岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 85–97.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240408

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征

周洪锋1, 吴海红2, 杨禹希1, 向红英1, 高吉宏2, 贺昊文2, 赵旭2   

  1. 1. 中国石油华北油田公司 二连分公司, 内蒙古 锡林浩特 027200;
    2. 智科石油技术有限公司, 河北 任丘 062552
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-12 修回日期:2023-05-31 出版日期:2024-07-01 发布日期:2024-07-04
  • 第一作者:周洪锋(1982—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究工作。地址:(027200)内蒙古锡林浩特市团结大街601号。Email:yjy_sz265@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油重大科技专项“华北油田持续有效稳产勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2017E-15)资助。

Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta front of the fourth member of Cretaceous A’ershan Formation in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin

ZHOU Hongfeng1, WU Haihong2, YANG Yuxi1, XIANG Hongying1, GAO Jihong2, HE Haowen2, ZHAO Xu2   

  1. 1. Erlian Branch, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Xilinhaote 027200, Inner Mongolia, China;
    2. Zhike Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd., Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China
  • Received:2023-05-12 Revised:2023-05-31 Online:2024-07-01 Published:2024-07-04

摘要: 在岩心观察和粒度分析的基础上,结合录井、测井、地震等资料,对二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷 B51 井区下白垩统阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征、分布规律与发育模式进行了研究。研究结果表明:①巴音都兰凹陷 B51 井区阿四段发育砂砾岩相、砂岩相、粉砂岩相、泥岩相等四大类,可进一步划分为 13 个小类,粒度概率累计曲线表现为悬浮一段式、低斜两段式、高斜两段式、滚动-跳跃-悬浮三段式 4 种类型,具有箱形、钟形、漏斗形、指形、平直形 5 种测井相标志,发育前积、丘状、杂乱状、亚平行状 4 种地震相。②研究区阿四段扇三角洲前缘发育水下分流主河道、水下分流河道、河口坝、水下分流间湾、席状砂和远砂坝 6 种沉积微相,纵向上可分为Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ共 3 个砂组,Ⅱ砂组和Ⅲ砂组沉积时期,扇三角洲前缘砂体分布广泛,水下分流主河道和水下分流河道发育;Ⅰ砂组沉积时期,湖盆范围最大,砂体变细、变薄。③研究区阿四段自下而上表现为水进沉积序列,发育退积型扇三角洲前缘,预测 B51-71 井区和 B51-74 井区发育的水下分流主河道和水下分流河道为利储集相带,B51-19 井区发育的河口坝为较有利的储集相带。

关键词: 扇三角洲前缘, 沉积特征, 水进-退积旋回, 粒度概率累计曲线, 测井相标志, 地震相, 水下分流河道, 河口坝, 阿四段, 白垩系, 巴音都兰凹陷, 二连盆地

Abstract: Based on core observation and particle size analysis,combined with mud-logging,wire-logging and seismic data,the sedimentary characteristics,distribution law and development model of fan delta front of the fourth member of Cretaceous A’ershan Formation(K1a4)in B51 well area of Bayindulan Sag in Erlian Basin were studied. The results show that:(1)The lithofacies of K1a4 in B51 well area can be divided into 13 types in four major categories:conglomerate,sandstone,siltstone and mudstone. The grain size distribution curves can be classified into four types,including one suspension segment pattern,low slope two segment pattern,high slope two segment pattern and one roll segment-one bouncing segment-one suspension segment pattern. The logging curves has the characteristics of box-shaped,bell-shaped,funnel-shaped,finger-shaped and flat-shaped, and there are four types of seismic facies :foreset,lenticular,moundy and subparallel.(2)There are six types of sedimentary microfacies in the fan delta front,including underwater channel,underwater distributary channel,mouth bar,underwater distributary interchannel,sheet sand and distal bar. The K1a4 can be divided into Ⅰ, Ⅱ,Ⅲ sand groups in vertical. During the sedimentary period of Ⅱ and Ⅲ sand groups,the sand bodies of fan delta front were widely distributed,underwater channel and underwater distributary channel were mainly developed. During the sedimentary period of Ⅰ sand groups,lacustrine basin occupied the largest area,sand bodies became finer and thinner.(3)The K1a4 in the study area shows water intrusion depositional sequence from bottom to top,with the development of a retrogradational fan delta front. It is predicted that the underwater channel and underwater distributary channel developed in B51-71 and B51-74 well areas are favorable reservoir facies zones,while mouth bar developed in B51-19 well area is a more favorable reservoir facies zone.

Key words: fan delta front, sedimentary characteristics, transgressive-regressive cycle, grain size cumulative probability curve, logging facies markers, seismic facies, underwater distributary channel, mouth bar, the fourth member of A’ershan Formation, Cretaceous, Bayindulan Sag, Erlian Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 邹志文,郭华军,牛志杰,等.河控型扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素:以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷上乌尔禾组为例[J].古地理学报,2021,23(4):756-770. ZOU Zhiwen,GUO Huajun,NIU Zhijie,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of river-dominated fan delta:A case study from the Upper Urho Formation in Mahu Sag of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition),2021,23(4):756-770.
[2] 蒋庆平,孔垂显,李维锋,等.陆相湖盆大型扇三角洲沉积特征与演化规律:以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷西斜坡区三叠系百口泉组为例[J].沉积学报,2020,38(5):923-932. JIANG Qingping,KONG Chuixian,LI Weifeng,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution law of a lacustrine large-scale fan delta:A case study from the Triassic Baikouquan Formation on the west slope of Mahu Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2020,38(5):923-932.
[3] 邹妞妞,史基安,张大权,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘玛北地区百口泉组扇三角洲沉积模式[J].沉积学报,2015,33(3):607-615. ZOU Niuniu,SHI Ji'an,ZHANG Daquan,et al. Fan delta depositional model of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mabei area,NW Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015,33(3):607-615.
[4] 陈欢庆,王珏,胡海燕,等.扇三角洲前缘沉积特征及对油藏有效开发的影响:以辽河西部凹陷某试验区于楼油层油藏为例[J].海洋地质与第四系地质,2018,38(5):156-170. CHEN Huanqing,WANG Yu,HU Haiyan,et al. Depositional characteristics of fan delta deposits and their impacts to reservoir development:An example from Liaohe Basin[J]. Marine Geology&Quaternary Geology,2018,38(5):156-170.
[5] 刘震,李晋,刘惠民,等.陆相断陷盆地陡坡带早期大型斜向扇三角洲的发现及其勘探潜力[J].地质学报,2022,96(1):265-283. LIU Zhen,LI Jin,LIU Huimin,et al. The discovery of largescale oblique fan delta and potential for its exploration during the early stage in the steep slope zone of the continental rift basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2022,96(1):265-283.
[6] 李文科,张研,方杰,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷岩性油藏成藏控制因素[J].石油学报,2015,36(3):337-346. LI Wenke,ZHANG Yan,FANG Jie,et al. Control factors of hydrocarbon accumulation for lithologic reservoirs in Beier depression,Hailar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(3):337-346.
[7] 高丽坤,林春明,姚玉来,等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系戴南组沉积相及沉积演化[J].沉积学报,2010,28(4):706-716. GAO Likun,LIN Chunming,YAO Yulai,et al. Sedimentary facies and evolution of Paleogene Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag,Subei Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(4):706-716.
[8] 张有平,盛世锋,高祥录.玛湖凹陷玛2井区下乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积及有利储层分布[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):204-210. ZHANG Youping,SHENG Shifeng,GAO Xianglu. Fan delta sedimentation and favorable reservoir distribution of the lower Urho Formation in Ma 2 well block of Mahu Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):204-210.
[9] 曾晓华,周伟,肖大志,等.扇三角洲沉积储层地质知识库的建立及应用:以北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷流沙港组为例[J].断块油气田,2021,28(3):352-358. ZENG Xiaohua,ZHOU Wei,XIAO Dazhi,et al. Establishment and application of fan delta sedimentary reservoir geological database:A case study of the Liushagang Formation in southwest Weizhou Depression,Beibu Gulf Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field,2021,28(3):352-358.
[10] 赵杰,李宏为,杨全凤,等.巴音都兰凹陷阿尔善组碎屑岩储层特征及其主控因素[J].断块油气田,2015,22(3):291-295. ZHAO Jie,LI Hongwei,YANG Quanfeng,et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of clastic rocks in Aershan Formation of Bayindulan Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field,2015,22(3):291-295.
[11] 张以明,史原鹏,李林波,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷岩性油藏勘探[J].中国石油勘探,2004,9(3):33-39. ZHANG Yiming,SHI Yuanpeng,LI Linbo,et al. Exploration of lithologic oil reservoirs in Bayindulan Depression of Erlian Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2004,9(3):33-39.探再获新发现[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(2):34-39. LI Zhengwen,WANG Yuanjie,YIN Hongping,et al. New finding of hydrocarbon exploration was obtained in Bayindulan Sag,ErlianBasin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2003,8(2):34-39.
[13] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,等.二连盆地地层岩性油藏 "多元控砂-四元成藏主元富集" 与勘探实践(Ⅳ)-勘探实践[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(1):15-20. HAN Chunyuan,ZHAO Xianzheng,JIN Fengming,et al. Multi-factor controlling,four-factor entrapping and key-factor enrichment of stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs and exploration practice in Erlian Basin (Ⅳ)-Exploration practice[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2008,20(1):15-20.
[14] 唐勇,徐洋,李亚哲,等.玛湖凹陷大型浅水退覆式扇三角洲沉积模式及勘探意义[J].新疆石油地质,2018,39(1):16-22. TANG Yong,XU Yang,LI Yazhe,et al. Sedimentation model and exploration significance of large-scaled shallow retrogradation fan delta in Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(1):16-22.
[15] 杨田,操应长,王艳忠,等.渤南洼陷沙四下亚段扇三角洲前缘优质储层成因[J].地球科学--中国地质大学学报, 2015,40(12):2067-2080. YANG Tian,CAO Yingchang,WANG Yanzhong,et al. Genesis of high-quality reservoirs of fan delta front in lower part of fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Bonan Subsug[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geoscience, 2015,40(12):2067-2080.
[16] 崔周旗,吴健平,李莉,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷早白垩世构造岩相带特征及含油性[J].古地理学报,2001,3(1):25-34. CUI Zhouqi,WU Jianping,LI Li,et al. Structure petrographical zonations and their oil-bearing properties of the Early Cretaceous in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeography,2001,3(1):25-34.
[17] 王会来,高先志,杨德相,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷下白垩统湖相云质岩成因研究[J].沉积学报,2014,32(3):560-567. WANG Huilai,GAO Xianzhi,YANG Dexiang,et al. Genesis of dolomitic rock within the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine facies in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(3):560-567.
[18] 李东昊.巴音都兰北洼槽阿尔善组沉积相特征及勘探潜力分析[J].工业技术与创新,2016,3(2):119-124. LI Donghao. Potential analysis on Bayinhe Dulan North trough Arxan sedimentary facies and exploration[J]. Industrial Technology Innovation,2016,3(2):119-124.
[19] 孙书洋,朱筱敏,魏巍,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷阿尔善组云质岩储层特征[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(2):87-98. SUN Shuyang,ZHU Xiaomin,WEI Wei,et al. Characteristics of dolomitic reservoirs of A'ershan Formation in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(2):87-98.
[20] 陈树光,张以明,崔永谦,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷反转构造及成因机制[J].地球科学--中国地质大学学报,2017, 42(4):559-569. CHEN Shuguang,ZHANG Yiming,CUI Yongqian,et al. The inversion structures and their genetic mechanisms of Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2017,42(4):559-569.
[21] 马永平,张献文,朱卡,等.玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):57-70. MA Yongping,ZHANG Xianwen,ZHU Ka,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of fan-delta of the Upper Urho Formation of Permian in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(1):57-70.
[22] 陈欢庆,舒治睿,林春燕,等.粒度分析在砾岩储层沉积环境研究中的应用:以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,29(6):6-12. CHEN Huanqing,SHU Zhirui,LIN Chunyan,et al. Application ofgrain-size analysis in research of sedimentary environment of conglomerate reservoir:Taking alluvial fan reservoir in the lower member of Kelamayi Formation in some area of the northwestern margin of Zhunger Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2014, 29(6):6-12.
[23] 何岸北,胡煜昭,任涛,等.新疆乌拉根铅锌矿克五段扇三角洲沉积模式[J].沉积学报,2020,38(2):245-256. HE Anbei,HU Yuzhao,REN Tao,et al. Sedimentary model of fan delta in the fifth member of Kizilsu Group in Uragen Pb-Zn deposit,Xinjiang[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2020,38(2):245-256.
[24] 林佳佳,阮宝涛,胡明毅,等.松辽盆地梨树断陷苏家屯地区火石岭组-营城组地震相与沉积相[J].东北石油大学学报, 2019,43(1):87-98. LIN Jiajia,RUAN Baotao,HU Mingyi,et al. Seismic facies and sedimentary facies of Huoshiling Formation-Yingcheng Formation in Sujiatun region,Lishu fault depression,Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2019,43(1):87-98.
[25] 李军辉,李跃,张赫航,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷南屯组扇三角洲沉积特征及模式[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(3):8-17. LI Junhui,LI Yue,ZHANG Hehang,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and model for the fan delta in Nantun Formation of Beier Sag in Hailar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38(3):8-17.
[26] 邱隆伟,贾继成,马立驰,等.孤北洼陷长堤断裂带扇三角洲砂砾岩体沉积特征及空间展布规律[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018,39(1):175-191. QIU Longwei,JIA Jicheng,MA Lichi,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and spatial distribution of coarse clastic rocks of fan delta in Changdi fault zone in Gubei sub-sag,Jiyang Depression[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2018,39(1):175-191.
[27] 于兴河,瞿建华,谭程鹏,等.玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲砾岩岩相及成因模式[J].新疆石油地质. 2014,35(6):619-627. YU Xinghe,QU Jianhua,TAN Chengpeng,et al. Conglomerate lithofacies and origin models of fan deltas of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(6):619-627.
[28] 梁官忠,谭建财,魏莉,等.内蒙古二连盆地阿北凹陷下白垩统近岸水下扇沉积特征[J].古地理学报,2013,15(1):31-42. LIANG Guanzhong,TAN Jiancai,WEI Li,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of nearshore subaqueous fans of the Lower Cretaceous in Abei sag of Erlian Basin,Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition),2013,15(1):31-42.
[12] 李正文,王元杰,殷宏平,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷油气勘
[1] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[2] 肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[3] 王洪星, 韩诗文, 胡佳, 潘志浩. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 35-45.
[4] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[5] 田亚, 李军辉, 陈方举, 李跃, 刘华晔, 邹越, 张晓扬. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带下白垩统南屯组致密储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 136-146.
[6] 杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
[7] 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[8] 史卜庆, 丁梁波, 马宏霞, 孙辉, 张颖, 许小勇, 王红平, 范国章. 东非海域大型深水沉积体系及油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 10-17.
[9] 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[10] 范蕊, 刘卉, 杨沛广, 孙星, 马辉, 郝菲, 张珊珊. 阿曼盆地A区白垩系泥岩充填型碳酸盐岩溶蚀沟谷识别技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 72-81.
[11] 罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[12] 刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[13] 齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[14] 杜长鹏. 松辽盆地莺山-双城断陷白垩系致密火山岩天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 115-124.
[15] 武小宁, 邓勇, 林煜, 钟厚财, 康晓宁, 汪钰婷, 屈琳. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡石炭系有利岩相预测及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 125-136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .