西湖凹陷平湖组岩相类型及沉积相分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.004

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 27–34.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.004

西湖凹陷平湖组岩相类型及沉积相分析

吴嘉鹏¹, 万丽芬², 张兰³, 王英民⁴, 赵千慧⁵, 李昆², 王思琦⁶

1. 中国石油长城钻探工程有限公司解释研究中心, 北京 100101;
2. 中国石油化工股份有限公司上海海洋油气分公司, 上海 200120;
3. 中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司, 上海 200030;
4. 浙江大学海洋学院, 杭州 310058;
5. 中国石油天然气管道局国际事业部, 河北廊坊 065000;
6. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-07-29 修回日期:2016-12-16 出版日期:2017-01-21 发布日期:2017-01-21
作者简介:吴嘉鹏(1987-),男,博士,工程师,主要从事层序地层、沉积储层及油气勘探等方面的研究工作。地址:(100101)北京市朝阳区安立路101号名人大厦。Email:wjp_better@sina.com。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划“南海深水盆地油气资源形成与分布基础性研究”（编号:2009CB219407）资助

Lithofacies types and sedimentary facies of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Depression

WU Jiapeng¹, WAN Lifen², ZHANG Lan³, WANG Yingmin⁴, ZHAO Qianhui⁵, LI Kun², WANG Siqi⁶

1. Geoscience Centre, CNPC Greatwall Drilling Company, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Sinopec Shanghai Offshore Oil & Gas Company, Shanghai 200120, China;
3. Shanghai Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Shanghai 200030, China;
4. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
5. International Business Department of China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China;
6. School of Energy Resources, China university of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-07-29 Revised:2016-12-16 Online:2017-01-21 Published:2017-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 西湖凹陷平湖组沉积相资料比较单一、研究区域相对局限，对其沉积相类型、展布特征及沉积模式等的认识不清。对西湖凹陷46 口平湖组取心井进行岩心观察，根据粒度和沉积构造等的不同来划分岩相，然后根据岩相的成因类型、组合特征及测井曲线特征等来划分沉积相，将平湖组岩相划分为砾岩相、砂岩相和细粒岩相3 种类型，并认为平湖组主要发育受潮汐作用影响的三角洲相、潮坪相及局限浅海相等沉积相，并细分出三角洲平原、三角洲前缘、前三角洲、潮上带、潮间带、潮下带、陆架砂脊及陆架泥等亚相。综合考虑平湖期不同时期的区域构造运动、古地貌形态及物源供应等影响因素，建立了西湖凹陷平湖期箕状断陷和潮汐作用控制下的物源-沉积模式，为储层研究奠定了基础。

Abstract: The research on sedimentary facies of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Depression is relatively limited,and the types of sedimentary facies,distribution characteristics and sedimentary model are unclear. Based on grain size and sedimentary structures of cores from 46 wells,the lithofacies of Pinghu Formation was identified. Then according to genetic types of lithofacies,lithofacies assemblage characteristics and well logging features,the sedimentary facies of Pinghu Formation was identified. The lithofacies was divided into three types：conglomerate facies,sandstone facies and fine- grained facies. The main sedimentary facies are tidal delta,tidal flat and confined shallow marine,which can be divided into several subfacies including delta plain,delta front, prodelta, supratidal zone,intertidal zone,subtidal zone,and shelf sand ridge etc. Considering the influencing factors such as the regional tectonic movement,palaeogeomorphology,provenance supply at the different Pinghu stage,the provenance-sedimentary model both controlled by half graben and tidal action of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Depression was established,which provides the base for further reservoir research.

中图分类号:

TE122.1

吴嘉鹏, 万丽芬, 张兰, 王英民, 赵千慧, 李昆, 王思琦. 西湖凹陷平湖组岩相类型及沉积相分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 27–34.

WU Jiapeng, WAN Lifen, ZHANG Lan, WANG Yingmin, ZHAO Qianhui, LI Kun, WANG Siqi. Lithofacies types and sedimentary facies of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1): 27–34.

参考文献

[1] 刘成鑫. 东海平湖油气田平湖组沉积相研究. 海洋石油, 2010,30(2):9-13. LIU C X. Study on sedimentary facies for Pinghu Formation in Pinghu oil and gas field in East China Sea Basin. Offshore Oil, 2010,30(2):9-13.
[2] 武法东,苏新,周平,等. 东海陆架盆地下第三系高频层序分析. 地质论评,2001,47(1):47-52. WU F D,SU X,ZHOU P,et al. Analysis of Paleogene high-frequency sequences in the East China Sea shelf basin. Geological Review,2001,47(1):47-52.
[3] 王果寿,周卓明,肖朝辉,等. 西湖凹陷春晓区带下第三系平湖组、花港组沉积特征. 石油与天然气地质,2002,23(3): 257-261. WANG G S,ZHOU ZM,XIAO C H,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Eogene Pinghu formation and Huagang formation in Chunxiao zone of Xihu lake depression. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002,23(3):257-261.
[4] 陈琳琳. 东海西湖凹陷平湖组沉积环境演化. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,1998,18(4):69-78. CHEN L L. Depositional environment evolution of Pinghu formation in Xihu Depression,the East China Sea. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,1998,18(4):69-78.
[5] 蒋海军,胡明毅,胡忠贵,等. 西湖凹陷古近系沉积环境分析 ——以微体古生物化石为主要依据. 岩性油气藏,2011,23 (1):74-78. JIANG H J,HU M Y,HU Z G,et al. Sedimentary environment of Paleogene in Xihu Sag:microfossil as the main foundation. Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(1):74-78.
[6] 刘光鼎. 东海的地质与油气勘探. 地球物理学报,1988,31 (2):184-197. LIU G D. Geology and exploration of petroleum in the East Sea. Acta Geophysica Sinica,1988,31(2):184-197.
[7] 彭伟欣. 东海油气勘探成果回顾及开发前景展望. 海洋石油, 2001(3):1-6. PENG W X. Prospects for developments and retrospects for oil/ gas exploratory results in the East China Sea. Offshore Oil, 2001(3):1-6.
[8] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,等. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响. 岩性油气藏,2008, 20(1):47-52. ZOU M L,HUANG S J,HU Z W,et al. The origin of carbonate cements and the influence on reservoir quality of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag,East China Sea. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008,20(1):47-52.
[9] 黄苓渝,张昌民,刘江艳,等. 东海西湖凹陷古近系砂岩侵入体及其地质意义. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):74-80. HUANG L Y,ZHANG C M,LIU J Y,et al. Sand injectites of Paleogene and its geological signifance in Xihu Sag,East China Sea. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):74-80.
[10] YIN Y,ZOU X Q,ZHU D K,et al. Sedimentary facies of the central part of radial tidal sand ridge system of the eastern China coast. Frontiers of Earth Science,2008,2(4):408-417.
[11] 阮伟,黄洁. 潮流沙脊和沙波沉积结构特征——以西班牙东北部比利牛斯前陆盆地Roda 砂岩组为例. 沉积学报,2010, 28(1):118-127. RUAN W,HUANG J. Sedimentary architecture characteristics of tidal bars and dunes:an example from Roda sandstone in Pyrenean foreland basin,NE Spain. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010,28(1):118-127.

相关文章 15

[1]	张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[2]	李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[3]	黄华, 袁娟梅, 彭伟, 张亮, 文辉. 江汉盆地古近系潜江组盐湖沉积特征与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 9-16.
[4]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[5]	杨洋, 石万忠, 张晓明, 王任, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 曹沈厅, 冯芊. 页岩岩相的测井曲线识别方法——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 135-146.
[6]	刘化清, 刘宗堡, 吴孔友, 徐怀民, 杨占龙, 孙夕平, 倪长宽, 康继伦, 王牧, 靳继坤. 岩性地层油气藏区带及圈闭评价技术研究新进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 25-36.
[7]	郭秋麟, 吴晓智, 卫延召, 柳庄小雪, 刘继丰, 陈宁生. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气运移路径模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 37-45.
[8]	陈棡, 卞保力, 李啸, 刘刚, 龚德瑜, 曾德龙. 准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 46-56.
[9]	马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[10]	余兴, 尤新才, 白雨, 李鹏, 朱涛. 玛湖凹陷南斜坡断裂识别及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 81-89.
[11]	关新, 潘树新, 曲永强, 许多年, 张寒, 马永平, 王国栋, 陈雪珍. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷滩坝砂的发现及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 90-98.
[12]	张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[13]	徐宇轩, 代宗仰, 胡晓东, 徐志明, 李丹. 川东北沙溪庙组天然气地球化学特征及地质意义——以五宝场地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 209-219.
[14]	朱如凯, 崔景伟, 毛治国, 曹正林, 王兴志, 高长海, 刘永福. 地层油气藏主要勘探进展及未来重点领域[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 12-24.
[15]	钟红利, 吴雨风, 闪晨晨. 北大巴山地区鲁家坪组页岩地球化学特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 13-22.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

西湖凹陷平湖组岩相类型及沉积相分析

Lithofacies types and sedimentary facies of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Depression

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10