松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20240504

岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 35–45.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240504

松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素

王洪星¹, 韩诗文², 胡佳¹, 潘志浩¹

1. 中国石油吉林油田公司地球物理勘探研究院, 吉林松原 138000;
2. 中国石油大庆钻探工程公司地质录井二公司, 吉林松原 138000

收稿日期:2023-10-06 修回日期:2024-04-08 出版日期:2024-09-01 发布日期:2024-09-04
第一作者:王洪星（1979—），男，硕士，高级工程师，主要从事地震资料综合解释研究工作。地址：（138000）吉林省松原市宁江区锦江大街1号吉林油田公司地球物理勘探研究院。Email：83610160@qq.com。
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司吉林油田公司项目“吉林探区重点风险勘探区带圈闭描述技术研究与井位部署”（编号：勘科23008）资助。

Prediction and main controlling factors of tuff reservoirs of Cretaceous Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault depression，Songliao Basin

WANG Hongxing¹, HAN Shiwen², HU Jia¹, PAN Zhihao¹

1. Research Institute of Geophysical Exploration, PetroChina Jilin Oilfield Company, Songyuan 138000, Jilin, China;
2. No. 2 Geo-Logging Company, PetroChina Daqing Drilling Engineering Company, Songyuan 138000, Jilin, China

Received:2023-10-06 Revised:2024-04-08 Online:2024-09-01 Published:2024-09-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于钻井岩心分析、测井曲线、地震等资料，运用模型正演、多参数反演体融合技术等，对松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层分布特征及油气富集条件进行了研究，预测了优质储层分布。研究结果表明：①松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩为裂隙式喷发形成的火山碎屑岩，主要为含角砾熔结凝灰岩、含角砾晶屑凝灰岩和沉凝灰岩。地震反射特征总体表现为低频、差连续、中强振幅或弱振幅，多参数反演体融合体技术预测的凝灰岩储层“甜点”分布与钻井证实结果的符合率高，凝灰岩储层平均钻遇率达92.8%，气层平均钻遇率为81.0%，其中12口井获得了工业气流；华家构造带与郭家断阶带储层岩性分别以含角砾熔结凝灰岩和含角砾晶屑凝灰岩为主，断裂发育，是2个优质储层发育区。②研究区凝灰岩的测井和地震相特征相匹配形成的岩性-岩相模板可有效指导凝灰岩的地震相识别，振幅属性刻画出的火山口相、近火山岩相为有利岩性分布区。③研究区发育火石岭组、沙河子组、营城组3套优质烃源岩厚度均超过300 m，TOC值分别为0.26%～5.08%，0.10%～5.55%，0.10%～9.74%，S₁+S₂分别为0.24～8.23 mg/g，0.12～18.15 mg/g，0.25～2.86 mg/g，R_o分别为0.6%～1.3%，1.1%～1.6%，1.0%～2.2%，具有丰度高，成熟度中等的特征，为大规模成藏奠定了良好的物质基础。④研究区凝灰岩气藏是一套源储侧向对接、高位富集的致密气藏，成藏主要受构造样式、断裂发育程度和供烃窗口控制，其中拉张和伸展作用形成的叠瓦状断弯褶皱控制了油气富集程度，断裂发育程度及供烃窗口的大小决定了气藏规模。

关键词: 凝灰岩, 地震振幅属性, 源储侧向对接, 构造样式, 断弯褶皱, 供烃窗口, 模型正演, 火石岭组, 白垩系, 德惠断陷, 松辽盆地

Abstract: Based on the core analysis，data of well logs and seismic，the distribution characteristics and oil-gas enrichment conditions of tuff reservoirs of Cretaceous Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault depression of Songliao Basin were analyzed by using forward modelling and multi-parameter inversion body fusion technology， and the distribution of high-quality reservoirs was predicted. The results show that：（1）The tuff of Cretaceous Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault depression，Songliao Basin，is a pyroclastic rock formed by fissure eruption，which mainly consists of breccia-bearing welded tuff，breccia-bearing crystal tuff and sedimentary tuff. The seismic reflection shows low frequency，poor continuity，medium strong amplitude or weak amplitude. The sweet spot distribution of tuff reservoirs predicted by multi-parameter inversion body fusion technology has a high coincidence rate with drilling data. The average value of tuff reservoir drilling catching rate is 92.8%，and the average gas reservoir drilling catching rate is 81.0%，among which 12 wells has obtained industrial gasflow. The reservoirs of Huajia structural belt and Guojia fault step belt are mainly composed of breccie-bearing welded tuff and breccie-bearing crystal tuff，with developed faults，making these two areas as the high-quality reservoir zones.（2）The lithology and lithofacies template formed by matching the well log and seismic facies characteristics of the tuff in the study area were useful to identify seismic facie of the tuff. It was confirmed that the crater and proximal crater facie characterized by amplitude attributes are favorable lithology distribution areas. （3）High-quality source rocks developed in Huoshiling Formation，Shahezi Formation and Yingcheng Formation have a thickness of more than 300 meters，with TOC of 0.26%-5.08%，0.10%-5.55%，0.10%-9.74%，S₁+S₂ of 0.24-8.23 mg/g，0.12-18.15 mg/g，0.25-2.86 mg/g，and R_o of 0.6%-1.3%，1.1%-1.6%，1.0%-2.2%，respectively. With the characteristic of high abundance and moderate maturity，they lay a good material foundation for a large-scale reservoir formation.（4）The tuff gas reservoir in the study area is a set of tight gas reservoirs with source and reservoir lateral connection and high enrichment. The accumulation is mainly controlled by structural styles，faults development and hydrocarbon supply windows. The imbricated fault-bending folds formed by tension and extension，is the major factor to control the degree of hydrocarbon enrichment，and the size of faults and hydrocarbon supply windows determine the gas reservoir scale.

Key words: tuff, seismic amplitude attribute, source and reservoir lateral connection, tectonic style, fault bend fold, hydrocarbon supply window, forward modelling, Huoshiling Formation, Cretaceous, Dehui fault depression, Songliao Basin

中图分类号:

TE122

王洪星, 韩诗文, 胡佳, 潘志浩. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 35–45.

WANG Hongxing, HAN Shiwen, HU Jia, PAN Zhihao. Prediction and main controlling factors of tuff reservoirs of Cretaceous Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault depression，Songliao Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 35–45.

参考文献

[1] 孔垂显, 邱子刚, 卢志远, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部石炭系火山岩岩体划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):15-22. KONG Cuixian, QIU Zigang, LU Zhiyuan, et al. Division of Carboniferous volcanic rock mass in eastern Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):15-22.
[2] 尹志军, 李超, 吕文杰, 等. 渤中34-9油田古近系火山岩岩相特征与分布预测[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(5):63-72. YIN Zhijun, LI Chao, LYU Wenjie, et al. Lithofacies characteristics and distribution prediction of Paleogene volcanic rocks in BZ34-9 oilfield[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(5):63-72.
[3] 李璐琪. 德惠断陷火山岭组火山岩储层特征研究[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学, 2014. LI Luqi. Research on the volcanic rock reservoir characteristics of the Huoshiling group in Dehui fault depression[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2014.
[4] 赵耀, 潘虹, 骆飞飞, 等. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层特征及质量控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5):1129-1140. ZHAO Yao, PAN Hong, LUO Feifei, et al. Characteristics and quality determinants of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in the Hongche fault zone, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(5):1129-1140.
[5] 蒋佳兵, 陈如鹤, 李小刚, 等. 火山岩内幕型储层特征与主控因素:以准噶尔盆地滴南凸起滴水泉西断裂下盘为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(2):119-132. JIANG Jiabing, CHEN Ruhe, LI Xiaogang, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of inner volcanic reservoir:A case study of the footwall of west Dishuiquan fault in Dinan Bulge, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(2):119-132.
[6] 武小宁, 邓勇, 林煜, 等. 准格尔盆地阜东斜坡石炭系有利岩相预测及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4):125-136. WU Xiaoning, DENG Yong, LIN Yu, et al. Prediction of favorable lithofacies and exploration direction of Carboniferous in Fudong slope, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4):125-136.
[7] 邓守伟. 松辽盆地德惠断陷火石岭组天然气成藏机理[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(2):432-442. DENG Shouwei. Accumulation mechanism for natural gas in the Huoshiling Formation of the Dehui fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):432-442.
[8] 李林泽. 松辽盆地德惠断陷火石岭组天然气输导与保存条件研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学, 2019. LI Linze. Study on natural gas transporting and preservation conditions of Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault sag in Songliao Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum, 2019.
[9] 邹才能, 贾承造, 朱如凯, 等. 中国沉积盆地火山岩油气藏形成与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(3):257-271. ZOU Caineng, JIA Chengzao, ZHU Rukai, et al. Formation and distribution of volcanic hydrocarbon reservoirs in sedimentary basins of China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(3):257-271.
[10] 邵晓州, 王苗苗, 齐亚林, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地平凉北地区长8油藏特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):59-69. SHAO Xiaozhou, WANG Miaomiao, QI Yalin, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Chang 8 reservoir in northern Pingliang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):59-69.
[11] 王璞珺, 郑常青, 舒平, 等. 松辽盆地深层火山岩岩性分类方案[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2007, 26(4):17-22. WANG Pujun, ZHENG Changqing, SHU Ping, et al. Classification of deep volcanic rocks in Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007, 26(4):17-22.
[12] 何贤英, 刘勇, 许学龙, 等. 西泉地区石炭系火山岩储层主控因素及有利储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):42-51. HE Xianying, LIU Yong, XU Xuelong, et al. Controlling factors of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs and favorable reservoir prediction in Xiquan area, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):42-51.
[13] 赵文智, 邹才能, 冯志强, 等. 松辽盆地深层火山岩气藏地质特征及评价技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(2):129-142. ZHAO Wenzhi, ZOU Caineng, FENG Zhiqiang, et al. Geological features and evaluation techniques of deep-seated volcanic gas reservoirs, Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(2):129-142.
[14] 罗静兰, 邵红梅, 张成立. 火山岩油气藏研究方法与勘探技术综述[J]. 石油学报, 2003, 24(1):31-38. LUO Jinglan, SHAO Hongmei, ZHANG Chengli. Summary of research methods and exploration technologies for volcanic reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, 24(1):31-38.
[15] 蔡东梅, 叶涛, 鲁凤婷, 等. 渤海海域中生界火山岩岩相特征及其识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):112-120. CAI Dongmei, YE Tao, LU Fengting, et al. Lithofacies characteristics and identification methods of Mesozoic volcanic rocks in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):112-120.
[16] 沈艳杰, 李钧如, 张立亚, 等. 松辽盆地营城组火山岩相发育特征:以吉林省九台地区野外露头为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(2):224-236. SHEN Yanjie, LI Junru, ZHANG Liya, et al. Volcanic facies development characteristics of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin:A case study of field outcrops in Jiutai area of Jilin Province[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2):224-236.
[17] 李素华, 卢奇军, 李蓉, 等. 川西广汉地区二叠系火山岩地震响应特征及分布预测[J]. 石油物探, 2022, 61(4):694-704. LI Suhua, LU Qijun, LI Rong, et al. Seismic response characteristics and distribution prediction of Permian volcanic rocks in the Guanghan area, western Sichuan[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022, 61(4):694-704.
[18] 徐敏, 藏殿光, 江娜, 等. 川西北地区上二叠统吴家坪组凝灰岩分布地震预测[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 18(3):21-28. XU Min, ZANG Dianguang, JIANG Na, et al. Seismic prediction of tuff distribution in Wujiaping Formation of Upper Permian in northwest Sichuan[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 18(3):21-28.
[19] 曹磊, 张达, 李宁, 等. 马尔可夫随机场反演在火山岩储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2021, 60(1):167-174. CAO Lei, ZHANG Da, LI Ning, et al. Application of Markov random field inversion in the prediction of volcanic reservoirs[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2021, 60(1):167-174.
[20] 柯钦, 郭波, 闫群, 等. 德惠断陷鲍家地区火山岩预测及成藏条件分析[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2018, 40(4):411-416. KE Qin, GUO Bo, YAN Qun, et al. The volcanic rock prediction and forming conditions analysis in Baojia area of Dehui fault depression[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 40(4):411-416.
[21] 杨润泽, 赵贤正, 刘海涛, 等. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古生界源内和源下油气成藏特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3):110-125. YANG Runze, ZHAO Xianzheng, LIU Haitao, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and favorable zones prediction in and under source of Paleozoic in Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3):110-125.
[22] 王璞珺, 陈树民, 刘万洙, 等. 松辽盆地火山岩相与火山岩储层的关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(1):18-23. WANG Pujun, CHEN Shumin, LIU Wanzhu, et al. Relationship between volcanic facies and volcanic resevoirs in Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, 24(1):18-23.
[23] 王军体. 源储侧接式油气侧向运移路径厘定方法及其应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2022, 41(1):48-55. WANG Junti. Determination method and application for sourcereservoir side-connected lateral hydrocarbon migration path[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2022, 41(1):48-55.
[24] 连志刚, 常智勇, 李路路, 等. 玛东地区二叠系火山岩成藏特征及勘探潜力[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5):57-65. LIAN Zhigang, CHANG Zhiyong, LI Lulu, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and exploration potential of Permian volcanic rocks in Madong area[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(5):57-65.
[25] 江梦雅, 王江涛, 刘龙松, 等. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系-二叠系天然气特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3):138-151. JIANG Mengya, WANG Jiangtao, LIU Longsong, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of natural gas of CarboniferousPermian in western well Pen-1 sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3):138-151.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素

Prediction and main controlling factors of tuff reservoirs of Cretaceous Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault depression，Songliao Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[2]	屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[3]	肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[4]	邱玉超, 李亚丁, 文龙, 罗冰, 姚军, 许强, 文华国, 谭秀成. 川东地区寒武系洗象池组构造特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[5]	周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[6]	杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
[7]	何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[8]	龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[9]	史卜庆, 丁梁波, 马宏霞, 孙辉, 张颖, 许小勇, 王红平, 范国章. 东非海域大型深水沉积体系及油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 10-17.
[10]	马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[11]	范蕊, 刘卉, 杨沛广, 孙星, 马辉, 郝菲, 张珊珊. 阿曼盆地A区白垩系泥岩充填型碳酸盐岩溶蚀沟谷识别技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 72-81.
[12]	罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[13]	刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[14]	齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[15]	杜长鹏. 松辽盆地莺山-双城断陷白垩系致密火山岩天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 115-124.