致密油储层成岩相类型及其对产能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8储层为例

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20180613

岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 109–116.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180613

致密油储层成岩相类型及其对产能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8储层为例

徐波^1,2, 王建³, 于乐丹^1,2, 王凯泽^1,2, 董凤娟^1,2, 刘峰^1,2

1. 西安石油大学石油工程学院, 西安 710065;
2. 陕西省油气田特种增产技术重点实验室, 西安 710065;
3. 中国石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 山东东营 257015

收稿日期:2018-03-30 修回日期:2018-06-02 出版日期:2018-11-16 发布日期:2018-11-16
第一作者:徐波(1968-),男,博士,教授,主要从事油气田地质与开发方面的教学与科研工作。地址:(710065)陕西省西安市雁塔区电子二路18号西安石油大学石油工程学院。Email:xsyuxb@126.com。
基金资助:
“十三五”国家重大科技专项“复杂断块油田提高采收率技术”（编号：2016ZX05011-002）和国家自然科学基金项目“基于多源信息和智能计算的钻井异常自适应预警方法研究”（编号：51574194）联合资助

Diagenetic facies types of tight reservoir and its effects on productivity: a case of Chang 8 reservoir in Jiangjiachuan area, Ordos Basin

XU Bo^1,2, WANG Jian³, YU Ledan^1,2, WANG Kaize^1,2, DONG Fengjuan^1,2, LIU Feng^1,2

1. Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Stimulation Technology for Oil & Gas Reservoirs, Xi'an 710065, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China

Received:2018-03-30 Revised:2018-06-02 Online:2018-11-16 Published:2018-11-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8油藏属于近源富集成藏，是特低孔、超低渗的典型致密油藏，分析储层成岩相类型并寻找受成岩相控制的优质储集体，可为有利储层预测和致密油藏高效开发提供依据。利用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、X射线衍射、阴极发光等手段，对目的层岩石学特征、成岩作用类型和成岩期次进行了研究，结合油田生产动态资料，分析了不同成岩相的特征、差异及其对产能的影响，预测了有利成岩相带分布。结果表明：长8储层主要为岩屑长石砂岩，压实作用和胶结作用使砂岩的原生孔隙结构遭到严重破坏，铁方解石、铁白云石等含铁碳酸盐的胶结作用是导致储层致密的决定性因素，成岩阶段中的溶蚀作用有利于改善储层的孔渗性能；主要成岩阶段处于中成岩阶段A期的晚期，同时部分区域进入中成岩阶段B期的早期，主要发育绿泥石膜胶结形成的残余粒间孔+长石溶孔相、绿泥石膜和伊利石胶结形成的残余粒间孔+长石溶孔相、伊利石胶结形成的长石溶孔相、碳酸盐胶结相等4类成岩相，其中绿泥石膜胶结形成的残余粒间孔+长石溶孔相物性最好、产油量最高，该成岩相分布区储集层具有良好的储渗能力。研究结果可为该区有利勘探区预测提供参考。

关键词: 成岩相, 成岩作用, 非均质性, 产能, 长8致密砂岩油藏, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Chang 8 reservoir in Jiangjiachuan area in southeast Ordos Basin belongs to near-source hydrocarbon accumulation without long-distance hydrocarbon migration. It is a typical tight oil sandstone reservoir with extralow porosity and ultra-low permeability. It is helpful for reservoir exploration and development through analyzing reservoir diagenetic facies and looking for favorable belt controlled by diagenetic facies. The test and analysis data of casting thin slice, scanning electron microscope, XRD data and cathode luminescence were used to study petrology characteristics, diagenesis types and diagenetic period. Based on the data of oilfield production, the characteristics and differences of different diagenetic facies and their influences on productivity were analyzed, and the favorable diagenetic facies distribution was predicted. The results show that Chang 8 reservoir is mainly composed of lithic arkose sandstone. Compaction and cementation seriously destroyed the primary pore structure of sandstone. Cementation of iron calcite and ferric dolomite is the decisive factor for the tight of the reservoir, and the dissolution in the diagenetic stage is beneficial to the improvement of the porosity and permeability of the reservoir. Most of the reservoirs were under the middle diagenetic stage A, part reservoir is under the early diagenetic stage B. The diagenetic facies can be divided into four types, including intergranular pore and feldspar dissolution diagenetic phase formed by chlorite cementation, intergranular pore and feldspar dissolution diagenetic phase formed by chlorite and illite cementation, feldspar dissolution diagenetic phase formed by illite cementation, and carbonate cementation phase. The favorable belt with good physical properties and maximum oil production is considered as the intergranular pore and feldspar dissolution diagenetic phase formed by chlorite cementation. This research result can provide practical reference for favorable reservoir prediction and efficient development in the study area.

Key words: diagenetic facies, diagenesis, heterogeneity, productivity, Chang 8 tight sand reservoir, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

徐波, 王建, 于乐丹, 王凯泽, 董凤娟, 刘峰. 致密油储层成岩相类型及其对产能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 109–116.

XU Bo, WANG Jian, YU Ledan, WANG Kaize, DONG Fengjuan, LIU Feng. Diagenetic facies types of tight reservoir and its effects on productivity: a case of Chang 8 reservoir in Jiangjiachuan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6): 109–116.

参考文献

[1] RAILSBACK L B. Carbonate diagenetic facies in the Upper Pennaylvanian Dennis Formation in Lowa, Missiouri and Kansas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1984, 54(3):986-999.
[2] 石玉江, 肖亮, 毛志强, 等.低渗透砂岩储层成岩相测井识别方法及其地质意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8段储层为例. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5):820-828. SHI Y J, XIAO L, MAO Z Q, et al. An identification method for diagenetic facies with well logs and its geological significance in low-permeability sandstones:a case study on Chang 8 reservoirs in the Jiyuan region, Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(5):820-828.
[3] 师调调, 孙卫, 张创, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区延长组长6储层成岩相及微观孔隙结构.现代地质, 2012, 26(4):769-777. SHI T T, SUN W, ZHANG C, et al. Diagenetic facies and micropore structure of Chang 6 reservoir in Yanchang Formation, Huaqing area, Ordos Basin. Geoscience, 2012, 26(4):769-777.
[4] 师调调, 孙卫, 何生平, 等. 华庆地区延长组长6储层不同类型成岩相微观孔隙结构特征及生产动态分析. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 48(3):7-13. SHI T T, SUN W, HE S P, et al. Diagenetic facies and its micropore structure of Yanchang Formation Chang 6 reservoirs in Huaqing area. Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Science), 2012, 48(3):7-13.
[5] 师调调.华庆地区长6储层微观孔隙结构及渗流特征研究. 西安:西北大学, 2012. SHI T T. The study on the micro-pore structure and percolation characteristics of Yanchang Formation Chang 6 reservoir in Huaqing area. Xi'an:Northwest university, 2012.
[6] 王猛, 曾明, 陈鸿傲, 等.储层致密化影响因素分析与有利成岩相带预测——以马岭油田长8油层组砂岩储层为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):59-70. WANG M, ZENG M, CHEN H A, et al. Influencing factors of tight reservoirs and favorable diagenetic facies:a case study of Chang 8 reservoir of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Maling Oilfield, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):59-70.
[7] 谭开俊, 许多年, 尹路, 等.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区三叠系成岩相定量研究.岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(6):24-29. TAN K J, XU D N, YIN L, et al. Quantitative study on Triassic diagenetic facies in Wuxia area, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(6):24-29.
[8] 邹才能, 陶士振, 周慧, 等.成岩相的形成、分类与定量评价方法.石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5):526-540. ZOU C N, TAO S Z, ZHOU H, et al. Genesis, classification and evaluation method of diagenetic facies. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(5):526-540.
[9] 赖锦, 王贵文, 王书南, 等.碎屑岩储层成岩相研究现状及进展.地球科学进展, 2013, 28(1):39-50. LAI J, WANG G W, WANG S N, et al. Research status and advances in the diagenetic facies of clastic reservoirs. Advances in Earth Science, 2013, 28(1):39-50.
[10] 吴立群, 焦养泉, 杨琴, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组物源体系分析.沉积学报, 2010, 28(3):434-440. WU L Q, JIAO Y Q, YANG Q, et al. Provenance system analysis of Yanchang Formation in Fuxian area of Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(3):434-440.
[11] 张文正, 杨华, 李善鹏.鄂尔多斯盆地长91湖相优质烃源岩成藏意义.石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5):557-562. ZHANG W Z, YANG H, LI S P. Hydrocarbon accumulation significance of Chang₉¹ high-quality lacustrine source rocks of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(5):557-562.
[12] 蔡劲, 王桂成, 张震.鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组长8油藏油源对比研究. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2014, 34(4):68-74. CAI J, WANG G C, ZHANG Z. Oil-source rock correlation for the Chang-8 oil reservoirs in the Yanchang Formation, Fuxian region, Ordos Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2014, 34(4):68-74.
[13] 贺永红, 任战利, 陈占军, 等.富县探区长8段致密油藏特征及主控因素.西安科技大学学报, 2016, 36(3):393-399. HE Y H, REN Z L, CHEN Z J, et al. Chang 8 section tight oil reservoir characteristics and distributional controlling factors in Fuxian exploration area. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2016, 36(3):393-399.
[14] 曹跃, 刘延哲, 陈义国, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东韩油区延长组长7-长9油气成藏条件及主控因素. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):30-38. CAO Y, LIU Y Z, CHEN Y G, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and main controlling factors of Chang 7-Chang 9 oil reservoirs of Yanchang Formation in Donghan region. Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):30-38.
[15] 唐建云, 王志维, 也尔哈那提·黑扎提, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组烃源岩及原油地球化学特征.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):107-116. TANG J Y, WANG Z W, YE'ERHANATI H Z T, et al. Source rocks and geochemical characteristics of crude oil of the Yanchang Formation in Xunyi exploration area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):107-116.
[16] 杨华, 李土祥, 刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力.石油学报, 2013, 34(1):1-11. YANG H, LI S X, LIU X Y. Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1):1-11.
[17] 宋岩, 李卓, 姜振学, 等.非常规油气地质研究进展与发展趋势.石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4):638-648. SONG Y, LI Z, JIANG Z X, et al. Progress and development trend of unconventional oil and gas geological research. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4):638-648.
[18] 周晓峰, 丁黎, 杨卫国, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组砂岩中绿泥石膜的生长模式.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):1-10. ZHOU X F, DING L, YANG W G, et al. Growth pattern of chlorite film in Chang 8 sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):1-10.
[19] 刘金库, 彭军, 刘建军, 等.绿泥石环边胶结物对致密砂岩孔隙的保存机制——以川中-川南过渡带包界地区须家河组储层为例. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(1):53-58. LIU J K, PENG J, LIU J J, et al. Pore-preserving mechanism of chlorite rims in tight sandstone-an example from the T₃x Formation of Baojie area in the transitional zone from the central to southern Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(1):53-58.
[20] EHRENBERG S N, NADEAU P H, STEEN Ø. Petroleum reservoir porosity versus depth:Influence of geological age. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(10):1281-1296.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

致密油储层成岩相类型及其对产能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8储层为例

Diagenetic facies types of tight reservoir and its effects on productivity: a case of Chang 8 reservoir in Jiangjiachuan area, Ordos Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2]	洪智宾, 吴嘉, 方朋, 余进洋, 伍正宇, 于佳琦. 纳米限域下页岩中可溶有机质的非均质性及页岩油赋存状态[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 160-168.
[3]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[4]	尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[5]	牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[6]	唐述凯, 郭天魁, 王海洋, 陈铭. 致密储层缝内暂堵转向压裂裂缝扩展规律数值模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 169-177.
[7]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[8]	王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[9]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[10]	李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[11]	雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[12]	翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.
[13]	龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[14]	杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五₅亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[15]	李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.