岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 44–55.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200305

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义

张亚, 陈双玲, 张晓丽, 张玺华, 谢忱, 陈聪, 杨雨然, 高兆龙   

  1. 中国石油西南油气田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-25 修回日期:2019-12-18 出版日期:2020-05-21 发布日期:2020-04-30
  • 第一作者:张亚(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事石油与天然气地质方面的研究工作。地址:(610041)四川省成都市高新区天府大道北段12号石油科技大厦。Email:zhangya08@petrochina.com.cn
  • 通信作者: 陈双玲(1989-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事石油与天然气地质方面的研究工作。Email:chenshuangling@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“四川盆地二叠系—中三叠统大型气田富集规律及目标评价”（编号：2016ZX05007004）和中国石油重大专项“西南油气田天然气上产300亿立方米关键技术与应用”（编号：2016E-06）联合资助

Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Lower Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum exploration implication in Sichuan Basin

ZHANG Ya, CHEN Shuangling, ZHANG Xiaoli, ZHANG Xihua, XIE Chen, CHEN Cong, YANG Yuran, GAO Zhaolong   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2019-08-25 Revised:2019-12-18 Online:2020-05-21 Published:2020-04-30

PDF (PC)

350

摘要： 四川盆地广泛发育岩溶缝洞型储层。为恢复茅口组岩溶古地貌，开展了钻井岩心分析、测井分析和地震资料解释等研究，并对全盆地茅口组地层进行精细划分和对比，通过井震结合、残厚法和印模法精细刻画了茅口组岩溶古地貌特征。结果表明：①茅口组整体具有“西高东低”的岩溶古地貌形态，由西向东可划分出岩溶高地、岩溶斜坡、岩溶洼地等3个一级地貌单元，细分为残丘、坡地、洼地和沟谷等二级地貌单元；②广元—元坝—达州—奉节一线为岩溶盆地，茅口组残余厚度小于180 m，是在茅口期裂陷槽基础上继承性演变的地貌形态，裂陷槽内发育深水相孤峰段沉积；③蜀南—川中—川北一带为岩溶斜坡，茅口组岩溶作用较为发育，有效岩溶储层保存好，主要分布于岩溶残丘和坡地，而岩溶沟谷内的溶蚀孔洞大多被龙潭组泥质充填；④茅口期的川北剑阁—元坝—龙岗地区处于裂陷槽边缘，为浅水高能台缘滩沉积，为岩溶储层的重要勘探领域。该研究成果为优质岩溶储层勘探指明了方向，具有重要的理论意义和勘探价值。

关键词: 岩溶古地貌, 岩溶储层, 峨眉地裂运动, 茅口组, 四川盆地

Abstract: Karst reservoirs are widely developed in Sichuan Basin. In order to restore the karst paleogeomorphology of Maokou Formation,the studies on drilling core analysis,logging analysis and seismic data interpretation were carried out. The karst paleo-geomorphological features of the Maokou Formation were characterized by well seismic combination,residual thickness method and impression method. The results show that:(1) The Maokou Formation has the paleo-karstic morphology of "high in the west and low in the east". From the west to the east, the paleo-karst geomorphology could be classified into three geomorphic units such as karst highland,karst slope and karst depression,as well as second-level geomorphologic units,such as residual mound,slope,depression and gully.(2) Karst basin are distributed in Guanyuan-Yuanba-Dazhou-Fengjie area,with residual thickness of Maokou Formation of less than 180 m,which is inherited and evolved landform on the basis of Mao-kou rifting trough. There are deep water facies deposits in the rift trough.(3) The area from south of Sichuan to middlenorth is a karst slope. Karsti-fication is well developed,and effective karst reservoirs are well preserved,mainly distributed in karst residual hills and slopes,while most of the dissolved holes in karst gully are filled with mud of Longtan formation.(4) Jiange-Yuanba-Longgang area in northern Sichuan is located at the edge of rift trough, which is shallow high energy platform edge beach facies and an important new exploration field of karst reservoir. The research results are of great theoretical significance and exploration value for the direction of high-quality karst reservoir exploration.

Key words: karst geomorphology, karst reservoirs, Emei Taphrogenesis, Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 江青春,胡素云,汪泽成,等.四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区.石油学报,2012,33(6):949-960. JIANG Q C,HU S Y,WANG Z C,et al. Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(6):949-960.
[2] 姜自然,陆正元,吕宗刚,等.四川盆地东吴期泸州古隆起与茅口组碳酸盐岩缝洞储层分布.石油实验地质,2014,36(4):411-415. JIANG Z R,LU Z Y,LYU Z G,et al. Distribution of carbonate fractured and vuggy reservoirs of Maokou Formation in Luzhou Paleo-uplift during Dongwu Movement,Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2014,36(4):411-415.
[3] 胡修权,施泽进,田亚铭,等.川东南地区茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征.地质通报,2014,33(6):874-882. HU X Q,SHI Z J,TIAN Y M,et al. The restoration of karst ancient landform of the Maokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin. Geological Bulletin of China,2014,33(6):874-882.
[4] 郭旭升,李宇平,魏全超,等.川东南地区茅口组古岩溶发育特征及勘探.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2012,34(6):1-8. GUO X S,LI Y P,WEI Q C,et al. Palaeokarst reservoirs and exploration areas of Maokou Formation in the southeast of Sichuan Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science&Technology Edition),2012,34(6):1-8.
[5] 何斌,徐义刚,王雅玫,等.东吴运动性质的厘定及其时空演变规律.地球科学--中国地质大学学报,2005,30(1):89-96. HE B,XU Y G,WANG Y M,et al. Nature of the Dongwu Movement and its temporal and spatial evolution. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2005,30(1):89-96.
[6] 何斌,徐义刚,王雅玫,等.用沉积记录来估计峨眉山玄武岩喷发前的地壳抬升幅度.大地构造与成矿学,2005,29(3):316-320. HE B,XU Y G,WANG Y M,et al. The magnitude of crustal uplift prior to the eruption of the Emei Mount:inferred from sedimentary records. Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2005,29(3):316-320.
[7] 王运生,金以钟.四川盆地下二叠统白云岩及古岩溶的形成与峨眉地裂运动的关系.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 1997(1):8-16. WANG Y S,JIN Y Z. The formation of dolomite and paleokarst of the Lower Permian series in Sichuan Basin and the relation of the Emei Taphrogenesis. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science&Technology Edition),1997(1):8-16.
[8] 杨雨然,张亚,谢忱,等.川西北地区中二叠统栖霞组热液作用及其对储层的影响.岩性油气藏,2019,31(6):44-53. YANG Y R,ZHANG Y,XIE C,et al. Hydrothermal action of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin and its effect on reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(6):44-53.
[9] 罗志立.试从地裂运动探讨四川盆地天然气勘探的新领域.成都地质学院学报,1983,10(2):1-13. LUO Z L. A discussion of new prospects for gas field exploration related to the taphrogenic movement in Sichuan Basin. Journal of Chengdu College of Geology,1983,10(2):1-13.
[10] 吴丽艳,陈春强,江春明,等.浅谈我国油气勘探中的古地貌恢复技术.石油天然气学报,2005(增刊4):25-26. WU L Y,CHEN C Q,JIANG C M,et al. Paleogeomorphic restoring techniques in China's hydrocarbon exploration. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2005(Suppl 4):25-26.
[11] 李海云.川西北地区二叠系龙潭组沉积前古地貌特征及地质意义.成都:西南石油大学,2016. LI H Y. Geomorphologic features and geological significance of Permian Longtan Formation in northwest of Sichuan Basin. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2016.
[12] 肖笛,谭秀成,山述娇,等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及其石油地质意义.地质学报,2014,88(10):1992-2002. XIAO D,TAN X C,SHAN S J,et al. The restoration of palaeokarst geomorphology of Middle Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum geological significance in southern Sichuan Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(10):1992-2002.
[13] 夏日元,唐健生,关碧珠,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系岩溶古地貌及天然气富集特征.石油与天然气地质,1999,20(2):133-136. XIA R Y,TANG J S,GUAN B Z,et al. Ordovician palaeokarst landform in Ordos Basin and gas enrichment characteristics. Oil & Gas geology,1999,20(2):133-136.
[14] 唐大海,肖笛,谭秀成,等.岩溶古地貌恢复及地质意义:以川西北中二叠统茅口组为例.石油勘探与开发,2016,43(5):689-695. TANG D H,XIAO D,TAN X C,et al. Restoration of paleokarst landform and its geological significance:a case from Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(5):689-695.
[15] 汪泽成,江青春,黄仕鹏,等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气大面积成藏的地质条件.天然气工业,2018,38(1):30-38. WANG Z C,JIANG Q C,HUANG S P,et al. Geological conditions for massive accumulation of natural gas in the Mid-Permian Maokou Formation of the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2018,38(1):30-38.
[16] 张玺华,陈聪,张亚,等.川西北地区茅口组海槽相地质特征及其油气地质意义.天然气勘探与开发,2018,41(3):46-54. ZHANG X H,CHEN C,ZHANG Y,et al. Geological characteristics of trough facies,Maokou Formation,northwestern Sichuan Basin:Implications for geology. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2018,41(3):46-54.
[17] 吴勘,马强分,冯庆来.扬子板块北缘孤峰组地层划分及空间分布特征.地层学杂志,2015,39(1):33-39. WU K,MA Q F,FENG Q L. Stratigraphic division and spatial distribution of the middle Permian Gufeng Formation in the northern Yangtze Block. Journal of Stratigraphy,2015,39(1):33-39.
[18] 韩宗珠,肖楠,李安龙,等.安徽巢湖下二叠统孤峰组硅质岩沉积地球化学特征与沉积环境分析.中国海洋大学学报, 2014,44(4):78-85. HAN Z Z,XIAO N,LIAN A L,et al. Geochemistry and sedimentary environments analysis of siliceous rocks from the Gufeng Formation of Lower Permian in Chaohu region,Anhui province. Periodical of Ocean University of China,2014,44(4):78-85.
[19] 胡东风.四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩天然气勘探的突破与启示.天然气工业,2019,39(3):1-10. HU D F. Breakthrough in natural gas exploration in the platform margin shoal at the Maokou Fm in the Yuanba area,Sichuan Basin,and its implications. Natural Gas Industry,2019,39(3):1-10.
[20] 姚军辉,罗志立,孙玮,等.峨眉地幔柱与广旺-开江-梁平等拗拉槽形成关系.新疆石油地质,2011,32(1):97-101. YAO J H,LUO Z L,SUN W,et al. Relationship between Emei mantle plume and aulacogens of Guangwang-Kaijiang-Liangping. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2011,32(1):97-101.
[21] 王一刚,文应初,洪海涛,等.四川盆地开江-梁平海槽内发现大隆组.天然气工业,2006,26(9):32-36. WANG Y G,WEN Y C,HONG H T,et al. Formation found in Kaijiang-Liangping Ocenic trough in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(9):32-36.
[22] 罗志立,孙玮,韩建辉,等.峨眉地幔柱对中上扬子区二叠纪成藏条件影响的探讨.地学前缘,2012,19(6):144-154. LUO Z L,SUN W,HAN J H,et al. Effect of Emei mantle plume on the conditions of Permian accumulation in middle-upper Yangtze area. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(6):144-154.
[23] 金民东,谭秀成,童明胜,等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区灯四段岩溶古地貌恢复及地质意义.石油勘探与开发,2017, 44(1):58-68. JIN M D,TAN X C,TONG M S,et al. Karst paleogeomorphology of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-moxi area,Sichuan Basin,SW China:Restoration and geological significance. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):58-68.
[24] 何江,郑荣才,胡欣,等.四川盆地西部晚二叠世吴家坪组沉积体系.石油与天然气地质,2015,36(1):87-95. HE J,ZHENG R C,HU X,et al. Sedimentary system of the Late Permian Wujiaping Formation in the western Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(1):87-95.
[25] 桑琴,未勇,程超,等.蜀南地区二叠系茅口组古岩溶地区水系分布及岩溶地貌单元特征.古地理学报,2012,4(3):393-402. SANG Q,WEI Y,CHENG C,et al. Distribution of palaeokarst water system and palaeogeomorphic unit characteristics of the Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan province. Journal of Palaeoeography,2012,4(3):393-402.
[26] 刘树根,孙玮,李智武,等.四川叠合盆地海相碳酸盐岩油气分布特征及其构造主控因素.岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):1-17. LIU S G,SUN W,LI Z W,et al. Distribution characteristics of marine carbonate reservoirs and their tectonic controlling factors across the Sichuan superimposed basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):1-17.
[27] 刘小平,孙冬胜,吴欣松.古岩溶地貌及其对岩溶储层的控制:以塔里木盆地轮古西地区奥陶系为例.石油实验地质, 2007,29(3):265-268. LIU X P,SUN D S,WU X S. Ordovician palaeokarst landform and its control on reservoirs in west Lungu region,the Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geolgoy&Experiment,2007,29(3):265-268.
[28] 徐世崎,邓洪斌,洪海涛,等.长庆气田奥陶系岩溶古地貌对气藏的控制作用.天然气勘探与开发,2001,24(4):1-6. XU S Q,DENG H B,HONG H T,et al. Control of gas reservoir in Ordovician karst paleogeomorphology in Changqing gas field. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2001,24(4):1-6.
[29] 耿晓洁,林畅松,吴斌.古地貌对塔中地区鹰山组岩溶结构及分布的控制作用.岩性油气藏,2018,30(4):46-55. GENG X J,LIN C S,WU B. Controlling of paleogeomorphology to characteristics and distribution of karst structures of Yingshan Formation in Tazhong area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018,30(4):46-55.
[30] 李大军,陈辉,陈洪德.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组储层形成与古构造演化关系.石油与天然气地质,2016,37(5):756-763. LI D J,CHEN H,CHEN H D. Relationship between reservoir development in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation and paleostructure. Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(5):756-763.
[31] 李笑天,潘仁芳,鄢杰.四川盆地灯四段岩溶古地貌精细刻画及油气勘探意义.地质科技情报,2018,37(3):191-195. LI X T,PAN R F,YAN J. Karst paleogeomorphology features of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin and the significance of oil and gas exploration. Geological Science and Technology Information,2018,37(3):191-195.
[32] 张玺华,陈聪,黄婕.四川盆地中二叠世广元-巴中拉张槽的发现及其油气地质意义.中国石油勘探,2019,24(4):466-475. ZHANG X H, CHEN C, HUANG J. The discovery of Middle Permian Guangyuan-Bazhong extensional trough in the Sichuan Basin and its petroleum geological significance. China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(4):466-475.
[1] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[2] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[3] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[4] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[5] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[6] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[7] 王同川, 陈浩如, 温龙彬, 钱玉贵, 李玉琢, 文华国. 川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 109-121.
[8] 卢科良, 吴康军, 李志军, 孙永河, 徐少华, 梁锋, 刘露, 李爽. 川中古隆起北斜坡寒武系龙王庙组油气成藏特征及演化模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 159-168.
[9] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[10] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[11] 岑永静, 梁锋, 王立恩, 刘倩虞, 张鑫哲, 丁熊. 四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 89-98.
[12] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[13] 孙汉骁, 邢凤存, 谢武仁, 钱红杉. 四川盆地及周缘地区晚奥陶世岩相古地理演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[14] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[15] 包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭　林,王　波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉，郑荣才，肖玲，马国富，窦世杰，田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发