岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 163–170.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210217

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏新型油藏生产指示曲线

杨美华, 钟海全, 李颖川   

  1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-07 修回日期:2020-07-06 出版日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2021-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 钟海全(1979—),男,博士,副教授,主要从事油气田开采技术方面的教学与研究工作。Email:swpuzhhq@126.com。 E-mail:swpuzhhq@126.com
  • 作者简介:杨美华(1979—),男,西南石油大学在读博士研究生,高级工程师,研究方向为油气田开发。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室。Email:zlyangmh@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“塔里木盆地碳酸盐岩油气田提高采收率关键技术示范工程”(编号:2016ZX05053)及国家自然科学基金“垂直疏水性圆管湍流场中多液滴形成机制及其携带模型研究”(编号:51974263)联合资助

New production index curve of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs

YANG Meihua, ZHONG Haiquan, LI Yingchuan   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation,Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2020-05-07 Revised:2020-07-06 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-03-31

摘要: 弹性驱动油藏的生产指示曲线一直被看作是一条直线,由于原油压缩系数是一个随着地层压力增大而减小的变量,因此其并非一条直线,而是一条曲线,并且油藏压降越大,曲线偏离直线越明显,尤其是对于埋藏较深、地层压力与饱和压力差值较大的缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏来讲,该油藏生产指示曲线会产生明显误差,需要进行改进。通过建立原油体积系数、原油压缩系数与地层压力的幂函数关系式,简化缝洞型油藏弹性驱动物质平衡方程,建立了新型的油藏生产指示曲线。研究与实例计算表明:地层压力大于饱和压力时,原油体积系数与地层压力不符合线性关系,而是符合幂函数关系,新建立的原油体积系数、原油压缩系数与地层压力的幂函数关系式,不仅符合实际变化规律,并且具有很高的计算精度;原油压缩系数的使用存在2种情况:一是某一地层压力对应的原油压缩系数;二是某一地层压力区间对应的平均原油压缩系数,两者不能混用,物质平衡方程应使用后者;新型的弹性驱动油藏的生产指示曲线始终为一条直线,直线的斜率即为原油地质储量。利用该新型油藏生产指示曲线可以更加准确地进行油藏驱动类型判断、储量计算等油藏研究。

关键词: 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏, 原油体积系数, 原油压缩系数, 幂函数, 新型油藏生产指示曲线

Abstract: The production index curve of elastic drive reservoir has always been regarded as a straight line. Because oil compressibility is a variable that decreases as formation pressure increases,the production index curve is not a straight line but a curve,which deviates from straight line more significantly as reservoir pressure drop increases. Especially for deep buried fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs which have large pressure difference between formation pressure and oil saturation pressure,the production index curve of reservoir will produce obvious error, hence it needs to be improved. By creating the power function relationship between oil volume factor,oil compressibility and formation pressure,the material balance equation of elastic drive fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir was simplified,and a new production index curve of reservoir was established. The results show that the relationship between oil volume factor and formation pressure above saturation pressure is not linear but accords with power function,and the power function relationships between oil volume factor,oil compressibility and formation pressure not only conform to the actual law but also have high computational accuracy. There are two cases for using oil compressibility:one is the oil compressibility at a certain formation pressure,the other is the average oil compressibility in a certain formation pressure range,the two cases cannot be mixed,and material balance equation should adopt the latter. The new production index curve of elastic drive reservoirs is always a straight line,and the slope of the line is just original oil in place. Therefore,the new production index curve of reservoir is conducive to reservoir research,such as accurately judging the driving type of a reservoir and calculating the reserves.

Key words: fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir, oil volume factor, oil compressibility, power function, new production index curve of reservoir

中图分类号: 

  • TE344
[1] 陈元千, 李璗.现代油藏工程.北京:石油工业出版社, 2001:88-111. CHEN Y Q, LI D. Modern petroleum reservoir engineering. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2001:88-111.
[2] 姜汉桥, 姚军, 姜瑞忠.油藏工程原理与方法.东营:中国石油大学出版社, 2006:200-234. JIANG H Q, YAO J, JIANG R Z. Reservoir engineering principles and methods. Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press, 2006:200-234.
[3] 李传亮.油藏工程原理.北京:石油工业出版社.2011:144-185. LI C L. Fundamentals of reservoir engineering. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011:144-185.
[4] AHMED T. Reservoir engineering handbook(5th Edition). Oxford:Gulf Professional Publishing, 2018:767-791.
[5] 李传亮.油藏生产指示曲线.新疆石油地质, 2001, 22(4):333-334. LI C L. Production index curves of reservoirs. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2001, 22(4):333-334.
[6] 何更生, 唐海.油层物理.北京:石油工业出版社.2011:169-170. HE G S, TANG H. Petrophysics. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011:169-170.
[7] 窦之林.塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏开发技术.北京:石油工业出版社, 2012:1-2. DOU Z L. The development technology of carbonate fracturedcavity reservoirs in Tahe oilfield. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2012:1-2.
[8] 凌建军, 黄鹂, 王尤富.计算超深油藏地层原油体积系数的精确公式.新疆石油地质, 1997, 18(4):377-379. LING J J, HUANG L, WANG Y F. An accuracy formula for calculating formation oil volume factor for ultradeep reservoir. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1997, 18(4):377-379.
[9] 李阳, 康志江, 薛兆杰, 等.中国碳酸盐岩油气藏开发理论与实践.石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4):669-678. LI Y, KANG Z J, XUE Z J, et al. Theories and practices of carbonate reservoirs development in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4):669-678.
[10] 程飞.缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏储层类型动静态识别方法:以塔里木盆地奥陶系为例.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):76-82. CHENG F. Integrated dynamic and static identification method of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs:a case from the Ordovician in Tarim Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):76-82.
[11] 李阳, 侯加根, 李永强.碳酸盐岩缝洞型储集体特征及分类分级地质建模.石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4):600-606. LI Y, HOU J G, LI Y Q. Features and hierarchical modeling of carbonate fracture-cavity reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4):600-606.
[12] 杨鹏飞, 张丽娟, 郑多明, 等.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩大型缝洞集合体定量描述.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(6):89-94. YANG P F, ZHANG L J, ZHENG D M, et al. Quantitative characterization of Ordovician carbonate fracture-cavity aggregate in Tarim Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(6):89-94.
[13] LIGAARDEN I S, KROTKIEWSKI M, KNUT-ANDREAS L, et al. On the Stokes-Brinkman equations for modeling flow in carbonate reservoirs. Ecmor Xii-european Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Oxford, 2010.
[14] 刘鹏飞, 姜汉桥, 徐晖, 等.缝洞型油藏开发室内模拟研究.石油钻采工艺, 2009, 31(5):72-76. LIU P F, JIANG H Q, XU H, et al. Laboratory simulation study on exploitation of fractured and cavernous reservoirs. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2009, 31(5):72-76.
[15] 王蓓, 刘向君, 司马立强, 等.磨溪龙王庙组碳酸盐岩储层多尺度离散裂缝建模技术及其应用.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):124-133. WANG B, LIU X J, SIMA L Q, et al. Multi-scale discrete fracture modeling technology for carbonate reservoir of Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi area and its application. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):124-133.
[16] VAZQUEZ M E, BEGGS H D. Correlations for fluid physical property prediction. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1980, 32(6):968-970.
[17] 周庆军, 张甲清, 马华丽. 原油高压物性参数计算方法及对比.油气井测试, 2003, 12(2):31-34. ZHOU Q J, ZHANG J Q, MA H L. Algorithm and its contrast aimed at oil PVT parameters. Well Testing, 2003, 12(2):31-34.
[18] 谢龙, 郭绪强, 陈光进, 等.计算原油体积系数的状态方程法. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(3):137-147. XIE L, GUO X Q, CHEN G J, et al. A new method predicting volume factor of formation crude oil. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2007, 31(3):137-147.
[19] 蔡勇胜, 信德发, 陈国强.封闭型弹性驱动油藏地层压力预测方法探讨.内蒙古石油化工, 2010, 36(22):56-57. CAI Y S, XIN D F, CHEN G Q. Discussion on prediction methods of formation pressure for closed elastic drive reservoirs. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2010, 36(22):56-57.
[20] DANESH, ALI. PVT and phase behaviour of petroleum reservoir fluids. Developments in Petroleum Science, 1998, 11(1):1-3.
[1] 任文博. 流势调控在缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏控水稳油中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 127-134.
[2] 凌浩川, 孟智强, 石洪福, 孙强, 潘杰. 基于甲型水驱规律曲线的表征方法改进[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 125-130.
[3] 黄全华,付云辉,陆 云,陈 冲,刘 彤. 应用改进无偏灰色模型预测油气田产量[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5): 117-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[6] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[7] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[8] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[9] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .
[10] 于兴河, 姜 辉, 李胜利, 陈永峤. 中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素 ——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 39 -45 .