divided into six types:early atmospheric freshwater dissolution,supergene atmospheric freshwater dissolution,shallow buried active reflux seepage dolomitization,shallow buried latent reflux seepage dolomitization,calcareous cementation and clay minerals filling. The crossplot method of logging parameters represented by Pe and DEN,RLLD and DEN,and RLLD and AC,and the comprehensive application of software program are effective approach for vertical quantitative identification and continuous division of different diagenetic facies of dolostone reservoir with low and ultralow permeability in single well. The spatial distribution of diagenetic facies of dolostone reservoir shows a typical characteristic of longitudinal zonation and planar partition. The favorable reservoirs are mainly developed in diagenetic facies of early atmospheric freshwater dissolution and shallow buried active reflux seepage dolomitization,followed by supergene atmospheric freshwater dissolution,and there is less reservoir deve-loped in shallow buried latent reflux seepage dolomitization diagenetic subfacies.

Key words: low and ultra-low permeability, dolomite reservoir, diagenetic facies, logging identification, Ma 5 member, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • P512.2
[1] 杨威,魏国齐,金惠,等. 碳酸盐岩成岩相研究方法及其应用:以扬子地块北缘飞仙关组鲕滩储层为例. 岩石学报,2011,27(3):749-756. YANG W,WEI G Q,JIN H,et al. Methods for diagenetic facies research on carbonate rocks and its application:Example from oolitic beach reservoir of the Feixianguan Formation in the northern margin of Yangtze block. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011,27(3):749-756.
[2] 王起琮,赵淑萍,魏钦廉,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中奥陶统马家沟组海相碳酸盐岩储集层特征.古地理学报,2012,14(2):229-242. WANG Q C,ZHAO S P,WEI Q L,et al. Marine carbonate reservoir characteristics of the Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin. Journal of Paleogeography,2012,14(2):229-242.
[3] 李百强,王起琮,张小莉,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中南部马家沟组马五5-马五1亚段白云岩成岩相特征及其对储层的影响.西北大学学报(自然科学版),2018,48(2):255-260. LI B Q,WANG Q C,ZHANG X L,et al. Characteristics of diagenetic facies and its effect on the reservoir of M55-M51 submembers of Majiagou Formation in central-southern Ordos Basin. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2018, 48(2):255-260.
[4] 王小芬,杨欣.鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区马五段碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究.岩性油气藏,2011,23(3):75-79. WANG X F,YANG X. Carbonate diagenesis of the fifth member of Majiagou Formation in Fuxian area,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(3):75-79.
[5] 陈彦华,刘莺. 成岩相:储集体预测的新途径. 石油实验地质, 1994,16(3):274-281. CHEN Y H,LIU Y. Diagenetic facies:a new approach to the predication of reservoir rocks. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,1994,16(3):274-281.
[6] 张秀莲. 碳酸盐岩成岩研究的新方法:成岩综合柱状图. 地质科学,1995(4):401-413. ZHANG X L. A new method in the study of carbonatite diagenesis:Composite column of diagenesis. Chinese Journal of Geology(Scientia Geologica Sinica),1995(4):401-413.
[7] RAILSBACK L B. Carbonate diagenetic facies in the Upper Pennsylvanian Dennis Formation in Iowa,Missouri,and Kansas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1984,54(3):986-999.
[8] 范宜仁,李菲,邓少贵,等. 致密砂岩储层成岩相特征分析及测井识别. 测井技术,2018,42(3):63-70. FAN Y R,LI F,DENG S G,et al. Characteristics analysis of diagenetic facies in tight sandstone reservoir and its logging identification. Well Logging Technology,2018,42(3):63-70.
[9] 冉冶,王贵文,赖锦,等. 利用测井交会图法定量表征致密油储层成岩相:以鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区长7致密油储层为例.沉积学报,2016,34(4):694-706. RAN Y,WANG G W,LAI J,et al. Quantitative characterization of diagenetic facies of tight sandstone oil reservoir by using logging crossplot:a case study on Chang 7 tight sandstone oil reservoir in Huachi area,Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2016,34(4):694-706.
[10] 赖锦,王贵文,王书南,等. 碎屑岩储层成岩相测井识别方法综述及研究进展. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(12):4942-4953. LAI J,WANG G W,WANG S N,et al. Overview and research progress in logging recognition method of clastic reservoir diagenetic facies. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44(12):4942-4953.
[11] 李百强.延长探区马家沟组马五段碳酸盐岩储层分布规律及主控因素.西安:西安石油大学,2016. LI B Q. Distribution law and main controlling factors of carbonate reservoir in member Ma 5 of Majiagou Formation in Yanchang exploration area. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University,2016.
[12] 李维,张军涛,朱筱敏,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区马五段白云岩储层特征与演化.岩性油气藏,2016,28(3):58-67. LI W,ZHANG J T,ZHU X M,et al. Characteristics and evolution of the Ordovician dolomite reservoir of Ma 5 member in Fuxian area,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(3):58-67.
[13] 李百强,王起琮,张小莉,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中南部马五1-2亚段岩相古地理特征及其对储层的影响. 沉积学报,2019,37(3):589-600. LI B Q,WANG Q C,ZHANG X L,et al. Characteristics of lithofacies paleography and its effect on the Majiagou submember 51-2 reservoir in the central-southern Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2019,37(3):589-600.
[14] MOU D C,BRENNER R L. Control of reservoir properties of Tensleep sandstone by depositional and diagenetic facies:Lost Soldire field,Wyoming. Journal of sedimentology,1982,39:1119-1136.
[15] SPTL C,WRIGHT V P. Groundwater dolocretes from the Upper Triassic of the Paris Basin,France:a case study of an arid,continental diagenetic facies. Sedimentology,1992,39:1119-1136.
[16] ANDREWS J E. Geochemical indicators of depositional and early diagenetic facies in Holocene carbonate muds and their preservation potential during stabilization. Chemical Geology, 1991,93:267-289.
[17] 邹才能,陶士振,周慧,等.成岩相的形成、分类与定量评价方法.石油勘探与开发,2008,35(5):526-540. ZOU C N,TAO S Z,ZHOU H,et al. Genesis,classification and evaluation method of diagenetic facies. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2008,35(5):526-540.
[18] 李国欣,赵太平,石玉江,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地马家沟组碳酸盐岩储层成岩相测井识别评价. 石油学报,2018,39(10):1141-1154. LI G X,ZHAO T P,SHI Y J,et al. Diagenetic facies logging recognition and evaluation of carbonate reservoirs in Majiagou Formation,Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(10):1141-1154.
[19] 王正允,张紫光,陈梦蛟,等.冀北坳陷雾迷山组的成岩作用及成岩相特征:以辽宁省凌源县魏杖子剖面为例.石油天然气学报,2009,31(4):1-8. WANG Z Y,ZHANG Z G,CHEN M J,et al. Diagenesis and features of diagenetic facies of Wumishan Formation of Jibei Depression:by taking the Weizhangzi section of Lingyuan county in Liaoning province for example. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2009,31(4):1-8.
[20] 石玉江,肖亮,毛志强,等.低渗透砂岩储层成岩相测井识别方法及其地质意义:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8段储层为例.石油学报,2011,32(5):820-828. SHI Y J,XIAO L,MAO Z Q,et al. An identification method for diagenetic facies with well logs and its geological significance in low-permeability sandstones:a case study on Chang 8 reservoirs in the Jiyuan region,Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011,32(5):820-828.
[21] 张海涛,时卓,石玉江,等.低渗透致密砂岩储层成岩相类型及测井识别方法:以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田下石盒子组8段为例.石油与天然气地质,2012,33(2):256-264. ZHANG H T,SHI Z,SHI Y J,et al. Diagenetic facies types and logging identification methods for low-permeability tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study on the 8 th member of Xiashihezi Formation in Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012,33(2):256-264.
[22] 赖锦,王贵文,信毅,等. 库车坳陷巴什基奇克组致密砂岩气储层成岩相分析.天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1019-1032. LAI J,WANG G W,XIN Y,et al. Diagenetic facies analysis of tight sandstone gas reservoir of Bashijiqike Formation in Kuqa Depression. Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(7):1019-1032.
[1] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[3] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[4] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[5] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[6] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[7] 曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[8] 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[9] 雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[10] 翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.
[11] 龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[12] 杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五5亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[13] 魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.
[14] 尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长611储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.
[15] 薛楠, 邵晓州, 朱光有, 张文选, 齐亚林, 张晓磊, 欧阳思琪, 王淑敏. 鄂尔多斯盆地平凉北地区三叠系长7段烃源岩地球化学特征及形成环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 51-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .