岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 89–98.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240209

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征

岑永静1, 梁锋1, 王立恩1, 刘倩虞1, 张鑫哲2, 丁熊2   

  1. 1. 中国石油西南油气田公司 川中北部采气管理处, 四川 遂宁 629000;
    2. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 四川 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-02 修回日期:2023-11-16 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-03-06
  • 第一作者:岑永静（1978—），男，本科，高级工程师，主要从事油气勘探开发管理工作。地址：（629000）遂宁市船山区凯旋路川中北部采气管理处。Email：asicyj@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 通信作者: 张鑫哲（2000—），男，西南石油大学在读硕士研究生，研究方向为储层地质的研究。Email：820183632@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油西南油气田分公司科研项目“蓬莱地区灯二气藏成藏模式及气水分布研究”（编号：2021DZ-04）资助。

Reservoir accumulation characteristics of the second member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Penglai-Zhongjiang area，Sichuan Basin

CEN Yongjing1, LIANG Feng1, WANG Lien1, LIU Qianyu1, ZHANG Xinzhe2, DING Xiong2   

  1. 1. North Central Sichuan Gas Production Management Office, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Suining 629000, Sichuan, China;
    2. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2023-10-02 Revised:2023-11-16 Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-06

PDF (PC)

221

摘要： 通过钻井、岩心、测录井及地震资料的综合分析，系统研究了四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段气藏的成藏特征。研究结果表明：①四川盆地灯影组沉积期，随着海水侵入，古陆多被淹没或侵蚀夷平，盆地逐渐演变为碳酸盐岩台地。灯二上亚段沉积期，川中北斜坡蓬莱—中江地区以发育台地边缘滩相和台地边缘丘相为特色，并可细分为滩核、滩缘、滩间海、丘核、丘缘、丘间海6种亚相，是储层发育的有利相带。②研究区灯二上亚段储层以藻云岩、藻砂屑云岩为主要储集岩，发育残余粒间孔+粒间溶孔型、粒内溶孔+藻格架孔型、裂缝型与孔洞型4种类型的储层，储层厚度分布特征与沉积相分布特征较吻合，位于台地边缘丘滩核的储层累积厚度大。③研究区灯二上亚段气藏的天然气主要来源于筇竹寺组烃源岩，烃源岩厚度大、有机碳含量及热演化程度高，气藏具备较好的烃源条件和封盖条件，具有“上生下储上盖”和“旁生侧储上盖”2种较好的生-储-盖配置关系。④研究区油气充注主要发生于三叠纪—白垩纪，为多期“准连续”型，灯二上亚段气藏主要经历了奥陶纪—志留纪古油气藏聚集阶段、志留纪—石炭纪古油藏破坏阶段、二叠纪—三叠纪再次生烃成油藏阶段和三叠纪—侏罗纪原油裂解生气阶段。

关键词: 台地边缘相, 藻云岩, 藻砂屑云岩, 旁生侧储, 上生下储, 原油裂解生气, 筇竹寺组烃源岩, 灯影组二段, 震旦系, 蓬莱—中江地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Based on the comprehensive analysis of drilling，logging，seismic and core data，the reservoir accumulation characteristics of the second member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Penglai-Zhongjiang area were systematically studied. The results show that：（1）During the sedimentary period of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin，with the intrusion of seawater，the ancient land was mostly submerged or eroded and flat‐tened，and the basin gradually evolved into a carbonate platform. During the sedimentary period of the upper submember of the second member of Sinian Dengying Formation（upper Sinian Deng-2 member），platform margin shoal facies and platform margin mound facies were developed in Penglai-Zhongjiang area，and they can be further divided into six subfacies：shoal core，shoal edge，intershoal sea，mound core，mound edge，and intermound sea，which are favorable facies zones for reservoir development.（2）The reservoirs in the upper submember of the second member of Dengying Formation in the study area are mainly composed of algal dolomite and algal sand clastic dolomite，with four types of reservoirs developed：residual intergranular pore and intergranular dissolved pore type，intragranular dissolved pore and algal framework pore type，fracture type and pore type. The thickness distribution characteristics of the reservoirs are consistent with the sedimentary facies distribution characteristics，and the reservoirs located in the mound/shoal core of platform margin have a larger cumulative thickness.（3）The natural gas in the upper submember of the second member of Dengying Formaiton in the study area is mainly derived from the source rocks of Qiongzhusi Formation. The source rocks have a large thickness，high organic carbon content and high degree of thermal evolution. The gas reservoir has good hydrocarbon sources and sealing conditions，with two types of good assemblages：“upper source，lower reservoir and upper cap”and “side source，side reservoir，and upper cap”.（4）The oil and gas filling in the study area mainly occurred during Triassic-Cretaceous，which is multi-stage quasi-continuous. The gas reservoirs of the upper submember of the second member of Dengying Formation mainly mainly went through four stages：the accumulation stage of paleoreservoirs from Ordovician to Silurian，the paleo-reservoirs failure stage from Silurian to Carboniferous，the hydrocarbon regeneration and reaccumulation stage from Permian to Triassic，and the crude oil cracking and gas generation stage from Triassic to Jurassic.

Key words: platform margin facies, algal dolomite, algal sand-clastic dolomite, side source and side reservoir, upper source and lower reservoir, crude oil cracking and gas generation, source rocks of Qiongzhusi Formation, the second member of Dengying Formation, Sinian, Penglai-Zhongjiang area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] HU Mingyi,GAO Da,WEI Guoqi,et al. Sequence stratigraphy and facies architecture of a moundshoaldominated dolomite reservoir in the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation,central Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Geological Journal,2019,54(3):1653-1671.
[2] XIONG Ran,ZHENG Jianfeng,WANG Xinxin,et al. 3D out crop geologic modeling and seismic forward modeling of moundbeach complexes[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2022,15(14):1-12.
[3] WEN Long,RAN Qi,TIAN Weizhen,et al. Strike-slip fault effects on diversity of the ediacaran mound-shoal distribution in the central sichuan intracratonic Basin,China[J]. Energies, 2022,15:5910.
[4] 谢增业,李剑,杨春龙,等.川中古隆起震旦系-寒武系天然气地球化学特征与太和气区的勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2021,41(7):1-14. XIE Zengye,LI Jian,YANG Chunlong,et al. Geochemical characteristics of Sinian-Cambrian natural gas in central Sichuan paleo-uplift and exploration potential of Taihe gas area[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(7):1-14.
[5] 魏国齐,谢增业,杨雨,等.四川盆地中部北斜坡震旦系-寒武系大型岩性气藏形成条件[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2022,49(5):835-846. WEI Guoqi,XIE Zengye,YANG Yu,et al. Formation conditions of Sinian-Cambrian large lithologic gas reservoirs in the north slope area of central Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(5):835-846.
[6] 耿夏童,邢凤存,闫海军,等.四川盆地磨溪地区震旦系灯影组四段储层特征及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(6):126-140. GENG Xiatong,XING Fengcun,YAN Haijun,et al. Reservoir characteristics of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation and its implications for oil and gas exploration in Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(6):126-140.
[7] 周红飞,戴鑫,贾敏,等.川中古隆起北斜坡震旦系灯影组二段油气成藏特征[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(5):130-138. ZHOU Hongfei,DAI Xin,JIA Min,et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of the second member of Sinian Dengying Formation in the north slope of central Sichuan paleo-uplift[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(5):130-138.
[8] WU Juan,LIU Shugen,WANG Guozhi,et al. Multi-stage hydrocarbon accumulation and formation pressure evolution in Sinian Dengying Formation-Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation, Gaoshiti-Moxi structure,Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science,2016,27(5):835-845.
[9] XU Fanghao,XU Guosheng,YUAN Haifeng,et al. Fluid system and pressure evolution study based on isotope and fluid inclusion geochemistry:A case study on the Sinian Dengying and the Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation in the Gaoshiti-Moxi structure,central Sichuan Basin[J]. Arabian journal of geosciences,2019,12(8):260.
[10] 任佳鑫,宋金民,刘树根,等.四川盆地灯影组二段微生物丘滩体结构类型与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(2):312-328. REN Jiaxin,SONG Jinmin,LIU Shugen,et al. Framework and sedimentary model of microbial mound-bank complex in member 2 of Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023,44(2):312-328.
[11] 杨雨,文龙,宋泽章,等.川中古隆起北部蓬莱气区多层系天然气勘探突破与潜力[J].石油学报,2022,43(10):1351-1368. YANG Yu,WEN Long,SONG Zezhang,et al. Breakthrough and potential of natural gas exploration in multi-layer system of Penglai gas area in the north of central Sichuan paleo-uplift[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(10):1351-1368.
[12] 谢继容,张自力,钟原,等.四川盆地中部-北部地区灯影组二段天然气勘探新认识及潜力分析[J].海相油气地质,2022, 27(3):225-235. XIE Jirong,ZHANG Zili,ZHONG Yuan,et al. New understanding and potential analysis of natural gas exploration of the Dengying member 2 in central-northern area of Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2022,27(3):225-235.
[13] 王亮,苏树特,马梓柯,等.川中地区寒武系沧浪铺组沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(6):19-31. WANG Liang,SU Shute,MA Zike,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(6):19-31.
[14] CHE Zhenqiang,TAN Xiucheng,DENG Jiating,et al. The characteristics and controlling factors of facies-controlled coastal eogenetic karst:Insights from the fourth member of Neoproterozoic Dengying Formation,central Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Carbonates & Evaporites,2019,34(4):1771-1783.
[15] 范俊佳,姜华,鲁雪松,等.四川盆地蓬莱地区震旦系灯影组气藏压力演化与成藏过程[J].天然气工业,2022,42(12):32-43. FAN Junjia,JIANG Hua,LU Xuesong,et al. Pressure evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation process of Sinian Dengying Formation gas reservoirs in the Penglai area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(12):32-43.
[16] 刘朱睿鸷,胡素云,谷志东,等.川西震旦系台内坳槽西缘地层划分与沉积演化[J].海相油气地质,2022,27(4):360-370. LIUZHU Ruizhi,HU Suyun,GU Zhidong,et al. The stratigraphic division and sedimentary evolution of the western Sinian intraplatform trough in the western Sichuan Basin,South China[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2022,27(4):360-370.
[17] 马奎,文龙,张本健,等.四川盆地德阳-安岳侵蚀裂陷槽分段性演化分析和油气勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(2):274-284. MA Kui,WEN Long,ZHANG Benjian,et al. Segmented evolution of Deyang-Anyue erosion rift trough in Sichuan Basin and its significance for oil and gas exploration,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(2):274-284.
[18] DING Xiong,TAN Xiucheng,LI Ling,et al. Differences between the platform-margin shoal reservoirs and the platform-interior shoal reservoirs of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation,Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites,2014,29(4):349-361.
[19] 张玺华,李勇,张本健,等.四川盆地中江-蓬莱地区灯二段储层特征及优质储层成因机制[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2023,50(3):301-312. ZHANG Xihua,LI Yong,ZHANG Benjian,et al. Characteristics and formation mechanism of high quality reservoir of the second member of the Dengying Formation in Zhongjiang-Penglai area,Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2023,50(3):301-312.
[20] 李剑,杨春龙,谢武仁,等.四川盆地安岳气田震旦系台缘带和台内地区天然气成藏差异性及勘探领域[J].石油与天然气地质,2023,44(1):34-45. LI Jian,YANG Chunlong,XIE Wuren,et al. Differences of natural gas accumulation and play fairways in the marginal zone and interior of Sinian platform in Anyue gas field,Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(1):34-45.
[21] 付小东,陈娅娜,罗冰,等.中上扬子区下寒武统麦地坪组- 筇竹寺组烃源岩与含油气系统评价[J].中国石油勘探,2022, 27(4):103-120. FU Xiaodong,CHEN Ya'na,LUO Bing,et al. Evaluation of source rocks and petroleum system of the Lower Cambrian Maidiping Formation-Qiongzhusi Formation in the Middle-Upper Yangtze region[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2022,27(4):103-120.
[22] 姜华,李文正,黄士鹏,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组跨重大构造期油气成藏过程与成藏模式[J].天然气工业,2022,42(5):11-23. JIANG Hua,LI Wenzheng,HUANG Shipeng,et al. Process and model of hydrocarbon accumulation spanning major tectonic phases of Sinian Dengying Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(5):11-23.
[23] 韩云浩,姜振学,张志遥,等.含油气盆地超高油气柱形成的有利地质条件[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(2):125-135. HAN Yunhao,JIANG Zhenxue,ZHANG Zhiyao,et al. Favorable geological conditions for the formation of ultra-high petroleum columns in petroliferous basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023,35(2):125-135.
[24] 关蕴文,周锋,蒲仁海,等.西湖凹陷平北缓坡带盖层特征及封堵性评价[J].海洋地质前沿,2022,38(10):34-41. GUAN Yunwen,ZHOU Feng,PU Renhai,et al. Caprock characteristics and sealing evaluation of Pingbei gentle slope belt in Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2022,38(10):34-41.
[25] 王宇鹏.四川安岳大气田泥岩盖层封闭天然气有效性定量评价[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2019. WANG Yupeng. Quantitative evaluation of effectiveness of mudstone caprock sealing natural gas in Anyue gas field,Sichuan Basin[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2019.
[26] DING Xiong,WU Han,SUN Yuefeng,et al. Genetic types of carbonate shoal reservoirs in the Middle Triassic of the Sichuan Basin(SW China)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019, 99:61-74.
[1] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[2] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[3] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[4] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[5] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[6] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[7] 夏茂龙, 张本健, 曾乙洋, 贾松, 赵春妮, 冯明友, 李勇, 尚俊鑫. 川中地区蓬莱气田震旦系灯影组二段储层发育主控因素及分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 50-60.
[8] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[9] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[10] 孙汉骁, 邢凤存, 谢武仁, 钱红杉. 四川盆地及周缘地区晚奥陶世岩相古地理演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[11] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[12] 包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[13] 张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[14] 魏全超, 李小佳, 李峰, 郝景宇, 邓双林, 吴娟, 邓宾, 王道军. 四川盆地米仓山前缘旺苍地区下寒武统筇竹寺组裂缝脉体发育特征及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 62-70.
[15] 黄彦庆, 刘忠群, 王爱, 肖开华, 林恬, 金武军. 四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 21-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发