鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长61致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20200304

岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 34–43.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200304

鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长6₁致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复

王继伟¹, 朱玉双², 饶欣久¹, 周树勋³, 吴英强³, 杨红梅⁴

1. 中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 西安 710018;
2. 西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室/地质学系, 西安 710069;
3. 中国石油长庆油田分公司油田开发事业部, 西安 710018;
4. 中国石油长庆油田分公司第二采油厂, 甘肃庆阳 745100

收稿日期:2019-11-13 修回日期:2019-12-20 出版日期:2020-05-21 发布日期:2020-04-30
第一作者:王继伟(1986-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气地质与开发方面的研究工作。地址:(710018)陕西省西安市未央区长庆兴隆园小区勘探开发研究院。Email:wangjw_cq@petrochina.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项项目“低渗—特低渗油藏有效开发关键技术”子课题“超低渗油藏改善开发效果关键技术“（编号：2017ZX05013004）和中国石油股份有限公司重大科技专项“长庆油田5000万吨持续高效稳产关键技术研究与应用”子课题“鄂尔多斯盆地超低渗透—致密油藏有效开发技术研究”（编号：2016E-0505）联合资助

Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity restoration of Chang 6₁ tight sandstone reservoir in Hujianshan area，Ordos Basin

WANG Jiwei¹, ZHU Yushuang², RAO Xinjiu¹, ZHOU Shuxun³, WU Yingqiang³, YANG Hongmei⁴

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China;
2. State Key Laboratory for Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China;
3. Oilfield Development Division, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China;
4. No.2 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Qingyang 745100, Gansu, China

Received:2019-11-13 Revised:2019-12-20 Online:2020-05-21 Published:2020-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在对大量岩心和薄片分析的基础上，运用扫描电镜、阴极发光、高压压汞等实验手段，系统分析了鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长6₁储层的成岩作用特征及其对储层物性的影响，并进一步对孔隙演化进行了定量恢复。结果表明：胡尖山地区长6₁储层整体处于中成岩阶段A期，主要经历了压实—压溶、胶结、溶蚀等成岩作用，且不同成岩作用对储层的孔隙发育造成了不同程度的影响。压实作用破坏了大量原生粒间孔，是导致研究区储层致密最主要的因素，孔隙度平均减少了18.41%，孔隙空间损失率达56.62%；胶结作用次之，在堵塞了孔隙空间的同时也一定程度地增强了颗粒的抗压实强度，孔隙度平均降低了10.38%，孔隙空间损失率达19.78%；溶蚀作用使碎屑颗粒及填隙物等不稳定组分溶解而产生大量的次生孔隙，从而改善了储层物性，增加的孔隙度平均为2.26%。根据成岩作用对物性的影响，结合测井响应特征，将该区长6₁致密砂岩储层划分出绿泥石膜剩余粒间孔相、剩余粒间孔相、长石溶蚀相、黏土矿物胶结相、碳酸盐胶结相及压实相等6种成岩相带，绿泥石膜剩余粒间孔相是研究区最有利的油气储集相带，剩余粒间孔相次之。

关键词: 成岩作用, 孔隙度定量恢复, 有利成岩相带, 长6₁储层, 胡尖山地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Based on the analysis of a large number of cores and casting thin slice,the diagenetic characteristics of Chang 6₁ reservoir in Hujianshan area of Ordos Basin and its influence on reservoir physical properties were systematically analyzed by means of SEM,cathodoluminescence and high-pressure mercury injection,and the pore evolution was quantitatively restored. The results show that the Chang 6₁ reservoir in Hujianshan area was in the middle diagenetic phase A,mainly underwent compaction-pressure dissolution,cementation and dissolution,resulting different influences on the pore development of the reservoir. The compaction destroyed a large number of primary intergranular pores,which was the most important factor for reservoir compaction in the study area. The average porosity decreased by 18.41%,and the loss rate of pore space reached 56.62%. The cementation not only blocked the pore space,but also enhanced the anti-compaction strength of particles to a certain extent. The porosity decreased by 10.38% on average,and the loss rate of pore space reached 19.78%. The dissolution dissolved unstable components such as clastic particles and interstitial materials,resulting in a large number of secondary pores,thereby improving the physical properties of the reservoir,and the increased porosity was 2.26% on average. According to the impact of the diagenesis on reservoir properties and logging response characteristics,six types of diagenetic facies were identified,namely chlorite film phase-residual intergranular pore facies,residual intergranular pore facies,feldspar dissolution facies,clay mineral cementation facies,carbonate cementation facies and compaction facies. Chlorite film phase-residual intergranular pore facies is the most favorable diagenetic facies for oil enrichment,followed by residual intergranular pore facies.

Key words: diagenesis, quantitative porosity restoration, favorable diagenetic facies, Chang 6₁ reservoir, Hujianshan area, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE121

王继伟, 朱玉双, 饶欣久, 周树勋, 吴英强, 杨红梅. 鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长6₁致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 34–43.

WANG Jiwei, ZHU Yushuang, RAO Xinjiu, ZHOU Shuxun, WU Yingqiang, YANG Hongmei. Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity restoration of Chang 6₁ tight sandstone reservoir in Hujianshan area，Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3): 34–43.

参考文献

[1] JARVIE D M,HILL R J,RUBLE T E,et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of northcentral Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[2] 邹才能,张国生,杨智,等.非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术-兼论非常规油气地质学.石油勘探与开发,2013,40(4):385-399. ZOU C N,ZHANG G S,YANG Z,et al. Concepts,characteristics,potential and technology of unconventional hydrocarbons:On unconventional petroleum geology. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):385-399.
[3] MORAD S,KETZER J M,ROS L F D. Spatial and temporal distribution of diagenetic alterations in siliciclastic rocks:Implications for mass transfer in sedimentary basins. Sedimentology, 2000,47:95-120.
[4] 朱筱敏,潘荣,朱世发,等.致密储层研究进展和热点问题分析.地学前缘,2018,25(2):141-146. ZHU X M,PAN R,ZHU S F,et al. Research progress and core issues in tight reservoir exploration. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018,25(2):141-146.
[5] 葸克来,操应长,王艳忠,等.低渗透储集层成岩作用与孔渗演化:以准噶尔盆地中部1区侏罗系三工河组为例.石油勘探与开发,2015,42(4):434-443. XI K L,CAO Y C,WANG Y Z,et al. Diagenesis and porositypermeability evolution of low permeability reservoirs:a case study of Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in block 1,central Junggar Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(4):434-443.
[6] 钟大康,祝海华,孙海涛,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化.地学前缘,2013,20(2):61-68. ZHONG D K,ZHU H H,SUN H T,et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of sandstones in Longdong area,Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(2):61-68.
[7] 廖朋,王琪,唐俊,等.鄂尔多斯盆地环县-华池地区长8砂岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,45(9):3200-3210. LIAO P,WANG Q,TANG J,et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of sandstones reservoir from Chang 8 of Yanchang Formation in Huanxian-Huachi region of Ordos Basin. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2014, 45(9):3200-3210.
[8] 施振生,李熙喆,董大忠,等.致密砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化:以川西南上三叠统为例.地学前缘,2018,25(2):179-190. SHI Z S,LI X Z,DONG D Z,et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoir:a case study from the Upper Triassic reservoir of the southwest Sichuan Basin,China. Earth Science Frontiers,2018,25(2):179-190.
[9] 邹才能,陶士振,周慧,等.成岩相的形成、分类与定量评价方法.石油勘探与开发,2008,35(5):526-540. ZOU C N,TAO S Z,ZHOU H,et al. Genesis,classification and evaluation method of diagenetic facies. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2008,35(5):526-540.
[10] CERIANI A,GIULIO A D,GOLDSTEIN RH,et al. Diagenesis associated with cooling during burial:an example from Lover Cretaceous reservoir sandstones. AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(9):1573-1591.
[11] 付晶,吴胜和,付金华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组储层定量成岩相研究.地学前缘,2013,20(3):86-97. FU J,WU S H,FU J H,et al. Research on quantitative diagenetic facies of the Yanchang Formation in Longdong area,Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(3):86-97.
[12] 朱国华.碎屑岩储集层孔隙的形成、演化和预测.沉积学报, 1992,10(3):114-132. ZHU G H. Origin and evolution and prediction of porosity in clastic reservoir rocks. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1992,10(3):114-132.
[13] 陈彦华,刘莺.成岩相:储集体预测的新途径.石油实验地质, 1994,16(3):274-281. CHEN Y H,LIU Y. Diagenetic facies:a new approach to the prediction of reservoir rocks. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 1994,16(3):274-281.
[14] 廖一,郑荣才,王成玉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组高分辨率层序分析.沉积学报,2010,28(3):481-488. LIAO Y,ZHENG R C,WANG C Y,et al. Analysis of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy in Chang-8 subsection of Yanchang Formation,Jiyuan area of Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(3):481-488.
[15] 刘昊伟,王键,刘群明,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区上三叠统延长组长8油层组有利储集层分布及控制因素.古地理学报,2012,14(3):285-294. LIU H W,WANG J,LIU Q M,et al. Favorable reservoir distribution and its controlling factors of the Chang 8 interval of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area,Ordos Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography,2012,14(3):285-294.
[16] 李相博,刘显阳,周世新,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组下组合油气来源及成藏模式.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):172-180. LI X B,LIU X Y,ZHOU S X,et al. Hydrocarbon origin and reservoir forming model of the Lower Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012, 39(2):172-180.
[17] 廖朋,唐俊,庞国印,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组长8₁段储层特征及控制因素分析.矿物岩石,2012,32(2):97-104. LIAO P,TANG J,PANG G Y,et al. Reservoir characteristics and control factors of Chang 8₁ of Yanchang Formation of Triassic in Jiyuan region of Ordos Basin. Journal of Mineralogy Petrology,2012,32(2):97-104.
[18] 赖锦,王贵文,陈敏,等.基于岩石物理相的储集层孔隙结构分类评价:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组为例.石油勘探与开发,2013,40(5):566-573. LAI J,WANG G W,CHEN M,et al. Pore structures evaluation of low permeability clastic reservoirs based on petrophysical facies:a case study on Chang 8 reservoir in the Jiyuan region, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013, 40(5):566-573.
[19] 国家能源局.SY/T 6285-2011油气储层评价方法.北京:石油工业出版社,2011. National Energy Administration. SY/T 6285-2011 Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011.
[20] 王勇,施泽进,刘亚伟,等.鄂西渝东地区石柱复向斜志留系小河坝组致密砂岩成岩作用.石油与天然气地质,2011,32(1):75-82. WANG Y,SHI Z J,LIU Y W,et al. Diagenesis of tight sandstone in the Silurian Xiaoheba Formation of the Shizhu synclinoyium, western Hubei-eastern Chongqing area. Oil & Gas Geology,2011, 32(1):75-82.
[21] 潘高峰,刘振,赵舒,等.砂岩孔隙度演化定量模拟方法:以鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区延长组为例.石油学报,2011,32(2):249-256. PAN G F,LIU Z,ZHAO S,et al. Quantitative simulation of sandstone porosity evolution:a case from Yanchang Formation of Zhenjing area,Ordos Basin.Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(2):249-256.
[22] 陈朝兵,朱玉双,陈新晶,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组长82储层沉积成岩作用.石油与天然气地质,2013,34(5):685-693. CHEN Z B,ZHU Y S,CHEN X J,et al. Sedimentation and diagenesis of Chang 82 reservoir in the Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan region,Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(5):685-693.
[23] 游国庆,潘家华,刘淑琴,等.东营凹陷古近系砂岩成岩作用与孔隙演化.岩石矿物学杂志,2006,25(3):237-242. YOU G Q,PAN J H,LIU S Q,et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Paleogene sandstone reservoir in Dongying Depression. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica,2006,25(3):237-242.
[24] 楚美娟,郭正权,齐亚林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8储层定量化成岩作用及成岩相分析.天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):477-484. CHU M J,GUO Z Q,QI Y L,et al.Quantitative diagenesis and diagenetic facies analysis on Chang 8 Reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):477-484.
[25] 戴启德,纪友亮.油气储层地质学.东营:石油大学出版社, 1996. DAI Q D,JI Y L.Reservoir geology of oil and gas.Dongying:Press of University of Petroleum,China,1996.
[26] 张瑞,王琪,姚泾利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长世湖盆中部长6段储层成岩特征.天然气地球科学,2010,21(6):890-896. ZHANG R,WANG Q,YAO J L,et al. Diagenetic characteristics and pore evolution from high-quality reservoirs of Yanchang Formation in the Middle of Ordos Basin.Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010,21(6):890-896.
[27] 邢顺洤.松辽盆地北部扶、杨油层砂岩的成岩作用与储层性质研究.大庆石油地质与开发,1990,9(4):13-22. XING S Q. Diagenesis and reservoir quality of Fuyu and Yangdachengzi sandstone in the north of Songliao Basin. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing,1990,9(4):13-22.
[28] 徐世琦.吐哈盆地温吉桑构造带中侏罗统砂岩成岩作用对储层储集性的影响.天然气工业,1996,16(2):16-18. XU S Q. The influence of middle Jurassic sandstone diageneses on the storage capacity of reservoirs in Wengjiesang structural belt of Tuha Basin. Natural Gas Industry,1996,16(2):16-18.
[29] 傅强.成岩作用对储层孔隙的影响:以辽河盆地荣37块气田下第三系为例.沉积学报,1998,16(3):92-96. FU Q. Diagenesis effect on reservoir pores:Taking the Rong-37 block of the Lower Tertiary,Liaohe Basin as an example. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1998,16(3):92-96.
[30] 王峰,陈蓉,田景春,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长4+5油层组致密砂岩储层成岩作用及成岩相.石油与天然气地质, 2014,35(2):199-206. WANG F,CHEN R,TIAN J C,et al. Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of the Chang 4+5 tight sandstone reservoirs in Longdong area,Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(2):199-206.
[31] BAKER J C,HAVORD P J,MARTIN K R,et al. Diagenesis and petrophysics of the Early Permian Moogooloo Sandstone, southern Carnarvon Basin,Western Australia. AAPG Bulletin, 2000,84(2):250-265.
[32] 李红,柳益群,刘林玉.鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田延长组长81低渗透储层成岩作用.石油与天然气地质,2006,27(2):209-217. LI H,LIU Y Q,LIU L Y. Diagenesis of Chang 81 reservoir with low permeability in Xifeng oilfield,Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2006,27(2):209-217.
[33] 柳益群,李文厚.陕甘宁盆地东部上三叠统含油长石砂岩的成岩特点及孔隙演化.沉积学报,1996,14(3):87-96. LIU Y Q,LI W H. Diagenetic characteristics and porosity evolution of the oil-bearing arkoses in the Upper Triassic in the eastern Shaan-Gan-Ning basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1996, 14(3):87-96.
[34] 罗静兰,MORAD S,阎世可,等.河流-湖泊三角洲相砂岩成岩作用的重建及其对储层物性演化的影响:以延长油区侏罗系-上三叠统砂岩为例.中国科学D辑:地球科学,2001,31(12):1006-1016. LUO J L,MORAD S,YAN S K,et al. The reestablishment of diagenesis and the effect to property in fluvial-lake and delta. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences,2001,31(12):1006-1016.
[35] 黄思静,谢连文,张萌,等.中国三叠系陆相砂岩中自生绿泥石的形成机制及其与储层孔隙保存的关系.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(3):273-281. HUANG S J,XIE L W,ZHANG M,et al. Formation mechanism of authigenic chlorite and relation to preservation of porosity in non-marine Triassic reservoir sandstones,Ordos Basin and Sichuan Basin,China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science&Technology Edition),2004,31(3):273-281.
[36] SURDAM R C,CROSSEY L J,HAGEN E S,et al. Organic-inorganic and sandstone diagenesis. AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
[37] 纪友亮,赵澄林,刘孟慧,等.东濮凹陷沙河街组碎屑岩成岩作用.石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):148-154. JI Y L,ZHAO C L,LIU M H,et al. Diagenesis of clastic rocks in Shahejie Formation,Dongpu Depression and its relation to organic matter evolution. Oil & Gas Geology,1995,16(2):148-154.
[38] 陈大友,朱玉双,张皎生,等.鄂尔多斯盆地马岭地区长8储层成岩作用与有利成岩相带.石油实验地质,2015,37(6):721-728. CHEN D Y,ZHU Y S,ZHANG J S,et al. Diagenesis and favorable diagenetic facies of the eighth member of Yanchang Formation in Maling area,the Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2015,37(6):721-728.
[39] 郑浚茂,庞明.石英砂岩的硅质胶结作用及其对储集性的影响.沉积学报,1988,6(1):29-38. ZHENG J M,PANG M. Quartz cementation in quartzose sandstone and its influence on sandstone porosity. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1988,6(1):29-38.
[40] 祝海华,钟大康,姚泾利,等.碱性环境成岩作用及对储集层孔隙的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密砂岩为例.石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):51-59. ZHU H H,ZHONG D K,YAO J L,et al. Alkaline diagenesis and its effects on reservoir porosity:a case study of Upper Triassic Chang 7 tight sandstones in Ordos Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):51-59.
[41] BEARD D C,WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bulletin,1973,57(2):349-369.
[42] 石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会. SY/T5477-2003碎屑岩成岩阶段划分.北京:石油工业出版社,2003. Committee for Standardization of Petroleum Exploration. SY/T 5477-2003 The division of diagenetic stages in clastic rocks. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.
[43] LENZ S C. Subcritical crack growth in creep compaction experiments. Texas:Texas A&M University,2002:21-48.
[44] 任大忠,孙卫,屈雪峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长6储层成岩作用特征及孔隙度致密演化.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,47(8):2706-2714. REN D Z,SUN W,QU X F,et al. Characteristic of diagenesis and pore dense evolution of Chang 6 reservoir of Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2016,47(8):2706-2714.
[45] 吴小斌,侯加根,孙卫.特低渗砂岩储层微观结构及孔隙演化定量分析.中南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,42(11):3438-3446. WU X B,HOU J G,SUN W. Microstructure characteristics and quantitative analysis on porosity evolution of ultra-low sandstone reservoir. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2011,42(11):3438-3446.
[46] 程新虎,柳益群,陈魏巍,等.鄂尔多斯盆地张家山区长8储集层成岩作用及有利相带.新疆石油地质,2012,33(3):316-320. CHENG X H,LIU Y Q,CHEN W W,et al. Diagenesis and favorable facies of Chang-8 reservoir in Zhangjiashan area in Ordos Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2012,33(3):316-320.
[47] 兰叶芳,邓秀芹,程党性,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长6油层组砂岩成岩相及储层质量评价岩石矿物学杂志,2014,33(1):51-63. LAN Y F,DENG X Q,CHENG D X,et al. Diagenetic facies and reservoir quality evaluation of Chang 6 sandstone reservoir in the upper Triassic Yanchang Formation of Huaqing area,Ordos Basin. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica,2014,33(1):51-63.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长6₁致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复

Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity restoration of Chang 6₁ tight sandstone reservoir in Hujianshan area，Ordos Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[3]	尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[4]	牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[5]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[6]	王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[7]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[8]	李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[9]	雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[10]	翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.
[11]	龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[12]	杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五₅亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[13]	李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[14]	魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.
[15]	尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长6₁¹储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.